February 9, 2010 5:33 PM

Senate Democrats Unveil Jobs Package

By
CBSNews
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

(AP)  Senate Democrats circulated a jobs bill Tuesday that's light on new initiatives on boosting hiring and heavy with provisions sought by lobbyists for business groups, doctors and the satellite broadcasting industry.

The 362-page measure is still in draft form and has not been officially released. It has bipartisan backing but very few new ideas for creating jobs, other than a $10 billion plan to exempt companies from paying the employer's share of Social Security payroll taxes for new hires if they are unemployed and hired this year.

The idea, by Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., and Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, is regarded as more workable than President Barack Obama's plan for tax credits of up to $5,000 for new hires.

The rest of the measure is mostly comprised of last year's unfinished business, including renewal of business tax breaks that have expired, an extension of unemployment benefits and health insurance subsidies and forestalling a cut in Medicare payments for doctors.

The jobs bill is politically important for Democrats seeking to respond to public anxiety about the economy. But the measure also has a lot of pull with an assortment of lobbying groups seeking to extend a raft of tax breaks and other benefits that expire at the end of the month.

The measure ignores some of Obama's ideas, including the per-job tax credit, a $250 payment to Social Security recipients and $25 billion in help for cash-strapped states.

Instead, the cornerstone of the plan would exempt companies from paying the employer's share of Social Security payroll taxes for new hires as long as those people had been unemployed at least 60 days.

A recent Congressional Budget Office report estimates that the idea could create up to 18 jobs per $1 million in tax relief, a more efficient way to boost hiring than provisions in last year's $862 billion economic stimulus bill. The $10 billion plan could create perhaps 50,000 to 90,000 jobs through September and another 80,000 to 180,000 jobs next year.

The overall measure would cost roughly $80 billion, said Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. Many elements would be financed by a variety of provisions closing tax loopholes such as one enjoyed by paper companies that get a credit from burning a dirty pulpmaking byproduct known "black liquor" as if it were an alternative fuel.

The bill would also raise about $7 billion from a crackdown on international tax cheats, an issue the Internal Revenue Service and the Obama administration have embraced.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he hopes to release the measure officially later Tuesday with hopes of passing it this week, despite a second major snowstorm in less than a week bearing down on the Washington area.

Reid said he expected the bill to get bipartisan support. But McConnell said he could not sign off on the package because many of his members had not yet seen the details.

The powerful physicians' lobby is behind a plan to prevent them from absorbing a 21 percent cut in Medicare payments but only wins relief through Sept. 30. Small businesses would continue to be able to write off equipment purchases as a business expense.

The small business "expensing" plan, however, has only a modest effect in boosting jobs creation, the CBO says. Additional unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless are far more effective in creating jobs, it says.

About $33 billion in popular tax breaks, including an income tax deduction for sales and property taxes and a business tax credit for research and development, would be extended through 2010.

The tax breaks, more than 40 in all, expired at the end of 2009. They are routinely extended each year the House voted to extend them in December but the Senate never addressed them because senators were consumed by the health care debate.

The tax breaks are important to a wide group of constituencies, including midwestern producers of biodiesel fuel. When the $1 per gallon tax credit for biodiesel expired at the start of the year, the retail price increased by $1 a gallon, making it less competitive with regular diesel fuel, said Michael Frohlich of the National Biodiesel Board.

There's still disagreement over some ideas, GOP aides said, including whether to add $20 billion in general Treasury funds to highway accounts for jobs-creating highway and bridge projects. The aides spoke on condition of anonymity due to the delicacy of the talks.

The measure also includes a major update of the law governing the satellite television industry.

AP
Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by redwilma February 9, 2010 11:48 PM EST
Awww. I want to see something good and BIG. I think Obama has done the best job any person could do as President, but if the Senators won't back him up, we don't get anything he campaigned for. I am very angry at the Republicans and the Dems who won't move on JOBS in a reasonable way! This is so important. I'm also mad at those who wouldn't move on a decent healthcare bill.
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 February 9, 2010 11:56 PM EST
Redwilma - exactly what has Mr. Obama done that has impressed you? I frankly am massively disappointed. He has acheived nothing. No successes domestically, unless you count spending money even faster than Bush did. Not internationally since he has been schooled by Iran, Russia, China and Venezuela. Not on national security since it took his security people less than one hour to shut up the christmas bomber from talking by rushing a lawyer to him.

Please - other than his less than soaring rethoric - has he done?
by wheresmycountry February 10, 2010 12:33 AM EST
Obama should take off the gloves and say "Hey! I inherited too big a mess to clean up in just one year! Reagan couldn't clean up Carter's mess in 8, and you worship him like he was a damnn prophet. "
by stychokiller February 9, 2010 11:11 PM EST
This Keynesian notion that Govt spending creates jobs made sense when the money supply needed to be expanded in the 1930's but is completely wrong-headed when the Govt is spending the amount of money they are now.
If they were really serious about creating jobs, they would exempt small businesses from ALL of the regulations that pertain to large corporations and QUIT paying what amounts to corporate welfare to the large corporations -- of course, the money overlords of Congress and the Senate are opposed to any of this happening.
And so the economy continues to remain stuck in the mire of the Govt's own creating.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 February 9, 2010 9:42 PM EST
by RobAla February 9, 2010 7:24 PM EST
Hopefully, they will not approve this until it can be determined whether this is just another bogus stimulus package. At least this package has tax cuts.






40% of the FIRST STIMULUS package was tax cuts, and you whined that it didn't work.

Bush passed tax cuts, employers reaped those benefits for 10 years, we NOW have 10% unemployment, and our economy nearly imploded.

Reagan passed tax cuts, the national debt doubled, unemployment soared, and we had a nasty 3 year recession.



But yeah, go ahead and cheer on MORE tax cuts, which is going to cause our national debt to go up, while doing NOTHING for the economy.
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 February 9, 2010 10:05 PM EST
starving1968 - The links you have between tax cuts and problems are simply in your mind. The Regean tax cuts and deregulation of the telcom industry created the boom of the late 1980s and 1990's. That boom made a lot of people a lot of money. Yes - it did get overheated and the bubble burst in 2000, which caused the downturn that the second George Bush had to deal with. Of course Greenspan kept telling people the market was over heated, over extended and was suffering "irrational exhuberience" but nobody listened.

Of course you neglected to mention that at the start of the Bush years we had a market correction and that little event in NY that crushed the markets and the economy for 7 years - slight oversight on your part I am sure.

Yea - it was the tax cuts - conveniently neglecting history doesn't make a good argument.
by starving1968-3 February 9, 2010 9:37 PM EST
More tax breaks for businesses, and the republicans will STILL find a reason to oppose this bill, even though it contains what they want.

They'll vote against it, just to try and make the democrats look bad - no matter HOW MUCH it hurts America.
Reply to this comment
by nearl451 February 9, 2010 9:33 PM EST
The bill is already messed up. The corporate lobbies like it, that is the clue.

It's description on"heavy" describes corporatism; and light on any true jobs creation.
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 February 9, 2010 10:07 PM EST
Funny - who would you like to create jobs?? Business does it- government jobs don't pay very well and aren't very productive.
by jschmidt27 February 9, 2010 9:18 PM EST
I have no doubt the Democrats will mess up this bill somehow.
Reply to this comment
by wfw3536 February 9, 2010 8:47 PM EST
Boy is this a great jobs plan-------------18 jobs per million. Must be the government at work. It is about time we stop spending money we do not have. I see were seniors do not get their $250 per year, yet Obama gave government worker a raise that amounts to almost $4,000 dollars per year. This administration is so out of touch.
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 February 9, 2010 10:08 PM EST
And what sector of the economy is growing at double digits?? Government workers. Funny how that works.

But you can't get rid of those jobs later.
by Amazingoly February 9, 2010 8:34 PM EST
If the "Jobs Bill" or more Stimulus means more spending - we do not need or want this, and predict it will go nowhere fast. Sorry Harry and Max. We do NOT have any money - remember?
Reply to this comment
by Dreadnut February 9, 2010 8:29 PM EST
Small tax breaks aren't going to drive rehiring. Do you think a relatively small $80 billion will create any jobs when an almost $800 billion last year didn't?
Reply to this comment
by jimmyc1955 February 9, 2010 10:09 PM EST
Well since almost none of the $787 billion has been spent yet, and most won't be spent until the second have of 2010 and a lot not until 2012 its no surprise it didn't work.

But then it wasn't a stimulus bill either. It was a criminally massive pork spending bill for the Democrats to pay their constituents of handssomely for their efforts.
by fishguru00 February 9, 2010 7:35 PM EST
Cannot seem to get the math on this...

18 jobs per 1 mil. in tax relief. The employer match is 7.65 to the max fica rate plus the 1.45 med after the max (106,800). Guess these jobs pay alot ? tax relief of about 55K per employee - that's a lot of employer match!
Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook