February 9, 2010 4:08 PM

Iran Moves Closer to Nuke Weapon Capacity

(AP)  Last Updated 11:47 a.m. ET.

Iran moved closer to being able to produce nuclear warheads Monday with formal notification that it will enrich uranium to higher levels, even while insisting that the move was meant only to provide fuel for its research reactor.

Iranian envoy Ali Asghar Soltanieh told The Associated Press that he informed the International Atomic Energy Agency of the decision to enrich at least some of its low-enriched uranium stockpile to 20 percent, considered the threshold value for highly enriched uranium.

Soltanieh, who represents Iran at the Vienna-based IAEA, also said that the U.N. agency's inspectors now overseeing enrichment to low levels would be able to stay on site to fully monitor the process. And he blamed world powers for Iran's decision, asserting that it was their fault that a plan that foresaw Russian and French involvement in supplying the research reactor had failed.

"Until now, we have not received any response to our positive logical and technical proposal," he said. "We cannot leave hospitals and patients desperately waiting for radio isotopes" being produced at the Tehran reactor and used in cancer treatment, he added.

Western powers blame Iran for rejecting an internationally endorsed plan to take Iranian low enriched uranium, further enriching it and return it in the form of fuel rods for the reactor - and in broader terms for turning down other overtures meant to diminish concerns about its nuclear agenda.

At a news conference with French Defense Minister Herve Morin, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates praised President Barack Obama's attempts to engage the Islamic Republic diplomatically and chided Tehran for not reciprocating.

"No U.S. president has reached out more sincerely, and frankly taken more political risk, in an effort to try to create an opening for engagement for Iran," he said. "All these initiatives have been rejected."

Israel, Iran's most implacable foe, said Iran's enrichment plans are "additional proof of the fact that Iran is ridiculing the entire world."

"The right response is to impose decisive and permanent sanctions on Iran," said Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already announced Sunday that his country would significantly enrich at least some of the country's stockpile of uranium. Still, Monday's notification to the IAEA was important as formal confirmation of the plan, particularly because of the rash of conflicting signals sent in recent months by Iranian officials on the issue.

Although material for the fissile core of a nuclear warhead must be enriched to a level of 90 percent or more, just getting its stockpile to the 20 percent mark would be a major step for the country's nuclear program. While enriching to 20 percent would take about one year, using up to 2,000 centrifuges at Tehran's underground Natanz facility, any next step - moving from 20 to 90 percent - would take only half a year and between 500-1,000 centrifuges.

Achieving the 20-percent level "would be going most of the rest of the way to weapon-grade uranium," said David Albright, whose Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security tracks suspected proliferators.

Soltanieh declined to say how much of Iran's stockpile - now estimated at 1.8 tons - would be enriched. Nor did he say when the process would begin. Albright said enriching to higher levels could begin within a day - or only in several months, depending on how far technical preparations had progressed.

Apparent technical problems could also slow the process, he said.

Iran's enrichment program "should be like a Christmas tree in full light," he said. "In fact, the lights are flickering."

While Iran would be able to enrich up to 20 percent, it is not considered technically sophisticated enough to turn that material into fuel rods for the Tehran reactor. A senior official from a member nation of the 35-country IAEA board said that issue cast Iran's stated reason for higher enrichment into doubt.

Legal constraints could tie Iran's hands as well. The senior official said he believed Tehran was obligated to notify the agency 60 days in advance of starting to enrich to higher levels.

The official asked for anonymity because he was not authorized to comment on the issue. The IAEA had no immediate comment.

On Sunday, Iranian officials said higher enrichment would start on Tuesday.

The Iranian move came just days after , which foresaw Tehran exporting the bulk of its low-enriched uranium to Russia for further enrichment and then conversion for fuel rods for the research reactor.

That plan was welcomed internationally because it would have delayed Iran's ability to make nuclear weapons by shipping out about 70 percent of its low-enriched uranium stockpile, thereby leaving it with not enough to make a bomb. Tehran denies nuclear weapons ambitions, insisting it needs to enrich to create fuel for an envisaged nuclear reactor network.

The proposal was endorsed by the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany - the six powers that originally elicited a tentative approval from Iran in landmark talks last fall. Since then, however, mixed messages from Tehran have infuriated the U.S. and its European allies, who claim Iran is only stalling for time as it attempts to build a nuclear weapon.

Even before Iran's formal notification of the IAEA, some of those nations criticized the plan and suggested it would be met by increased pressure for new penalties on the Islamic Republic.

Iran has defied five U.N. Security Council resolutions - and three sets of U.N. sanctions - aimed at pressuring it to freeze enrichment, and has instead steadily expanded its program.

Iran's enrichment plans "would be a deliberate breach" of the resolutions, the British Foreign Office said. In Berlin, Ulrich Wilhelm, the spokesman for German Chancellor Angela Merkel, said Germany and its allies were watching developments and were prepared to "continue along the path of raising diplomatic pressure."
By Associated Press Writer George Jahn; AP writers Danica Kirka in London, Anne Flaherty in Paris and Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed to this report

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 109 Comments
by wdh3007 February 8, 2010 9:00 PM EST
The radical leaders of Iran have no idea that what they are experimenting with is dangerous to themselves and others. Their goal is to destroy Israel with a nuclear weapon but what they fail to realize is that Israel has many nuclear weapons. Eventually they will either try & wage war against Israel or they will radiate themselves in the process.
Reply to this comment
by gorgeousm February 8, 2010 8:36 PM EST
The opinion of Iran having nuclear weapons is very dangerous, because contrary to MAD as a deterrent, these Iranian religous fanatic ayatollas actually WANT a nuclear war for their messiah to come!
How do we deal with that DELUSIONAL religious crap?

Whatever is written here, these Iranian leaders, who supply the religious Moslem terrorists who in the name of THEIR superior god Allah being intolerant of others, want to destroy and glorify worthless, misconceived martyrdom(or martyrDUMB)

Religion and religious HATE is the root cause.
It's THE root cause of not only the Mideast situation, but Islamic extremists all around the world from South America to Europe, to Philippines, and even in China!

The rhetoric and hate and from these religious fanatic Iranians who run the Iranian government, leaves the Israelis no choice but to act fast before more missiles are fired into Israel from Lebanon and Hizbollah.

No wonder the Israelis are concerned about Iranian nuclear weapons.

Religion is the scourge of this whole world!
Reply to this comment
by enwr77 February 8, 2010 8:19 PM EST
Iran will look like Iraq if it does not produce a nuclear weapon. Once it was confirmed that Iraq had no WMD?s, our soldiers were order into Iraq. The same will happen with Iran. Why is Israel making our foreign policy? If they are at odds with Iran let them handle it. Iran is the last country to conquer before this small country controls the entire region.
Reply to this comment
by cowardlyimbecile February 8, 2010 8:50 PM EST
When New Jersey controls the USA, let people know.
by cowardlyimbecile February 8, 2010 10:08 PM EST
How does one say "Dolchstoßlegende" in Arabic? Because this board is nothing other than a blend of Dolchstoßlegende, Proudhon, and a traditional Arab recipe for shoving a chicken up a lamb and a lamb up a camel. I have a serving suggestion for your guest of honor, and if he's a friend of yours, no doubt he'll enjoy it.
by wfw3536 February 8, 2010 8:00 PM EST
I thought Obama was going to be tough on Iran after the first of this year if they didn't cooperate. He said he was going to work with Russia, China and European countries to deal with Iran. I guess this is another failure of the Obama foreign policy.
Reply to this comment
by cowardlyimbecile February 8, 2010 7:33 PM EST
Photo caption contest: Is Ahmadinejad (1) A fan of Devo; (2) Enjoying a nuclear tanning booth; (3) Attending the anti-Hindu movie "No More Avatars"; (4) Avoiding recognition when his first Iranonaut is discovered in the landing gear of a Delta Airlines flight to Tokyo.
Reply to this comment
by GreatDepression February 8, 2010 5:00 PM EST
Last week, China privately informed USA that along with Russia, it will help Iran complete it Nuclear facilities by supplying the uranium fuel. At this point, Russia and China are helping Iran built nuclear technology and capability.

Israel should be more concern about Russia, China and India than about Iran. USA will never start a war with Russia, China or India, especially when we are already in 2 wars.

Nuclear Deterrent is the best policy since it works perfect between USA and USSR/Russia for the last 60 years.
Reply to this comment
by jgg000101 February 8, 2010 4:22 PM EST
looks like this photo was taken on mamoud's way into Avatar.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 February 8, 2010 3:51 PM EST
by gorgeousm February 8, 2010 3:15 PM EST
To hungry1968

Re: Iran Attacking America

There are two reasons;

1. because they consider the U.S. as The Great Satan(not Santa)
2. you hungry1968, must be a supporter and/or an agent of Iran, and agent of Hizbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Al Qaeda, and other murderous Islamic terrorist extremists, and anything that is against Israel, a country forced to fight for its tiny sliver of land.

PS:
You sure know how to hate, hungry1968.






Ahmadinejhad calling us "the great satan" is irrelevant to the discussion. They aren't going to attack us with nukes, and risk nuclear annihilation and obliteration, because Ahmadinejhad called us a name. How childish on your part.

And AGAIN - I don't give a flying flip about Israel. Whatever they have to do to survive in the MIDST OF THEIR IDEOLOGICAL ENEMIES, is of no concern to us. And if it IS a concern to them, then they should have thought about that BEFORE they STOLE 50% of the land in 1948. Either way, it's no concern of America's.
Reply to this comment
by jwesel1 February 8, 2010 5:50 PM EST
Well said
by cowardlyimbecile February 8, 2010 7:14 PM EST
When St. Coprolite first brought religion to your country, what year was that?
by mary-miami February 8, 2010 3:32 PM EST
Let's see...Iran's leader told his top scientist to go ahead with the enrichment of uranium...Why are we giving this lunatic such leeway to make decisions that would result in the destruction of the planet? While the rest of the civilized world is seeking peace, this muslim is waiting for us to turn our backs so he can shoot off a nuclear missile. He doesn't stop to think of the retaliation that will ensue, primarily because he thinks that is his way to heaven...If we're going to get religious about it, then I'll say he'll end up in hell, like Hitler. Dialog is not possible with crazy people.
Reply to this comment
by wyodutch February 8, 2010 3:49 PM EST
"...Why are WE.. WE.. WE... giving this...."
.
"..while the rest of the civilized world.."
.
What "civilized world" are you refering-to, Mary. Israel? America?
.
What the "civlized world" did to Iraq... a nation without nukes was a good lesson to Iran. The only way to insure that the "civilized world" doesn't bomb your cities is to do what North Korea did... get a couple nukes and make sure everyone knows you have 'em.
by cowardlyimbecile February 8, 2010 7:23 PM EST
Good old North Korea, your standard of virtue in the 21st Century. lol
by gorgeousm February 8, 2010 3:15 PM EST
To hungry1968

Re: Iran Attacking America

There are two reasons;

1. because they consider the U.S. as The Great Satan(not Santa)
2. you hungry1968, must be a supporter and/or an agent of Iran, and agent of Hizbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Al Qaeda, and other murderous Islamic terrorist extremists, and anything that is against Israel, a country forced to fight for its tiny sliver of land.

PS:
You sure know how to hate, hungry1968.
Reply to this comment
by U_S_Drug_Addict February 8, 2010 3:20 PM EST
NAKBA...
by cowardlyimbecile February 8, 2010 7:17 PM EST
O Transvestite Slave of Jihad, you who talk to boys, prepare to be buried by thy shamed relatives...
See all 109 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook