February 6, 2010 11:30 AM

Obama Pushes for Small Business Loans

(AP)  Republicans sparred with President Barack Obama over proposals to create jobs in dueling radio addresses Saturday, highlighting the difficulty of reaching bipartisan solutions in a political climate marked by partisan bickering.

Mr. Obama pushed Congress to use $30 billion that had been set aside to bail out Wall Street to start a new program that provides loans to small businesses, which the White House calls the engine for job growth. Republicans, meanwhile, taunted President Obama with a familiar refrain: Where are the jobs the president promised in exchange for the billions of dollars already spent?

The barb came a day after the government reported an unexpected decline in the unemployment rate, from 10 percent to 9.7 percent. It was the first drop in seven months but offered little consolation for the 8.4 million jobs that have vanished since the recession began.

"Even though our economy is growing again, these are still tough times for America," President Obama said. "Too many businesses are still shuttered. Too many families can't make ends meet. And while yesterday, we learned that the unemployment rate has dropped below 10 percent for the first time since summer, it is still unacceptably high - and too many Americans still can't find work."

President Obama's Radio and Internet Address (whitehouse.gov)

To help the recovery, Mr. Obama asked Congress to use leftover money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP, to give to small banks so they can make more loans to small businesses. Republicans have criticized the move, arguing any money left over from the bailout should be used to reduce the budget deficit.

In the Republican address, Rep. Jeb Hensarling chided President Obama for proposing a 2011 budget on Monday that would increase spending, taxes and the national debt.

"Americans are still asking, 'Where are the jobs?' but all they are getting from Washington is more spending, more taxes, more debt and more bailouts," Hensarling said.

Republican Weekly Address (YouTube.com)

The Republican attack came even as key Democrats and Republicans in the Senate are working on a bipartisan jobs bill. The senators hope to unveil a bill as early as Monday that would provide tax breaks to businesses that hire unemployed workers, extend unemployment payments for those whose benefits have run out, and renew a program that offers the jobless a subsidy for health insurance premiums.

Senate passage of a bipartisan jobs bill would mark an important political victory for President Obama. But Saturday's radio and Internet addresses showed that bipartisanship won't be easy.

The White House has repeatedly argued that the $787 billion economic stimulus package enacted in February helped save the economy from complete collapse. On Friday, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told ABC News there is a much lower risk of a double-dip recession "than at any time over the last 12 months or so."

Hensarling, however, said the stimulus package and the growing government debt have added to the country's economic problems.

"Democrats chose to go it alone and jam through their stimulus," Hensarling said. "What did the American people get? A bill for $1.2 trillion and 3 million more jobs lost."

By Associated Press Writer Philip Elliott

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 77 Comments
by starving1968-3 February 7, 2010 3:54 PM EST
by apachekid February 7, 2010 11:55 AM EST






Well your MISSING LINK specifically says, "By law, Social Security benefits cannot go down," but somehow you conveniently omitted that part of your link. (coincidence? doubtful)

Either way, I'd be willing to bet that you're STILL getting FAR MORE out of the system, than you paid into it - just like EVERY SENIOR CITIZEN IS.

What's next, "Get your government hands off of my Medicare!!"

You senior citizens are unreal - you whine and cry about freeloading welfare lifers, but then fully expect that you get well over 100% of what you paid into the system.

What's the difference between you and them?
Reply to this comment
by JWinATL February 7, 2010 5:20 PM EST
As a senior citizen, I can tell you that I have paid into social security for 43 years and Medicare since it was instituted. I AM entitled to collect from the system. I am a Republican; but I had no choice but to pay. Therefore, I should recoup some of what I paid in, wouldn't you say? It is doubtful I will ever get back what I paid in. My husband died 2 months before he could collect anything. Because I was a widow without children, I was paid a death benefit of $255 TOTAL. I deserve to be paid far more than those who have been mooching off the system most, if not all of their lives.
by babooph February 7, 2010 7:36 AM EST
As bad as the economy is those accusing Obama of being a socialist may be selling his re -election-unless they put a communist up....or maybe the rich can sucker enough soft minds to vote for their continued rip off ...
Reply to this comment
by flsunjnky February 6, 2010 10:08 PM EST
That's true, ponzi schemes never last. So, tell me, what sector of society are you referring too? I have a feeling it's not wall street, or anyone connected to it.
Reply to this comment
by wjksea February 6, 2010 9:04 PM EST
The reality is no matter what the ideology of the day or era is, there is no absolute guarantee of well being and security. It is the ability of a society or an individual to insure their own ongoing well being and security. Severe imbalance in the midst of social contracts is identified by the majority who are sacrificing the quality of their lives to enrich and defend the excess and extravagance of a shrinking minority. Such imbalance sparks social unrest and revolution. In the end, it all comes tumbling down. Dysfunctional socioeconomic ponzi schemes never last.
Reply to this comment
by wjksea February 6, 2010 9:01 PM EST
The reality is no matter what the ideology of the day or era is, there is no absolute guarantee of well being and security. It is the ability of a society or an individual to insure their ongoing well being and security. Imbalance is when most are sacrificing the quality of their lives to enrich and defend the excess and extravagance of a shrinking minority. Such imbalance sparks social unrest and revolution. Dysfunctional socioeconomic ponzi schemes never last.
Reply to this comment
by wjksea February 6, 2010 9:00 PM EST
Another 9 million to the CEO of Golden Scks. Is this part of the greatest transfer of wealth that T. Boone Pickens was talking about a year ago?
Reply to this comment
by wjksea February 6, 2010 8:59 PM EST
Capitalism is a game of monopoly that eventually burns out if not refereed.
Reply to this comment
by CBSisCommunist5 February 6, 2010 8:48 PM EST
Tax and spend Baby tax and spend...

You have until November 2010 !!!
Reply to this comment
by curse914 February 6, 2010 8:52 PM EST
Why not, he would just be following Reagans' lead.
by curse914 February 6, 2010 8:29 PM EST
by -One_American- February 6, 2010 8:17 PM EST

It's a matter of survival for businesses to either wait until Obama is out of office, or has been neutralized as a lame duck, before they even think about hiring more people.

Socialism is a parasite that feeds off of its host, Capitalism.

Kill the parasite, spare the host.

The founding fathers of this country would agree.

[][][][][][][][][][[][][][]

Wow, you are mind numbingly ignorant.

Conservatism and socialism were in there infancy when we established this nation. If you read Edmund Burke and his Reflections on the Revolution in France, you will find the seeds of conservatism that basically supported the concept of Aristocrats appointed by "God". That would antithetical to our Founding Fathers concept of Democracy.

Get real, dipstick.
Reply to this comment
by -One_American- February 6, 2010 8:17 PM EST
Obviously, Obama just doesn't understand supply and demand. Not surprising for someone who hasn't held a job in the private sector in his entire life.

Small businesses don't want to secure any loans - they don't want to put themselves at high risk, knowing that Obama wants to make everything else more expensive for them - mandated expensive health care, cap and trade carbon taxes, higher payroll taxes, higher taxes on the "wealthy" (aka business owners), and a huge government debt that everyone is going to have to pay for.

It's a matter of survival for businesses to either wait until Obama is out of office, or has been neutralized as a lame duck, before they even think about hiring more people.

Socialism is a parasite that feeds off of its host, Capitalism.

Kill the parasite, spare the host.

The founding fathers of this country would agree.
Reply to this comment
See all 77 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook