February 4, 2010 5:45 PM

Rangel: Health Reform Compromise in Works

(CBS/AP)  Leading lawmakers hoping to revive President Obama's stalled health care overhaul have started writing a compromise bill, but it's unclear when the legislation will be ready for votes, a top House Democrat said Tuesday.

The measure would change the massive Senate-approved health bill to what bargainers from the White House, Senate and House agreed to last month, Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., said in a brief interview.

Special Report: Health Care Reform

Rangel's remarks, if borne out, could be the first concrete sign that Democrats will try enacting major health legislation in the wake of the Republican upset in a Massachusetts special election that cost them their crucial 60th Senate seat. Stunned by that setback, the White House and top Democrats have been conceding that they no longer know if they have the votes to pass health legislation, or what such a bill would look like.

Scott Brown, Martha Coakley and the Supermajority

In January, White House and congressional negotiators agreed to ease a Senate-approved tax on high-cost health insurance plans opposed by unions and many House Democrats. They also planned to remove a Senate provision having the federal government fully pay for an expansion of Medicaid coverage solely for Nebraska, one of whose senators, Democrat Ben Nelson, was the crucial 60th vote for the Senate bill at the time.

Nelson: "Sweetheart Deal" Not Meant Just for Nebraska

Rangel said leaders have to decide whether the health package would begin moving before or after Congress tackles legislation aimed at creating jobs.

"The question is when are we going to do it," said Rangel, who chairs the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. "We got to move on with jobs. It's not clear to me what the priority is going to be."

President Obama made it clear on Tuesday, to much applause from his supporters at a town hall meeting in New Hampshire, that he wasn't throwing in the town on health care reform.

"I do not quit. We are going to get that done," he told the group in Nashua. "We have to get it done," he added, urging Congress to "get it done this year."

Rangel said a fight between liberal and conservative Democrats over how to limit federal financing for abortion remains unresolved.

In a remark underscoring the political sensitivities Democrats have about their two top issues, Rangel said, "The major things we're talking about now are, one, don't let health care even look like it's not on the front burner. And don't forget that the priority of people in their districts is jobs."

The measure Rangel discussed would be a so-called reconciliation bill, a seldom-used procedure that only requires a simple majority of votes for Senate passage. He said he believed both chambers could muster the votes needed for passage, despite virtually unanimous GOP opposition.

Meanwhile, as Democrats wrestle among themselves to try and secure a future for major reform, conservative lawmakers in about half the states are forging ahead with constitutional amendments to ban government health insurance mandates.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., also voiced optimism about the reconciliation bill approach in a conference call Tuesday with bloggers, while cautioning that final decisions to move forward remained to be made.

"We will not be deterred from this course of getting something done one way or another, and I'm hoping it will ... be mainly by passing the comprehensive bill. That's our plan," Pelosi said.

Pelosi also said the House plans to vote next week on a small element of the massive health bill it approved in November stripping insurance companies of their decades-old exemption from certain federal antitrust laws. Pelosi's office provided audio of the conference call.

Industry analysts see the effort as largely symbolic as courts have long allowed federal regulators to intervene when competition could be jeopardized.

Also Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., emerged from a meeting with Pelosi to say no decisions had been made about the health bill. Reid said a scenario in which the House produces a reconciliation package "seems like a strong possibility," but is not the only option.

In a separate interview, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, who was Obama's first pick to lead the health care effort, said he thinks Democrats are back on track to finishing a bill.

"The bottom line is that this is still doable" because many Democrats realize they may take a bigger hit politically if they fail to deliver a bill, Daschle said. Republicans will still use the legislation to attack them, but Democrats won't have any of the overhaul's benefits to defend themselves unless they approve it.

"I don't think any of this is easy to solve," he said, adding that the likeliest window for action would be between the Presidents' Day recess and the late March break for Easter and Passover.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 172 Comments
by babooph February 3, 2010 5:50 PM EST
The one they had was a mess-IRS the muscle to collect for crooked insurance-as bribed as the rpublicans are ,the compromise will be no worse than the bribed dems...
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday______ February 3, 2010 4:53 PM EST
" by Mortar_29
At times in the past, Slow has shown some ability to undersand."



I do frequently, unlike yourself. I am capable of dialogue and discourse, whereas you are only capable of megalomaniac monologue.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday______ February 3, 2010 4:51 PM EST
" by endurorob_5

"So illegally turn over our healthcare system to the government?? "

slownewsday______
Your TriCare healthcare is already run by the government, Mort, and it isn't illegal. It's socialized, and you are happy with it.

Of course, it helps if you can understand the definition of "socialized"...

----

by endurorob_5
And as i have told you before slow, Tricare is tax payer funded not government run. Medicare is government run. And those facts should be obvious since medicare is a complete disaster fraught with corruption and Tricare runs very well."

----

Rob - again, I say that you simply don't understand the term "socialized" if you are still arguing the point.


.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-2 February 3, 2010 5:04 PM EST
Read back through the posts slow, and you'll see that I argued this very point with them for several hours today.

They just REFUSE to grasp the concept of what "socialized" means.
by slownewsday______ February 3, 2010 9:03 PM EST
"Intentionally ignorant" and "world class denial" are both phrases I feel apply to rob and mortimer, starving.

Still, it's some good entertainment watching them attempt to dodge established definitions, no?
by hull7777 February 3, 2010 3:38 PM EST
Don't be so political! No breaks for the unions, they need to be treated like everyone else. Tort reform is needed (no breaks for the trial lawyers). Federal Gov't employees need to be included (no exemtions for Washington, like social security). If you think it is good for the citizens, then it must be good for Washington. No rejections for health conditions or pre-existing conditions. Let insurance companies sell uniform policies throughout the US.

For God's sake, do not let the Federal Government administer the program. Let private enterprise. Since the beginning of time, the Federal Government has not been able to manage any programs without waste and cost overruns.(its not their money and there is no real accountability for their spending).

I know Washington (Administration, Senate and Congress) have such a high opinion of themselves, they think they can do everything better. However,only a handful have ever had any business experience. So, how can they understand how to run anything. All is they know how to do is spend money.

I hope this might get forwarded to someone drafting new legislation for health care.
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman February 3, 2010 2:19 PM EST
by endurorob_5 February 3, 2010 12:23 PM EST
Actually in many areas these services are provided by private companies under contract to the city state or county. And if you think they are provided at no extra cost then you have never had an ambulance come to your house.



To use counter-examples, the fire dept does not charge. The police do not charge. You don't get a bill for sending your child to a public school. We have govt retirement plans for the elderly. We have govt health care plans for the elderly. These are all examples of the socialist elements of our society. To somehow claim they do not exist is ludicrious.
Reply to this comment
by stormerF2 February 3, 2010 1:07 PM EST
So there is a bill,that the Majority of the American Tax Payers do not want and the Dimocrats are still pushing for it? Nov, can not come soon enough,kick these pompus a$$es out of office.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-2 February 3, 2010 1:06 PM EST
by endurorob_5 February 3, 2010 12:48 PM EST
You totally missed the point.







No - I got your point.

You're NOW trying to redefine "fascism", so that greedy capitalists are portrayed as NOT trying to control our society.

Good luck with that.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-2 February 3, 2010 12:33 PM EST
by endurorob_5 February 3, 2010 12:23 PM EST
Actually in many areas these services are provided by private companies under contract to the city state or county. And if you think they are provided at no extra cost then you have never had an ambulance come to your house.









When I was a child, our house started on fire.

We're still waiting for that bill.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-2 February 3, 2010 12:28 PM EST
by endurorob_5 February 3, 2010 12:10 PM EST
The problem hungry is that you are trying to fit these services in as a form of a socialist nation. These services are in some places volunteer and in some places government run but they are necessary municiple services that serve everyone and are not socialist in the way that you are lookinf at them.







YOUR problem is that Fox News repeatedly tells you "socialism is bad", and you accept it UNQUESTIONINGLY, the whole time ignoring all of the "socialized" services that numerous levels of government provide.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-2 February 3, 2010 12:24 PM EST
by endurorob_5 February 3, 2010 12:14 PM EST
Corporations trying to exert influence on the political direction of the nation is not any type of fascism. If you want to look at fascist elements in this country look no further then the progressives or the gay rights advocates. They viscously attack anyone who disagrees with or apposes them. Zero tolerance for the views of others. That is fascism.







Yeah, god forbid that gay should have "equal rights", huh?
Reply to this comment
by Mortar_29 February 3, 2010 12:34 PM EST
Lol.
by endurorob_5 February 3, 2010 12:48 PM EST
You totally missed the point.
See all 4 Replies
See all 172 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook