Modified Eucalyptus to Transform Forests
This article was written by Discover's Smriti Rao.
Now that many U.S. farmers have grown used to genetically modified (GM) soy and corn, the controversy surrounding GM crops may shift over to GM eucalyptus-a fast-growing Australian tree that, in its unmodified strains, dominates the tropical timber industry.
Two industry giants, International Paper Co. and MeadWestvaco Corp. have formed a biotech venture called ArborGen LLC that is looking to introduce this tree to the southeastern forests of the United States. The company is seeking greater governmental deregulation so it can roll out its plans of replacing native pines in southeastern plantation forests with the genetically engineered eucalyptus, which can survive freezing winter temperatures.
Unlike the pine trees used in Southern plantations - which have quietly helped displace tobacco in the region's economy - eucalyptus can deploy a full canopy of leaves within a few years. It is greedy for carbon, and within 27 months can grow to 55 feet in height [The New York Times].
ArborGen points out that the high growth rate will allow the company to grow more wood on less land, which could provide a boost to the region's timber exports. What's more, the wood could potentially serve as a biofuel feedstock
Critics, however, worry that the plant would grow untrammeled, like a weed gone wild, and would consume whole forests and wipe out native foliage. One of the two species used to breed ArborGen's hybrids, Eucalyptus grandis, had previously turned invasive in South Africa-raising concerns about this tree turning invasive in the south.
ArborGen has received conditional approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to expand its experimental eucalyptus operations to 28 sites in seven states, for a total of 330 acres of forest.
Given the uncertainty involved, however, the Nature Conservancy has recommended to USDA that ArborGen be allowed fewer acres and trees to flower, and none in Florida, [ecologist Doria Gordon] said. The draft permit approved by USDA would allow flowering in 10 sites across the state.">[The New York Times].
ArborGen has pointed out that the tree that grew invasive in South Africa was thriving in arid conditions, something that would not happen in Florida due its moist climate.
ArborGen also says that the GM trees won't spread because of a genetic tweak that prevents the trees from reproducing. (Similar techniques have been used to make GM plants like corn and soy infertile, a controversial tactic that forces farmers to buy new seeds each year.)
In the case of the eucalyptus trees, ArborGen restricts their pollen production with a bacterial gene that produces a toxic enzyme called barnase that slices apart genetic material in a cell, causing death. Through genetic trickery, the enzyme is only produced in the pollen-spreading parts of the tree, destroying its ability to reproduce - at least most of the time
It's not yet clear how the public will feel about GM forests. But scientists note that some trees that have been genetically tweaked to prevent disease have already gained widespread acceptance-like papaya trees in Hawaii that are less susceptible to the ringspot virus, and American chestnuts that resist a deadly fungus. ArborGen's scientists argue that tweaking eucalyptus trees for commercial reasons isn't so different from those earlier efforts, and say the trees could eventually play a significant role in biofuel production.
Tree geneticist Steve Strauss, who consulted with ArborGen, says: "If we're going to rely on biofuels as a significant part of a diverse portfolio of renewable technology," then harvesting trees is the best way to go, he said. "There's a lot of marginal land that could be used" The New York Times].
By Smriti Rao:
Reprinted with permission fromDiscover
Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved. Now that many U.S. farmers have grown used to genetically modified (GM) soy and corn, the controversy surrounding GM crops may shift over to GM eucalyptus-a fast-growing Australian tree that, in its unmodified strains, dominates the tropical timber industry.
Two industry giants, International Paper Co. and MeadWestvaco Corp. have formed a biotech venture called ArborGen LLC that is looking to introduce this tree to the southeastern forests of the United States. The company is seeking greater governmental deregulation so it can roll out its plans of replacing native pines in southeastern plantation forests with the genetically engineered eucalyptus, which can survive freezing winter temperatures.
Unlike the pine trees used in Southern plantations - which have quietly helped displace tobacco in the region's economy - eucalyptus can deploy a full canopy of leaves within a few years. It is greedy for carbon, and within 27 months can grow to 55 feet in height [The New York Times].
ArborGen points out that the high growth rate will allow the company to grow more wood on less land, which could provide a boost to the region's timber exports. What's more, the wood could potentially serve as a biofuel feedstock
Critics, however, worry that the plant would grow untrammeled, like a weed gone wild, and would consume whole forests and wipe out native foliage. One of the two species used to breed ArborGen's hybrids, Eucalyptus grandis, had previously turned invasive in South Africa-raising concerns about this tree turning invasive in the south.
ArborGen has received conditional approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to expand its experimental eucalyptus operations to 28 sites in seven states, for a total of 330 acres of forest.
Given the uncertainty involved, however, the Nature Conservancy has recommended to USDA that ArborGen be allowed fewer acres and trees to flower, and none in Florida, [ecologist Doria Gordon] said. The draft permit approved by USDA would allow flowering in 10 sites across the state.">[The New York Times].
ArborGen has pointed out that the tree that grew invasive in South Africa was thriving in arid conditions, something that would not happen in Florida due its moist climate.
ArborGen also says that the GM trees won't spread because of a genetic tweak that prevents the trees from reproducing. (Similar techniques have been used to make GM plants like corn and soy infertile, a controversial tactic that forces farmers to buy new seeds each year.)
In the case of the eucalyptus trees, ArborGen restricts their pollen production with a bacterial gene that produces a toxic enzyme called barnase that slices apart genetic material in a cell, causing death. Through genetic trickery, the enzyme is only produced in the pollen-spreading parts of the tree, destroying its ability to reproduce - at least most of the time
It's not yet clear how the public will feel about GM forests. But scientists note that some trees that have been genetically tweaked to prevent disease have already gained widespread acceptance-like papaya trees in Hawaii that are less susceptible to the ringspot virus, and American chestnuts that resist a deadly fungus. ArborGen's scientists argue that tweaking eucalyptus trees for commercial reasons isn't so different from those earlier efforts, and say the trees could eventually play a significant role in biofuel production.
Tree geneticist Steve Strauss, who consulted with ArborGen, says: "If we're going to rely on biofuels as a significant part of a diverse portfolio of renewable technology," then harvesting trees is the best way to go, he said. "There's a lot of marginal land that could be used" The New York Times].
By Smriti Rao:
Reprinted with permission from
Popular in SciTech
- Amazon proposes a colossal biospherelike Seattle campus
- Weird pirate ant comes with an "eye patch"
- iPhone 5S and low-cost iPhone said to be multicolored
- Jennifer Lopez to open Verizon cellphone stores
- The 7 weirdest things made by 3D printing
- Apple's next iPhone may be coming in June
- "God particle": Why the Higgs boson matters
- Google to add Galapagos Islands to Street View
7 Comments Add a Comment
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- This worries me. Eucalyptus is not native to the US for a reason. Why haven't we heard about this before now? All I could find online is something about a responsible use program that arborgen and mead are doing with a nonprofit. Are these companies going to do something if all hell breaks lose? Will these trees be in our water supplies? If someone knows who to talk for real answers PLEASE TELL!!
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Ok, for once I'm with the side urging caution. Introducing a "new species" (well sort of new) is a tricky business. History shows us that things can go very wrong very fast (environmentally).
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- There are approximately 10 million acres of pine plantation that this plant may be grown on. The insects, birds, rodents, and mammals that use pine can't use eucalyptus. So what happens to all those animals? Between the eucalyptus and suburbia our common species will become even less common. Bad idea all around.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Sounds good...fast growing, sucks carbon, sterile. Yet the introduction of non-native species, even genetically modified ones, has a poor track record. There always seems to be some surprise that none of the experts predicted.
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- This whole project is doomed to failure from the start... Back in the 40's, they tried to plant them in California... They found that due to the earths rotational differences from Northern hemisphere to Southern hemisphere, the trees grown were not viable for use in the lumber industry. The trees warped wrong here, and all the lumber split and was unusuable... These people need to do their research a little better. California has a bunch of the trees that are useful only as ornamintal floppery...
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- Oh OK the trees do all the work OK
- reply
- linkicon reporticon emailicon
- The more I think about Kudzu, cane toads, African honeybees and the carp that was imported to SC that was only supposed to eat weeds in the big lakes (yeah, right. Say goodbye to all the fish) the more I take a dim view of mucking around with nature.
- reply
