February 4, 2010 6:26 PM

CIA Chief: Al Qaeda Poised to Attack U.S.

(CBS/AP)  Last updated 6:30 p.m. ET

Al Qaeda can be expected to attempt an attack on the United States in the next three to six months, senior U.S. intelligence officials told Congress on Tuesday.

The terrorist organization is deploying operatives to the United States to carry out new attacks from inside the country, including "clean" recruits with a negligible trail of terror contacts, CIA Director Leon Panetta said. Al Qaeda is also inspiring homegrown extremists to trigger violence on their own, Panetta added.

"There is the opportunity and chance that al qaeda will be sending networked individuals, trained individuals in particular from the regional affiliates but there's also the potential of radicalized inspired lone wolves trying to attack using simple methods," said CBS News security analyst Juan Zarate.

"I think the challenge for the intelligence community, and part of the worry that the intelligence specialists expressed;p they're not sure," Zarate told "Early Show" co-anchor Harry Smith.

The annual assessment of the nation's terror threats provided no startling new terror trends but amplified growing misgivings since the attempted Christmas Day airline attack outside Detroit, Michigan, that militants are growing harder to detect and moving more quickly in their plots.

"The biggest threat is not so much that we face an attack like 9/11. It is that al Qaeda is adapting its methods in ways that oftentimes make it difficult to detect," Panetta told the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Several senators tangled over whether suspected terrorists should be tried in civilian or military court. At the same time, a group of bipartisan lawmakers introduced legislation that would force the Obama administration to backtrack on its plans to try Sept. 11 defendants in federal court in New York and use military tribunals instead.

Panetta said the fear is al Qaeda is relying more and more on recruits with little training using simple devices, as in the attempted Christmas day attack, reports CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid.

Panetta also warned of the danger of extremists acting alone: "It's the lone-wolf strategy that I think we have to pay attention to as the main threat to this country," he said.

The hearing comes just over a month since the failed attempt to bring down an airliner at Detroit, allegedly by a Nigerian suspect. The assessment also comes only a few months after U.S. Army Maj. Nidal Hassan is accused of single-handedly attacking his fellow soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas, killing 13 people.

National Intelligence Director Dennis Blair said with changes made since the Dec. 25 attack, U.S. intelligence would he able to identify and stop someone like the man alleged to be the Detroit bomber before he got on the plane. He warned, however, that a more careful and skilled would-be terrorist might not have been detected.

FBI Director Robert Mueller defended the FBI's handling of the Detroit incident, disputing assertions that agents short-circuited more intelligence insights from the Nigerian suspect by quickly providing him with his constitutionally guaranteed right to remain silent.

Mueller said that in "case after case," terrorists have provided actionable intelligence even after they were given their rights and charged with crimes. Mueller said they know such cooperation can result in shorter sentences or other consideration from the government.

Law enforcement officials confirm to CBS News that the Nigerian suspect, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, started talking again last week and is providing useful information.

Hundreds of terror suspects already have been convicted in civilian federal courts, including convicted shoe bomber Richard Reid.

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham offered a bill Tuesday that would prohibit the government from using Justice Department money to prosecute suspects charged in the Sept. 11 attack in civilian courts.

The move comes in the aftermath of the Obama administration's decision to rethink whether it would try that attack's alleged mastermind, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, in a New York City courtroom.

The proposed law would cover people who legally could be prosecuted by a military commission, applying to terror suspects who are not U.S. citizens. By Tuesday evening, the bill had support from 18 senators, mostly Republicans.

During the terror assessment hearing, Blair also warned of the growing cyberthreat, saying computer-related attacks have become dynamic and malicious.

Obama has promised to make cybersecurity a priority in his administration, but the president's new budget asks for a decrease in money for the Homeland Security Department's cybersecurity division.

The government's first quadrennial homeland security review states high consequence and large-scale cyberattacks could massively disable or hurt international financial, commercial and other infrastructure.

The report, obtained by The Associated Press, said these types of cyberattacks could cripple the movement of people and goods around the world and bring vital social and economic programs to a halt.


© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 61 Comments
by Leaderless February 4, 2010 11:58 AM EST
Why wouldn't al qaeda attacked us now, obama and holder has weaken us so much already. There's NO DOWN SIDE for them if they get captured!!
It's tragic that these two clowns can't even see the damage that they are doing to the country.
Reply to this comment
by fedup12 February 3, 2010 1:45 PM EST
by Ms_enza February 3, 2010 5:38 AM EST
The glee in the Republican camp is palpable...
-----------------------------------
Reply to this comment by Mortar_29 February 3, 2010 7:37 AM EST
The only "glee" I have is when another Jihadi dies.
-------------------------------------

Nope im pretty sure that you just said you were a Republican Hypocrite.

A Big Military budget, deficit spending, bs war making, 9-11 ignoring republican. Anyway you sure stick up for them a lot. Like here.
Reply to this comment
by hologram5 February 3, 2010 12:38 PM EST
Lies, lies and more lies. When does it stop? They wouldn't even EXIST if it wasn't for the CIA. They were all buddy buddy right up until Sept. 10th 2001, then they attacked for no reason? Come on, let's get real and get past the BS and get some TRUTH.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George- February 3, 2010 10:55 AM EST
by prajaowain February 3, 2010 8:06 AM EST

and 2 bogus wars.
_______________________

2 bogus wars ? So did you think we were going to sit back and take another hit like 9/11, another 3,000 killed and not do something about the problem ? So, the Afghanistan war and frankly the Iraq war, were not Bogus, but a necessary action to deal with the threat against our country....but if you can't understand that, then it's very sad on your part that someone could be so mis-guided and ill informed.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George- February 3, 2010 10:52 AM EST
Mortar_29

I heard Obama state today, that (paraphrased) "he felt it was important to tell everyone that they could keep their doctor if they liked, and we wouldn't get between you and your doctor"....then went on to say..."something was slipped into the bill, that got in the way of this"....basically admitting that they lied, and Americans never were going to be able to keep their doctor.....interesting now that the momentum has changed, they are fessing up to what went on behind closed doors, during the healthScare
Reply to this comment
by Mortar_29 February 3, 2010 10:58 AM EST
Yep. They arent about improving healthcare. They are about control and remaking America.

So, we either stand up and stop them...or be ready to have our society and our way of life destroyed by these people!
by maistir February 3, 2010 9:43 AM EST
After 9/11 the demand on political leaders changed: use intelligence to anticipate attacks and prevent them. Pre-emptive tactics are required. Treat an al Qaida attack as an ordinary crime that only needs to be investigated after it occurs and you will be out of office at the next election. Panetta's CIA failed at Khost and lucked out with the Xmas bomber. He is down to his third strike IMHO.
Reply to this comment
by us_1776 February 3, 2010 9:30 AM EST
Forget being afraid of these stupid terrorists.

The big-banks have caused more damage to America than any terrorists possibly could.

The bankers collapsed the global economy by taking huge risks with OUR money.

The bankers caused millions of American families to lose their home.

The bankers caused tens of millions of Americans to lose their jobs.

This massive amount of damage to our society by the bankers dwarfs anything that some little terrorist could do.
Reply to this comment
by Mortar_29 February 3, 2010 9:32 AM EST
The Federal government has caused more damage than the banks, the terrorists combined!
by prajaowain February 3, 2010 8:46 AM EST
usaguy2010 shove your opinion and whatever authority you have in your butt! Smootch me rose red a$$.
Reply to this comment
by usaguy2010 February 3, 2010 9:03 AM EST
you just proved my point.. You're so ignorant...Amazing.
by Mortar_29 February 3, 2010 9:08 AM EST
He did prove your point, USA.
by finkfurst February 3, 2010 8:32 AM EST
"CIA Chief: Al Qaeda Poised to Attack U.S."....... so I still deserve my HUGE salary!
Reply to this comment
by ConstantineXIII February 3, 2010 8:21 AM EST
The story about the Nigerian jihadist alleging giving us information is fake. It is designed solely to prop up Obama and create the false impression that Obama made the right decision to read Miranda rights to the Nigerian jihadist and to give the Nigerian jihadist the best of taxpayer funded counsel. Even if the Nigerian jihadist is providing us with some information(I don't trust the truth of this story because it seems awfully politically convenient for Obama), this is due to luck and in no way justifies Obama's stupid decision to rush to treat this as a civilian matter. By putting this(and the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed matter) in civilian courts, the real dangers still exist that our intelligence methods will be revealed through discovery, that the accused might escape justice on some legal technicality, and that the accused might be able to use the civilian trial as a platform to promote and recruit jihadists .
Reply to this comment
See all 61 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook