February 2, 2010 1:18 PM

Obama Budget Projects $1.56T Deficit

(CBS/AP)  Updated 5:50 p.m. ET

President Barack Obama unveiled a multitrillion-dollar spending plan Monday, pledging an intensified effort to combat high unemployment and asking Congress to quickly approve new job-creation efforts that would boost the deficit to a record-breaking $1.56 trillion.

Obama's new budget blueprint preaches the need to make tough choices to restrain run-away deficits, but not before attacking what the administration sees as the more immediate challenge of lifting the country out of a deep recession that has cost 7.2 million jobs over the past two years.

The result is a budget plan that would give the country trillion-dollar-plus deficits for three consecutive years. Obama's new budget projects a spending increase of 5.7 percent for the current budget year and forecasts that spending would rise another 3 percent in 2011 to $3.83 trillion.

See the Full Budget
With Budget in Hand, Congress Starts Real Work
Obama's 2011 Budget Highlights

"Until America is back at work, my administration will not rest and this recovery will not be finished," Mr. Obama declared in his budget message.

Addressing the fact that his budget first projects big increases in the deficit before starting to lower these imbalances, Mr. Obama told reporters, "It's very important to understand, we won't be able to bring down this deficit overnight given that the recovery is still taking hold and families across the country still need help."

But Mr. Obama added that the federal government cannot "continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences," saying it is unacceptable to act "as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like Monopoly money."

The president blamed the huge deficit on the decisions of President George W. Bush, previous Congresses and his administration's steps to prevent an economic collapse.

"The fact is, 10 years ago, we had a budget surplus of more than $200 billion, with projected surpluses stretching out toward the horizon, Mr. Obama said. "Yet over the course of the past 10 years, the previous administration and previous Congresses created an expensive new drug program, passed massive tax cuts for the wealthy, and funded two wars without paying for any of it -- all of which was compounded by recession and by rising health care costs." (Read more about Mr. Obama's remarks | Watch the video)

Mr. Obama's budget offers tax cuts for businesses, including a $5,000 tax credit for hiring new workers this year, help for the unemployed and $25 billion more for cash-strapped state governments. All the temporary measures would boost the deficit over the next two years by $245 billion.

The deficit for this year would surge to a record-breaking $1.56 trillion, topping last year's then-unprecedented $1.41 trillion gap, a number which had dwarfed the previous record of $454.8 billion set in 2008 under former President George W. Bush.

The administration is forecasting that deficits over the next decade will add an additional $8.5 trillion to the national debt, even if Congress adopts the administration's package of proposals to trim future deficits starting in 2011. Those include a three-year freeze on spending for government programs, an effort which does not touch popular benefit programs such as Social Security and Medicare and which also exempts defense and homeland security. It also proposes a boost in taxes on the wealthiest Americans, families making more than $250,000 annually, by allowing the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 to expire.

Republicans were not impressed with Mr. Obama's deficit cutting, saying that it fell far short of the bold steps needed in light of the fiscal challenges the country is facing.

"This country is sinking into a fiscal quagmire," said Sen. Judd Gregg, the top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee. "These circumstances call for a bold, game-changing budget that will turn things around."

House Minority Leader John Boehner also criticized the budget proposal, saying it "spends too much, taxes too much, and borrows too much."

On CBS' "The Early Show" this morning, Peter Orszag, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, said there were things in the budget that both Democratic and Republican partisans will be unhappy about.

"We're proposing freezing non-security discretionary spending, for example; [that] has made some on the left unhappy," Orszag said. "There are other parts of the budget that make some on the right unhappy… None of this is easy, but it is crucially important for the American people." (Read more on Orszag's comments about the budget.)

Face the Nation: Debating Obama's Plea for Civility
Obama: Taxes Can't be "Monopoly Money"
Commentary: Forget The Deficit, It's Jobs, Jobs, Jobs!

Some Republicans complained that Obama's budget would end up restraining the economy rather than promoting growth.

"This budget features too many new taxes, too much new spending and too much new debt, all of which will discourage hiring and further reduce Americans' job security," said Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan, the top Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee.

The administration argued that Obama inherited a deficit that was already topping $1 trillion when he took office and, given the severity of the downturn, the president had to spend billions stabilizing the financial system and jump-starting economic growth.

Mr. Obama's new budget carries forward the pledge he made in his State of the Union address: To put full attention on reviving the moribund U.S. economy, an effort to convince recession-battered voters that Democrats are in tune with the issues that affect their lives.

Mr. Obama's new budget assumes enactment of a comprehensive health care program, the issue that dominated the president's first year in office. Passage of that proposal is currently stalled with Democrats trying to figure out how to cope with the loss of a key Democratic seat that gave them the 60 votes they needed to overcome a Republican filibuster.

Mr. Obama's job proposals would push government spending in 2010 to $3.72 trillion and increase that amount to $3.83 trillion in the 2011 budget year, which begins on Oct. 1.

The deficit in 2011 would total $1.27 trillion, the third straight trillion-dollar-plus imbalance. The deficit would fall to $828 billion in 2012 but would remain at levels surpassing any previous deficits through 2020.

The deficit for this year would be 10.6 percent of the total economy, a figure unmatched since the country was emerging from World War II. The administration does not trim the deficit below 3.6 percent of GDP for any year in the next decade, failing to meet its goal of lowering the deficit to 3 percent of GDP by 2015.

Orszag said the administration will rely on a deficit commission which the president will create by executive order to recommend ways to further reduce the deficit plus cope with deficits projected to soar further in the next decade with the retirement of millions of baby boomers.

Much of the spending surge starting in 2008 reflects the cost of massive economic stimulus measures passed by Congress to deal with the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. The surge in the deficits reflects not only the increased spending but also a big drop in tax revenues, reflecting the 7.2 million people who have lost jobs since the recession began and weaker corporate tax receipts.

Mr. Obama's new budget attempts to navigate between the opposing goals of pulling the country out of a deep recession and getting control of runaway deficits. The administration insists that once the recession is history, the government will turn its attention to attacking the deficits.

Proposed Tax Hikes in Obama's Budget
Deficit Declines Next Year, But Debt Keeps Soaring
Billions More for Schools, but with a Catch?
Analysis: Obama Likely To Miss Jobs, Deficit Goals

On the anti-recession front, Mr. Obama's new budget proposed extending the popular Making Work Pay middle-class tax breaks of $400 per individual and $800 per couple through 2011. They were due to expire after this year. The budget also proposes making $250 payments to Social Security recipients to bolster their finances in a year when they are not receiving the normal cost-of-living boost to their benefit checks because of low inflation. Obama will also seek a $25 billion increase in payments to help recession-battered states.

In a bow to worries over the soaring deficits, the administration proposed a three-year freeze on spending beginning in 2011 for many domestic government agencies. It would save $250 billion over the next decade by following the spending freeze with caps that would keep increases after 2013 from rising faster than inflation.

But the spending freeze on many domestic programs is already getting a very cool reception from Democrats on Capitol Hill, CBS Radio News correspondent Bob Fuss reports.

"Every president proposes budget cuts that Congress rejects," Fuss said. "And it is especially hard in an election year with high unemployment to get rid of a program, even a wasteful one, if it provides jobs somewhere. So it is unlikely this budget blueprint will be accepted as is."

Military, veterans, homeland security and big benefit programs such as Social Security and Medicare would not feel the pinch. Federal support for elementary and high school education would get what the administration termed the biggest increase in history. The Pell Grant college tuition program which would see an increase of $17 billion to just under $35 billion, helping an additional 1 million students.

The budget reveals some of the changes the administration is seeking in an overhaul of the No Child Left Behind school accountability law. The administration wants to change how schools are judged to be succeeding or failing, looking not only at a single year's test score but at how kids and schools are progressing over time.

In Mr. Obama's new budget, there would be substantial increases for homeland security and veterans programs - exempt from Obama's partial freeze - with a 3.4 percent increase in the Pentagon's core budget to $549 billion for next year.

The administration would kill $175 billion worth of Environmental Protection Agency clean water accounts used as a pork-barrel kitty by Congress.

Mr. Obama also kills his predecessor's signature space program to return astronauts to the moon. NASA had already spent $9.1 billion on the program, which was projected to cost $100 billion by 2020. Mr. Obama's new budget said NASA will be "launching a bold new effort" with an extra $1.2 billion annually for five years, money expected to be used to encourage private companies to build, launch and operate their own spacecraft for the benefit of NASA and others. NASA would pay the private companies to carry U.S. astronauts.

The new Obama budget will also include a proposal to levy a fee on the country's biggest banks to raise an estimated $90 billion to recover losses from the government's $700 billion financial rescue fund.

GRAPHICS:

Here's a breakdown of President Obama's proposed 2011 budget spending by agency and the percent change from estimates for 2010.

(CBS)


And here are the deficit figures from 2002 through 2020. Keep in mind that the years 2010 through 2020 are projections:

(CBS)

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 323 Comments
by truthseeker66 June 6, 2010 7:01 PM EDT
All of you with your heads in the sand want to keep on blaming BUSH and that's ok he was part of the problem but he's been gone for almost 2 years now and who really spends most of the money? CONGRESS and even under Bush the DEMs were in control during most of his second term spend spend spend. Now we have a DEM president more spending. It is out of control! You don't lower a deficit by spending more and you surely do not get people to spend more of their hard earned money to stimulate the economy by raising their taxes. You also don't get private industry to expand and create more jobs (yes that's right it is the private sector that creates real jobs not the government!!!) by taxing and regulating them into the ground. But in our new "progressive world" facts, the truth and even GOD for that matter doesn't really matter anyway right, all that matters is gaining control. This current government doesn?t care what THE People want they are not listening so they are no longer really representing all of us are they. The government should not be telling the people what is best for them and what to do?. we tell them what we want them to do. All we can hope for is that more and more Americans wake up and start to give a darn about what is happening to this country and make their voices heard at the poles and WE THE PEOPLE will take back control of OUR government. It took Jimmy Carter one of our worst presidents in history to get Reagan hopefully we will see this pattern repeat!! Wake up folks!! Wake up your friends and family, your neighbors, the guy next to you in the street. Spread the word! Inspire those in your community of intelligence and integrity to run for public office, research the issues be informed don?t just rely on what your ?progressive? out of touch college professors or our head in the sand left wing driven media tell you. Get informed, use the internet to gather facts and spread the word while you still can as there are those working hard right now to control free speech on the net. All these wonderful people that our current administration is quietly putting in place all through our government do some research about what they really believe don?t be surprised though if you are scared by what you find.
Reply to this comment
by chevyhotrod February 4, 2010 8:29 AM EST
by velma179 February 3, 2010 7:42 PM EST
My point chevy, is you write things here and have no idea that you don't have the whole picture.

The chart is accurate and it goes up in FISCAL 2008. Obama was not at the helm until FISCAL 2009 -- with much of the deficit for that year waiting for him when he came into office.


velma,
Please allow me to educate you. We have 3 equal branches of government, the Executive, Legislative and Judicial. In 2006 the Democrats won and took control of 1 of these branches of government starting in 2007, that would be the legislative and this is where all spending takes place. All the debt incurred from FISCAL 2008 and beyond belongs to the Democrats. No, Obama was not at the helm for FISCAL 2008, but the Democrat party was. The deficit waiting for President Obama when he came into office in FISCAL 2009 was written and passed by his Democrat party.
But maybe I am just stupid and don?t have the whole picture. You?re so funny.
Reply to this comment
by jlegg08 February 4, 2010 6:01 AM EST
see what happens when a nig gets his hands on some money. SPEND SPEND SPEND
Reply to this comment
by lakota2012 February 3, 2010 7:33 PM EST
by Empire-George:
"Bush didn't cause the deficit to balloon"
---------------------------



Unfortunately, he certainly did, but trying to explain this to someone with "HYPOCRITICAL REPUBLICON" tattooed on their forehead, is completely impossible.

Repetitious posts of quotations from a half century or more ago, bare little resemblence to sanity in the 21st century of an entirely different reality and world situation.
Reply to this comment
by chevyhotrod February 3, 2010 11:14 PM EST
If we do not learn from our past we will never move forward as a country.

We should listen to our great leaders of the past, they were wise people with great conviction, you would be un-wise not to learn from them.
by noloyalisti February 3, 2010 6:20 PM EST
Unfortunately hot rod, after all the rhetoric about tax cuts, they did not work, just look at the economy. It is because the corporate crooks used to be regulated by the government of We the People.

But they re-wrote the laws and followed the failed fraudulent and misnamed "free-trade" policies of the anti-tax nut cases Milton Friedman and Grover Norquist. All of their stuff has been completely discredited by reality.
Reply to this comment
by chevyhotrod February 3, 2010 11:12 PM EST
Your socialistic utopia has failed every time it is tried. Free markets and free trade are for free people. Thomas Jefferson created the most opportunistic country the world has ever seen and people like you just want to tear it down. You will fail along with all your socialistic policies and the American people will rise and take down your reality. John F. Kennedy was correct about tax cuts, so was Reagan and Bush.
by noloyalisti February 3, 2010 6:12 PM EST
Bush took the failed privatization and free-market schemes of Reagan and put them on steroids. It took him 8 years to double the deficit. Bushoccio added 6 billion to the deficit by starting illegal wars without paying for them and left the Dems a 1.3 trillion dollar yearly deficit. The Bush Crime Family also left a depression for us.

Of course it is all Bush's fault.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George- February 3, 2010 5:07 PM EST
by RedWings_ninety_one February 3, 2010 12:12 PM EST

It is all Bush's fault...He started the wars that caused this mess, he signed the bills that also caused this mess... So now the question becomes, How isn't it Bush's fault?
______________________

Sir, I'm disappointed in your comment.....just look at the above chart Deficits...you see the blue area = Bush from 2002-2007, then look at what happened when Barry, Harry and Scary (democrats) took control...from 2008 forward....the Red Area = Obama.

Now, would you prefer the part of the chart in blue, or the red ? with skyrocketing deficits out-of-control.

Now, as for the wars, America went to war, not Bush...America, add in the fact that the majority of Democrats in the Senate voted to proceed with the Iraq war, they voted YES to continual funding and voted NO to withdrawing from Iraq.....so, given all of that, how is it Bush's fault ? Bush also had to deal with losses and expenses associated with 9/11 attack....not calculated or mentioned

Bush didn't cause the deficit to balloon, and Bush didn't attack us on 9/11....so if you are looking to blame anyone, it would be "Democrats and Terrorists"
Reply to this comment
by fxr60 February 3, 2010 3:53 PM EST
Here is the latest report by Dick Morris in today's newsletter titled : Behind Obama's Phony Deficit Numbers In 2008, Bush ran a deficit of $485 billion. By the time the fiscal year started on Oct.1. 2008. it had gone up by another $100 billion due to increased recession-related spending and depressed revenues. So it was about $600 billion at the start of the fiscal crisis. That was the REAL Bush deficit. But when the fiscal crisis hit, Bush had to pass TARP in the final months of his presidency which cost $700 billion. Under the federal budget rules, a loan and a grant are treated the same. So the $700 billion pushed the deficit-offically-up to $1.3 trillion. But not really. The $700 billion was a short term loan. $500 billion has been repaid. So what was the REAL DEFICIT Obama inherited? The $600 billion deficit Bush was running plus the $200 billion TARP money that propably won't be repaid( mainly AIG and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). That totals $800 billion. The REAL deficit Obama inherited. And I will add the rest is Obama's now and forever!!!!
Reply to this comment
by lakota2012 February 3, 2010 7:39 PM EST
by fxr60:
"And I will add the rest is Obama's now and forever"
---------------------------



Hardly....but trying to explain simple economics to highly-partisan hacks like dickie morris and you, is quite impossible.

The fact still remains that bush's agenda is still driving about 33% of each year's budget, and he never put his endless WAR spending in any of his budgets, just like the interest payments on the national debt!
by lakota2012 February 3, 2010 12:22 PM EST
by lakota2012:
Recent additions to the public debt of the United States:
2001 $144.5 billion
2002 $409.5 billion
2003 $589.0 billion
2004 $605.0 billion
2005 $523.0 billion
2006 $536.5 billion
2007 $459.5 billion
2008 $1.017 trillion

"figures never lie, but LIARS ALWAYS FIGURE"
---------------------------------------


by chevyhotrod:
"These numbers do not reflect the chart CBS is reporting. If you look at the chart (do you know how to read?)"
-----------------------------------




Hey -- you can stop the cheap shots and learn something for a change!

First off, the interest on the national debt is not included in the budget (this is running about $1 Billion per day, or $365 Billion per year) nor was bush including his TWO WARS in the budget, and sneakily asking the congresscritters for SUPPLEMENTALS!....remember?

Also, since the markets were going sideways during bushworld (DJIA LOST 26% during his 8 years, going from 10,880 to 8,000) so Americans either invested in foreign markets like "Chindia" or helped create the real estate bubble buying and selling homes (flips were the big story) and many made quite sizeable ROI's that increased federal revenue, thus lowering the budget deficit, but leaving the current mess, where foreclosures will continue in 2010 from loan resets!

Whether you want to believe it or not, the figures above in my post are entirely accurate from our government, and reflect the addition to our national debt of an average of $600 Billion per year, which is why bush oversaw a DOUBLING of our national debt from $5.6 Trillion to $11.2 Trillion in his 8 years!
Reply to this comment
by chevyhotrod February 3, 2010 3:57 PM EST
Whether you want to believe it or not, the chart CBS showed is accurate, it is what it is.

And President Obama and the Democrats will double it in 4 years, not 8. I didn't like the way the Republicans spent money either, including President Bush. But what the Democrats are doing is insane.

What, do you think there is no interest in the money the Democrats and President Obama are spending? Should we add the interest onto the debt figures that are posted for when the Democrats have been in control of Congress, but will you only apply them to when the Republicans controlled Congress?

I can also recall every time President Bush sent a budget up to Congress is always came back 10% larger than what was proposed. He should have used veto pen, but in the name of bipartisanship he signed.

President Obama can bring home the troops anytime he wants, the WARS continue and are even expanding. Maybe you should pay attention to the news every once in awhile and learn something new.
by velma179 February 3, 2010 7:42 PM EST
by chevyhotrod February 3, 2010 3:57 PM EST

"I can also recall every time President Bush sent a budget up to Congress is always came back 10% larger than what was proposed. He should have used veto pen, but in the name of bipartisanship he signed."

________

But I guess you are not so clear in recalling who was in the majority in Congress for the greatest part of the Bush presidency. Are you saying his "sense of bi-partisanship" was because he became a Democrat for six years in office (2001-2007). (Yes there was the Senate anomaly in 2001 when Jeffords went Independent and caucused with the Dems... but that was hardly a true majority).

_______________________

My point chevy, is you write things here and have no idea that you don't have the whole picture.

The chart is accurate and it goes up in FISCAL 2008. Obama was not at the helm until FISCAL 2009 -- with much of the deficit for that year waiting for him when he came into office.

I wonder why you know better than economists, what will happen in the next 4-8 years -- when you don't even know what has already happened in the USA?
by RedWings_ninety_one February 3, 2010 12:17 PM EST
Before the Great Depression there was no such thing as Defecit spending. Now we are 13 trillion into debt. Obama wants to reduce spending and increace taxes...That's going to be what's nessicary to get us out of this mess. We owe China, and other countries owe us. We can get out of it, we just need time and the right strategy.
Reply to this comment
by chevyhotrod February 3, 2010 4:07 PM EST
Thomas Jefferson gave us Independence; Franklin D. Roosevelt gave us Dependence.
by chevyhotrod February 3, 2010 4:55 PM EST
"Obama wants to reduce spending" what a freaking joke that is and you know it.

HEADLINE: Obama Budget Projects $1.56T Deficit

Please learn how to comprehend, it says "Obama Budget", not Bush's. You cannot blame your budget on someone else, it is your budget and not anyone elses. The American people are stupid.


"we just need time and the right strategy" this we can agree on, maybe we should listen to another great leader?

"A bill will be presented to the Congress for action next year. It will include an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in both corporate and personal income taxes. It will include long-needed tax reform that logic and equity demand ... The billions of dollars this bill will place in the hands of the consumer and our businessmen will have both immediate and permanent benefits to our economy. Every dollar released from taxation that is spent or invested will help create a new job and a new salary. And these new jobs and new salaries can create other jobs and other salaries and more customers and more growth for an expanding American economy."

John F. Kennedy, Aug. 13, 1962, radio and television report on the state of the national economy
See all 323 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook