January 30, 2010 5:18 PM

Trailers-to-Haiti Proposal Stirs Backlash

By
CBSNews
(AP)  The trailer industry and lawmakers are pressing the government to send Haiti thousands of potentially formaldehyde-laced trailers left over from Hurricane Katrina - an idea denounced by some as a crass and self-serving attempt to dump inferior American products on the poor.

"Just go ahead and sign their death certificate," said Paul Nelson of Coden, Ala., who contends his mother died because of formaldehyde fumes in a FEMA trailer.

The 100,000 trailers became a symbol of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's bungled response to Katrina. The government had bought the trailers to house victims of the 2005 storm, but after people began falling ill, high levels of formaldehyde, a chemical that is used in building materials and can cause breathing problems and perhaps cancer, were found inside. Many of the trailers have sat idle for years, and many are damaged.

CBS News was first to report on the high levels of formaldehyde in FEMA trailers.

FEMA's Toxic Bureaucracy Holds Back Aid
FEMA Can Be Sued For Trailers
FEMA Seeks Immunity In Trailer Lawsuits
Did Trailer Makers Know About Toxic Fumes?

The U.S. Agency for International Development, which is coordinating American assistance in Haiti, has expressed no interest in sending the trailers to the earthquake-stricken country. FEMA spokesman Clark Stevens declined to comment on the idea.

Haitian Culture and Communications Minister Marie Laurence Jocelyn Lassegue said Thursday she had not heard of the proposal but added: "I don't think we would use them. I don't think we would accept them."

In a Jan. 15 letter to FEMA, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, said the trailers could be used as temporary shelter or emergency clinics.

"While I continue to believe that these units should not be used for human habitation, I do believe that they could be of some benefit on a short-term, limited basis if the appropriate safeguards are provided," he wrote.

For the recreational-vehicle and trailer industry, which lost thousands of jobs during the recession, the push to send the units to Haiti is motivated by more than charity.

Bidding is under way in an online government-run auction to sell the trailers in large lots at bargain-basement prices - something the RV industry fears will reduce demand for new products. Some of the bids received so far work out to less than $500 for a trailer that would sell for about $20,000 new.

Lobbyists for the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association - which includes some major manufacturers in Elkhart, Ind., among them Gulf Stream - have been talking with members of Congress, the government and disaster relief agencies to see if it would be possible to send the trailers to Haiti instead.

"This isn't really the best time for the RV industry to have very low-priced trailers put out onto the market," said the group's spokesman, Kevin Broom.

How much formaldehyde the trailers contain - or if they still have any at all - isn't known. The auction site warns that the trailers may not have been tested for the chemical, and FEMA said buyers must sign an agreement not to use the auctioned trailers for housing. Broom contends the majority are "perfectly safe," and "the handful of trailers that might have a problem" can be removed.

Though the formaldehyde fumes in the trailers may have lessened with time, Haiti's hot, humid weather would boost the amount released, said Becky Gillette, the formaldehyde campaign director for the Sierra Club.

Lindsay Huckabee, who blames a rash of illnesses on the two years she lived with her husband and five children in FEMA trailers in Kiln, Miss., said that while "some shelter is better than no shelter," sending FEMA trailers is a bad idea without tight controls and warnings.

"I think it's very self-serving to hand off a product that's not good enough for Americans and say, 'Hey, we're doing a good thing here,"' she said.

In Haiti, Ermite Bellande said she has had no shelter since losing her three-story house. Still, she doesn't want one of the trailers. "We have nothing," she lamented. "But I would rather sleep outside than be in a metal box full of chemicals."

Joseph Pacious, who was hoping to find shelter at a tent city near the Port-au-Prince airport, disagreed. "The trailers may be hot, and they may make us sick," he said. "But look at how we are living already. How bad can it be?"

Myriam Bellevu, who is sleeping in a tent because she does not feel safe in her damaged home, said: "If the trailers are not good, the Americans must keep them for themselves. It's true that we are poor, but if they want to help, they must help in a good way."

Among the lawmakers backing the idea is Mississippi state Sen. Billy Hewes.

"If I had the choice between no shelter and having the opportunity of living in a shelter that might have some fumes, I know what I'd choose," he said. "If these trailers were good enough for Mississippians, I would think they were good enough for folks down in Haiti as well."

AP
Add a Comment See all 31 Comments
by PatriotPaul February 1, 2010 4:41 PM EST
Yes, this is a prime example of why this activist "Corporate" Supreme Court's recent ruling allowing corporate funding of campaigns is such an abomination.

Our tax dollars went to purchase the FEMA trailers which was a huge windfall for the trailer companies at the time. Now that we hope to recoup some of our tax dollars through surplus sales the corporations want to stop that. Do we next give in to GM, or Ford, or Coleman, or John Deere the next time our government wants to sell surplus machinery that our tax dollars already paid for? I think not.

Any Congressperson who accepts donations from the trailer companies and then votes to send them to Haiti should be identified and then voted out of office whether they are a Democrat, Republican, or Independent.

If we are going to be send temporary housing to Haiti let's make it tents or yurts or something less toxic.


Paul Harris
Author, "Diary From the Dome, Reflections on Fear and Privilege During Katrina"
Reply to this comment
by cidaia January 31, 2010 3:19 PM EST
It is embarrassing how America cannot even seem to deliver aid to a nation in trouble without these scandals from self-serving profiteers.

No, don't send toxic trailers.

Poor people don't stop being human beings just because they're in crisis. They do not want to breath poison fumes and it is not okay to just take their children and NO, you may NOT solve your own problems at their expense and pass it off as "helping"!!!

If you want to help them, you have to do things that will benefit them. Not do things that will benefit YOU, and put THEM into a position of trying to decide which is worse, the frying pan or the fire?

Can we please stop offering "help" that is blatantly meant to help ourselves and not our intended victims...err, beneficiaries? It's getting embarrassing!!
Reply to this comment
by thesevenveils January 30, 2010 10:56 PM EST
None of these trailers would be used in Haiti with their windows closed. Ventilation from open windows will remove the fumes.
Send them to Haiti. many many Haitians would be thrilled to have a trailer to live in, it'd be a far cry better than the slum conditions they were used to before the quake.
Reply to this comment
by mimi5952 January 30, 2010 6:08 PM EST
Haiti's government is the most corrupted in the world. Whatever we do will not be enough for these people. They need to fix their own country so they can be proud of what they have. To many hand outs is not good for anyone.
Reply to this comment
by steve8313 January 30, 2010 7:09 PM EST
Please take some time and learn about Haitian history and you'll see that Haiti had no chance since the French, Spanish, and American governments striped the island of it's natural resources, enslaved the people, or imported slaves, and politically isolated the country.
by mimi5952 January 30, 2010 6:02 PM EST
US citizens don't owe Haitians any trailers. This country is broke and bankrupt. We do not owe people jobs either. 58% of the entire country works for government now and each year that number increases by 5%. In 7 years only 7% of the population will work at a job that produces real goods or services.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 January 30, 2010 3:59 PM EST
After 5 years most of the toxic gas is gone, it does not continue forever.
Reply to this comment
by ibsteve2u January 30, 2010 4:22 PM EST
Would you put your children in them? The trailers I saw - acres and acres of them - were unoccupied and tightly closed up.

I know one thing - if this happens, the headlines around the world will say "Insult To Injury: Americans Send Toxic Trailers To Haitian Earthquake Victims".

And worse...there are more than a few groups - some Islamic ones, for instance - who would seize upon this as a recruiting tool.
by sjc_1 January 31, 2010 4:05 PM EST
Oh please, common sense is suppose to take a back seat to public perception. You test the units for toxic pollutants with an independent lab, they pass the EPA standards and that is that. No hysterical hair pulling needed.
by ibsteve2u January 30, 2010 3:50 PM EST
lolll....CBS didn't lay it right in front of everybody, but if you consider this part of the above story:

[bq]
Lobbyists for the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association - which includes some major manufacturers in Elkhart, Ind., among them Gulf Stream - have been talking with members of Congress, the government and disaster relief agencies to see if it would be possible to send the trailers to Haiti instead.
[eq]

You see the name "Gulf Stream" prominently as one of the manufacturers that is trying to manipulate Congress. Now if you go to the link above that says "Did Trailer Makers Know About Toxic Fumes?"?

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/08/cbsnews_investigates/main4243041.shtml

Well, you find this:

[bq]
Current and former Gulf Stream employees told CBS News the company knew it had a problem with formaldehyde.

"We were instructed to open the doors and windows so that the odor wouldn't be as strong when the FEMA inspectors got there," Esparza said.
[eq]

So in short, Gulf Stream put it to a bunch of Americans (men, women, and their little kids) and now wants America's Congress to not only give them a bye but reward them for their callousness.

Pretty sweet, huh? You can do whatever you want - no matter how evil it is or who gets hurt - as long as you have that corporate facade to hide behind.

And the Supreme Court gave them unlimited propaganda rights?
Reply to this comment
by SHEETPAN January 30, 2010 10:38 AM EST
Did the plywood that is in these trailers come from China? Anyone who buys wood on a regular basis knows how much cheaper the China plywood is, as compared to domestic. Cabinet companies and other home building and remodeling companies are buying this crap by the boatload.
Reply to this comment
by texas_liberal January 30, 2010 9:52 AM EST
Among the lawmakers backing the idea is Mississippi state Sen. Billy Hewes.

live in a trailer for a year you pig, then come bqck and report on their safety.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 January 30, 2010 3:00 PM EST
You are saying that Having "NO SHELTER" is better than living in a FEMA trailer!!!!
You should try that yourself...
Or you could "ASK" the homeless if they want to use them and let them know about the odor to start with.
by jd2408 January 30, 2010 3:29 PM EST
This is not "just" about an odor toolmangler1. These trailers are very bad for a persons health. No one should be using them and they should be destroyed. Tents would be much better and safer for people to use. The taxpayers should have received their money back for those junk trailers but our government doesn't care about that anymore then they cared about the damage they were doing to peoples health.
by goneagain09 January 30, 2010 9:16 AM EST
I passed one of those huge holding areas for the FEMA trailers on vacation a couple of years ago. Acres and acres of trailers. I would buy one for 500 dollars
Reply to this comment
See all 31 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook