January 29, 2010 3:34 PM

Turning E. Coli into Road-Ready Diesel

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  This article was written by Discover's Smriti Rao.

Most of us associate the bacteria E. coli with nasty stomach ailments. But a new study published in Nature magazine suggests E. coli can not just turn stomachs, but could potentially turn the wheels of your car, since a genetically engineered strain of the bacteria has produced clean, road-ready biodiesel.

The bacteria can work on any type of biomass, including wood chip, switchgrass, and the plant parts that are left behind after a harvest-all contain cellulose, a structural material that comprises much of a plant's mass. Study coauthor Jay Keasling and his colleagues report engineering E. coli bacteria to synthesize and excrete the enzyme hemicellulase, which breaks down cellulose into sugars.

The bacteria can then convert those sugars into a variety of chemicals-diesel fuel among them. The final products are excreted by the bacteria and then float to the top of the fermentation vat before being siphoned off [Technology Review].

E. coli bacteria naturally turn sugars into fatty acids to build their cell membranes; the researchers just tweaked the bacterium's genetics a bit. The researchers basically amplified and then short-circuited E. coli's internal machinery for producing large fatty-acid molecules, enabling them to convert precursor molecules directly into fuels and other chemicals…. In all, the authors report more than a dozen genetic modifications [Nature].

Researchers said the process could be refined to produce multiple chemical products ranging from jet fuel to solvents and lubricants [MSNBC]. However, they cautioned that the study was a "proof of concept" rather than a full demonstration of a commercially viable process.

Still, the news of bacteria producing biofuels has been welcomed by biofuel manufacturers who usually use corn and sugarcane to produce ethanol; these processes have raised ethical questions about using food crops for fuel.

This new bacterial biofuel technique avoids such problems. The cellulosic biomass doesn't have to come from plants that are consumed by humans or used in animal feedstocks, so the process doesn't add undue pressure on global food prices, and since the E. coli can ferment and convert the biomass to biofuel all at once the process could greatly improve the economics of biofuel production [Popular Science].

Study coauthor Keasling is certainly excited about the possibilities. "We've got a billion tons of biomass every year that goes unused," said Jay Keasling…. Theoretically, the fuel produced from biomass could make up for as much as 50 percent of U.S. oil imports. "We want to turn the U.S. Midwest into the new 'Mideast,'" Keasling said [MSNBC].

By Smriti Rao:
Reprinted with permission from Discover

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment
by rf35 February 1, 2010 6:13 AM EST
This is a great alternative to corn-based fuel. However, it fails to address the fact that something is still being burned. The internal combustion engine, whatever fuel is used, is still the problem. There will always be a need for what are now petroleum-based products and this may be a great way to get away from using actual petroleum for many of those. Still, running a car should not be one of them. Hydrogen fuel cell technology seems to be mature enough to start the rollout of a hydrogen infrastructure (the only real issue holding back the mass adoption of this). The mass production of hydrogen using algae and sea water is now possible, storage and transportation are not that difficult, and Honda has put the engine in a car. Now all we need are the places to fill up. We need to elect representatives that will cut the political/economic BS and give business the incentives they require get this moving before it's too late.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 January 30, 2010 1:12 AM EST
Well you should because you put some of them into your car every time you fill up and they are running out of them. It will be the biggest problem to face the next generation and it will adversely affect all of their lives.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 January 29, 2010 3:38 PM EST
Think of all the sea creatures going to the bottom on inland seas and becoming petroleum. Nature did that over millions of years and now we are taking all that carbon the earth put away and spewing it BACK into the atmosphere in a few hundred years.
Reply to this comment
by cowardlyimbecile January 29, 2010 10:51 PM EST
I'm afraid to think about sea creatures.
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook