January 24, 2010 4:46 PM

McCain: Campaign Finance Reform Is Dead

By
Michelle Levi
(CBS)  Senator John McCain, who helped rewrite the nation's campaign finance laws, said Sunday that this week's Supreme Court ruling removing limits from corporate spending on political advertising means that campaign finance reform is dead.

"I don't think there's much that can be done," he told "Face the Nation" moderator Bob Schieffer.

McCain said he was not surprised by Court's decision: "I went over to observe the oral arguments," he said. "It was clear that Justice Roberts, Alito and Scalia, by their very skeptical and even sarcastic comments, were very much opposed to it.

"I think that it was interesting that they have had no experience in the political arena," McCain said. "I was reminded of the story of Lyndon Johnson, when he was vice president, was told about President Kennedy's appointments of all these brilliant people, and he said, 'You know, I wish one of them had run for county sheriff.'"

The Republican senator noted that in prior Court hearing on the issue of campaign financing, Justices Rehnquist and O'Connor had taken a different position. "Both had significant political experience; Justices Roberts, Alito and Scalia have none," he said.

"We are going to see now an inundation of special-interest money into political campaigns," McCain warned. "I think that diminishes the influence of average citizens."

Schieffer asked McCain if he thought the issue of campaign finance reform was "dead."

"Oh, I think so." He predicted a backlash would occur when people see the amounts of unfettered money, from corporations and unions, that will go into political campaigns.

"But in the short term, the Supreme Court has spoken. I respect their decision," he conceded.

Also on the program, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., invited McCain to work together with him on a new campaign finance bill.

"I would say to John McCain, join me in a public financing effort," he told Schieffer. "I've got the bill in with John Larson of Connecticut. Let's really take the reform on that many states already have started, including the state of Arizona, to make sure that every candidate of modest means has a chance to run and win."

Federal Reserve Chairman Nomination

Also during the interview, McCain said he is leaning against the reconfirmation of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

"I'm very skeptical about his nomination. I'm worried that if his nomination is turned down, the effect that it might have. But the fact is that Chairman Bernanke was in charge when we hit the iceberg. And his policies were partially responsible for the meltdown that we experienced. I think that he should be held accountable . . . I'm both concerned and leaning against," he said.

Durbin said he plans to vote for reconfirmation, though he "still has unanswered questions."

Asked about President Obama's passed deadline for closing Guantanamo Bay prison, McCain admitted that the president made a "mistake."

"The president's mistake was announcing the closure within a year without having all the policies in place to achieve that," he said. "So Guantanamo Bay must remain open until such time as we have a coherent, comprehensive policy addressing the detainees. And many of them cannot be released, especially to some of the countries that . . . they've been released to, and they've gone back into the fight," he told Schieffer.





Watch CBS News Videos Online

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 188 Comments
by jim4u2 November 20, 2011 8:11 PM EST
Wrong John, on the way is a constitutional admendment to take the Pimps and Polital ****** drug of choice out ot the equation! MONEY!
Reply to this comment
by Danceswithdachshunds January 26, 2010 1:31 PM EST
Why should I fear allowing corporations to present their viewpoints? They are in business to make money and that money EMPLOYS PEOPLE and flows to stockholders - US. So how can their input, based on increasing their business to employ more people and pad our IRAs and 401Ks be such a bad thing? There used to be a saying, "What's good for GM is good for the country." When Obama took over GM the phrase became, "What's bad for GM is bad for the country." Too bad GM wasn't allowed to voice its opinion concerning how the government shackled them into bankruptcy. Maybe the next big company on the ropes and about to lay off ten's of thousands of people can now voice it's opinion of HOW government is at the core of its problem - before it decides to close or leave the USA?
Reply to this comment
by Clouseau2 January 26, 2010 3:05 PM EST
Obama could have done nothing and watch GM get liquidated. Somehow I doubt that would have made the people on the right very happy; they would be foaming at the mouth at Obama's "destruction of the American manufacturing sector." Now Bush managed to kill off both Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns (who just happen to be competitors to Goldman Sachs) and bring the entire financial sector to collapse ... At least Obama is doing the right thing and proposing we reinstate the regulations that prevent the financial sector from becoming a bloated mess guaranteed to fail.
by Clouseau2 January 26, 2010 12:59 AM EST
Union membership is down to 8% of employees in the private sector. Let's not pretend they have even close to the kind of power corporations will have with the new rules that completely legalize corruption to an even greater scale than before. The only real solution is public financing of elections; if you accept public financing and can raise a large number of $5 donations you will get matched funds allowing you to ignore special interests. It sounds expensive, paying for campaigns, but compared to the kind of freebies corporations get by bribing politicians it's cheap.
Reply to this comment
by stychokiller January 25, 2010 8:01 PM EST
You want real campaign reform, take away an Incumbent's franking privileges and make it a public record who gets how much money and from whom, down to the last penny.
The American people are smart enough to recognize Quid Pro Quos when they occur.
Reply to this comment
by SueZeeeQue January 25, 2010 10:45 PM EST
Good idea.

But just try to get a bunch of lawmakers to vote that in.
by velma179 January 25, 2010 11:21 PM EST
You know this is a great idea.

We really should stop getting all our hackles up about the President (whether it's Clinton, Bush, Obama, Reagan or the original George... Washington) -- just because ONE guy or girl (perhaps, someday) is an easy target.

It is Congress where the slime collects. I mean that in a scientific way -- though there IS a certain kind of personality flaw that does apply. Really, have you ever had a fish tank that didn't get cleaned and aerated regularly.. slime is the result.

Congress, having the ability to make the laws, makes the rules for themselves -- the Prez can only say okay or no way and Congress, with enough members in agreement can tell the Exec... we say yea, you go away.
Meanwhile we-the-people sit on the sidelines like broodmares only needed to give life to Congress every two, four, six years. Yeah, they want our vote and they covet it, but after they get it... they roll over and say "close the door on your way out".

Yes, we need to do something, but I am not sure it is just kicking all the incumbents out -- all we'll get is new incumbents. I'd say we need to stop being such pissants to each other and realize our country is at stake. The moneyed interests that would create a ruling and a serving class are not "going to" do it -- they already have the cement drying.

This Supreme Court decision is the "back story" of a very scary sci-fi movie... we need to change that story and we need to do it now... and do it together.
by culturechang January 25, 2010 5:52 PM EST
Abraham Lincoln stated, "I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me, and causes me to tremble for the safety of our country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the republic is destroyed."

Boy did he nail that. And the extreme conservatives are the prejudiced ones because it will do nothing but screw them over too.....yet they believe it soley because thier party (and Sarah Palin) told them to believe it.
Reply to this comment
by SueZeeeQue January 25, 2010 10:46 PM EST
Exactly.
by GreatDepression January 25, 2010 5:49 PM EST
America just switched from a Democracy to a Oligarchy State.

They need to replace all references to 'WE THE PEOPLE...' with 'WE THE CORPORATIONS AND UNIONS...' in the U.S. Constitution and it's Amendments.
Reply to this comment
by culturechang January 25, 2010 5:55 PM EST
Dont need to replace the words. When the court rules in direct contradiction to the Constitution, it no longer matters what it says....it only matters what they rule....until another court overturns it.
by Empire-George- January 25, 2010 4:38 PM EST
by velma179 January 25, 2010 10:58 AM EST

Velma, your senario is similar to those in Unions, who pay dues, yet don't support the candidate that the union leadership wishes to endorse, it's really too bad.

Within a corporation, I would suspect it is the company owners who decide who or which campaign they wish to donate to....and since they are the owners or upper management, they make that decision which may or may not be in the best interests of the corporation....the worker doesn't make these decisions.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George- January 25, 2010 4:40 PM EST
velma179

PS: Jets Lost, bummer
by noloyalisti January 25, 2010 4:42 PM EST
The difference between corporations and unions are that unions are a democracy and corporations represent anti-democracy. Corporations exist for one single reason: profits. Unions exist for the health and safety and welfare of the people who create the wealth: the workers.

Do NOT try to equate these diametrically opposed enities.
by noloyalisti January 25, 2010 4:16 PM EST
Of course the big winner are the big corporations whose Mafia can really influence the government now. It is no longer We the People. And these same big corporations who are profiting off of violent occupations will also profit from advertising since they all own and run the media.
Reply to this comment
by makemyday2day January 25, 2010 6:37 PM EST
noloyalisti - Unions are NO better than the corporations. They're both in it for the same thing: MONEY! Union 'leadership' does NOT listen to its members - they're every bit as greedy as the CEO of a corporation. You make me laugh when you refer to the big corporations "Mafia" and their government 'influence'. Ever hear of Jimmy Hoffa??!!
by hockeymom441 January 25, 2010 3:40 PM EST
"We are going to see now an inundation of special-interest money into political campaigns," McCain warned. "I think that diminishes the influence of average citizens."

This is exactly what some political figures want! They want those w/ money to make all the decisions; screw the average guy. Sadly the average guy believes everything he/she sees on TV... so it's anyone's guess what will be real.
Reply to this comment
by culturechang January 25, 2010 5:47 PM EST
It is amazing how many people don't ever know of this decision. That is the problem. Too few care because it has not immediate (today) impact on thier lives.
by likeitbe January 25, 2010 10:30 AM EST
We all knew that Campaign Finance Reform died with Obama and his half Billion dollar special interest campaign. Why is this news?
Reply to this comment
by Fatesrider January 25, 2010 4:34 PM EST
If you mean the raising of campaign contributions by everyday people, that's always been allowed. Very few special interests were involved in his campaign. But then, those who are so anti-anything-left-of-an-extremist-right-wing-radical point of view will believe anything Rush says.
by culturechang January 25, 2010 5:46 PM EST
Obama had nothing to do with this court decision.

Voters should be the only source of money for campaigns.....not corporations or unions or special (radical) interest groups. We have too many elected officials who owe thier souls to campaign contributors instead of the voters.
See all 188 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook