AP/ January 16, 2010, 5:08 PM

Mass. Senate: It's the Bank Fee, Stupid

The U.S. Senate candidates in Massachusetts clashed Saturday over a proposed bank bailout tax, abandoning health care for a new issue that the White House hopes will attract mainstream voters angry about Wall Street abuses and that Republicans say affirms Democrats as a pro-tax party.

A day before President Barack Obama's late visit to try to preserve a 60th Senate vote critical to his agenda, Democrat Martha Coakley and Republican Scott Brown tussled over the president's tax plan. The candidates are in a dead heat heading into Tuesday's election to replace the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, despite the state's long Democratic tradition and Kennedy's cherished stature.

"When President Obama says, 'Let's get our taxpayer dollar back,' I'm standing with him, and I'm standing with you," Coakley told union members about to canvass on her behalf.

Brown said he was the one with the working class in mind. He said the tax would restrict banks from making loans and that consumers would end up paying higher service and ATM fees.

President Obama contends that with banks shelling out for big bonuses, they can afford the tax. It would be used to close a deficit in the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which many big banks used for bailouts but have since repaid.

"I'm not in favor of a huge payout" for bank executives," Brown said. "The bottom line is a tax right now on anybody in the midst of a recession is not the way to go."

Brown vs. Coakley: A Primer

The state senator told supporters at a series of bus tour stops that it was one of many taxes Coakley would impose if she were elected.

The Democrats' challenge was evident during her first appearance Saturday. The Massachusetts attorney general sought to flex the party's traditional union muscle during a stop at an International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers hall, but several speakers acknowledged many in the rank and file are interested in Brown.

"I have a lot of friends out there that are talking about voting the other way for whatever reason," state Rep. Marty Walsh, a Boston Democrat, told the crowd. "Look at their records, and then come back and tell me with a straight face that our friends can vote for the other side, because the other side doesn't care about working-class people."

Robert Haynes, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO, said: "A lot of our members are dramatically uninformed about this election and about the positions of the two candidates in this race."

His voice rising to a yell, Haynes said: "If there's anybody in this room, or any brother or sister of yours across this commonwealth, that's suffering from some misconception, it's up to us tell them."

President Obama planned a quick dash to Boston Sunday to appear with Coakley in a gymnasium at Northeastern University.

"I think he will provide the focus ... for voters in Massachusetts about what's really at stake here," she said.

In suburban Quincy, Brown appeared with former Massachusetts Republican Gov. William F. Weld, now a corporate lawyer in New York. Weld endorsed Mr. Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign, but he said voters are now suffering "spending fatigue and tax fatigue."

Of Brown, Weld said, "He's not going to be a rubber stamp for every trillion dollars that comes along."

Weld remains popular because of his record of fiscal conservatism and social liberalism. Brown has avoided appearing with the most recent Republican governor, Mitt Romney, who took a sharply conservative turn while running for president in 2008.

Coakley and Brown also clashed over his decision not to provide health insurance for his campaign staff. Coakley provides coverage for her workers, but Brown treats them as independent contractors. They either have insurance from other jobs or get a salary bump to get coverage under the state's universal health care program. The move also allows Brown to avoid payroll taxes.

"Scott Brown has a campaign, he has employees, he doesn't pay health care for his employees," Coakley said. "All you need to do is look at his action, what he's done."

Brown retorted: "The people who are working for me, they're happy."

The third candidate in the race, independent Joseph L. Kennedy, has largely limited his campaign to debate appearances.

Coakley crushed three opponents in December's party primary, gaining nearly 50 percent of the vote and beating her next closest rival by 19 percentage points. Brown has never run statewide and was largely unknown in a state where he and his fellow Republicans represent only 15 percent of the Legislature.

But he has surged with aggressive campaigning while Coakley employed a Rose Garden strategy to try to avoid a general election mistake. Brown has risen while Coakley has fallen as voters exhibit the same pro-populism, anti-government sentiment that propelled Republicans to victory in November's gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia.

Democrats and Republicans say internal polls show the race has tightened as some Democrats return to the party in the waning days. But Brown still has enthusiasm on his side, and is viewed more favorably than Coakley.

Turnout will be critical, both sides agree.
By Associated Press Writers Glen Johnson and Beth Fouhy; AP National Political Writer Liz Sidoti contributed to this report from Washington
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
173 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gboyd41 says:
Kunicich-a congressman who can be bought off with a fancy plane-ride? Compares well with my Mo congressman who went to Copenhagen with Pelosi. The only reason I can see is to party in a $1200/night room-paid for by taxpayers. Can't wait till Nov.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
Yes, I am talking non-violent revolution. In order to do this, we (millions of us) must recognize who is really running things and why. It is big corporations who exist for one thing and one thing only: profits. They have taken over the government for profit, that is why they are able to pay the average CEO 1,700 times the average worker and get away with the looting legally.

We already have a class war here, big time.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
The fact is that big corporations only provide jobs because they have to. If they could make the same obscene profits without creating jobs, they would do it in a heartbeat.

I have no problems with big corporations as long as 1) they don't have human rights, 2) have no corporate lobbyists, 3) consistently serve the common good including protecting civil and human rights, the environment and good jobs.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Berkeley-SkirtLifter says:
by noloyalisti January 19, 2010 3:18 PM EST

Instead of fighting and arguing amongst ourselves, we need to unite against the common enemy, the big corporation/government cabal run by the top 1%. Unless we do that, NOTHING will ever get better for We the People. It really is that simple.

_____

Well...

you say wanna revo-olutio -uhn weh-ell ya know-o-o...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
This is the state of the United States: Under Republicans, man exploits man. Under Democrats it is just the opposite.

Instead of fighting and arguing amongst ourselves, we need to unite against the common enemy, the big corporation/government cabal run by the top 1%. Unless we do that, NOTHING will ever get better for We the People. It really is that simple.
reply
Empire-George- replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by noloyalisti January 19, 2010 3:18 PM EST

TO YOU, corporations are evil in an effort to push your class warfare.

To everyone else in the country, they realize Corporations provide a pay-check for millions of Americans and you are a threat to their livelihood.

Big government, that I will join you in making smaller.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Empire-George- says:
by noloyalisti January 19, 2010 2:04 PM EST

MA voters would want to put the keys back in the hands of the right wing wackos who drove the US off the cliff
________________

Isn't that a little ironic, considering what happened to Kennedy at Chappaquiddick ??

I think the People of Massachusetts are tired of Liberals driving the car out of control, claiming they are cleaning up messes while crashing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
Don't blame Obama, he is just the next puppet for the big corporations. We had the chance to elect Kucinich who may have stood up to the military industrial complex.

Right wing big corporations own and run the media, the military and the government for their profit. The only thing that will work is for us to organize against the top 1% and threaten or carry out general strikes until we have a progressive society. It's just that simple.
reply
Empire-George- replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by noloyalisti January 19, 2010 2:49 PM EST

We had the chance to elect Kucinich
___________________

Kucinich ?? BBWaaaaaaaahhhhhHH !!! LMAO

Is that who washed your brain ?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rexrox2 says:
IT'S OBAMA STUPID. People are finding out about Obama's plans for this country, despite the best efforts of CBS, that's it. Also, I admire CBS' determination. Todays headlines:
Palin
Israel gets too much money
Pat Robertson
Limbaugh
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
noloyalisti says:
I have a really hard time believing that MA voters would want to put the keys back in the hands of the right wing wackos who drove the US off the cliff. And then fled the scene of the accident.

Well, the American people are nothing if not frightened and ignorant, I'm sorry to say.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
RedWings_ninety_one says:
by Empire-George- January 18, 2010 2:28 PM EST

My point is, cash can be lost or stolen, bank cards can be replaced, if lost/stolen...with no loss of money if lost....so there are certain advantages of ATM cards and C/C's.
__________________________________________________________________
I guess I have no idea how New York works, but in Michigan, cash will get you along way. There are soooo many places here that offer automatic acceptance regardless of bad credit or no credit. Too much of America's money now a days is credit on a computer. I hear the UK has outlawed checks, and the US MAY soon follow. Keyword: may, which is why it is all capitals.
reply
See all 173 Comments