January 14, 2010 10:31 PM

Obama on Bank Tax: We Want Our Money Back

By
CBSNews
(AP)  Updated 12:45 p.m. ET

President Barack Obama said Thursday he wants to tax banks to recoup the public bailout of foundering firms at the height of the financial crisis. "We want our money back," he said.

In a brief appearance with advisers at the White House, Obama branded the latest round of bank bonuses as "obscene." But he said his goal was to prevent such excesses in the future, not to punish banks for past behavior.

It was an emphatic and populist tone for a president keenly aware of public antipathy toward Wall Street. With the sharp words, he also tried to deflect some of the growing skepticism aimed at his own economic policies as unemployment stubbornly hovers around 10 percent.

Obama said big banks had acted irresponsibility, taken reckless risk for short-term profits and plunged into a crisis of their own making. He cast the struggle ahead as one between the finance industry and average people.

"We are already hearing a hue and cry from Wall Street, suggesting that this proposed fee is not only unwelcome but unfair, that by some twisted logic, it is more appropriate for the American people to bear the cost of the bailout rather than the industry that benefited from it, even though these executives are out there giving themselves huge bonuses," Obama said.

Jill Schlesinger on What to Call the New Tax

He renewed his call for a regulatory overhaul of the industry and scolded bankers for opposing the tighter oversight in legislation moving through Congress.

"What I'd say to these executives is this: Instead of setting a phalanx of lobbyists to fight this proposal or employing an army of lawyers and accountants to help evade the fee, I'd suggest you might want to consider simply meeting your responsibility," Obama said.

The president is proposing a tax of 0.15 percent on the liabilities of large financial institutions. It would apply only to those companies with assets of more than $50 billion - a group estimated at about 50.

They would have to pay up even though many did not accept any taxpayer assistance and most that did have repaid the infusions.

AP
Add a Comment See all 173 Comments
by ysroq1 January 22, 2010 11:21 PM EST
Hey, PrezBO, the banks did pay back the TARP loans, many of which were forced upon them, with interest. We want OUR money back, buddy! I'm happy to take mine in the form of a big, fat tax cut.
Reply to this comment
by brianfromglencoe January 16, 2010 2:00 PM EST
Two questions for Obama supporters. Can you explain how it is fair if two individuals have the exact same job description, work the exact same hours, make exactly the same compensation and have the same health coverage and yet the one employee in a union does not have to pay taxes but the other does. Second, why is Obama demonizing those banks that were told they must take the bailout and then paid every penny back plus 17% interest to the governmment, and those banks that never took a penny period. Shouldn't he focus his ire on those banks that haven't paid us back?Brian
Reply to this comment
by mars7578 January 16, 2010 8:07 AM EST
Congress so far has neglected to deal with the main cause of the economic demise of capitalism.Capitalism will not work until Congress straighten out the tax codes. The Obama administation and this democratic congress are trying to tweak this trickle down based tax system we have.When are they going to realize that the down side greatly outweigh the huge profits for the few.This is third world economics and we are experiencing third world crisises thoughout the country.
Reply to this comment
by FP1970 January 15, 2010 1:10 PM EST
Who could object to that? A fee on the big evil banks? Anyone with common sense that's who!!Obama is a typical, reckless, blinkered Socialist who likes to propose schemes that appeal to people's emotions but discourage business activity and discourage businsesses from getting bigger and hiring more people. A lot of bankers contributed to the mortgage crisis but the seed of the whole problem was gov't intervention in the banking sector, in other words forcing or encouraging loans to people that don't actually qualify for them. If you let banks evaluate the risk themselves and lend who they want to lend to, everyone will be better off and housing bubbles will be a heck of a lot less likely. Banks will be able to grow profitably and pay taxes and play their role in the economy. Of course, that leaves parasite community organizers with not much to do.
Reply to this comment
by nowhiningallowed January 15, 2010 1:45 PM EST
I think the taxpayers should be repaid for all of the reckless spending by the likes of ACORN, CETA, and a host of other failed social programs that have only benefited a few, versus the majority. It's the taxpayers who've gotten taken for a ride.
by FP1970 January 15, 2010 1:09 PM EST
Who could object to that? A fee on the big evil banks? Anyone with common sense that's who!!Obama is a typical, reckless, blinkered Socialist who likes to propose schemes that appeal to people's emotions but discourage business activity and discourage businsesses from getting bigger and hiring more people. A lot of bankers contributed to the mortgage crisis but the seed of the whole problem was gov't intervention in the banking sector, in other words forcing or encouraging loans to people that don't actually qualify for them. If you let banks evaluate the risk themselves and lend who they want to lend to, everyone will be better off and housing bubbles will be a heck of a lot less likely. Banks will be able to grow profitably and pay taxes and play their role in the economy. Of course, that leaves parasite community organizers with not much to do.
Reply to this comment
by indiethink January 15, 2010 1:44 PM EST
Please go to the beginning of this discussion, there is valuable information here.

Businesses aren't growing because banks aren't lending. When one of these largest 50 firms jacked my credit card rate from 9% tp 29% I closed all my accounts and went to a credit union. My excellent credit rating did not save me from corporate usery.

Some other information available here is the Federal Reserve Invistagative Report. In a nut shell, only 20% of default loans are in neighborhoods that have "parasite community organizers". Seems 80% of defaults are in these bankers own neighborhoods.

Deregulation of banks removed goverment intervention on some promise (wink wink, nudge nudge)that the banks would police themselves. Seems that didn't work out so well. Now the good suffer with the bad for condoning unethical behavior from their own.

Banks did "evaluate risks themselves". Lied about the risk. Passed it off to Fannie and Freddie.

The tax proposed is 0.15%. Small consequence for the harm done to the entire country.
by rocketjl January 15, 2010 12:13 PM EST
Obama has developed a pattern to go public when he covers a topic that will put in the we category, in a we against them battle. Needless to say that he has already met with 'them' days before and said, OK, now trust me.
Reply to this comment
by velma179 January 15, 2010 10:52 AM EST
by teaparty2010 January 15, 2010 6:00 AM EST

"The tide has turned. Americans have seen the light and the Giant is awake. How much Hope and how much Change have you really seen?"

____________

Please. Your group isn't the "sleeping giant", but you are among the people/ideologues who lost political power through the last election processes.

Folks like you have been around for a long, long time and you always surface when a there is a Democrat majority, especially if it includes the Executive Branch. Your complaints are nothing new and though you furl them at the current administration as if this was the first time, they are weak in their sheer predictability.

You scream "socialism" and call for YOUR liberty (I don't think you approve of MY liberty because votes I freely cast, put five of these Dems in office -- five people is all any of us get to choose, by the way). You rail against "big" government, while you cry for it to control and legislate our personal decisions. You ask for war and don't count the cost while you cling to a penny that would go to help the poor and infirm.

No, you are not the sleeping giant awakened, you are the same old puny voice of dissent when your team lost control.

"Americans have seen the light"? Well, some of us have, that's why most of us who took the responsibility and right to vote seriously, cast those votes as we did.

You clearly have no vision -- or you would know, we don't "see" hope... it holds in our hearts. And as for change... I definitely see it every day, I hear it, I feel it and I HOPE it continues. Yes, it moves slowly sometimes, but isn't that why hope is necessary.

I hope you one day will have eyes to see....
Reply to this comment
by teaparty2010 January 15, 2010 10:55 AM EST
My Group, is the other 80% of America. We see this and will not follow blindly.
by teaparty2010 January 15, 2010 10:55 AM EST
My Group, is the other 80% of America. We see this and will not follow blindly.
by jeffinpa1234 January 15, 2010 10:29 AM EST
Seems to me that GM. Crysler and AIG is who the president should be asking for the payments for the levy!

A clueless President elected by clueless voters....and now he double crosses the very voters that elected him by not allowing health care debates on C-Span and conducting late night meeting with the Unions!

He promised a these discussions would be open and all he has done is do in secret! This guy is a liaer and a shame! Wake up America.
Reply to this comment
by velma179 January 15, 2010 11:10 AM EST
by jeffinpa1234 January 15, 2010 10:29 AM EST

I voted for Obama. You can call me clueless all you want, but at least I know how to use a television.

I have watched hours and hours of Congressional health care reform legislation debate on C-SPAN.

I am not remotely offended by having the conference negotiations between the House and the Senate held behind closed doors. I find it to be necessary when there has been so much obfuscation and outright lying going on concerning the issues.
Yep, it's just the Democrats and while I really do not want "one party rule" -- I also understand that within the Democrat party exists all three political viewpoints... conservative, moderate and liberal, so I am comfortable with the one party making these decisions today.
If the Republicans could begin to offer constructive solutions and not sound bytes of dissent only, I'd love to see the entire Congress working for the American people, all of us -- not just the ones whose vote they covet.

Your comment: "He promised a these discussions would be open and all he has done is do in secret! This guy is a liaer and a shame! Wake up America." is ludicrous.

He didn't promise anything, for one. He did state his good intentions and like any of us humans, good intentions often meet harsh reality.

The discussions are being done by Congress -- the president does not have the authority to tell them what to do, it's in the Constitution.... called "separation of powers".

Your hyperbole "all he has done..." assertion is plain not true. And in that, person -- you have no standing to call someone else a liar.

Period.

America is awake. We just aren't all looking at the same sunrise. I hope you will have eyes to see one day...
by gboyd41 January 15, 2010 9:49 AM EST
Don't worry, BO will pander to the SEIU, after all, they helped him get elected.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 January 15, 2010 7:47 AM EST
So he wants to recoup the the bailout money. Maybe he should think about recooping it from those that accepted it and have not yet paid it back. Many of these banks already payed back the money with interest. How about the auto companies paying back what they took? Oh, wait a minute, that would affect his union buddies and we can't have that. Obama is a hypocrit that is trying to create class warfare to promote his socialist idealogy.
Reply to this comment
by gboyd41 January 15, 2010 8:23 AM EST
endurorob_5-you are correct,sir. But, "auto" can't/will not pay the taxpayers back. At this point, I think BO would settle for some "baby-back" ribs. Sounds GOOD.
See all 173 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook