60 Minutes
July 24, 2006 2:08 PM

Outrage over photos of girls signing bombs

By
Mike Yamamoto
Topics

Any images from a war zone are controversial, but the level of disturbance rises exponentially when children are involved. So not surprisingly, the rhetoric has run rampant with the publication of photos depicting Israeli girls signing shells apparently destined for Lebanon.

Bombs

Although some bloggers praised the images for portraying the tragedy of war, others pointed out that the photos have been predictably used for propaganda on all sides. A common theme among several posts is the responsibility of newspapers and other media in publishing photos that are certain to provoke deep emotions at a most volatile time.

And, as with any form of information today, the issue was additionally complicated because of the instant circulation afforded by the Web. Once they were picked up from such mass-distribution photo sites as Flickr--and often presented with little or no context--control over the interpretation of the images became impossible.

Blog community response:

"What we would suggest is that editors think not just about the emotional response certain photographs can elicit, but also about whether in any given case they have supplied readers with the information they need to really understand what it is they are seeing."
--CJR Daily

"While the bomb-signing event is certainly newsworthy, BAGNewsNotes makes the additional point that children are almost certainly being used to propagandize a particular ideology. And that's just outrageous."
--slatta

"Better for them that they see what's going down. For us, on the other hand, unaware of the stage (and unwitting consumers of 'knock out' information product), we can only be outraged."
--BAGnewsNotes


  • Mike Yamamoto is an executive editor for CNET News.com.

11 Comments +

Follow 60 Minutes

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
60 Minutes on Facebook