AP/ January 12, 2010, 8:40 AM

U.S. Probes Afghan Reconstruction Abuses

The U.S. agency overseeing the multibillion dollar Afghanistan reconstruction effort is investigating 38 criminal cases ranging from contract fraud to theft - most involving non-Afghans, officials said Tuesday.

The reconstruction effort has come under increased scrutiny as Defense Department contractors pour into Afghanistan to support the U.S. military surge. But the Office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, headed by retired Marine Corps Gen. Arnold Fields, was only established by Congress in 2008, nearly seven years after the U.S. invasion to oust the Taliban.

Just 10 of the criminal cases under the microscope involve Afghans only, while the rest involve U.S. and other foreigners, according to Raymond DiNunzio, the agency's assistant inspector general for inspections. He would not elaborate since the cases are under investigation.

Afghanistan also faces intense pressure to control rampant corruption in the country, but its institutions are weak after years of war and civil strife.

Fields acknowledged that the government might not be ready to deal with the flow of additional funds into Afghanistan as the international communicate escalates the mission to stabilize the country.

"We suspect ... that there may not necessarily be the capacity here to absorb additional funding when it comes to the government of Afghanistan, but we are not sure yet," he said at a news conference at the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.

He said his office also plans to increase staff from 90 in 2008 to 118 by the end of this year and a projected 132 in 2011.

"We are ramping up commensurate with the increased numbers and spending expected here in Afghanistan," he said.

The international community has invested more than $60 billion since 2002 in reconstruction efforts, including $40 billion from the U.S. alone. Concerns have been raised in past months that the waste and fraud that has undermined the U.S. reconstruction effort in Iraq is being repeated in Afghanistan, particularly as the number of contractors rises.

More than 60 percent of the investigators had experience in Iraq, DiNunzio said.

"They have come over from our sister agency responsible for Iraq reconstruction as the U.S. winds down its involvement in that country," he said.

DiNunzio said 40 percent of the criminal cases involve allegations of program fraud, procurement fraud or contract fraud while the other 60 percent involve bribery allegations and theft of emergency military funds. Two other investigations are under way into cases involving alleged negligence and incompetence, he said.

The agency also has stepped up efforts to involve the public, opening a hot line for reports of fraud involving U.S. reconstruction funds.

The inspector general's office is responsible for monitoring a broad range of projects, including training of the Afghan army and police, and ensuring U.S. tax dollars are spent properly.
© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
15 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sjc_1 says:
The whole invasion of Afghanistan and then Iraq were seen as great opportunities to profit by several companies. Two of those were Halliburton (KBR) and Bechtel. Halliburton is Dick Cheney's old company and Bechtel has been a friend of the Bush family for decades. Does anyone see a conflict of interest? I see one as big as the great outdoors, but no one said anything about that and no one followed up to see if they really earned their money by completing the job in a quality way nor whether the job was done at a fair price with the no bid contracts. It was one big looting and friends made a bundle.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
inventagod says:
Massive riches for defense contractors?

You DON'T SAY!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
watchdogtexas says:
Why are we paying to rebuild. Its up to them.
reply
DaVicar8 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
yeah...right
sjc_1 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If a failed state stops failing they are no longer a haven for terrorists. This is a good use of money to bring these people into the 21st century and make them strong enough to resist the Taliban who would just take them back into the 12th century and cause problems for the rest of the world for decades to come.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ramos1129 says:
This is nothing new. As long as we are in Afghan, it is accepted that there will be graft and corruption and that is part of the process. The only way to stop these crimes is to turn off the money spigot. That we will not do.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rightbehind says:
What's even worse is the the "private army" contractors. They make more than 5 times what our troops are paid and have the best of gear. Our troops are instant targets because they wear the uniform. We need to stop these private armies. It's shameful. I would rather we pay our troops better.
reply
jgg000101 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
actually the private contractors like blackwater are all former special ops or green berets. Not only are they involved in the most dangerous missions ie. pursuing high profile targets in remote areas, but they are also the security of choice for politicians visiting war zones.
That's why obama, pelosi et al have retained them. In a war, personally I want the biggest baddest mf'ers on my side and if they are willing to risk their lives and go beyond their initial call of duty I have no problem with paying them what they are worth.
jgg000101 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
actually the private contractors like blackwater are all former special ops or green berets. Not only are they involved in the most dangerous missions ie. pursuing high profile targets in remote areas, but they are also the security of choice for politicians visiting war zones.
That's why obama, pelosi et al have retained them. In a war, personally I want the biggest baddest mf'ers on my side and if they are willing to risk their lives and go beyond their initial call of duty I have no problem with paying them what they are worth.
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
mturner1938 says:
OK, so more waste has been found and now it's going to be investigated. That's all they ever do is investigate. Do something about it! Stop all this sitting around twiddling thumbs and make a move on it! DO SOMETHING!!!!!!!!!!!!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wyodutch says:
So... the idiot American taxpayers have been forced to shell out $40 Billion dollars to "rebuild" Afghanistan.
.
Just how big would a $40 billion pile of tax dollars be?
.
The largest American currency in circulation is the $100 bill.
.
A million dollars in $100 bills would weigh 22 pounds.
.
A billion dollars in $100 bills would weigh 22,000 pounds.
.
40 billion dollars in $100 bills weighs 888,000 pounds.
.
Makes ya wanna shout for joy.. don't it? That the morons in the Bush and Obama administrations, in cahoots with the criminals in Congress... dropped 440 TONS of US $100 bills on Afghanistan for "rebuilding".
.
Remember.. that doesn't include any "war funds".
.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
reply
timdgrim replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Good Post! Yet we will still follow like sheep in a herd behind the great United States of America INC. Hail to your Wall Street masters sheeple. It's bonus time, and YOUR money will pave THEIR streets in gold.
Constitionalist replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kinda brings the reason for the second ammendment in focus, huh?
See all 15 Comments