January 12, 2010 1:15 PM

Vatican on "Avatar": It's Sappy and Bland

By
CBSNews
(AP)  Unlike much of the world, the Vatican is not awed by the film "Avatar."

James Cameron's big-grossing, 3-D spectacle has earned lukewarm reviews by both the Vatican newspaper and its radio station, which say the movie is simplistic in its plot is superficial in its eco-message, despite groundbreaking visual effects.

Perhaps more significantly, the Vatican takes the movie to task for flirting with what it says is the worship of nature as a substitute for religion.

"So much stupefying, enchanting technology, but few genuine emotions," said Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano, which devoted three articles to "Avatar" in its Sunday editions.

Vatican Radio called it "rather harmless" but added: "We doubt that this is an heir to those sci-fi masterpieces that - for reasons other than special effects - have marked cinema history."

The story of the tall blue creatures who inhabit Pandora and contend with humans intent on grabbing the resources of their planet has made over $1.1 billion at box offices worldwide. Partly boosted by higher 3-D ticket prices, "Avatar" looks well on its way to becoming the biggest grossing movie of all time.

"Pandora is the planet that cleverly winks at all those pseudo-doctrines that turn ecology into the religion of the millennium," Vatican Radio said. "Nature is no longer a creation to defend, but a divinity to worship."

L'Osservatore Romano said the movie's plot is unoriginal and its message not new. It faulted Cameron for taking a "bland approach."

"He tells the story without going deep into it, and ends up falling into sappiness," it said.

The reviews came out after a red carpet preview held in Rome just a stone's throw from St. Peter's Square. The movie will be released Friday in Italy.

Vatican Radio did say, however, that "really never before have such surprising images been seen," while L'Osservatore said the movie's worth lies in its "extraordinary visual impact."

The Vatican newspaper occasionally likes to comment in its cultural pages on movies or pop culture icons, as it did recently about "The Simpsons" or U2. In one famous instance, several Vatican officials have spoken out against "The Da Vinci Code."

AP
Add a Comment See all 110 Comments
by gosstom January 13, 2010 11:05 PM EST
Sappy and Bland--A movie about people fighting to keep from being exterminated...It looks like the Nazi Pope is finally showing his true feelings about Jews.
Reply to this comment
by BeckieBest January 12, 2010 10:25 PM EST
The Vatican is as boring as it gets.

A bunch of old, fat, white dudes, in robes.


YAWWWWNNNN...........
Reply to this comment
by armyoftwelve January 12, 2010 10:28 PM EST
Oh yeah?? Tell that to Cardinal Arinze, not that you even know who he is.
by BeckieBest January 12, 2010 10:45 PM EST
Who cares?


The last person most people would go to for a movie review is some boring old fat guy who walks around in his robe all day.
by armyoftwelve January 12, 2010 10:09 PM EST
They got one thing right: Avatar is just a space-aged version of "Dances With Wolves." And frankly, the idea of downloading what makes a person a person from one body to another was very far-fetched.

The strength of this movie lies in the visual spectacle, not a message.
Reply to this comment
by c3pee0h January 12, 2010 10:05 PM EST
The "Vatican" doesn't necessarily imply the Pope. More than likely, the mid-level bureaucrat that issued this statement didn't even see the movie. One thing this movie is not is "bland". Anti business, yes. Not pro-military I can go with as well. It even might suggest that the people who colonized the Americas (think Cortez) might have torn into an advanced civilization who did not build machines of war. The fact that it is generating so much controversy is because it isn't shallow at all. In fact, it's exactly the opposite of what "The Vatican" has stated that it is.
Reply to this comment
by quapawsix January 12, 2010 7:37 PM EST
what do 80 year old virgins know about being movie critic?
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 January 12, 2010 7:05 PM EST
Perhaps more significantly, the Vatican takes the movie to task for flirting with what it says is the worship of nature as a substitute for religion.
**********************
Does anyone really give a rat's patuti about what the Vatican thinks about a movie?? And what business is it of theirs what religion or lack thereof a fantasy, fictional, race of people have. I doubt folks on another planet are going to be running around talking about Jesus.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday___ January 12, 2010 6:57 PM EST
"Why do all religions have commandments to do good or condemn what is bad in their opinion?"

Because they are attempting to manipulate and control the masses.


"Is God both good and bad, what's the Eastern term for that? Is God for light and darkness spiritually speaking?"

Not sure. Google can probably help you there.


"Why throughout the Bible representatives of God command us to chose what is good over what is evil? if it just is? Why did God reveal this truth to us?"

He didn't. Humans wrote that book. See my first answer, above, then, for the reasoning as to the "why"s you are asking about.


.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday___ January 12, 2010 6:57 PM EST
"Why do all religions have commandments to do good or condemn what is bad in their opinion?"

Because they are attempting to manipulate and control the masses.


"Is God both good and bad, what's the Eastern term for that? Is God for light and darkness spiritually speaking?"

Not sure. Google can probably help you there.


"Why throughout the Bible representatives of God command us to chose what is good over what is evil? if it just is? Why did God reveal this truth to us?"

He didn't. Humans wrote that book. See my first answer, above, then, for the reasoning as to the "why"s you are asking about.


.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 January 12, 2010 6:27 PM EST
Aren't most public movie critics effeminate little prattling gaywads being paid show the public that they have no life, and...

Oops, Forget it...
Reply to this comment
by rational_1 January 12, 2010 7:04 PM EST
Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who know diddly squat about the subject, critique. A lot of movie reviewers fit that mold.
by slownewsday___ January 12, 2010 6:21 PM EST
"by cleric60
Hello slownewsday. I was wondering if only humanity is God in your belief system or is God also the lower animal world? Also, if you believe in a God--Good do you believe in a Devil-evil/bad? And what's wrong with Romans 1:18-22? in your opinion? "Do I not fill heaven and earth? says the Lord (Jermiah 23:11)"



Anything living, of course. How could it be otherwise? There is no divide.

I don't believe it's either good nor bad - it just is.

And per the bible quote, life is in all of those places, sure.


.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday___ January 12, 2010 6:32 PM EST
Forgot to address your question re: Romans 1:18-22. It's just a laughable Bible quote, really. Of course there's a "believe in this or else" clause - it wouldn't be a religious tome otherwise.
by cleric60 January 12, 2010 6:49 PM EST
Thanks for your reply, slownewsday. So God is neither good or bad? Why do all religions have commandments to do good or condemn what is bad in their opinion? Is God both good and bad, what's the Eastern term for that? Is God for light and darkness spiritually speaking? Why throughout the Bible representatives of God command us to chose what is good over what is evil? if it just is? Why did God reveal this truth to us?
See all 110 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook