January 11, 2010 2:04 PM

Protection of Food Supply Faces Problems

By
Bill Whitaker
(CBS)  When it comes to agriculture, America is indeed the land of plenty. Foods raised here and imported from around the world provide greater abundance and choice than ever before. But while our foods are bountiful, they're also inconsistently regulated.

The U.S. has one of the safest food supplies in the world, but the report card is mixed, reports CBS News Correspondent Bill Whitaker. Every year 33 percent of Canadians get sick from what they eat. In the U.S., it's 25 percent. But in England it's only 2 percent and in France just 1 percent. In both places food is grown more locally and on a smaller scale than in North America.

For part of the CBS News series "Where America Stands," a recent poll found that just one in three Americans are very confident that the food they buy is safe although the vast majority are at least somewhat confident that their food is safe.

Special Report: "Where America Stands"

Safety always comes first in 12-year-old Rylee Gustafson's kitchen.

"I need to wash my hands … I touched my jeans," Gustafson said in her Henderson, Nev., home recently.

She, more than anyone, knows that even good food can hurt you. In 2006, on her 9th birthday, she ate a spinach salad and was infected with a virulent strain of e-coli.

"It felt like killer pain, and my organs started to shut down," Gustafson told Whitaker.

Kathleen Chrismer, Rylee's mother, told Whitaker that she panicked when she didn't know what was hurting her daughter.

"You really didn't think you were going to pull through?" Whitaker asked Gustafson.

"I really felt that bad," she said.

She spent 35 days in the hospital on dialysis. Today she's still wary of fresh fruits and vegetables and has a damaged heart, kidney and vocal chords.

The Problem

Her story is just one example of the problem of food safety. Over the last few years, widespread outbreaks in spinach, tomatoes, peppers and peanut products sickened thousands and killed nearly a dozen Americans.

Every year there are 76 million cases of foodborne illness in the United States, resulting in 325,000 hospitalizations and 5,000 deaths.

Today Americans consume more fresh produce, increasingly from imports from around the world. But imported produce is inspected even less than home-grown harvests.

"Ninety-nine percent of the food that you're buying at the grocery store that comes from foreign coutnries has not been inspected by the FDA," said Erik Olson, director of food and consumer product safety at the Pew Charitable Trusts.

Olson says the Food and Drug Administration is simply not up to the task. The FDA is responsible for 80 percent of the food supply, which is everything but meat and poultry.

The number of food producers under FDA jurisdiction has increased, but the number of inspections is going down. Between 2001 and 2007, the number of domestic food producers increased from 51,000 to 65,500. At the same time, the number of producers inspected fell from 14,721 to 14,566, according to the Government Accountability Office.

"They simply do not have the tools to really protect our food supply," Olson told Whitaker.

The Solution

So, what's the solution? To start with, more and more farmers are creating their own rules.

Jack Vessey represents the fourth generation in his family to farm his land in Holtville, Calif., 8,000 acres of leafy greens. After the 2006 spinach outbreak, likely caused by unsanitary field conditions, he joined a farming cooperative - the California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement - which agreed to a set of voluntary standards in the field for irrigation, fertilization and sanitation, including hairnets, gloves and frequent hand-washing.

Vessey hired a food safety manager and estimates the extra cost to keep his fields contamination-free is about $250,000 a year, but another e-coli outbreak could cost farmers billions in lost sales.

"We know that for us we do the best we can to provide a safe, reliable food supply then we're going to spend the money," Vessey told Whitaker.

The California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement has become a model for other states and other produce such as tomatoes. The cooperative sends out state inspectors for frequent, even monthly, audits.

"We're focused on it; we have these inspectors out here, and they're really making us do the right thing," Vessey told Whitaker.

Another part of the solution? Science, cutting edge research around the country to find how pathogens make it onto fresh produce and how to lessen that risk. At the Center for Produce Safety on the University of California-Davis campus, Linda Harris is focusing her research on irrigation.

"It's hard to prove, it's hard to measure, but I really think we do make a difference," Harris told Whitaker.

Yet another part of the solution lies in Washington. Legislation, which could be considered as soon as next month, could change the FDA's 100-year-old mandate. It hasn't been updated since the Great Depression.

"We are hamstrung," Mike Taylor, a senior adviser to the FDA's commissioner, told Whitaker. "We often find ourselves as a result in a reactive mode."

The proposed changes include giving the FDA the ability to recall foods, which it can't do now, access to farm and factory records, more inspectors and more funding to back it up.

"Things that will make food safer, not just regulation for regulation's sake," Taylor described the proposed legislation to Whitaker.

Gustafson traveled to Washington to share her story with members of Congress. She'll probably need a kidney transplant when she's a teenager. Until then, she just wants to see this bill pass.

"I would love to see that so people don't have to take the risk," Gustafson told Whitaker. "They know that it's probably not gonna have a bacteria that's gonna kill you or your child."

Having safe food, she says, is not too much to ask.

Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
by Bayaka6903 January 14, 2010 10:49 PM EST
What about the effects of the genetically modified organism so prevalent in the US diet?
You can't have a discussion about food in America without bringing up the monopoly that Monsanto has in the growing of food.
Is CBS going to do any investigation into this area?

I have travelled for decades and lived in many countries and have found the US diet to be the worst on the planet. Its the stalest foods around. You eat in a foreign land and the food is FRESH.
The American diet truly is SAD(Standard American Diet).
Add to that the laziness of the masses and what do you expect.
A bonanza for Big Pharma.
Feed them garbage and then attempt to treat them with toxic drugs.
And you wonder why the health(death) care system is for crap.
What about prevention?
Reply to this comment
by americasbestflowers January 12, 2010 4:49 PM EST
Just give the following a little thought. I grew up on a farm. I played in the barnyard at times. This means I was covered with various types of animal manure at times. I drank raw unpasturized milk until I was 18. In general I think we raise our children, and ourselves in too much of a sanitized world. Many times my hands were dirty and in my mouth yet I had no problems.

Raw animal manure was spread on the vegetable garden. We didn't get sick. It was standard practice to load up a manure spreader full and spread it on the garden before it was tilled in the spring 50 years ago.

We had lead in our paint and the pipes coming into many of the homes was lead. Yet folks lived full and productive lives.

Kids ran through the smoke for DDT as it was sprayed for mosquitoes in cities.

Gasoline is much more poisonous and injures many more folks each year than pesticides do. Yet we continue to use gasoline widely.

Many more folks are killed from: traffic accidents related to alcohol, being overweight, smoking, and unhealthful eating than are hurt by contaminated food. Why not put the money and effort into the worst things first. We will have the greatest results.

The sanitation practices we now are supposed to follow make our bodies more susceptible to various fungi, bacteria, and viruses. Given time and a slow initiation we have a remarkable ability to develop resistance.

Perhaps it is time to back off a little on this sanitation
Reply to this comment
by calgal4 January 12, 2010 8:50 AM EST
If more people got off their butts and quit saying it's someone else's job to supply safe food; if more people took responsibility for ensuring that their town food supply is safe; if more people got proactive instead of reactive, this could stop being a problem. The fact is, Americans want what they want when they want it (strawberries in December), but they don't want to have to pay much for it and they want it to be safe. Hmmmmmm...
Reply to this comment
by MPHgrad January 12, 2010 12:30 PM EST
well said calgal4.
by mgoodman58 January 10, 2010 6:05 PM EST
As to the safety of food:
I looked into growing a couple of acres and selling what was left over. I would have to sell my vegetables at the local farmers market and would be subject to having my farm inspected, the farmers market would determine at what price I could sell my food (so much for free market) and of course I would have to pay taxes. I asked my neighbor about people I see on the side of the road selling food. He stated they move all over the county as they are "illegally" selling - kind of like selling drugs.

As to the illegals:
I looked into buying a convenience store, my banker told me I would have to do a business plan etc, and in the end I would be turned down. As he explained, a foreigner coming to this country would get a govt. guaranteed zero interset loan. That explains why so many own business in this country.

As to the politicians:
All of them will sell us out to line their own pockets.

My history:
I just left a large computer company as they wanted me to teach people in a foreign country to do my job. Let the managers figure it out and teach others.
Reply to this comment
by WeCanDoBetter January 10, 2010 3:51 PM EST
This story made me mad. Don't we all deserve to be able to sit down at the dinner table without worrying that the food is going to make us or our kids sick? Congress is way overdue in fixing that 70 year-old food safety law! Check out www.MakeOurFoodSafe.org
Reply to this comment
by gohan31 January 11, 2010 11:46 PM EST
You must be a democrat. Why would you trust the government to make sure your food is safe? Start your own garden. The family that grows food together, grows together!!!
by GTR5 January 10, 2010 3:44 PM EST
And I find it even more rude when I see my voting ballots printed in Spanish and English. Should be in English only!
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 January 10, 2010 1:16 PM EST
"Every year 33 percent of Canadians get sick from what they eat. In the U.S., it's 25 percent."


I'm thinking that it must be the other way around. Sure we have the odd cases of food poisoning, but nothing compared to what I hear happening in the U.S. Over the last couple of years it's been spinch, tomatoes, peanuts, lettuce...?

If people are getting sick, maybe it's because they are eating the fruits and vegetables coming from the U.S.? : ) I always buy local and have never had a problem.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 January 10, 2010 1:19 PM EST
sorry, "spinch" should be "spinach"
by erasmus111 January 11, 2010 2:56 AM EST
by Berkeley-SkirtLifter January 10, 2010 2:26 PM EST
No.


What do you mean "No"?

Isn't that what I said? Canadians are eating YOUR contaminated food and getting the trots?
by fedup12 January 10, 2010 10:58 AM EST
What is so sad about this is we have republicans adverse to any type of regulation either hamstringing or completely doing away with inspection programs.

Food companies are like banks. Quality control and inspection takes time and money. They will do as little as they can get away with.
Reply to this comment
by quotelawrence January 10, 2010 9:35 AM EST
our politicians are not concerned about the american as much as they are about the in coming immigrants example:

If the immigrant is over 65, they can apply
for SSI and Medicaid and get more than a
woman on Social Security, who worked
from 1944 until 2004.
She is only getting $791 per month
because she was born in 1924 and there?s
a ?catch 22?. It is interesting that the federal
government provides a single refugee
with a monthly allowance of $1,890.
Each can also obtain an additional $580
in social assistance, for a total of
$2,470 a month. That's more than a lot of Americans who are working are now making!!!
This compares to a single pensioner,
who after contributing to the growth and
development of America for 40 to 50
years, can only receive a monthly
maximum of $1,012 in old age pension
and Guaranteed Income Supplement..
Maybe our pensioners should apply as refugees !
Consider sending this to all your American friends, so we can all be ticked off and maybe get the refugees cut back to $1,012 and the pensioners up to $2,470. Then we can enjoy some of the money we were forced to submit to the Government over the last 40 or 50 or 60 years.
where is innocence.
Reply to this comment
by fedup12 January 10, 2010 11:08 AM EST
If what you say is true it is sad.

My wife and I are about as American as you can get without being an Indian. After she got laid off she went back to school and tried for assistance and grants. We didnt find hardly any assistance for us and as a result she now cant find work and we have 16K in school loans to pay for. But the (illegal?) immigrant next to her got almost her whole education paid for and could barely speak english. It was sad and angering.
by caeric January 10, 2010 9:14 AM EST
Watch the documentary "Food, Inc." The website is at http://www.foodincmovie.com/

It's very eye-opening.
Reply to this comment
See all 43 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook