By

CBSNews /

AP/ January 23, 2010, 12:32 PM

Iraq Dismayed by Blackwater Dismissal

A federal judge cited repeated government missteps in dismissing all charges against five Blackwater Worldwide security guards accused of killing unarmed Iraqi civilians in a case that inflamed anti-American sentiment abroad.

U.S. District Judge Ricardo Urbina dismissed the case against the guards accused of the shooting in a crowded Baghdad intersection in 2007.

The shooting in busy Nisoor Square left 17 Iraqis dead. The Iraqi government wanted the guards to face trial in Iraq and officials there said they would closely watch how the U.S. judicial system handled the case.

Urbina said the prosecutors ignored the advice of senior Justice Department officials and built their case on sworn statements that had been given under a promise of immunity. Urbina said that violated the guards' constitutional rights. He dismissed the government's explanations as "contradictory, unbelievable and lacking in credibility."

"We're obviously disappointed by the decision," Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said. "We're still in the process of reviewing the opinion and considering our options."

Prosecutors can appeal the ruling.

Opinion: U.S. v. Slough, et al

Ali al-Dabagh, the Iraqi government spokesman, said in a statement Friday that the government was dismayed by the court's dismissal of the case.

"The Iraqi government regrets the decision," he said. "Investigations conducted by specialized Iraqi authorities confirmed unequivocally that the guards of Blackwater committed the crime of murder and broke the rules by using arms without the existence of any threat obliging them to use force."

"The Iraqi government will follow up its procedures strictly and firmly to pursue the criminals of the above named company and to preserve the rights of the Iraqi citizens who were victims or the families who suffered losses from this crime."

Dr. Haitham Ahmed, whose wife and son were killed in the shooting, said the decision casts doubt on the integrity of the entire U.S. justice system.

"If a judge ... dismissed the trial, that is ridiculous and the whole thing has been but a farce," Ahmed said. "The rights of our victims and the rights of the innocent people should not be wasted."

Dozens of Iraqis, including the estates of some of the victims allegedly killed by Blackwater employees, filed a separate lawsuit last year alleging that Blackwater employees engaged in indiscriminate killings and beatings. The civil case is still before a Virginia court.

Blackwater contractors had been hired to guard U.S. diplomats in Iraq. The guards said insurgents ambushed them in a traffic circle. Prosecutors said the men unleashed an unprovoked attack on civilians using machine guns and grenades.

The shooting led to the unraveling of the North Carolina-based company, which since has replaced its management and changed its name to Xe Services.

The five guards are Donald Ball, a former Marine from West Valley City, Utah; Dustin Heard, a former Marine from Knoxville, Tenn.; Evan Liberty, a former Marine from Rochester, N.H.; Nick Slatten, a former Army sergeant from Sparta, Tenn., and Paul Slough, an Army veteran from Keller, Texas.

Defense attorneys said the guards were thrilled by the ruling after more than two years of scrutiny.

"It's tremendously gratifying to see the court allow us to celebrate the new year the way it has," said attorney Bill Coffield, who represents Liberty. "It really invigorates your belief in our court system."

"It's indescribable," said Ball's attorney, Steven McCool. "It feels like the weight of the world has been lifted off his shoulders. Here's a guy that's a decorated war hero who we maintain should never have been charged in the first place."

The five guards had been charged with manslaughter and weapons violations. The charges carried mandatory 30-year prison terms.

Urbina's ruling does not resolve whether the shooting was proper. Rather, the 90-page opinion underscores some of the conflicting evidence in the case. Some Blackwater guards told prosecutors they were concerned about the shooting and offered to cooperate. Others said the convoy had been attacked. By the time the FBI began investigating, Nisoor Square had been picked clean of bullets that might have proven whether there had been a firefight or a massacre.

The Iraqi government has refused to grant Blackwater a license to continue operating in the country, prompting the State Department to refuse to renew its contracts with the company.

In a statement released by its president, Joseph Yorio, the company said it was happy to have the shooting behind it.

"Like the people they were protecting, our Xe professionals were working for a free, safe and democratic Iraq for the Iraqi people," Yorio said. "With this decision, we feel we can move forward and continue to assist the United States in its mission to help the people of Iraq and Afghanistan find a peaceful, democratic future."

The top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. Raymond Odierno, declined to comment on the specifics of the case, but said, "I do worry about it, because clearly there were innocent people killed in that attack ... it is heart-wrenching."

The case against the five men fell apart because, after the shooting, the State Department ordered the guards to explain what happened. In exchange for those statements, the State Department promised the statements would not be used in a criminal case. Such limited immunity deals are common in police departments so officers involved in shootings cannot hold up internal investigations by refusing to cooperate.

The five guards told investigators they fired their weapons, an admission that was crucial because forensic evidence could not determine who had fired.

Because of the immunity deal, prosecutors had to build their case without those statements, a high legal hurdle that Urbina said the Justice Department failed to clear. Prosecutors read those statements, reviewed them in the investigation and used them to question witnesses and get search warrants, Urbina said. Key witnesses also reviewed the statements and the grand jury heard evidence that had been tainted by those statements, the judge said.

The Justice Department set up a process to avoid those problems, but Urbina said lead prosecutor Ken Kohl and others "purposefully flouted the advice" of senior Justice Department officials telling them not to use the statements.

It was unclear what the ruling means for a sixth Blackwater guard, Jeremy Ridgeway, who turned on his former colleagues and pleaded guilty to killing one Iraqi and wounding another. Had he gone to trial, the case against him would likely have fallen apart, but it's unclear whether Urbina will let him out of his plea deal.
By Associated Press Writer Matt Apuzzo; AP Writers Bushra Juhi and Rebecca Santana in Baghdad contributed to this report
AP
58 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
antoniof123 says:
Did the Republicans do anything competent or did they just **** at us for the fourteen years they were in power?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lilbear925 says:
Iraq is dismayed...
What about the rest of the world that is 'dismayed' at Iraq's inability to form a government, their inability to form a viable army, their inability to protect their own civilians from suicide bombers, their inability to realize they have a chance to have peace, but can't muster the guts to cash in on the opportunity. The whole world is dismayed that Iraqis are more intersted in cash then their own freedom. Tell Iraq to go f&%k themselves!
reply
toldyouso21 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Well..lets see now--How about we have China invade the US dismantle our entire social system, have about 1 million US citizens killed via bombs and guns due to an occupying army, have all our freeways, mfg centers and schools and hospitals bombed, have a group of conniving collaborators help out the Chinese who invaded us--and have the Chinese doing all of this under the pretense that since Taiwan performed a terrorist attack on them, we were the logical choice to invade. After that, see how well we can form a decent government, who sides with who and who cashes in on our "freedom". We turned their country into a clusterfunk and then we have the nerve to be mad when they don't cooperate and bounce back from it? Maybe they WILL bounce back--once we get out of their country, stop trying to net contracts for oil fields and plant KFCs and McDonalds into their country...maybe they like Afghanistan don't want to do anything positive that we might benefit from so they are waiting for us to leave both countries that we were NEVER invited into and that we did so much damage to and yet still think of ourselves as "heroes".
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Turbidite says:
Seems to be a lot of ex-special forces vets in the comment column today. Their motto in Vietnam was, "Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out". Didn't work then, won't work now. The bad guys use the same motto.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
exusmc8541 says:
I see lots of comments some good some in need of research.
Our president Ronald Reagan sent us into Lebanon to help stop three warring factions of muslims. We were thanked by them blowing our LBT base to hell. Then we came home in 1984.
That was the first time this country tried to be the world police.
We should have acted then but did not.
So now after 911 Mr. Bush says OK you hit our home land now we fight.
So everyone calls this mess the Bush war. Fine.
Our military is spread so thin that they can not protect all the people we send over there to that nice place to try to make it terrorist free.
We use a company like Black Water. Almost all ex military personal.
The training is the best in the free world.
Do you believe they went over there just to fire there weapons into an un armed group of people. Or did they use the rules of engagement to defend the person in there care.
Did we then tie there bodies to a car or truck set it on fire and drive down the street to a cheering crowd.
No we did not but those nice people everyone feels so sorry for did with both our army and marine service people.
Sorry folks but war is hell. It is man made and ugly.
Mr. Bush is out of office now. We have a new man at the wheel.
You want us to leave this hell hole we find our self in then sound off and tell our goverment we want out.
Leave those nice people to once again kill each other and we just worry about the cost of a gallon of gas.
There it is now pick a side.
reply
toldyouso21 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You must be on drugs. America has been trying to be the world police ever since WWII, when we found it was a very lucrative thing to be...so lucrative, that we still occupy bases in much of Europe and Japan. We have always liked the idea of appearing to police the world, while we really shook it down and tried to infiltrate any/every society so that we could eventually create markets there. it was and remains all about the money. We were responsible for the Marcos Regime, the Iranian regime (the Shah) and for the installation of Noriega, Saddam and others. We have kept our hands in many countries business and fomented terrorism (we call it covert ops ) for DECADES. Some we did to disrupt unfavorable gov. but we never really did it for the locals--THAT was just our cover story--we did it for American business interests or military interests--and the locals usually suffered for it--that is why so many around the world hate us--we have a very long history and while for you it may have started with Reagan or you want to pretend it did--our meddling and "policing" including our policing after WWII is well known around the world. You either have to be about 15 or have lived under a rock for the past 40 years to have no idea what we have and always will be about. We are biased and fancied ourselves the puppetmasters of the world, but if you look at our history be it with us supplying the Taliban, or Saddam or Vietnam or anyone else--there is nothing we have done, that did not later come back to bite us and the world on the patoot. Given your laxity in history--it is ignorance that ensures we continually REPEAT the mistakes we make from the past.
toldyouso21 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
As for what the Iraqis did to us--don't forget we took the war to them, they were not a part of 911 nor did they ever bomb our homeland or commit terrorism here --if they dragged bodies in the street or anything else--that is what people do to invaders--I can guarantee that if we had not been in Iraq, those who were maimed and killed there and drug through the streets would not have been killed in Iraq. You can't deliberately put your hand in a fire then complain when it burns you.

CAUSE AND EFFECT. WE WENT THERE. We INVADED. WE STARTED THE SHEEET--NOW YOU WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THEY DRUG OUR FACES IN THAT SHEET AND IT STUNK--WE STARTED THE SHEET ON THEIR HOME TURF WHAT DID YOU EXPECT? THEM TO GO BELLY UP AND THANK US FOR INVADING AND KILLING THEM?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kastner63 says:
There is ample proof of wrongdoing. The guards were just protected by the U.S. State Department taking their statements with promises of immunity. The upshot is that five, possibly six people got away with murdering innocent civilians without provocation. Givent this fact, the attorney's reaction is highly inappropriate. The judge did not say these men were innocent, in fact he strongly indicates that he thinks them guilty. It is just that without those statements he did not have a case agains them.
The Iraquis of course will just see that Americans got away with a massacre. Exactly the thing you don't need in an already hostile country.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
50BMS13 says:
If there is no proof of wrongdoing, you must dismiss! If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!
reply
alphaa10000 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
PROSECUTORIAL SABOTAGE

The evidence of wrongdoing by Blackwater at Nissoor Square is not in serious doubt by any familiar with the case. Seventeen Iraqi civilians died after attack by Blackwater personnel, and many witnesses are in accord about what happened.

Instead, the issue is prosecutorial sabotage of a straightforward government case by a US Department of Justice lead prosecutor named Ken Kohl.

As a GOP partisan, not a law enforcement professional, Kohl had no intention of bringing harm to Blackwater, a firm profiting heavily (a billion dollars) from Bush-era GOP patronage.

As a GOP partisan, Kohl's apparent gameplan was to lose the case brought by DOJ to let Blackwater-- a heavy GOP donor and personnally-linked with Bush-- walk free.

Kohl's flagrant disregard for senior-level legal counsel that he not base his case on Blackwater statements indicates his purpose was to compromise every reasonable legal strategy for success with which he is familiar.

In effect, Kohl was a "suicide bomber" for the GOP against the US government.

Kohl, a Bush-era appointee who served at the pleasure of the GOP, followed much the same strategy as those who, from all appearances, went out of their way to forfeit the case against former Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens.

Those who followed the Stevens case understand it was not the lack of evidence that set Stevens free, but the sum of egregious errors-- so flagrant as to seem deliberate-- by federal investigators and prosecution.

Such repeated acts of sabotage, putting GOP partisan gain over professional and civic duty, casts the GOP in an even darker light, after the GOP the previous year brought America the Wall Street recession.

By any view, widespread GOP sabotage of the machinery of government after GOP election defeat was unparalleled. For example, EPA had to work overtime to halt Bush plans, already in progress, to bulldoze the tops from Appalachian mountains. Clearly anticipating heavy losses at the polls, Bush staffers had created page after page of statutory obstructions to prevent normal operations of the next administration.

In case after case, eight years of Bush-era politics seriously compromised the integrity of the DOJ, The agency is riddled with those who place loyalty to the GOP over their own country, and the administration of justice.

A more anti-American plot could not be devised-- this from the party that once billed itself defender of American values.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FauxNews says:
You know, the Saudis didn't prosecute their civilians that financed the 911 terrorists. So, I guess we can be "dismayed" at that too.
reply
GreatDepression replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If America is a leader, then show leadership to the world.
DSR_57 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
by GreatDepression,

We do, by the way of superior firepower ! Go to bed hippy
See all 4 Replies
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wallyj16 says:
by Leaderless January 1, 2010 3:36 PM EST
In a war, civilians casualty is a given, especially when the enemy is hiding behind and using them.
This kind of tragedy is what the enemy is hoping for, it's one of their tactics to sway their sympathizers to help them.


Kind of ironic isn't it? Your accusation of the enemy hiding behind civilians is justification of this illegal activity by Blackwater. Isn't that also what we are doing by sending "civilian contractors" vis a vis Blackwater to do the dirty, bloody work that 90% of our flag waving citizens don't have the stomach for?

We should hang our heads in shame over this outrage and practice our "American Values" and letting justice and liberty guide us to do what is right. Hold those accountable for war crimes and if those are so inclined to promote war, join our military. We need it!
reply
Leaderless replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wallyj16, can you enlighten us on the illegal activies that you are accusing Blackwater of doing?
Your outrage should be directed at the enemy who orchestrated this outcome.
War will always be dirty and bloody so what is your point?
Terrorist sympathizers should hang their head in shamed for encouraging the enemy to stepped up the civilian death counts.
Kind of ironic isn't it when it doesn't even crossed your mind about procecuting the enemy for war crimes. Using civilian as a human shield qualifies as one !!
writer10 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Ummm...no...leaderless is dead on right - the sympathizers in this country are the downfall of this country, yet so very quick to blame everyone else when anything goes awry...it's pathetic and our forefathers are rolling in their graves stating "This is not what we fought and died a bloody death for" You should hang your head in shame for shaming their sacred loss of liberty given to you to even allow you the privalege to speak your piece w/out being beheaded as you would if you were in a country that does not allow such a freedom that you spat upon
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Leaderless says:
In a war, civilians casualty is a given, especially when the enemy is hiding behind and using them.
This kind of tragedy is what the enemy is hoping for, it's one of their tactics to sway their sympathizers to help them.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FauxNews says:
Why did anyone think the US would prosecute their own mercenaries? I guess Iraq is "dismayed" because the US wasn't stupid.
reply
formrusmcsgt replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Such a fundamental breach in legal protocol makes one think the case was sabotaged intentionally by DOJ.
alphaa10000 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
FauxNews said, "Why did anyone think the US would prosecute their own mercenaries? I guess Iraq is "dismayed" because the US wasn't stupid."
---

"Our mercenaries"? Mercenary, by definition, means having no native loyalty. And Blackwater certainly proved that point.

Likewise, "stupid" is defined by a belief warlord power ever can replace the rule of law.

"Stupid" is also Bush insisting Iraq was liberated from Saddam's tyranny into promise of democracy.

In fact, Iraq was delivered into smoldering civil war, terror and corruption. They had all that under Saddam.

But Bush gave al Maliki a bonus-- a real sweetheart contract with foreign oil firms lusting after Iraqi oil reserves. All it took was weeks of behind-the-scenes arm twisting.

No, Iraqis cannot learn about either the rule of law or democracy by our recent example.

Iraq is not dismayed, merely released from its last, wistful trust in claims made by the Bush administration.
See all 58 Comments