December 31, 2009 8:03 PM

8 U.S. Civilians Killed in Afghan Bombing

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  Last updated at 12:44 a.m. EST

Separate bomb explosions Wednesday in Afghanistan's volatile east and south killed eight Americans and four troops and a journalist from Canada, U.S. and NATO officials said.

A suicide attacker detonated explosives at Forward Operating Base Chapman in Khost province near the Afghan border with Pakistan, killing eight American civilians and wounding others, U.S. officials in Washington said. CBS News correspondent David Martin reports that all eight civilians were affiliated with the CIA.

"We mourn the loss of life in this attack, and are withholding further details pending notification of next of kin," U.S. State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said.

Early Thursday morning the Taliban took responsibility for the attack. Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid told The Associated Press that a Taliban bomber wearing a military uniform and a suicide vest entered the base in Khost and blew himself inside the gym.

A senior U.S. official in Washington said there were conflicting reports on the number of casualties, but that others were injured in the attack. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because not all details about the incident had been confirmed.

A senior State Department official told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity that all of the victims were civilians. However, that could include military contractors and U.S. intelligence officials.

In Kabul, a spokesman for the international coalition force in Kabul said no U.S. or NATO troops were killed in the afternoon explosion.

The outpost is located in the middle of a notorious stronghold for Afghan insurgents near the border with Pakistan, reports Martin.

Afghan soldiers and civilians are present at almost every American outpost since one of the chief principals of the U.S. strategy is to partner with the Afghans. According to Christine Fair of Georgetown University, some of them may actually be working for the Taliban.

"They have really become a vehicle of infiltration for the Taliban," Fair told Martin. "This is most certainly a vulnerability in our strategy going forward in trying to hand over security to the Afghans if we don't really have a way of figuring out who we can trust."

In the south, NATO said that the four Canadian troops and a reporter embedded with their unit died when their armored vehicle hit the bomb while on an afternoon patrol south of Kandahar city.

The Canadian Press identified the journalist as Michelle Lang, a 34-year-old health reporter with the Calgary Herald, who was on her first assignment to Afghanistan.

The military has not disclosed the names of the troops because relatives had not all been notified.

"We are all very saddened to hear this tragic news," Alberta Health and Wellness Minister Ron Liepert said in a statement. "Michelle covered health issues with professionalism, accuracy and thoroughness. She was tenacious in her quest to inform Albertans, and for her diligence she was very well respected."

Brig. Gen. Daniel Menard, commander of coalition forces in Kandahar, told Canadian Press early Thursday that the soldiers were conducting a community security patrol in order to gather information about daily life in the area and how to maintain security.

Wednesday was the second lethal strike against the Canadian force in a week. Another Canadian troop and an Afghan soldier were killed Dec. 23 during a foot patrol in Panjwayi district of Kandahar province. According to figures compiled by The Associated Press, the latest casualties bring to 32 the number of Canadian forces killed in Afghanistan this year; in all, 138 have died in the war.

Separately on Wednesday, NATO questioned Afghan reports that international troops killed 10 civilians, including schoolchildren, in a weekend attack that prompted hundreds of angry Afghan protesters to burn an effigy of U.S. President Barack Obama and chant "death" to America.

The head of an investigative team appointed by Afghan President Hamid Karzai told The Associated Press by telephone that eight students between the ages of 12 and 14 were among the dead discovered in a village house in a remote section of Kunar province in eastern Afghanistan. NATO said in a statement released late Wednesday night that while there was no direct evidence to substantiate the claims, the international force had requested and welcomed a joint investigation to reach an "impartial and accurate determination" of what happened in the attack.

Conflicting accounts of what occurred during fighting in Kunar's Narang district prompted an emotional outcry over civilian deaths, one of the most sensitive issues for international troops fighting the more than eight-year-old war. Although insurgents are responsible for the deaths of far more civilians, those blamed on coalition forces spark the most resentment and undermine the fight against militants. With 37,000 more U.S. and NATO troops being deployed to the battle zone, concern over civilian casualties is unlikely to ease anytime soon.

Several hundred Afghans demonstrated in the capital of Kabul and in the eastern city of Jalalabad where the likeness of Obama, adorned with a small American flag, burned on a pole held above demonstrators.

Several hundred Afghans demonstrated in the capital and in the eastern city of Jalalabad where the likeness of Obama, adorned with a small American flag, burned on a pole held above demonstrators. In Kabul, protesters carried signs that read: "Does peacekeeping mean killing children?" and "Stop killing us."

Karzai said in a statement that he talked to the relatives of the Kunar victims to express his condolences and pledge to bring to justice those responsible for the attack.

Asadullah Wafa, a senior adviser to Karzai who led a 10-member investigative team to Kunar province, said he was convinced that all those killed were innocent civilians.

"I have talked to the principal of the school in the village and he gave us details about the killed children," Wafa said. "The schoolchildren cannot be al Qaeda."

The bodies had already been buried by the time Wafa's team arrived on Tuesday.

According to the NATO statement, the initial review by Wafa's delegation "asserted that the dead were unarmed civilians removed by international forces from their homes and shot."

The international force's account of what occurred was much different.

NATO said that on Saturday, a joint coalition and Afghan security force entered the village of Ghazi Khan looking for an insurgent group responsible for a series of violent attacks in the area.

"As the joint assault force entered the village, they came under fire from several buildings and in returning fire killed nine individuals," the NATO statement said. "Several assault rifles, ammunition, and ammonium nitrate used in bomb-making were discovered."

Col. Wayne Shanks, spokesman for NATO's International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, said at a news conference Wednesday that the coalition force goes to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties.

The latest figures released by the United Nations show that 2,021 civilians died during clashes in the first 10 months of this year, up from 1,838 for the same period last year. International forces' stepped up efforts to protect the population has reduced civilian casualties. Taliban insurgents were blamed for 68 percent of the deaths this year - three times more than NATO forces, according to the U.N.

CBS/ AP
Add a Comment See all 57 Comments
by noloyalisti January 2, 2010 12:24 PM EST
How stupid does the mainstream media think we are to call these government paid terrorists civilians? It's almost as blatantly false as saying we are in the Middle East to spread freedom and democracy. We don't even live in a democracy here. It's just a sad, sick joke to trick us all into giving all our money to the greedy, rich corporations and the politicians they own and run.
Reply to this comment
by quotelawrence January 2, 2010 11:52 AM EST
what is our goal bye this police action, we are going to lose a lot of our children trying to extend our morality yet these cowards over there will not fight these "a" holes themselves. so we die and they refuse to police their own communities. but we will travel around the world spending money we don't have to fight crime there and ignore our own issues here, we are very distracted.
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 January 2, 2010 12:57 AM EST
8 US civilians could not possibly be killed in Afghanistan if they kept their greedy azzzzzzes out of a war torn and actively war engaging country.

Maybe its time for the US government to stop trying to force economic diversity and prosperity for our nation at the point of a gun and at the expense of an entire nation and their people.

I have absolutely NO SYMPATHY for anyone who dies in Afghanistan as an American civilian because civilians should NOT BE IN countries that we are at war with--PERIOD.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti January 1, 2010 5:49 PM EST
That's almost funny. An Afghani freedom fighter kills 8 American terrorists plotting against his people. That's what the headline should read.
Reply to this comment
by jwesel1 January 2, 2010 7:06 AM EST
Yes but unfortunately truth doesn't sell. Faux News proves this.
by RositaKhan January 3, 2010 7:34 AM EST
I definitely like this headline.....
by dronemonk January 1, 2010 4:28 PM EST
US CIA agents are "civilians" now?
Reply to this comment
by cbsblogger January 1, 2010 7:47 PM EST
"US CIA agents are "civilians" now?"

That's the safe way for our controlled media (by outside the USA interests) to address it when they know that some are private mercenaries.
by wyodutch January 1, 2010 11:03 AM EST
I wonder if these were the same non-military Americans who killed those 8 Afghani children? Maybe the bomber was a relative... possibly even the father of one of those dead kids and was simply settling a score.
.
"NATO is still scrambling to explain away the high profile Kunar massacre, in which forces, which NATO now claims were "non-military Americans" killed 10 Afghan civilians, eight of them children."
Reply to this comment
by randyfortner December 31, 2009 12:58 AM EST
The Afghanistan corridor is the most important drug triangle in the world next to Asia for organized crime. The area was the source of trade roots and if you will ?sin cities from the beginning of history in the Middle East. Iran is one of the world?s sources of Heroin. What can we do with Iran and the rest of the middle east. They are still without a single legitimate government-anywhere ?period. No real public schools or any contribution to modern humanity except a very strong historical driving force - religion. We need to modernize Entergy usage in the US. Did you know there is no building codes in the west to use solar panels. Was that analysis a part of our energy solutions prior to 9/11 and 1979 Entergy crisis? Yet the US sent enough in the Middle East to install on nearly every home in the sunshine belt. I hope we learn from this mess. Without knocking out organized crime in the Middle East we can?t win any war there. Is that likely? Lets change DC instead-limit campaign contributions to 100 dollars from corporate or private sources and save the USA. It is the only solution-period? OUR NEW PRESIDENT IS A GOOD FRESH START...
Reply to this comment
by justdatrooth December 30, 2009 7:37 PM EST
Obama is still paying his cronies at Halliburton, the same Halliburton he conveniently pretended to criticize during his campaign. War is a bout slick operators making money and the slickest operator of all is Obama.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 December 30, 2009 6:43 PM EST
Ignorant, greedy, neos gambling on the high pay for being in a "war" zone, lost the bet, and got what they had coming.

In fact, it is a mark of media cowardice that tries to differentiate people working on a hostile military base as civilians, this is an obvious attempt to stoke the blood lust in the war mongers for the continuation of this deadly farce, and make the corpses out to be something other than what they really are, participants in the genocide of any locals who don't accept our illegal occupation, and the installation of our corrupt puppet government.

As far as Afghanistanis and the traditional rules of engagement are concerned, anyone working there is fair game. It is highly doubtful the losers were wearing clothing that clearly ID-ed them as civilians.
Reply to this comment
by RositaKhan December 30, 2009 6:51 PM EST
I agree with you, those who help the enemies - in this case the US Army - are their enemies too, civilians or not.

Make sense doesnt it? The civilian came in to set up basic infrastructure such as telecommunication equipments - which help the communication between these troops - that is called abetting with the enemies.

They are regarded as a dangerous entity to the opposition. So kill. Furthermore, how are they to know which area contains civilians, and which do not? Surely an army base do not have areas designated with boldly written words "CIVILIANS".

Even the US Army made mistakes and bombed Afghans civilians, and this in a clear civilian area, what more an Army base camp - US Army at that!
by brianbwb-2009 December 30, 2009 8:13 PM EST
To RositaKhan

Agreed, except for one point, the civilian bombings by the US were intentional, they bombed clearly civilian areas, it was no mistake that civilians were killed. It is in fact terrorism on a US state-sponsored level.

If any of us had lost family, or ourselves been wounded by a hostile occupying military, then had to see members of that military playing basketball, or otherwise clowning around in "a makeshift gym", I am pretty sure that insult would not be taken lightly.
by brianbwb-2009 December 30, 2009 6:43 PM EST
Ignorant, greedy, neos gambling on the high pay for being in a "war" zone, lost the bet, and got what they had coming.

In fact, it is a mark of media cowardice that tries to differentiate people working on a hostile military base as civilians, this is an obvious attempt to stoke the blood lust in the war mongers for the continuation of this deadly farce, and make the corpses out to be something other than what they really are, participants in the genocide of any locals who don't accept our illegal occupation, and the installation of our corrupt puppet government.

As far as Afghanistanis and the traditional rules of engagement are concerned, anyone working there is fair game. It is highly doubtful the losers were wearing clothing that clearly ID-ed them as civilians.
Reply to this comment
See all 57 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook