U.S. and Dutch Spat Over Image Scanners

(CBS)  CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports Dutch and U.S. officials today offered new details of their apparent dispute over why body scans weren't already being used in the Netherlands.

In a letter, the Dutch Minister of Justice blamed the U.S. saying "the United States didn't accept (body scanners) as a primary screening resource until now ... and ... also wanted to have a metal detector" used.

In a statement, the U.S. Homeland Security Departmetn countered by saying the Dutch don't "need the United States' permission" to use better security, such as body scanners. "We obviously support advanced imaging technology, as we use it here."

Special Report: The Christmas Day Terror Attack

Wednesday, officials at Reagan National airport showed how 40 body scanners now in use at 19 airports can detect objects like a cell phone. There are plans to quickly deploy 150 more machines, with 300 more on the way.

Some say the scanners are an invasion of privacy. But they're more effective than pat-downs or metal detectors.

Explicit images are made of people who've done nothing wrong. But the images aren't stored, faces are blurred and the image reviewers don't see the actual passengers.

There's radiation exposure. But the exposure is tiny, equivalent to flying in a plane for two minutes.

Airline passenger Jenny Houck said, "It wouldn't bother me at all, as long as I'm getting on that airplane, and getting off."

Since even body scans won't catch every security risk, there's pressure to do more. Some say political correctness should be abandoned in favor of profiling passengers based on factors such as behavior, profession and age such as authorities do in Israel.

"I mean you have to put people in the right boxes, if I may say so, in order to have the right conclusion," said Pini Schiff, former director, security division, Israel Airport Authority.

One controversy with the body scans is that passengers in the U.S. and the Netherlands can "opt out" and instead get a pat-down, which is widely considered less effective.

In other words, a terrorist can actually defeat the body scan by simply choosing the full pat down instead. Security officialls differ on how much a pat down can catch.

More coverage from CBSNews.com:

Official: We Knew Al Qaeda Planned "Christmas Surprise"
U.S. Intel Lapses Helped Abdulmutallab
Friend Says Abdulmutallab Was Not Extremist in London
Yemen, North Africa: Terrorism's New Home
Yemen Raids Al Qaeda Hide-Out; 1 Arrested
Opposition Grows to Transferring Gitmo Detainees to Yemen
Dick Cheney: Obama Stance "Makes Us Less Safe"
Democrats Say GOP Playing Politics on Bombing Attempt
Obama: "Systemic Failure" Allowed Attack
Roommate: Abdulmutallab Shunned Women
Abdulmutallab's Missing Months in Yemen
TSA Still Vexed by Explosives Screening
Tracing Bomb Suspect's Journey to Detroit

[whammersley]

Has anyone considered the effects of radiation on the passenger? How about the businessmen who travel 300 days a year? What are the accumulative effects on them? What dose of radiation is emitted by the full body scans?

[sjc_1]

It is the U.S. responsibility to insure secure flights into the U.S. The T wave scanner can detect any explosive in any body cavity. Well worth the cost to have these in ALL airports flying into the U.S.

[bobnjersey]

[It is the U.S. responsibility to insure secure flights into the U.S. The T wave scanner can detect any explosive in any body cavity. Well worth the cost to have these in ALL airports flying into the U.S. ]

they have no way of doing this ... and after spending billions trying to do it ... this incident clearly proves they never will.

spend a billion on your scanners ... then they'll place the bomb in the cargo hold ... since they're checking very little of that.

[bobnjersey]

[Wednesday, officials at Reagan National airport showed how 40 body scanners now in use at 19 airports can detect objects like a cell phone. There are plans to quickly deploy 150 more machines, with 300 more on the way. ]

will it detect an 'an@l bomb' made from a non metallic explosives?