December 29, 2009 1:01 PM

Marine Base Closure Sours U.S.-Japan Ties

By
CBSNews
(AP)  When the U.S. took over a Japanese airfield here in the closing days of World War II, it was surrounded by sugarcane fields and the smoldering battlegrounds of Okinawa. It is now the focus of a deepening dispute that is testing Japan's security alliance with the United States and dividing its new government in Tokyo.

A large city has grown up around the base, and helicopters and cargo planes from the U.S. Marine Corps facility buzz so low over Futenma No. 2 Elementary School, whose playground fence borders the facility, that the windows rattle and teachers stop class until the aircraft are on the ground.

"It's just too much," said the school's vice principal, Muneo Nakamura. "I understand the political role the U.S. bases in Japan play. But we have to live here."

That Marine Corps Air Station Futenma must go is not the dispute. U.S. military officials agree the base must be moved. The problem is where.

The United States says that Futenma cannot be shut down until a replacement is elsewere on Okinawa, an idea that most Okinawans oppose. They have the ear of a new left-leaning Japanese government that took office in September and is reassessing the U.S.-Japan alliance.

The standoff has clouded relations between Tokyo and Washington, delayed a plan to restructure America's military presence in Asia and divided Japan's political leadership. It comes as China's rising military strength and North Korea's nuclear program are changing the security landscape in Asia, underscoring the importance for the U.S. and Japan of keeping the issue from creating a major rift.

In Ginowan, the city of 92,000 where the base is located, patience is wearing thin.

The Futenma facility, home to about 2,000 Marines and one of the Marines' largest facilities in the Pacific, is surrounded by urban sprawl.

The population density outside the base is roughly equivalent to downtown Tokyo. Intense training by helicopters and planes off a 9,186-foot (2,800-meter) runway has prompted residents to dub Futenma "the most dangerous base in the world."

The base takes up roughly a quarter of the city's land. Residents must drive around it, causing traffic jams, delays and frustration. Sewer and water lines have been detoured around its perimeter.

"This base violates so many regulations and safety rules that it would be illegal to operate it in the United States," Yoichi Iha, the mayor of Ginowan, told The Associated Press. "The situation has just been left to fester for too long, and no one has been willing to accept responsibility to do anything."

He also accused the Marines of regularly ignoring agreements on when and where they can fly. The city is installing a 2 billion yen ($20 million) radar system next year to keep tabs on them. A Japanese court ruled last year the noise levels are unacceptable, and ordered the Japanese government to compensate residents. An appeal is ongoing.

Lt. Col. Douglas Powell, a spokesman for the Okinawa Marines, said no flights are conducted after 11:00 p.m. and the airstrip is closed on Sundays.

"Night training flights are limited to the minimum required to fulfill assigned missions and maintain aircrew proficiency," he said. "Flight patterns can vary due to weather conditions such as wind velocity and wind direction. Marine Corps pilots make every effort to minimize overflight of civilian population centers, but, first and foremost, must ensure safe flight operations."

Progress on the Futenma issue has generally only occurred after major incidents have sent Okinawans into the streets in protest.

Following a public uproar over the rape of a local schoolgirl by two Marines and a sailor, Tokyo and Washington agreed in 1996 to close the base. The deal bogged down in the details, including finding an alternative site both sides could agree on.

After a helicopter from Futenma crashed on the Okinawa International University campus near the base in August 2004, another agreement was announced in 2006. The university was closed at the time and no one was killed on the ground.

That "strategic roadmap" included moving the facility farther north to a less crowded area and reducing the U.S. presence in Okinawa by transfering 8,000 Marines from Futenma and other bases to Guam, a tiny U.S. territory in the Pacific.

It would be the most sweeping realignment of the 47,000 U.S. troops in Japan since the Vietnam War.

But the decision to replace the Futenma base with another on the outskirts of Nago, another Okinawan city, sparked intense protests.

The new base would likely require bulldozing beaches near an existing Marine facility, Camp Schwab.

"We are not going to let them destroy our ocean to build another military base," said Hiroshi Aratomi, the co-leader of a group that has held a daily sit-in for the past five years. "We will be glad to see Futenma go, but not at the price of simply substituting it with another base in our backyard."

The protests by Nago residents have effectively thwarted efforts to finally settle on a site and have the sympathy of Okinawans in general, who would prefer that no replacement facility be built on their island at all.

The United States insists the base must stay somewhere on Okinawa so that the Marine units remain cohesive.

Japan's new government is listening to the protesters, at least for the moment.

In large part, that reflects domestic politics. Mizuho Fukushima, head of the Social Democratic Party, has threatened to pull her party out of the ruling coalition if the base remains on Okinawa.

Her threat is seen as a major factor behind Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama's reluctance to make a decision on the issue.

"I am optimistic something can be done to move the base off Okinawa or out of the country," Fukushima said after a meeting with Okinawa's governor, Hirokazu Nakaima, this month. "We must do our best to see that it is closed soon."


AP
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by mikal15 April 5, 2011 7:01 PM EDT
It's always the same sob story. The base was there FIRST, then the town grew up around it, and then they want the base to move because it's inconvenient for the newcomers. I'm sorry that you have to stop class when aircraft are taking off and landing, but if anyone had an ounce of sense THEY WOULDN'T HAVE BUILT THE SCHOOL AT THE END OF THE RUNWAY IN THE FIRST PLACE! Don't blame the base because you're dumb enough to build your school/house in a bad location.
Reply to this comment
by Yutaka-Uno December 30, 2009 5:26 AM EST
Americans just don't understand. Japan today doesn't really need any US bases in Okinawa nor on mainland. They were forced on Japan. The security alliance was forced on it, too. If there was no such alliance, Japan would simply build up its own armed forces like China. That would totally change the world's security landscape. Japan could export arms, too, from which it has restrained since WWII. The fact is that a Japan politically independent and armed to its teeth is the last thing the US wants. You are not in Japan to protect it. You are there for your own interests, period. How would you like to have foreign forces in your country? If that happened, you'd understand it's an incredible insult. You people see things only from your point of view. Put yourselves in the place of other peoples, especially of native Americans who've been almost exterminated and robbed of their own land? For your information, those people had lived on the continent for thousands of years before it was "discovered" by Europeans(what a joke). Put yourselves in the place of Iraquis, Afghans and slaves from Africa to name just a few. You are just arrogant invaders who mistakenly believe everything you do is good for everyone else.
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 December 30, 2009 9:04 AM EST
Same can be said of those China stole their land from, Japan stole theirs from, on down the line. Everyone took their land from someone weaker. BTW I am American Indian, and Most of the Cherokee, and Sioux that I know understand this...
by thesevenveils December 30, 2009 12:04 AM EST
Solution:
Replace the 47,000 Marines and all their aircraft with Japanese soldiers and aircraft.

The base has a strategic purpose for Japan. Japan knows it just can't shut this one down unless there is a replacement.
Reply to this comment
by lmartink December 29, 2009 6:50 PM EST
Close the base, and get out. I would like to know why Japan does not step up to the plate and build up its own military, so we don't have to spend millions of our dollars protecting the place?
Reply to this comment
by SocietysNightmare December 29, 2009 7:56 PM EST
Something about the Treaty that ended World War II. It looks like Japan is getting tired of the US being on it's soil, too. Time to put an end to the US WORLD POLICE FORCE once and for all. The money that's alloted to keep Americans on foreign soil can go to better use.
by ffoulkes-2009 December 30, 2009 4:33 AM EST
Japan is not allowed to build any sort of an offensive military force. The are only allowed to build limited defensive military forces after World War II. This to prevent World War III.
by doch48 December 29, 2009 5:29 PM EST
Hey,

This is just like people from California moving to Spokane, then complaining about grass burning.

I had one of these types move into our condo complex, insisted that an 80 yo Blue Spruce was a problem, had it cut down, and then moved out.

So, move out for a few months, and see how business goes. I bet a few smart sarges will make a bundle.

-D
Reply to this comment
by ramos1129 December 29, 2009 4:38 PM EST
The United States says that Futenma cannot be shut down until a replacement is elsewere on Okinawa, an idea that most Okinawans oppose. They have the ear of a new left-leaning Japanese government that took office in September and is reassessing the U.S.-Japan alliance,

--------------------------------------------

This is an excellent change to close the base and move everything back to the USA. There is simply no military need to being there that Japan itself could not fill. Failing that, Japan should bear the cost of our military being there. After all, no one benefits from having a base there but Japan.
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 December 30, 2009 4:31 AM EST
By allowing us a base within attacking distance of many possible aggressors, the entire world benefits from the lack of World War III due to our presence within various nations around the world.
by presjfk December 29, 2009 3:43 PM EST
First of all, after what we lost in fighting for the island - it should have been taken from Japan and all the residents at the time relocated to mainland Japan.

Second, the base was surrounded by sugar cane and open land when it was first occupied. If the Japanese decided to build around the base then the noise and inconvenience is on them and not us.

3rd, best yet let's pull all our troops out of Japan and let them deal with the Chinese and Koreans. we can't afford it and they can't afford to lend us any more money.
Reply to this comment
by didserve December 29, 2009 3:25 PM EST
Pull all bases out of Japan, Germany, and Korea! Spend the money at home!
Reply to this comment
by mrleme December 29, 2009 7:42 PM EST
Yeah, let World War III occur on U.S. land, great idea, don't protect allies whom we have made treaties with????
by wheresmycountry December 29, 2009 2:40 PM EST
Why would anyone build next to a military base in the first place? This is stupid. The base has been there for over 50 years.
Reply to this comment
by thesevenveils December 29, 2009 2:14 PM EST
The air base and Marines were there first. Poor city planning put schools and high population centers close to the airport.
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook