December 29, 2009 2:15 PM

Calif. Cops Use Head Cams to Police Selves

By
CBSNews
In this product image provided by TASER International Inc., the TASER AXON head cam is shown. An audio-video earpiece imager, speaker and microphone integrates into the communications loop between existing radios and the communications headset, recording

In this product image provided by TASER International Inc., the TASER AXON head cam is shown. An audio-video earpiece imager, speaker and microphone integrates into the communications loop between existing radios and the communications headset, recording (AP Photo)

(AP)  Grainy cell phone images are often used against cops accused of using excessive violence. Now, officers are being armed with their own cameras.

The so-called head cameras are the latest technology to come from TASER International, Inc., makers of the stun guns popular with law enforcement.

"It's like the helmet cam you've seen on X Games," said San Jose police officer William Pender, who demonstrated the camera on a recent afternoon.

Eighteen of San Jose's more than 1,300 sworn officers have been trained to use the AXON head cameras as part of a free trial. Other departments are expected to be added to the program.

Experts say the head cameras could help catch officers behaving badly and clear those who are falsely accused so long as they are accompanied by police department policies requiring they be switched on during each encounter and not as an officer chooses.

"I think it will also make the officers very aware that their behavior is being documented, which could cut down on possible police excesses," said Sam Walker, professor emeritus of criminal justice at the University of Nebraska, Omaha.

The device resembles a Bluetooth earpiece and is attached by a band that runs around the back of the officer's head.

It can be connected to an on-and-off button on the officer's chest, and from there to a video screen on a holster. In San Jose, officers are required to switch on the cameras for even routine investigations, such as vehicle stops.

At the end of an officer's shift, the device is placed in a docking station, where it recharges and its content is downloaded and stored on a secure server offsite. A three-year contract for the system for one officer that includes software and video storage costs $5,700, said Tom Smith, chairman and founder of TASER.

"People have been using (this technology) against us for years, unfortunately only for the bad stuff," Pender said. "So it'd be nice to show our view and our side of what's going on."

San Jose police came under fire recently after cell phone video surfaced showing officers striking and using a Taser on an unarmed Vietnamese student, Phuong Ho, during an arrest in September. Police are investigating the incident, but an attorney for Officer Kenneth Siegel, who is seen repeatedly hitting Pho with his baton, says the suspect was combative and resisting arrest.

Police officials say the pilot program, which has been in the works for more than a year, is not a response to the incident.

The device will capture the context for an officer's response to a suspect, said Jermaine Thomas, a spokesman for the San Jose police.

Additionally, the video and audio captured by the device cannot be tampered with, TASER officials say.

The AXON camera already has proven its worth in the only other police department that has tested it so far.

Prosecutors cleared a Fort Smith, Ark. officer of any wrongdoing in the fatal shooting Nov. 11 of a man suspected of threatening his wife with a handgun.

Officer Brandon Davis was wearing an AXON camera when he confronted Eric Wayne Berry. In the video released to the media, the officer's gun is drawn as he repeatedly tells Berry, who authorities say was armed, to drop his weapon before opening fire.

While noting there were several witnesses to the incident, Sebastian County prosecutor Dan Shue said in a letter clearing Davis that the video and audio enabled him to "observe what happened with complete objectivity."

"Any evidence that we got about what had taken place is what we're looking for," said Joseph Self, chief deputy prosecutor in Shue's office. "We're in the search for the truth here."

Skyler Porras, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's San Jose office, argued that departments should not only have policies about when to use the cameras but also should allow independent reviews of the video to ensure officers are following the rules.

"We need to know, 'Are officers turning video cameras on at the very beginning of an engagement with a resident? Which officers have a 15 percent failure rate in turning it on?" she said. "If they are used appropriately and with proper protocols in place, they could be useful."

AP
Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by magoo2u1 December 31, 2009 11:52 AM EST
"now we get to see how the "innocent victims" act right before they are arrested/shot"
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Brilliant observation. That is the purpose of the equipment. DUH. Some people cling to the old fashioned idea that unarmed 14 yr olds shouldn't be shot 6 times in the back. Or an unarmed merchant shouldn't be shot 42 times , including in the bottoms of his feet as he lies in a hallway, when returning home after working 16 hours to support his family.
Reply to this comment
by techcommuser December 31, 2009 2:56 AM EST
Seems like a good idea
Reply to this comment
by Dgunner December 30, 2009 10:29 AM EST
Fort Smith Arkansas is the filthiest jail I have ever seen. I was arrested for transporting a loaded fire arm. { my fault I should become proficient at throwing bullets from vehicle ]The jailers were allowing people with open sores to walk about on the floor even though they took your shoes and SARS is rampant.I reported to local helath dept. I should have went straight to sheriff but having spoke with him in the past. P---ing in the wind and not getting your shoes wet carries
a more probable chance of success.I thought military police had huge egos until I met these bowery boys.All you can do and this my STRENEST advice for travelers . {STAY THE H---L OUT OF FORT SMITH ARKANSAS IF YOU CARRY FOR PROTECTION .iDIOTS AND REDNECKS ARE BEST VIEWED FROM MOVING VEHICLE FROM INTERSTATE.
Reply to this comment
by hologram5 December 30, 2009 10:15 AM EST
This is a good idea, the cops in california need to be reigned in. San Francisco just set a precedence with tazers, now this. Good move. Let's address this excessive force issues.
Reply to this comment
by ludvig1-2009 December 30, 2009 1:10 AM EST
My doctor told me to lose weight or get diabetes, so I took up walking and bike riding. While bike riding an idiot cop passed me, made a U-turn stuck a camera in front of his face and snapped my picture. Now the cops have my picture. Have you heard about all the people that the innocence project has cleared of crimes that ended up in jail because the cops had their pictures. A Marin County lawyer just spent 4 months clearing his name after he was wrongly arrested for a bank robbery based on witness identification.
Reply to this comment
by CBSisCommunist2 December 29, 2009 6:49 PM EST
now we get to see how the "innocent victims" act right before they are arrested/shot
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 December 29, 2009 6:13 PM EST
London has been doing this for a year or more. California should ask them how it is working
Reply to this comment
by SusanStoHelit December 29, 2009 4:44 PM EST
Excellent.

Good cops go up against criminals who don't care at all about making false accusations and trying to ruin a good person's life. And bad cops need to be caught, the sooner the better.
Reply to this comment
by Brokennews December 29, 2009 3:29 PM EST
Alright!

We get to see the action from a first person perspective.
It will be like watching someone playing Halo.

Personally, I think this idea will clear far more cops from false accusations than it will weed out bad cops. Either way it's a good thing!
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 December 29, 2009 5:35 PM EST
It's a good thing for Big Brother. The Cameras are a good tool for getting the story straight, they are a bad tool for innocent people that happen to be near where a crime happens.. Imagine this, You happen to be walking past a crime scene as it happens, you actually do not see it happen because you were fixated on the Blondes rear in front of you. The police see you in the video and make an ID. You are approached at work the next day by the police and questioned at length. They leave and warn you as they walk out the door (in front of your co-workers) "Not to leave town"...
I shouldn't have to tell you what happens next,,, (but I will). Your friends suddenly don't spend anytime with you any more, your Boss becomes irritated at every little thing you do. Very shortly afterwards you are terminated (for various reasons). surely you can see how this will impact everybody within the cameras view. I am barely scratching th3e3 surface of this event..
by ffoulkes-2009 December 30, 2009 4:52 AM EST
Tool, you forgot to mention you can prevent all this by tightening your tin cap.
See all 11 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook