April 7, 2010 7:39 PM

Taliban Video Shows Captive U.S. Soldier

(AP)  Updated 12:55 p.m. ET

The Taliban released a video Friday showing a U.S. soldier who was captured more than five months ago in eastern Afghanistan.

Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl is the only known American serviceman in captivity. The U.S. airborne infantryman was taken by the Afghan Taliban in Paktika province on June 30.

"This is a horrible act which exploits a young soldier, who was clearly compelled to read a prepared statement," said a statement from U.S. Navy Rear Admiral Gregory Smith, spokesman for the NATO-led international force in Afghanistan that confirmed the man in the video is Bergdahl. "To release this video on Christmas Day is an affront to the deeply concerned family and friends of Bowe Bergdahl, demonstrating contempt for religious traditions and the teachings of Islam."

Bergdahl is shown seated, facing the camera, wearing sunglasses and what appears to be a U.S. military helmet and uniform. On one side of the image, it says: "An American soldier imprisoned by the Mujahideen of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan."

Watch the video

The man identifies himself as Bergdahl, born in Sun Valley, Idaho, and gives his rank, birth date, blood type, his unit and mother's maiden name before beginning a lengthy verbal attack on the U.S. conduct of the war in Afghanistan and its relations with Muslims. He seems healthy and doesn't appear to have been abused.

The video, which has an English-language narration in parts, also shows images of prisoners in U.S. custody being abused. The speaker says he did not suffer such ill treatment.

Later, Bergdahl's family released a statement pleading for his release and urging him to "stay strong."

Lt. Col. Tim Marsano of the Idaho National Guard issued the statement after meeting with the family Friday morning at their home outside Hailey, Idaho.

In their statement, the family is urging the captors "to let our only son come home."

And to their son, the family says, "We love you and we believe in you. Stay strong."

A statement read by a Taliban spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid, appears at the end of the video and renews demands for a "limited number of prisoners" to be exchanged for Bergdahl. The statement says that more American troops could be captured.

The Geneva Conventions, which regulate the conduct of war between regular armies, bar the use of detainees for propaganda purposes and prohibit signatories from putting captured military personnel on display. As an insurgent organization, the Taliban are not party to the treaty.

Statements from captives are typically viewed as being made under duress. The insurgents also released a video of Bergdahl a few weeks after he was captured. In the July 19 video, Bergdahl appeared downcast and frightened.

Bergdahl, who was serving with a unit based in Fort Richardson, Alaska, was 23 when he vanished just five months after arriving in Afghanistan. He was serving at a base in Paktika province near the border with Pakistan in an area known to be a Taliban stronghold. On Friday, NATO said a joint Afghan-international force killed several militants in Paktika while searching for a commander of the Jalaluddin Haqqani militant network that is linked to al Qaeda.

U.S. military officials have searched for Bergdahl, but it is not publicly known whether he is even being held in Afghanistan or neighboring Pakistan.

The man on the video said U.S. officials keep leading America "into the same holes," citing Vietnam, Japan, Germany, Somalia, Lebanon and Iraq.

"This is just going to be the next Vietnam unless the American people stand up and stop all this nonsense," he said.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by mnbrant December 26, 2009 8:53 PM EST
yeah, but I have no influence with the pentagon! heh
Reply to this comment
by mnbrant December 26, 2009 4:30 PM EST
I just watched the whole PFC Bowe Bergdahl tape on youtube. It is about 40 minutes long. These are the reasons that PFC Bowe Bergdahl should be allowed to live. 1. He is a PFC. God loves the PFC. 2. He was caught straggling while on patrol and his unit did not care enough about him to report it. This give me a special warm feeling about him. 3. I forget. Anyways, I watched the whole thing and the views went from over 4000 on tape 1 to 397 by tape 4. I think the information on the whole tape was important. Some of what he said appeared to be genuine. I think there was way too much stupid american stuff in the video for the average american to watch. Please do not use him too much for propaganda if he is still alive and/or please return the body to his family if he is dead. He does appear to be clean and well fed. You can't hide that in a video. Please look at him as a person and not as just a chip to be bargained. He is not the enemy. As far as this thing ending soon I disagree. I suspect that it will get alot bigger and will spill over the world. That is our fault I do agree.
Reply to this comment
by fedup12 December 26, 2009 12:03 PM EST
by OhTheMessiah December 26, 2009 11:22 AM EST

Let's see what we have here:

An anti-religious person having psychological problems and
wearing socialist red

Sounds like a typical standard left-wingnut liberal to me
------------------------------------
What an ijiot.

Now if she had gone after the pope for 30 sec then attacked Jamaica because Jamaica had some faked WMD's that she lied about. And then she screwed around on her spouse in a GAY police sting while high on oxycontin....

Then I could say that she sounded like your typical Right Wingnut Conservative.

Hypocrit.
Reply to this comment
by longtree-2009 December 26, 2009 6:54 AM EST
wonder why the family didn't plead with him not to volunteer in the first place? he enlisted, volunteered, and had to have known the risks to life and limb, including being captured and tortured. he was not drafted. the decision rests with obama as commander-in-chief of all the military. obama can withdraw all troops or turn afghanistan into ashes from border to border. obama will do neither but send more "volunteers" to the grinder, to be cannon fodder. keep volunteering everyone for a war, where the potus and congress are afraid to wage total war but then again they are safely at home or in HI vacationing. think twice before enlisting, then think again. it's on you.
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 December 28, 2009 2:58 AM EST
They didn't plead with him not to volunteer in the first place because he made a decision to help protect his family and lifestyle and they agreed and supported him in his decision.
by rightbehind December 25, 2009 10:46 PM EST
Our troops wear the uniform provided by the politicians. Usually chosen by those that line their pockets best. The private contractors who are paid almost 5 times as much or more wear anything they want and have the best of gear. It's shameful. I would rather our troops be paid better for the risk they take rather than lining the pockets of these private contractors.
Reply to this comment
by enwr77 December 25, 2009 9:38 PM EST
Attack on our holiday spirit. Sorry for the family. Why do this to them today? Thought our guards would be down because of the holiday.
Reply to this comment
by abaur2 December 25, 2009 8:30 PM EST
We should execute the American Generals who send our young into harms way. Those bastards Generals who profit from the war should be executed one by one, They are of no use to America or the world.
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 December 28, 2009 5:56 AM EST
YoureSoWrong16, If we were to execute the Taliban's cheerleaders, who would we debate against on these boards?
by mawskrat December 25, 2009 5:03 PM EST
prayers for him and his family
was the Red Cross or Red Crecent allowed to visit him
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 December 28, 2009 5:58 AM EST
I am guessing that since no one even was certain he was alive that, no the Red Cross/Crescent were not allowed to visit.
by rickstas December 25, 2009 4:36 PM EST
If the Americans hadn't flaunted the Geneva Convention during the Bush Administration, they wouldn't appear so hypocritical inoking it now, as was accurately predicted at that time.
Reply to this comment
by bankersvox December 25, 2009 4:31 PM EST
Where is the crying liberals and the ACLU ?
Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook