December 24, 2009 7:04 AM

Brazilian Family Won't Fight More for Boy

(CBS/AP)  Updated at 3:10 p.m. EST
An aide to the lawyer of a Brazilian family fighting for custody of a 9-year-old boy says the family has agreed to turn him over to his U.S. father.

The aide to lawyer Sergio Tostes says "it is certain the family will not pursue any more legal channels."

She spoke on condition of anonymity Wednesday because she said she wasn't authorized to discuss the matter.

Tostes referred inquiries to the aide.

Also Wednesday, a federal court ordered the family to hand over the boy by Thursday morning.

The ruling came as representatives of both families were negotiating the timing of the custody transfer. A representative for the family's lawyer told CBS News the family wouldn't appeal the court-ordered return and are planning a "peaceful transition" to take place.

On Tuesday, Supreme Court Chief Justice Gilmar Mendes ruled that Sean should be turned over to David Goldman in a decision that appeared to bring the case in line with international custody accords.

"This is now an enforcement issue, where the Brazilian government needs to fascilitate the transfer of Sean Goldman from the abductors to his one-and-only father, David Goldman," Rep. Chris Smith (R, N.J.), told "Early Show" co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez Wednesday. "Abduction ... needs to be seen for what it is -- a very serious human rights abuse. Sean deserves to be with his dad."

Smith, an ardent backer of David Goldman's cause, flew to Rio to be with Goldman.

In a broadcast interview Wednesday morning, Goldman expressed hope he would soon be able to take his son home for good, but remained wary, as previous court rulings in his favor had been repeatedly appealed.

"When? When? When will Sean and I be able to go home, father and son?" he asked in an interview aired NBC.

Sean was taken by Goldman's now-deceased ex-wife to her native Brazil in 2004, where he has remained. Goldman, of Tinton Falls, N.J., has been fighting to get him back from the boy's stepfather.

Both the U.S. and Brazilian governments have said the matter clearly fell under the Hague Convention, which seeks to ensure that custody decisions are made by the courts in the country where a child originally lived - in this case, the United States.

Goldman's New Jersey-based lawyer, Patricia Apy, said Tuesday she believed the order by Supreme Court Chief Justice Gilmar Mendes required Sean to be handed over immediately, but she said Goldman's attorneys had not heard from lawyers for the Brazilian family at the time.

Rep. Smith told reporters Tuesday David Goldman was "elated" when he heard of Mendes' ruling, adding, "A big smile came to his face, but he said 'I'm not going to let my guard down until it's wheels-up.'"

Goldman launched his case in U.S. and Brazilian courts after Sean was taken by his mother to Brazil, where she then divorced Goldman and remarried. She died last year in childbirth, and the boy has lived with his stepfather since.

A lawyer specializing in the Hague Convention said Tuesday's decision by Mendes was the only right one to make.

"It would be virtually impossible to reconcile international law with a ruling in favor of the Brazilian family," said Greg Lewen of the Miami-based law firm Fowler White Burnett.

He said that if the Hague Convention were not followed by the chief justice, "the State Department should immediately issue a travel advisory warning parents not to go to Brazil with their children."

Smith, the congressman, said the fact that the Brazilian chief justice ruled Sean should be with his father would take the steam out of any appeal from the stepfather, himself a lawyer from a prominent family of Rio de Janeiro attorneys.

During a teleconference with U.S. journalists late Tuesday, Smith said law enforcement was on guard in case the Brazilian family did not transfer Sean. He said the international police agency Interpol had been notified to make sure Sean was not flown out of Brazil.

"Our hope is, given the prominence of this family in legal circles, that's less likely to happen," Smith said.

And the word from Tostes Wednesday indicated those fears would probably prove unfounded.

Silvana Bianchi, Sean's maternal grandmother, had written an open letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva just hours before the Tuesday ruling, in which she said cultural differences and international pressure were driving the case.

"Our moral foundation values the mother's role. In the absence of the mother, the raising should be done by the grandmother," she wrote. "That's how it's done in Brazil, from north to south, regardless of race, religion or social class. It's natural that foreigners, with a different foundation, would not understand these authentically Brazilian feelings."

Meanwhile, Goldman has said his parents and other relatives have been waiting for years to be reunited with Sean.

Silva has said he would not intervene in the case, that it was purely a matter for Brazil's legal system.

The case has affected diplomatic ties between Brazil and the United States, as the U.S. State Department applied pressure for the boy to be returned. President Barack Obama and Silva have discussed the matter.

Last week, U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg, of New Jersey, reacted to the case by blocking renewal of a trade bill that benefits more than 130 countries, including Brazi, by allowing them to export a variety of products duty-free to the United States. Brazil is the fifth-largest beneficiary from the duty-free provision, receiving an estimated $2.75 billion in benefits last year, according to Lautenberg's office.

Lautenberg lifted the hold after Tuesday's ruling in Brazil and the U.S. Senate quickly passed the trade measure.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
by rgartner2 December 24, 2009 11:47 AM EST
What a WONDERFUL thing to happen! Welcome Home Sean and David Goldman!!!!!This speaks Volumes for Fatherhood in this country and speaks Volumes about the existence, credibility, and the insidious effects of the epidemic of Parental Alienation!

Now if the so-called advocacy groups like the one here in Houston, Justice for Children, founded by lawyer Randy Burton, ( that took my daughter 17 years ago with whom I have most fortunately only recently experienced the beginnings of reunification ) and thier entourage of materially wealthy lawyers form some of the largest law firms we have here, would acknowledge the existence of Parental Alienation they and it would be able to become a little closer to a functioinal organization and not the child abusers, at times, they are!
Reply to this comment
by carolo43 December 24, 2009 10:45 AM EST
How is it that a country can allow the legal kidnapping of an American citizen? This boy was a citizen of the U.S. visiting Brazil. First the mother kidnapped the child from the father and then the country kidnapped him for his ex-father. Right up to the end this family was still trying to hold control and make consessions with Mr Goldman.

The 5 years Mr Goldman has not has his son has been a travesty of justice for this child and Mr Goldman. Years they will never get back. Brazil is a beautiful country but the way this was handled was all wrong and I hope citizens of the US think about this before taking their children there on vacation!
Reply to this comment
by carolo43 December 24, 2009 10:51 AM EST
oops.......Step-father not ex-father. Sorry. Step-fathers have no rights. This country needs to fix their crummy laws.
by rcvsiqueira December 24, 2009 9:54 AM EST
I hope not to see in the future Sean telling the press that he was abused and beaten by his father...Truly speaking I think that even if this happens David Goldman will get the Nobel Prize of Peace in 2010...
Reply to this comment
by GOOD_DAD December 24, 2009 8:56 AM EST
The following injustice is happening right now, in Montgomery County, Texas, under our laws and in our courts.

I was recently massacred in a 3+ year custody battle for my 6 year old daughter.

http://www.courthouseforum.com Judge Suzanne Stovall

Convicted child molesters have more access to their children than I do.
I am completely alienated from my 6 year old daughter.
All calls and letters are intercepted, and I have no visitation.
The mother completely alienated her older children from their father for 15 1/2 years in the same way.
Judge Stovall punished me with 20% +$100 monthly child support.
She inconsistently ruled on motions, laws, or rules to favor the mother.
My lawyers repeatedly complained that she favored the mother.
For 3 years, I pleaded for a trial or in some way, to present a case.
Despite 3 years of hearings, Rule 11's, hundreds of emails, letters, and conversations, Judge Stovall refused to compel the mother to provide discovery, yet granted the mother 4 trial continuances; twice on the grounds that her discovery was incomplete; one of which was a preferentially set trial.
She disregarded over 3 years and over 300, exhibited, provable charges of Contempt of Court against the mother.
I paid the jury fee and insisted on a trial, which never came.
When I received a copy of the Final Decree, it was significantly different, even opposite, to what had been read into the record.
I refused to sign and adamantly insisted on a trial but Judge Stovall signed the settlement that she knew would totally alienate me from my daughter.
Perjury, forged letters, falsified evidence, unsupported, inconsistent, and unchallenged false accusations, by the mother, CPS, et al., outweighed exhaustive undisputed facts, certified evidence, sworn statements, and objective/testable/verifiable documentation disproving the accusations and proving neglect and abuse by the mother.
Even with the mother's sworn statements of medically abusing/neglecting my daughter and with the doctors corroborating records of her mistreatment, Judge Stovall took my daughter from me and placed her into her mother?s sole custody.
For months, pediatricians and specialists examined, x-rayed, diagnosed, and ordered treatment for my daughter, but the opposite diagnosis and falsified evidence of Elaine Baggerley, an undereducated CPS investigator, prevailed over the professionals, with Judge Stovall.
The mother continues to deliberately, medically mistreat my daughter's diagnosed medical condition(s), neglects her dental care, and the high risk lifestyles exposes my daughter to diseases.
For over 1/2 of my daughter's life, she has been left in her mother?s violent and abusive home.
Depositions, CISD records, Sworn statements, and other Certified and Certifiable evidence revealed a home with an AGGRAVATED SEXUAL ASSAULT FELON, wrist CUTTING, daily VIOLENCE, runaway teen, destruction, criminals, drug abuse (METH, COCAINE, XANAX, OXYCOTIN, etc), frequent police visits and a SEARCH WARRANT confiscated drug paraphernalia, multiple sex partners, multiple suspensions for drugs and violence, burglary, vandalism, shootings, disease, fighting, screaming, profanity, pornography (including BEASTIALITY), boys and men sleeping over, taking my daughter to sleep at men?s homes, and so much more.
My daughter is taught obscene language and gestures.
The mother provided SEXUALLY VIOLENT material and entertainment to her criminal teen children since they were young.
The well paid mother has lived rent and utilities free for 3 ½ years but is deep in debt from undisclosed medical bills.
My fees and expenses have exceeded $200,000.
I will never, ever, ever give up trying to rescue my daughter.

I can provide:
the CPS investigation reports of drug abuse and more
the psychological evaluations
depositions
CISD records
police reports
myspace entries
emails to the
ad litem
psychologist
therapist
http://local.yahoo.com/info-19096883-teresa-burbank-pc-conroe
more

I have recorded nearly every contact with the mother, CPS, and many others.

PLEASE HELP MY DAUGHTER!
Reply to this comment
by rcvsiqueira December 23, 2009 8:27 PM EST
Only time will tell who is right...There are many americans thinking that all people from abroad are kidnappers/terrorists...I don't trust them...Well, the future will bring us the truth....
Reply to this comment
by lssbigdog December 23, 2009 10:07 PM EST
rcvsiqueira, If , grandma, papa, stepdad, had been more caring and loving they would have found a way for David the father to be in seans life. They are the ones who have made this situation worse, and now they are tormented as well as sean. Im divorced and I have children and I would never deny grandparents or father not to be in my childrens life. My ex husbund and my disputes are just that. Ours not our childrens.
by all4science December 23, 2009 8:27 PM EST
what do you mean "not fight?" The boy rightly belongs to his father!

I've no pity towards the boy's mother who died during childbirth; she was outrightly evil. To take the child from the father, then to marry another man????
Reply to this comment
by rcvsiqueira December 23, 2009 7:39 PM EST
Did someone asked the boy's opinion on this matter????
Reply to this comment
by SusanStoHelit December 23, 2009 8:11 PM EST
No, that is not relevant. Any kidnapper can buy the goodwill of a 9 year old boy with enough presents and treats. Would you let your children be stolen from you for 5 years, then allow the kidnapper to keep your kids if they bribed them with enough treats?
by lssbigdog December 23, 2009 8:36 PM EST
Sean was not asked his opinion when he was abducted. Also the Brazillian Courts thru psycological tests that Sean suffered from Parental Alienation Syndrome. Grandma, step dad, and others made sure the father have no contact, all presents returned, all letters returned, ll visits which were court ordered were totally ignored by the family with connections were not enforced. Unfortunated Lins Silva international lawyer for Hague thought he was above the law, that that the real dad , David would give up. Did you know that the stepdad even tried in the brazillian courts to have the real fathers name expunged from birth certificate and replaced with his own.
So why would you even as the boy what his opinion is when it has been deemed not once but several times that THIS WAS AN ABDUCTION NOT A CUSTODY SUIT. PLEASE enlighten yourself on the timeline.
by toldyouso21 December 23, 2009 6:37 PM EST
I wonder what would have been the outcome or how Mr.Goldman would have acted, if no one had ever told him that is exwife had died?
Reply to this comment
by SusanStoHelit December 23, 2009 8:12 PM EST
Mr. Goldman was fighting to regain his son from the first moment his wife kidnapped him. He has never stopped. The Hague convention says the laws of the birth country rule, and Mr. Goldman, as the primary custodial parent during their marriage (he did the Mr. Mom bit), was given full custody.
by MicheleinCA December 23, 2009 5:34 PM EST
This is indeed great news! This will be the best Christmas for this father and son since the boy was kidnapped from him. I wish them both a safe return to the United States, where they both belong.
Reply to this comment
by GetAGrip007 December 23, 2009 4:38 PM EST
Hallelujah! Finally! This custody battle went on far too long- it has been a travesty of justice since the very beginning. Without the media getting involved this happy ending may have never happened. Now I pray that the transition ACTUALLY happens and this Brazilian family doesn't try anything illegal....
Reply to this comment
See all 29 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook