December 23, 2009 3:54 PM

Teen Births Rose for Second Year

(WebMD)  For the second year in a row, the birth rate among teens increased in 2007, raising concerns that efforts to curb teen pregnancies are not working as well as they once did.

Teen births increased 5 percent between 2005 and 2007, following a 34 percent drop between 1991 and 2005.

In 2007 -- the last year for which figures are available -- the birth rate among teens rose by about 1 percent, with 42.5 babies born for every 1,000 teens aged 15 to 19.

The overall birth rate also increased by 1 percent between 2006 and 2007, with a record 4.3 million babies born in the U.S.

The record number of births is the result of the growing population and is not indicative of a new baby boom, says CDC chief of reproductive statistics Stephanie J. Ventura, MA.

"The average woman is still having two children," she tells WebMD. "That hasn't really changed much in recent years."

Other Major Birth Trends
Among the other trends highlighted in the new report by the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics:
  • In 2007, there were 69.5 births for every 1,000 women of childbearing age in the United States.
  • Nearly 1 in 3 babies -- 31.8 percent -- were delivered by cesarean section, up 2 percent from the previous year.
  • The percentage of births to unmarried women increased from 38.5 percent in 2006 to 39.7 percent in 2007.
  • The rate of twin and higher-order multiple births remained unchanged between 2005 and 2006.
  • The infant mortality rate in 2007 did not change significantly from the 2006 rate of 6.77 deaths per 1,000 live births. But this rate is still much higher than in most other developed nations.
  • Life expectancy for a child born in 2007 reached a record high of 77.9 years.

    The report appears in the January issue of the journal Pediatrics.

    Teen Births a "Cause for Concern"
    Although the rate of increase in births among teenagers was similar to that seen in older women, there is cause for concern, Ventura says.

    The 14-year decline in teen birth rates began to slow early in the decade. At its peak in 1991, there were close to 62 births per 1,000 teens. By 2005, that number had declined to 40.5.

    "We certainly don't want to see this upward trend continue," she says. "Even though we have made a lot of progress in this area, we still have a long way to go. The birth rate among teens in the U.S. is still much higher than in most other developed countries."

    A recent analysis of data from a national survey of young people conducted by CDC showed declines in sexual activity and improvements in contraceptive use among teens between 1991 and 2003, with no significant changes in these behaviors since.

    Researcher John Santelli, MD, MPH, who chairs Columbia University's Clinical Population and Family Health department, led the team that conducted the analysis. He tells WebMD the 14-year decline in births among teens was largely driven by a big increase in condom use resulting from public health campaigns warning about the risks of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases posed by unprotected sex. He blames the increase in births on the shift away from public funding for AIDS education in favor or "abstinence-only" programs starting early in the decade.

    "We have raised a generation of young people who don't have basic information about contraception," he says.

    Record Number of C-Sections
    The C-section rate in the U.S. is now at its highest, rising in 2007 for the eleventh straight year.

    This represents a more than 50 percent increase in surgical deliveries in the past decade. C-section rates increased for most age groups and racial and ethnic groups in every state in the U.S., Ventura says.

    One clear reason for this is the trend away from vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, known as VBAC. Many smaller hospitals have banned VBACs because of malpractice concerns and regulations that require a surgical team to be in place to perform an emergency C-section, if needed.

    But many experts believe the steady increase in C-section deliveries has been largely driven by issues that have little to do with the health of the mother or baby, such as doctor convenience and patient preference.

    C-section delivery is the most common surgery performed in the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics statistician Fay Menacker, DrPH, says research is needed to identify the causes of the increase in surgical deliveries and their impact on outcomes.

    "This is major abdominal surgery and it is really important to look at the risks and benefits, both long and short term, for both the mother and the infant," she tells WebMD.
    By Salynn Boyles
    Reviewed by Louise Chang
    ©2005-2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved
  • © 2009 WebMD, LLC.. All Rights Reserved.
    Add a Comment See all 25 Comments
    by andie52 December 29, 2009 8:30 AM EST
    Teen age girls equate sex with love-bad idea. They also see so many celebrities having babies out of wedlock and think it's a glamorous life. In many instances the grandparents wind up raising the children and welfare gets taken for the support. Don't just talk to your daughters about respect;talk to your sons.
    Reply to this comment
    by cidaia December 26, 2009 12:40 PM EST
    Have the scientists and experts who have "proved" that abstinence-only education "doesn't work" controlled for...well, SABOTAGE?

    Have they controlled for the liberal meme that sex is glorious, that having it at 12 is natural, and that if your parents try to tell you otherwise they're fascists?

    Have they controlled for the Planned Parenthood "educational materials" that teach that a child has the right to do whatever she likes with her own body, and that if her parents don't understand that, it's okay to lie?

    Have they controlled for the effects of social messages, TV shows, and the open hostility leveled at people like me when I objected to that show targeting teens with "oh threesomes are so cool" - THEN I was informed that it's up to a family to decide that family's values (apparently, it's a family's choice as long as the family chooses to let the kid be promiscuous...if the family chooses something else, then and only then does "society" have an "obligation" to intervene"...

    What I want to know is, why are so many people so eager to defend childhood promiscuity?

    Why do the same people who agree that it's wrong for polygamists to be screwing children, justify other children just the same age being sexually active?
    Reply to this comment
    by womanofinsight December 26, 2009 2:12 PM EST
    Cidaia, you said it well. Planned Parenthood has at its heart a mission to make money, and since its the nation's largest abortion provider, it'll make its blood money any way it can. Never mind its founder Margaret Sanger advocated genocide of the handicapped and minorities. It's rich history is conveniently overlooked. Hey, even President Obama has spoken before it's membership showing genuine affection for it, which boggles the mind when you think about it. But you've got to admit it's been quite a success story. It gets our tax dollars, propagandizes our classrooms with its "education materials" and promotes birth control as the only risk precaution to consider in regards to youthful sexual activity. Then, on the back end of its business model, it's able to attract what every company needs -- new and repeat customers. Those are the pregnant teens whom it, in the vast majority of cases, persuades to abort. Now how's that for the profit motive? In regards to the media, the US is facing a horrific sexually transmitted disease outbreak affecting 1 out of 4 sexually active teens. Diseases not easily overcome by medicine, many with lifelong implications we've only yet to discover. Not only are they at risk of HIV, but other serious viruses that are immune-attacking in ways our youth will only fully understand as they age. Funny, none of the news outlets apparently consider this topic "sexy" enough to cover in depth. Where's the level of concern we've heard about H1N1 or AIDS? As for the entertainment decision makers who saturate TV and film with tales of youthful promiscuity, obviously this is where their minds and hearts are at. So maybe it's a Roman Polanski world after all.....
    by pubsrtoast December 26, 2009 9:16 AM EST
    LOL, What oh what could have possibly happened?
    _____________________________________________

    Posted 11/25/2004 5:31 PM

    Today's Top News Stories

    ? 1 dead, 2 hurt in Mich. office shooting; police say suspect had worked there - 6:04 PM
    ? AP Poll: Congress' approval hits high point - 5:35 PM
    ? Katrina claims stagger corps - 4:22 PM
    ? National Guard tapped for Iraq tour - 3:04 PM
    ? Edwards scared of 'rabid Republican' neighbor - 2:00 PM
    ? Add USATODAY.com RSS feeds Add USATODAY.com RSS feeds



    Bush urges more abstinence funds; effectiveness uncertain
    WASHINGTON (AP) ? President Bush's re-election insures that more federal money will flow to abstinence education that precludes discussion of birth control, even as the administration awaits evidence that the approach gets kids to refrain from sex.

    Congress last weekend included more than $131 million for abstinence programs in a $388 billion spending bill, an increase of $30 million but about $100 million less than Bush requested. Meanwhile, a national evaluation of abstinence programs has been delayed, with a final report not expected until 2006.
    _________________________________________________________________

    I would say this qualifies as a final report.
    Reply to this comment
    by from_the_north December 24, 2009 3:52 AM EST
    Palin would have all kids living sexually abstinent until they get married - her daughter is a good example of how that works. Why don't these kids use the good old birth control pill!!!!
    Reply to this comment
    by cidaia December 24, 2009 8:04 AM EST
    Because the same people - people like YOU - who justify ****** behavior (which is why abstinence-only education doesn't work, because "cool" people delegitimize the idea of abstinence), are the same ones who justify not using birth control.

    Hey, a girl has a RIGHT to be sexually active. It's her body.

    A girl has a RIGHT to kill the baby she made, if she doesn't want it. It's her body.

    And if that girl wants to KEEP the baby, she has a RIGHT to expect US to support it. After all, she's just a kid - she's not old enough to take responsibility for her body, her life, her mistakes, or her baby.
    by cidaia December 26, 2009 12:31 PM EST
    At least I am smart enough to know why teenagers should keep their legs shut.

    At least I am smart enough to know what is wrong with the logic, "we have this rule but people keep breaking it, therefore the logical conclusion is to stop having rules".

    Girls who have teen sex are losers. The truth of teen sex is that college dorm rooms are full of girls confiding in each other that they wish they could have their virginity back, so the next time they wouldn't waste it. Boys don't respect girls who put out. Girls who respect themselves don't put out.

    Listen to the so-called "liberals", the so-called "feminists", who mock girls like the Palin girl. You're all in favor of having every 13 year old screwing around - WHY? WHY DO YOU WANT THIS? - but then when they get in trouble, you mock them and you are cruel and nasty.

    WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?

    There is only one way the teen pregnancy situation will go away. That is when people stop stigmatizing girls who choose to be "prudes", and stop glamorizing the act of teen sex. It's parasitic and destructive, and so is everyone who tries to justify it.
    by rf35 December 24, 2009 3:04 AM EST
    I grew up in a predominately red state and the sex ed portion of health class was pretty much a joke. The school even made students get permission slips from their parents to attend that part of the class. It was therefore accepted by the student population that the only real way to learn anything about sex was to try it for ourselves. This is the consequence of "abstinence only" education.
    Reply to this comment
    by CBSName December 23, 2009 10:05 PM EST
    Why does it take nearly 2 years to get a basic statistic like the teen birth rate now that data is mostly computerized?
    Reply to this comment
    by jclark7613 December 23, 2009 8:05 PM EST
    Maybe parents should teach their children the truth about pregancy and have a open relationship with our children so they trust us to understand and help them. If my teen son thinks he wants to have sex I'll show him how to use a condom and If my daughter wanted to have sex as a teen I would take her to the clinic for birth control and teach her how to put the condom on the guy so there is no slip up. I remember my mother telling me to just wait til I was married to have sex because it wouldn't be good until I was in my thirties... I ended up getting married at 18 and realized most of her advise about sex was wrong
    Reply to this comment
    by cidaia December 24, 2009 8:15 AM EST
    Or, we could just teach kids the concept of responsibility.

    If a kid isn't old enough to have a baby - if she isn't in a position to raise it without help, and if she doesn't have a partner who is both willing and able to support both her and the baby if she gets pregnant - then she isn't entitled to "rights", because rights and responsibilities are tied together as surely as supply and demand, or risk and reward.

    If she claims rights without responsibility, that means someone else, somewhere, is going to get stuck with responsibilities.

    Don't teach your daughter to be a parasite on society. If she's sexually active, she'd better be using MULTIPLE forms of birth control, because she does not have the RIGHT to make a baby, in the same way that just because it's "your dog" does not give you the RIGHT to let your dog run around unspayed, if you're not prepared to care for the puppies.
    by ffoulkes-2009 December 27, 2009 6:33 AM EST
    When my first teenage daughter started having serious relationships at 16 years old, I used a simple method to get across to her the inconvenience of child birth. I handed her a cantaloupe and said...now imagine giving birth to that. 8 YEARS later, I am about 9 months from becoming a grandpa.
    by armyoftwelve December 23, 2009 7:25 PM EST
    From this story:

    "The record number of births is the result of the growing population and is not indicative of a new baby boom, says CDC chief of reproductive statistics Stephanie J. Ventura, MA."


    Well, that pretty much says it all. This isn't even a problem.
    If more teenagers are having babies because they are having FEWER abortions I say it's a good thing. Mom always said that children were the best kind of birth control.....
    Reply to this comment
    by P0STING_AWAY December 23, 2009 6:40 PM EST
    by american_11-2009 December 23, 2009 5:05 PM EST
    A large percentage are & Illegal Hispanics! Illegal Hispanics have invaded this Nation like swarm of Locusts & they breed like Cockroaches and drop out of school and join gangs like fleas jumping off a dead dogs back!

    by doctor_know December 23, 2009 5:28 PM EST
    You sound very un-American sir.... you may want to move somewhere less culturally diverse...

    WRONG.
    MR. American hit the nail right on the head.
    Hispanic pollution is a HUGE problem.
    Reply to this comment
    by ewo1977 December 23, 2009 7:29 PM EST
    Yeah! Let's keep America as white as we can. Those dirty brown people illegal or otherwise shouldn't be having babies in my good old White United States.
    by ffoulkes-2009 December 24, 2009 7:47 AM EST
    ewo, you are purposefully ignoring the 'illegal' part here.
    by diamruby December 23, 2009 5:56 PM EST
    I say let the parents pay in full for their own teen baby breeders. Most of them have learned well from their parents lead. Life long baby breeding welfare loosers & alot of rich families too using the system. The Mexicans come here to have their large families on our dime, all expense paid medical, food, expensive translators in schools & housing. People have no shame any more, they can breed with any man or woman that they want & have a kid by each one & they think nothing of it. We need to stop paying people to have children & restrict all access to free schooling & train them to work for what they get.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 25 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    Better Information. Better Health.
    CBS News on Facebook