By

CBSNews /

AP/ June 10, 2010, 12:50 PM

Obama Taps Cyber Security Exec as New Czar

KarmaVolition

The White House has tapped a corporate cyber security expert and former Bush administration official to lead the effort to shore up the country's computer networks and better coordinate with companies that operate 80 percent of those critical systems.

Howard A. Schmidt, a former eBay and Microsoft executive, will become the government's cyber security coordinator, weathering a rocky selection process that dragged on for months, as others turned the job down.

In a letter posted on the White House web site Tuesday, John Brennan, assistant to President Barack Obama for homeland security and counterterrorism, said Schmidt will have regular access to the president and play a vital role in the country's security.

Schmidt's selection comes more than 10 months after Obama and ordered a broad administration review.

A senior White House official said Obama was personally involved in the selection process and chose Schmidt because of his unique background and skills. Schmidt will have regular and direct access to the president for cyber security issues, the official said. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the selection process.

Obama released the findings of the cyber security review nearly seven months ago, vowing that the White House would name a cyber coordinator to deal with one of the "most serious economic and national security challenges we face as a nation."

U.S. government computer systems are being attacked or scanned millions of times a day. Hackers and cyber criminals pose an expanding threat, using increasingly sophisticated technologies to steal money or information, while nation-states probe for weaknesses in order to steal classified documents or technology or destroy the networks that run vital services.

"60 Minutes" Cyber War: Sabotaging the System

Corporate computer security leaders have openly expressed frustration with the White House as movement on the job post stalled.

At the same time, cyber experts and potential job candidates have complained that the position lacks the budgetary and policy-making authority needed to be successful. Schmidt will report to the National Security Council and closely support the National Economic Council on cyber issues.

Schmidt's selection suggests that economic and business interests in the White House held more sway in the selection process. Schmidt, president and CEO of the Information Security Forum, a nonprofit international consortium that conducts research in information security, has served as chief security officer for Microsoft and as cyber security chief for online auction giant eBay. He was reportedly preferred by Lawrence Summers, director of the economic council.

Roger Thornton, a cyber security expert and chief technology officer for Fortify Software, praised the choice. He said Schmidt understands the technology, has broad management experience and has worked well within the political arena, a key requirement for the White House post.

"I think he would be able to get people to compromise and move things forward," said Thornton.

Considered an expert in computer forensics, Schmidt's roughly 40-year career includes 31 years in local and federal government service, including a stint as vice chairman of President George W. Bush's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board. He also was for a short time an adviser to the FBI and worked at the National Drug Intelligence Center.

Congress members, business leaders and cyber security experts have called for a more coordinated effort by the federal government to monitor and protect U.S. systems and work with the private sector to insure that transportation systems, energy plants and other sensitive networks are equally protected.
AP
13 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stormerF2 says:
Too many CZARs,Just someone else to blame when something goes wrong. What happened to the Buck stops here? At least Harry Truman was not afraid to make a decision and call it as he saw it.
reply
AOCGUY replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Stomer, below is a list of Truman's csars. So much for the Buck Stopping Here!

cleanup czar - Morris Newbold
food czar - Charles Luckman
housing czar - Wilson Wyatt
mobilization czar - Charles Wilson
civilian economy czar - Charles Wilson
patronage czar - Bob Hannegan
reconversion czar - John Snyder
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bubbadubba says:
"Banks whose executives served on Federal Reserve boards were more likely to receive government bailout funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, according to the study from Ran Duchin and Denis Sosyura, professors at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business."

Bush's Paulson and Obama's Giethner worked together at the FED.
Now we have another Bush guy in a top position.
I would suspect this new guy is going to find a way to shove money to Microsoft.
I also suspect the wealthy as just as much in control of our country as they were under Bush and still growing.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bubbadubba says:
Here we go again, another Bush guy appointed by Obama.
What is Obama doing?
This is getting really strange.
reply
CoastalExchange replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Maybe he's actually choosing based on qualifications instead of party affiliations ?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tmittelstaed says:
Howard A. Schmidt is a terrible choice. He did nothing for Microsoft, he started working for them in 1997 and Windows 98, Windows 2000 and Windows XP have been utterly full of security holes - it wasn't until Vista (long after he left) that Microsoft has changed the structure of Windows to make it more secure. He also did nothing for Ebay, as he came in 2003 with the result that Ebay merely ended up making their rules for going after fraudulent sellers even more complex for buyers and harder for buyers to get Ebay to investigate.

Yes, Howard has an impressive Resume and he knows what a security hole looks like. But, he has no spine whatsoever. His method of operations is when a security researcher reports a discovered security hole to him, he will go to the organization with the hole and try to get them to fix the hole - and will give them unbelievable amounts of time to "get around" to fixing the hole.

This "work with the vendor" strategy has been shown to not work. Cyber vendors do not spend a lot of effort to close holes like this that are reported to them, unless a deadline for them to fix the hole is given, and Howard never gives such deadlines. Howard as NEVER ONCE published a security hole that the vendor had earlier notification of and never bothered fixing. Thus he cannot make a credible threat to any of these companies that serves as an incentive for them to fix the hole.

This is why we are seeing many more "zero day" software security patches - because the security research community has figured out that telling vendors in advance doesn't get them to fix the holes. Can you imagine if the airlines and government had managed to hide the fact that the 911 hijackers got their weapons past airport security? They would STILL be dithering over whether or not to nationalize airline security inspections.
reply
bubbadubba replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I dumped Windows for Linux and have never looked back.
It is kind of like going from a Chinese moped to a Lexus to get around.
Nobody uses that sloppy old slow, error filled, Windows any more do they?
I mean why would anyone pay for a piece of junk when they can get the best free?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
-One_American- says:
Appointed by Obama alone, with no oversight from anyone in Congress, this new czar could be directed by Obama to gather information to use against American citizens, businesses and organizations, and other independent government agencies.

Of course, Obama is so transparent and honest with America - he would never do that, right?
reply
CoastalExchange replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Lol, did you just wake up from a Coma? I seriously have to ask, when the Bush wiretapping/patriot act laws came out, were you as concerned then as you are now? I just ask because there is no good reason for paranoia now, as opposed to the former situation... But then again, I forget how seriously brainwashed 40% of Americans are (both left and right).
CoastalExchange replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Okay, admittedly, I made up the 40% figure.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
wdh3007 says:
To many Czar's make for bad politics in any administration look bad!
reply
CoastalExchange replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Really? Or is it the word Czar (which brings to mind references of Russia where the word originates)? You know what the opposite of having these Czars is? Dictatorship.
stn_sage replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Since we have shifted to Corporate Communism as the de facto form of government in the United States, the term Czar is probably appropriate...
I take it as an admission that is what has happened, and that is why they are using that term!

If we ever revert back to a republic, with representative government,
then maybe they could use the term 'director'?
See all 13 Comments