December 19, 2009 5:52 AM

Conference OKs Watered-Down Climate Deal

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon says "we have a deal" after a climate conference in Copenhagen decided to recognize a political accord brokered by President Barack Obama with China and other emerging powers.

But Ban says he's "aware that this is just the beginning" of a
process to craft a binding pact to rein in greenhouse gas emissions. Still, Ban says the Copenhagen Agreement "will have an immediate operational effect."

Many poor nations had bitterly protested the deal because it lacks specific targets for reducing carbon emissions.

Earlier, the conference was near collapse, but the pact was agreed on during an all-night plenary session that satisfied nations that had been blocking the accord because of the absence of the targets. Decisions are taken by unanimity in U.N. climate talks.

After a break, the conference president gaveled the decision to "take note" of the Copenhagen Accord specifying those who agreed with it in the title.

Several developing countries, including Bolivia, Cuba, Sudan and Venezuela, bitterly protested the deal and said it is unacceptable because it lacks specific targets for reducing carbon emissions. Decisions are made by consensus in U.N. climate negotiations.

After failing to resolve the impasse during an all-night session, Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen announced a break for consultations with U.N. officials.

"If it fails, you have a collapse of the whole negotiating process out of Copenhagen," said Alden Meyer of the Union of Concerned Scientists. "The Copenhagen Express is in danger of derailing."

The overnight talks resulted in the ultimate agreement.

Mr. Obama appeared to have salvaged the faltering talks Friday when he declared a "breakthrough" with China, India, Brazil and South Africa. But the three-page document they agreed on ran into trouble in the plenary where some delegates denounced it because it was nonbinding and set no overall target for curbing greenhouse gas emissions.

Sudan's delegate, Lumumba Di-Aping, said it would condemn Africa to widespread deaths from global warming and compared it to Nazis sending "6 million people into furnaces" in the Holocaust. The African Union, however, backed the deal and his statement was denounced by other delegations.

British Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband said the U.N. faced "a moment of profound crisis" if it did not approve the deal.

Mr. Obama's day of hectic diplomacy produced a document promising $30 billion in emergency aid in the next three years and a goal of channeling $100 billion a year by 2020 to developing countries with no guarantees.

The emerging outcome was a disappointment to those who had anticipated the Copenhagen Accord would be turned into a legally binding treaty. Instead, it envisions another year of negotiations and leaves myriad details yet to be decided.

It includes a method for verifying reductions of heat-trapping gases - a key demand by Washington, because China has resisted international efforts to monitor its actions.

It requires industrial countries to list their individual targets and developing countries to list the actions they will take to cut global warming pollution by specific amounts. Mr. Obama called that an "unprecedented breakthrough."

If the countries had waited to reach a full, binding agreement, "then we wouldn't make any progress," Mr. Obama said. In that case, he said, "there might be such frustration and cynicism that rather than taking one step forward, we ended up taking two steps back."

Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama said the deal would represent "a major step forward." German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a leading proponent of strong action to confront global warming, gave the Copenhagen Accord grudging acceptance, but said she had "mixed feelings" about the outcome and called it only a first step.

Mr. Obama met twice with Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao - once privately and once with other leaders present - in hopes of sweeping aside some of the disputes that had blocked progress. The U.S. and China are the world's two largest carbon polluters.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said the deal was "clearly below" the European Union's goal.

"I will not hide my disappointment," he said.

But British Prime Minister Gordon Brown was positive, saying "a year ago nobody thought this sort of agreement was possible."

The document said carbon emissions should be reduced enough to keep the increase in average global temperatures below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) compared to pre-industrial levels.

It also is the figure that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the U.N.-sponsored science network, recommends to head off the worst of global warming, and says would require an emissions reductions average in the 25-40 per cent range below 1990 levels.

However, some of the most vulnerable nations believe the limit should be held to no more than 1.5 degrees and environmental groups called it a meaningless aspiration.

"The deal is a triumph of spin over substance. It recognizes the need to keep warming below 2 degrees but does not commit to do so. It kicks back the big decisions on emissions cuts and fudges the issue of climate cash," said Jeremy Hobbs, executive director of Oxfam International, an organization that works with developing countries.

He said the agreement "barely papers over the huge differences between countries which have plagued these talks for two years."

Outside the conference hall, more than 100 protesters chanted, "You're destroying our future." Some carried signs of Mr. Obama with the words "climate shame" pasted on his face.

Mr. Obama had planned to spend only about nine hours in Copenhagen as the summit wrapped up. But, as an agreement appeared within reach, he extended his stay by more than six hours to attend a series of meetings aimed at brokering a deal. He and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton held talks with European leaders, including Merkel, Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Mr. Obama said there was a "fundamental deadlock in perspectives" between big, industrially developed countries like the United States and poorer, though sometimes large, developing nations. Still he said this week's efforts "will help us begin to meet our responsibilities to leave our children and grandchildren a cleaner planet."

The deal as described by Mr. Obama reflects some progress helping poor nations cope with climate change and getting China to disclose its actions to address the warming problem.

He said the world will have to take more aggressive steps to combat global warming. The first step, he said, is to build trust between developed and developing countries.

In a diatribe against the U.S., Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez criticized the conference as undemocratic.

"There is a document that has been moving around, all sorts of documents that have been moving around, there is a real lack of transparency here," he said earlier Friday. "We reject any document that Mr. Obama will slip under the door."



Find behind-the-scenes information, blog posts and discussion about the Copenhagen climate conference at a Facebook page run by the Associated Press and an array of international news agencies. Follow coverage and blogging of the event on Twitter

CBS/ AP
Add a Comment
by Noval53 December 21, 2009 4:44 AM EST
The Copenhagen chicken little conference fell apart and that's great news. The Russians, Indians, Chinese, and Brazilians weren't fooled by the scam and refused to sign on to being governed by UN schemes for money. We all now know the difference between weather and climate; MONEY. Hang on to your wallet as the UN will now flood the willing media with more manipulated research, sob stories, dire climate predictions to make demands of more money commitments from the us all. Europeans and Americans sucked in by this scam can expect to pay more for everything with new taxes, fees, and penalties. They'll be no improvement in the climate anywhere; you'll just have less money.
Reply to this comment
by MADDAT52 December 19, 2009 9:29 PM EST
I will sum this up for you in code: Russians, Iraq,) (Russians Iran,) (Russians Venezuela,) (Brazil Soros + Obama + oil) (E. U. + Russia + oil - NATO) (Russian Investors + U.S.)(Russia + Oil + Soros + Obama + China). ===I suggest that you start Googleing or what ever these combinations of word, I believe you will be surprised at what you find!!
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 December 19, 2009 2:36 PM EST
Burning less coal and oil is good for air quality and the bottom line. As soon as people figure out that it is the smart thing to do for SO many reasons, we can make progress. I have seldom seen a situation where people need to be persuaded to do what is beneficial for them.
Reply to this comment
by doctor_know December 20, 2009 3:00 AM EST
Absolutely right.
by fiberglass3 December 20, 2009 11:00 AM EST
sjc_1 You are so right. Wish folks could see this. It's all about saying goodbye to oil.

After the prices that we saw in 2008, most people are finding ways to use a lot less.
by bubbadubba December 19, 2009 10:07 AM EST
What's the main cause of CO2 emissions?
Oil.
And who is in the pockets of oil companies?
Republicans.
And who is against reducing CO2?
Republicans.
And what is the main plan to reduce CO2?
Electricity generated by nuclear power.
And who will lose record profits if we switch to nuclear power and electric cars?
The oil companies.
Do I have to draw you a map?
Reply to this comment
by jgg000015 December 19, 2009 2:03 PM EST
since all breathing creatures exhale CO2 you're gonna have to do more than draw a map.
by cbs4111 December 19, 2009 9:15 AM EST
CBS - When are you going to realize that the Associated Press is no longer a credible news organization?

The climate conference DID NOT COME TO AN AGREEMENT. They only voted to "TAKE NOTE" of the NON-BINDING agreement Obama reached with only 5 OF THE 190 COUNTRIES. FIVE. Obama's "agreement" was nothing more than a failed attempt at saving face, and a laughable one at that. If AP was credible, they would have published the "agreement". Have you read it? It's pure gibberish!
Reply to this comment
by lobo62740 December 19, 2009 8:39 AM EST
Another non-accomplishment for Obama. This time in Copenhagen. Why wouldn't the poor countries jump on this? It may mean future money for their country--none of which would go for what it was intended. What a joke this entire event has been but the Messiah thinks he has done something AGAIN. And I thought Jimmy Carter was naive.
Reply to this comment
by 2012EOD December 19, 2009 7:06 AM EST
Mr. Obama's day of hectic diplomacy produced a document promising $30 billion in emergency aid in the next three years and a goal of channeling $100 billion a year by 2020 to developing countries with no guarantees

Alright, let me try to understand this. 10 Billion of our dollars (which we do not have) will go to other countries per year for the next 3 years.

We have 10% un-employment here at home, so if you factor in 300 million people and 10% of that is 30 million.

So instead of using that money to help our citizens, our President decides to give it to other countries.

Wow, and you voted for him.

Hoax and Chains folks.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook