December 16, 2009 10:07 AM

Marines Struggle to Secure Afghan Border

(CBS/AP)  Only a few hundred American troops are policing the southern border of one of Afghanistan's major smuggling areas, leaving open a vast expanse of desert that the Taliban use to shuttle in weapons and fighters from Pakistan.

This dusty hamlet 75 miles north of the border in Helmand province was the Taliban's key transit point from Pakistan before the Marines arrived in July. Since then, the Marines have set up a series of patrol bases east and west of Khan Neshin to disrupt the Taliban's supply lines.

CBSNews.com Special Report: Afghanistan

But the battalion deployed at only about 50 percent of its authorized strength, and one of its three companies is posted in central Helmand. That leaves several hundred Marines to cover roughly 6,000 square miles - an area larger than Connecticut.

As a result, the Marines may have trouble curbing Taliban supply lines as thousands of fresh troops pour into the province as part of President Obama's surge.

Obama Discusses Afghan Surge on "60 Minutes"

"I would like to push closer to the border, but I can only go as far as I can support," said Lt. Col. Michael Martin, commanding officer of 4th Marine Division, 4th Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion.

"Like Napoleon, you don't want to overextend your capabilities, or you will get your butt handed to you," said Martin, whose troops are spread out among a handful of patrol bases along the Helmand River, marking the coalition's most southern presence in the province.

Some 8,500 additional Marines are slated to arrive in Helmand by mid-2010 as part of the 30,000-troop buildup. But any decision to send more Marines south to patrol the largely uninhabited border area would leave fewer troops for the major population centers farther north.

Meanwhile, there are growing doubts about how many troops the U.S. military will actually be able to move into Afghanistan by the summer.

CBS News correspondent Kimberly Dozier reports the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff met Tuesday with a roomful of military logistics experts to try and figure out how to "force-flow" 30,000 U.S. troops into Afghanistan, with all the necessary hardware, using just one airport, in just a handful of months.

Logistics Experts Try to Pull Off Afghanistan "Miracle"

Admiral Mike Mullen already said in congressional testimony that it's more likely they'll only get to the 20,000 or 25,000 mark by the end of next summer. But he was meeting with the military's top movement experts to make sure it doesn't slip any further.

Earlier this week, America's top military officer expressed concern about the "growing level of collusion" between Taliban insurgents in Afghanistan and al Qaeda and other militants across the border in Pakistan.

Many Taliban fighters fled to Pakistan following the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 and found sanctuary in the mountainous belt that runs between the two countries. Obama has pressed Pakistan to target the militants, but many analysts believe the government has resisted because the Taliban could serve as useful proxies if the coalition effort in Afghanistan fails.

That leaves the Marines with the difficult task of disrupting the flow of Taliban fighters into Afghanistan largely without Pakistani help.
598601
"We are trying to make it as difficult as possible for the Taliban to stay connected to their sanctuary in Pakistan," said Capt. Timothy Newkirk, executive officer of 4th LAR's Bravo Company, which is based in a 200-year-old mud fort in the town of Khan Neshin.

Tribal elders attending a recent meeting at the Marines' most eastern patrol base reported scores of Taliban fighters flowing through a bazaar about 12 miles to the northeast near the town of Sar Banader.

"If they can get there, they can get into Marjah and they have basic freedom of movement there," Newkirk said.

Marjah is the Taliban's principal stronghold in central Helmand and will likely be a key target once the 11,000 Marines currently in the province are bolstered with the surge troops.

If the Taliban are able to send reinforcements to Marjah from Pakistan, it could make it more difficult for the Marines to take the city.

Martin, the battalion commander, said his ultimate goal would be to push south with Afghan border police the Marines are training to set up an outpost near Bahram Chah, a town just north of the Pakistani border teeming with Taliban fighters and drug smugglers making their way into Afghanistan.

But that would require hundreds of additional troops so that the Marines could extend their security control far enough south to protect any outpost near the border.

"I can drive my vehicle down to the border and back, but if I have a problem, I can't be reinforced," Martin said.

The Marines said they don't want to make the same mistake as the Army, which set up a series of remote bases near Afghanistan's eastern border with Pakistan that were constantly in danger of being overrun because the military didn't control the surrounding area. Some of those outposts have now been abandoned.

"A presence on the border would be better, but it is so far south that supporting it wouldn't be feasible right now," Newkirk said. "It wouldn't be diligent to have hundreds of Marines down in hostile territory 200 kilometers (125 miles) from the nearest medical facilities."

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by Cyber998 December 16, 2009 2:28 PM EST
Why on earth are we there? More and more I think my country (at least under Bush) isn't much better than the NAZI's.

You can't just go around invading countries because you don't like them or want their oil.

It just ain't right!
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George- December 16, 2009 2:41 PM EST
by Cyber998 December 16, 2009 2:28 PM EST

What are you talking about....."Invading countries because we don't like them or want their oil" what kind of naive nonsense is that statement......we aren't in Afghanistan because we don't like them, we are there in a counter-terrorism military operation....."want their oil" ? There is no oil flowing in the Hindu-Kush mountain range....and we didn't "want their oil" in Iraq, or we would have had oil tankers traveling round the clock.

What "ain't right" is you making comments that you have no idea what you are saying, based on some Liberal talking points you may have heard
by exusmc8541 December 16, 2009 1:36 PM EST
We can not secure our own border. Ask my neighbor. Oh thats right I do not speek spanish.
Use satellite and UAV for the watch dog in the open spaces and direct our Marines to the locations for the stop of incoming forces and supplies.
Oh yea that one was too hard for the leaders of the free world to figure out.
Sorry.
Reply to this comment
by finkfurst December 16, 2009 1:46 PM EST
by exusmc8541 December 16, 2009 1:36 PM EST
We can not secure our own border. Ask my neighbor. Oh thats right I do not speek spanish.
------------------
.............. or English!
by fedup12 December 16, 2009 1:34 PM EST
But But But, we cant even police our own Mexican border. Because of funding... How can we do it for a foreign country?
Reply to this comment
by YoureSoWrong17 December 16, 2009 1:11 PM EST
I think that some folks will explain themselves in Gitmo before long, and all of their streetwalking for Jihad will be for nothing.
Reply to this comment
by YoureSoWrong17 December 16, 2009 1:03 PM EST
Which groupie said their favorite act was Taliban featuring al-Qaeda with special guest Agit-Prop? By a show of missing hands.
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 December 16, 2009 8:43 AM EST
If we used Nukes or Biological weapons, this war would be over in a minute. These technologies are exactly what the enemy is pursuing to use on us. While we "hold back" and be politically correct and honorable in war, many of our brave young troops die at the cowardice of a camel riding IED implanter.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-1 December 16, 2009 8:53 AM EST
You can't kill women, children, elderly, handicapped, etc, etc, etc and expect the world to support us!!

You'd turn England into a bitter foe with that plan!!
by wyodutch December 16, 2009 9:15 AM EST
Those "cowards", as you call them, have fought every would-be occupier to a standstill... burying hundreds of thousands of their own along the way.
by wyodutch December 16, 2009 8:24 AM EST
Well, look on the bright side. If those Americans were not in Afghanistan with their finger in the ****... they'd be unemployed back in the states.
.
At least they have 3 hots, a cot and a decent paycheck.
.
It's only costing America $12,000,000,000 a month to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq. Put in simpler terms, that's 72 tons of crisp, newly printed hundred-dollar bills tossed on the bonfire each month. Now THAT ought to warm the cockles of your heart this holiday season.
Reply to this comment
by finkfurst December 16, 2009 6:46 AM EST
Of course they're struggling to secure the Afghan/Pakistan border! What idiot thought they possibly could?
Reply to this comment
by sean71z December 16, 2009 6:29 AM EST
Helmand harvests a great deal of valued poppies for pharmaceutical use. Pakistan takes advantage of this deal. The Americans should never discourage poppy crops. Trade reaps substantial revenues for the region. Without it, Afghanistan is a poor third world nation.
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook