December 16, 2009 8:24 AM

Copenhagen Carbon Footprint: 40,500 Tons

By
CBSNews
(AP)  If they fail to reach a climate deal in Copenhagen, world leaders flying in their private jets and huddling in five-star hotels will have little to show for their efforts beyond a big, fat carbon footprint.

The U.N. estimates 40,500 tons of carbon dioxide will be pumped into the atmosphere during the 12-day conference - 90 percent of it from flights. The rest comes from waste and electricity related to transport to and from the conference center and lodging in and around the Danish city.

Most of the leaders were flying either on commercial airlines or government-owned jets and Sweden was one of the few to announce plans to offset those aviation emissions - something it does routinely. Most are doing nothing to boost their green credentials and some saw no reason to treat their trip to the U.N. climate talks any differently.

"This prime minister is the last person in India or maybe even the world to do anything for effect," said Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's spokesman Harish Khare. "It'll be a normal visit, like any other visit by the prime minister." Singh was scheduled to travel in a private jet to Copenhagen for security, his office said.

Those traveling on commercial flights include Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejajjiva, Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann and Finnish President Tarja Halonen.

Barack Obama is traveling on Air Force One, French President Nicolas Sarkozy in his special Airbus and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on a presidential jet nicknamed "Aerolula."

A handful of Europeans made a point of taking the train, like the environment ministers of the Netherlands and Switzerland.

Few environmentalists at the conference made an issue of the carbon footprints from more than 100 world leaders. They were more worried that governments are failing to make progress on reaching a global climate pact.

Norway's Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg - who often gives green advice to Norwegians - was criticized at home, however, for deciding to take a private jet from Oslo to Copenhagen rather than one of the 17 shuttles that daily make the hour-long run between the two Scandinavian capitals.

"If he tells everybody to take the bus, take the train, stop wasting energy, then you'd have to expect Stoltenberg to sacrifice something too," said Oerjan Holm, vice president of the Norwegian Conservation Society.

A statement from Stoltenberg's office said he decided to travel by private jet because he wanted the "flexibility" to match the somewhat unstable schedule of the climate conference. It added that the government buys carbon credits at the end of every year to offset the prime minister's air travels.

Some activists said leaders should at least find ways to make their trip more sustainable, especially if they aren't serious about reaching a deal.

"There is an obsession by world leaders to be able to come in here with big entourages on their special airplanes, land at the airport and be driven in big limousines, with bigger entourages," said Asad Rehman, spokesman for the environmental group Friends of the Earth.

"What they should be looking at is how they could travel here with the minimal carbon impact that they can have," he said. "But also, more importantly, are they coming here to actually sign a deal and make a deal that will save both the people and the planet? If they're coming here with an empty pocket and empty promises, then they should stay at home."

Susan Burns, the chief executive officer of the Global Footprint Network, a California-based sustainability research institute, said it would be wrong to scale back negotiations over concerns about carbon emissions, especially with so much work to be done.

"They should have a Copenhagen every month until they figure this out," Burns said. "We need to spend our carbon very wisely. And getting world leaders together and locking them in a room while they get this done is one such investment, as is investing it in the economy of the future."

Climate summits, which attract thousands of delegates and are often held in far-flung or glitzy locations like Barcelona and Rio de Janeiro, are easy targets for critics.

The last big climate conference, in 2007 on the Indonesian island of Bali, blew through 47,000 tons of carbon - equal to the daily emissions of Marseilles, one of the biggest cities in France. Delegates were criticized for running their air conditioners as they chatted in beach-side villas.

This time, it's the idling limos waiting in subzero temperatures to shuttle delegates between their hotels and the conference center.

Organizers from the Danish government said they were doing everything they could to minimize the conference's carbon footprint.

They have reduced emissions 20 percent through a number of energy efficiency measures, promoted public transport, encouraged hotels to provide environmentally certified rooms and installed efficient lighting in the conference center, according to Jan-Christoph Napierski, who heads conference logistics for the Danish Foreign Ministry.

They are offsetting the rest of the emissions by investing in a program to upgrade antiquated brick kilns in Bangladesh with the help of the World Bank.

"Bangladesh is one of the countries hardest hit by climate change and there's a great need to assist the country with technology and capital contributions," said conference president Connie Hedegaard. "In addition, the project will result in significant environmental improvements for the local community, where particle pollution from the existing old brick works is clearly visible."

AP
Add a Comment See all 40 Comments
by json46 December 17, 2009 1:06 AM EST
climate change is caused by electromagnetic energy.

http://cctech-info.blogspot.com/

Carbon could never create jagged clouds in 15 minutes over 6 thousand miles.
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman December 16, 2009 10:26 PM EST
by louiville35 December 16, 2009 7:55 PM EST
by troutfishyman December 16, 2009 2:00 PM EST


You are wrong as usual.


http://www.slate.com/id/2194989/?y=1
==============================================================

Your quoting SLATE LOL AHAHHAHHAHA









The information you posted is incorrect and out of date. Try again. The Slate article contains references to the studies done, unlike your fictitious post.
Reply to this comment
by louiville35 December 16, 2009 7:55 PM EST
by troutfishyman December 16, 2009 2:00 PM EST


You are wrong as usual.


http://www.slate.com/id/2194989/?y=1
==============================================================

Your quoting SLATE LOL AHAHHAHHAHA
Reply to this comment
by louiville35 December 16, 2009 8:01 PM EST
So prius owners enjoy:
"As already noted, the Prius is partly driven by a battery which contains nickel. The nickel is mined and smelted at a plant in Sudbury, Ontario. This plant has caused so much environmental damage to the surrounding environment that NASA has used the ?dead zone? around the plant to test moon rovers. The area around the plant is devoid of any life for miles.

The plant is the source of all the nickel found in a Prius? battery and Toyota purchases 1,000 tons annually. Dubbed the Superstack, the plague-factory has spread sulfur dioxide across northern Ontario, becoming every environmentalist?s nightmare.

?The acid rain around Sudbury was so bad it destroyed all the plants and the soil slid down off the hillside,? said Canadian Greenpeace energy-coordinator David Martin during an interview with Mail, a British-based newspaper.

All of this would be bad enough in and of itself; however, the journey to make a hybrid doesn?t end there. The nickel produced by this disastrous plant is shipped via massive container ship to the largest nickel refinery in Europe. From there, the nickel hops over to China to produce ?nickel foam.? From there, it goes to Japan. Finally, the completed batteries are shipped to the United States, finalizing the around-the-world trip required to produce a single Prius battery. Are these not sounding less and less like environmentally sound cars and more like a farce?

Wait, I haven?t even got to the best part yet. When you pool together all the combined energy it takes to drive and build a Toyota Prius, the flagship car of energy fanatics, it takes almost 50 percent more energy than a Hummer - the Prius?s arch nemesis.

Through a study by CNW Marketing called ?Dust to Dust,? the total combined energy is taken from all the electrical, fuel, transportation, materials (metal, plastic, etc) and hundreds of other factors over the expected lifetime of a vehicle. The Prius costs an average of $3.25 per mile driven over a lifetime of 100,000 miles - the expected lifespan of the Hybrid."
by ubrew12 December 16, 2009 6:01 PM EST
"If they Fail to Reach Climate Deal, Leaders will Leave Nothing Behind but Massive Emissions"

40,500 tons is 0.00014% of what humanity releases in a year. I'm not sure what CBS means by 'massive emissions', but if it reduces our global output by 2%, that is still 15000 times as much as the Copenhagen attendees released in their conclave.
Reply to this comment
by elmgreen11 December 16, 2009 5:26 PM EST
US envoy Todd Stern "Death Star" lies when he says that "we didn't know what was happening." Scientists have published papers on global warming for over 50 years, in which time the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has increased by 10%. Denialism will probably destroy us all. Fortunately, bimbo airhead Sarah "bailin'" Palin couldn't get elected dogcatcher of Wasilla, AK.
Reply to this comment
by akw1 December 16, 2009 4:24 PM EST
This says it all! From yesterday's meetings:



?This is not a climate-change negotiation,? said Janos Pasztor, director of the U.N. secretary-general?s climate-change support team. ?It?s about something much more fundamental. It?s about economic strength.? Countries, he added, ?just have to slug it out.?
Reply to this comment
by moski33-2009 December 16, 2009 4:12 PM EST
These people are a JOKE.
Can someone PLEASE drop a nuke on Copenhagen now? It is really really cold and they need something to warm them up RIGHT AWAY! (and to vaporize these Idiots trying to destroy the World!)
Reply to this comment
by prohb December 16, 2009 2:35 PM EST
Another non-story furthered by the not-left-not-right-but-just-sensationalist media. Can't you see people??? The media (in this case CBS) is just pushing your buttons for a media splash and internet frenzy. They know how to get you going, don't they?
Of course, any conference is going to have a carbon footprint....as is any major human endeavor. What should they have done huddled around a picnic table in a park....and walked to get there. Don't be ridiculous. We are stuck with many of these energy intensive life-style choices till a better way is found. This meeting was an attempt to change that and I wish them the best.
Reply to this comment
by sjc_1 December 16, 2009 2:11 PM EST
The emissions for the conference are a ONE time deal. They do not spew out millions of tons 24/7/365 like the thousands of coal fired power plants. Get a grip, these sorts of stories are distorting and misleading.
Reply to this comment
by kluzer12 December 16, 2009 2:10 PM EST
What a joke these people are. They do not care about the planet they want power and money to control our lives and redistribute American wealth to other countries.
Reply to this comment
See all 40 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook