December 15, 2009 8:00 PM
- Text
What Will it Take to Win Over Lieberman?
Scroll Left Scroll Right
-
play SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship; Couple ... -
play Couple reeling from recession rewrites story, publishes romance novels -
play Snowden: "U.S. Government is not going to be able ... -
play SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship -
play Syria tensions make for chilly meeting between Obama, Putin -
play Colo. Black Forest fire has died down, yet danger remains -
play 6/16: Protesters seek refuge in Istanbul hotel; Pope blesses ... -
play Ghost army: How a group of artists helped win WWII -
play Okla. tornado survivor finds dog buried alive under rubble -
play What does the new Iranian president mean for the rest ... -
play The power of a uniquely American song -
play David Coleman Headley: Terror sleeper agent foiled by NSA
Even close colleagues of Sen. Joe Lieberman were at a loss Tuesday to explain his apparent about face.
"I have no idea," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich.
After all, the proposal to allow younger Americans to buy-in to Medicare had been crafted specifically as a compromise for Lieberman and other moderates who opposed a public option, reports CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes.
Lieberman has championed the buy-in idea for nearly a decade and reiterated his support just three months ago.
"What I was proposing was that they have an option to buy in to Medicare early," he said during an interview.
But this week he suddenly threatened to block the health care bill if it contains a Medicare buy-in, throwing the entire process into disarray yet again.
"I'm very disappointed because I thought we had Sen. Lieberman's staff in the room, I thought during the negotiations he would go along with it I'm very disappointed that he didn't," said Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio.
It is especially mystifying because Lieberman has historically sided with liberals on domestic issues, even though he became an independent in 2006 after losing his Democratic primary.
"No one can understand exactly what Joe's up to with this," said Jim Shea with the Hartford Courant. "There's some people that think that he's grandstanding. There's some people that think he's cow towing to the insurance industry."
The industry does have a large presence in Connecticut and gives generously to his campaigns. But Lieberman is hardly the only moderate putting the brakes on the bill.
Democratic senators Mary Landrieu, Blanche Lincoln and Ben Nelson, who came from conservative states successfully blocked the public option, even though the other 55 Democrats support it.
Nelson is still holding out for stricter anti-abortion language.
It is all leading some liberals to complain their agenda is being hijacked by a few.
"Does it trouble you that you're going against the overwhelming majority of your caucus?" Cordes asked Lieberman.
"Well it's not fun," he said. "I said that to my colleagues at the White House, I haven't enjoyed it. But you got to do what you think is right."
So this small group of four or so senators has managed to impose their will on 530 other members of Congress because the changes they're demanding in the Senate bill will likely have to be made to the House bill, too. But Congressional experts say this is exactly how the process is designed to work - it's designed to require compromise.
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved. "I have no idea," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich.
After all, the proposal to allow younger Americans to buy-in to Medicare had been crafted specifically as a compromise for Lieberman and other moderates who opposed a public option, reports CBS News correspondent Nancy Cordes.
Lieberman has championed the buy-in idea for nearly a decade and reiterated his support just three months ago.
"What I was proposing was that they have an option to buy in to Medicare early," he said during an interview.
But this week he suddenly threatened to block the health care bill if it contains a Medicare buy-in, throwing the entire process into disarray yet again.
"I'm very disappointed because I thought we had Sen. Lieberman's staff in the room, I thought during the negotiations he would go along with it I'm very disappointed that he didn't," said Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio.
It is especially mystifying because Lieberman has historically sided with liberals on domestic issues, even though he became an independent in 2006 after losing his Democratic primary.
"No one can understand exactly what Joe's up to with this," said Jim Shea with the Hartford Courant. "There's some people that think that he's grandstanding. There's some people that think he's cow towing to the insurance industry."
The industry does have a large presence in Connecticut and gives generously to his campaigns. But Lieberman is hardly the only moderate putting the brakes on the bill.
Democratic senators Mary Landrieu, Blanche Lincoln and Ben Nelson, who came from conservative states successfully blocked the public option, even though the other 55 Democrats support it.
Nelson is still holding out for stricter anti-abortion language.
It is all leading some liberals to complain their agenda is being hijacked by a few.
"Does it trouble you that you're going against the overwhelming majority of your caucus?" Cordes asked Lieberman.
"Well it's not fun," he said. "I said that to my colleagues at the White House, I haven't enjoyed it. But you got to do what you think is right."
So this small group of four or so senators has managed to impose their will on 530 other members of Congress because the changes they're demanding in the Senate bill will likely have to be made to the House bill, too. But Congressional experts say this is exactly how the process is designed to work - it's designed to require compromise.
-
Nancy Cordes Nancy Cordes is CBS News' congressional correspondent.
Follow on Twitter »
50 Comments +
Popular Now in CBS Evening News
- Couple's steamy romance e-books save their home
- Couple reeling from recession rewrites story, publishes romance novels
- Colo. senator who pushed for gun control may lose job
- SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship; Couple reeling from recession publishes novels
- Snowden: "U.S. Government is not going to be able to cover this up"
- Iran's new president-elect seen as bridge-builder
- SCOTUS: States can't require voters to prove citizenship
- Parents of mentally ill child may have averted mass shooting
- Syria tensions make for chilly meeting between Obama, Putin
- Ghost army: How a group of artists helped win WWII
- Colo. Black Forest fire has died down, yet danger remains
- Innovative Ariz. class turns students' dreams into reality
- Okla. tornado survivor finds dog buried alive under rubble
- David Coleman Headley: Terror sleeper agent foiled by NSA
- 6/16: Protesters seek refuge in Istanbul hotel; Pope blesses Harley Davidson motorcycles
- The power of a uniquely American song
