December 12, 2009 5:02 PM

Effort to Remove Atheist From City Council

(AP)  Asheville City Councilman Cecil Bothwell believes in ending the death penalty, conserving water and reforming government - but he doesn't believe in God. His political opponents say that's a sin that makes him unworthy of serving in office, and they've got the North Carolina Constitution on their side.

Bothwell's detractors are threatening to take the city to court for swearing him in, even though the state's antiquated requirement that officeholders believe in God is unenforceable because it violates the U.S. Consititution.

"The question of whether or not God exists is not particularly interesting to me and it's certainly not relevant to public office," the recently elected 59-year-old said.

Bothwell ran this fall on a platform that also included limiting the height of downtown buildings and saving trees in the city's core, views that appealed to voters in the liberal-leaning community at the foot of the Appalachian Mountains. When Bothwell was sworn into office on Monday, he used an alternative oath that doesn't require officials to swear on a Bible or reference "Almighty God."

That has riled conservative activists, who cite a little-noticed quirk in North Carolina's Constitution that disqualifies officeholders "who shall deny the being of Almighty God." The provision was included when the document was drafted in 1868 and wasn't revised when North Carolina amended its constitution in 1971. One foe, H.K. Edgerton, is threatening to file a lawsuit in state court against the city to challenge Bothwell's appointment.

"My father was a Baptist minister. I'm a Christian man. I have problems with people who don't believe in God," said Edgerton, a former local NAACP president and founder of Southern Heritage 411, an organization that promotes the interests of black southerners.

The head of a conservative weekly newspaper says city officials shirked their duty to uphold the state's laws by swearing in Bothwell. David Morgan, editor of the Asheville Tribune, said he's tired of seeing his state Constitution "trashed."

Bothwell can't be forced out of office over his atheist views because the North Carolina provision is unenforceable, according to the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution. Six other states, Arkansas, Maryland, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas, have similar provisions barring atheist officeholders.

In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that federal law prohibits states from requiring any kind of religious test to serve in office when it ruled in favor of a Maryland atheist seeking appointment as a notary public.

But the federal protections don't necessarily spare atheist public officials from spending years defending themselves in court. Avowed atheist Herb Silverman won an eight-year court battle in 1997 when South Carolina's highest court granted him the right to be appointed as a notary despite the state's law.

Bothwell said a legal challenge to his appointment would be "fun," but believes his opponents' efforts have more to do with politics than religious beliefs.

"It's local political opponents seeking to change the outcome of an election they lost," said Bothwell, who's lived in Asheville nearly three decades and wrote the city's best-selling guide book.

Bothwell was raised a Presbyterian but began questioning Christian beliefs at a young age and considered himself an atheist by the time he was 20. He's an active member of the Unitarian Universalist Church of Asheville and he still celebrates Christmas, often hanging ornaments on his Fishhook cactus.

Bothwell said his spiritual views don't matter to most of his constituents. Bothwell is a registered Democrat but didn't run on a party ticket in the nonpartisan Council election.

Even if he can't force Bothwell out of office, Edgerton said he hopes a legal battle would ultimately force North Carolina's Legislature to determine the legality of the article of the Constitution.

"If the law is wrong, it is the obligation of the Legislature to say it's wrong," he said.

Provisions like North Carolina's tend to stay on the books because lawmakers would rather not spend time weeding-out outdated laws, said Duke University Law School Professor Joseph Blocher.

"I mean, there are state laws against spitting in the street," he said. "Why spend the time?"

But the battle is important to Silverman, who says there are scores of other atheist politicians afraid to "come out of the closet." He cited U.S. Rep. Pete Stark of California, the first and only congressman to publicly acknowledge he doesn't believe in God.

"We're trying to change our culture to the point where it's not political suicide," Silverman said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 134 Comments
by mensarino December 15, 2009 1:56 PM EST
For once, I agree with endurorob.
Reply to this comment
by ge556 December 15, 2009 1:11 PM EST
So many people who claim to be followers of Jesus don't seem to have a clue about what Jesus taught. Jesus taught tolerance and acceptance of others, including outcasts.
You can't be a Christian and hate atheists.
Reply to this comment
by bundye December 15, 2009 12:38 PM EST
Does our American money say "In God We Trust"? Anyone who holds public office should be a believer in God, or he doesn't hold office. Why wasn't this fact brought before the people before the vote? Is it Madelyn O'Hare all over again. Prayer was taken out of the schools because those that believe didn't do anything. Believers of North Carolina, NOW is your time to Stand.
Reply to this comment
by obwan222 December 15, 2009 12:46 PM EST
"Why wasn't this fact brought before the people before the vote? Is it Madelyn O'Hare all over again. Prayer was taken out of the schools because those that believe didn't do anything."

Wrong and wrong. The fact that Cecil wasn't a believer isn't a secret. The voters still wanted him because - prepare yourself, it's a shocking answer - they liked him on the ISSUES better. Wow, imagine that - a candidate winning on the issues.

Prayer was taken out of schools because it was unconstitutional. A wild group of radicals called the Founding Fathers resented govt.-mandated religion and decided that a free country was no place for the government to demand that the people believe as they were ordered.
by endurorob_5 December 15, 2009 12:54 PM EST
It is unconstitutional and immoral to require a belief in any deity to hold public office.
See all 4 Replies
by AnnieDanny December 15, 2009 12:12 PM EST
Yeah, science. Athiests need to give up on quoting science, IMO. There's too many gaps and inconsistencies in science. Scientists can't agree on hardly anything. We can't even see Pluto with our strongest telescopes and yet they claim to know what's going on beyond our galaxy, and how the universe began. They have no proof. They have no more "proof" than Christians do. So I suppose it comes down to faith no matter how you look at it. IMO, Atheism is just another religion: a religion of doubts. Doctrine of doubts. They absolutely love to say, "Where's the PROOF", but they don't have any proof either. Just a truckload of doubts.
Reply to this comment
by obwan222 December 15, 2009 12:51 PM EST
"Athiests need to give up on quoting science, IMO. There's too many gaps and inconsistencies in science. Scientists can't agree on hardly anything."

Substitute the word "Christians" for "Athiests" (spell-checker, folks, it's built in - use it) and "Scientists". And substitute the word "religion" for "science".
by rx4oblivion December 18, 2009 12:02 PM EST
Annie, a stunted awareness of the world does not make a "truckload of doubts." I suppose that when you get sick, you wouldn't get an MRI, since our most powerful microscopes can't see magnetic fields, nor the nuclei of your body's atoms that they resonate with. And why accept an oxygen mask while you're at it? A colorless, odorless, invisible, life-giving gas? Blasphemy!

Your arguments are proof not of God's existence, nor the temporary failings of the scientific method, but only of your stunning ignorance to well-documented observations of our solar system that were made in 1930 (and lets forget about the mathematical speculation of Pluto's existence that were made in the 1840's. You'd have to believe in Newtonian physics to buy that, and lets face it: you clearly haven't opened a book that was less than 400 years old that wasn't written by an evangelist). I thank the Founders for free speech; for without it, we would never know who among us is a tremendous anathema to reason, civilization, and the betterment of mankind.
by OleJohn3 December 15, 2009 10:37 AM EST
I find that I cannot believe in a LOVING god that requires me to worship only him or I will be cast into Hell to burn for ever and ever.
The Bible was a great way to control people and is still being used for that.
Christens would do well to invest in the wellfare of the needy instead of the monsterous churches they are now building. They tend to say "look at me as I get Slicked up for church" then continue their Quest for the Dollar.
Reply to this comment
by newsterl December 14, 2009 7:40 PM EST
Bravo for Bothwell, I wish him the best of luck in his fight against the religious reich!

Amazing thatin the middle of a near depression, with 7 million out of work, national debt out of control, global climate changes and all the rest these morons are going to waste court and legislator time and money on a frivolous lawsuit over whether their ELECTED guy believes in Santa Claus or not!
Reply to this comment
by MichaelZWilliamson October 21, 2010 1:33 AM EDT
AGW is as much BS as creationism. The arguments used by both are quite similar. No debate, no dissent, you hate America, and there was nothing before the date we pick to start our arguments from.
by sunspro December 14, 2009 3:55 PM EST
I live in North Carolina and far too many of our representatives are undereducated good ole boys. So, I'm not surprised that such a hateful thing is still in the state Constitution.

How can a Christian make such prejudiced statements as Edgarton and Morgan and still think he's a Christian?
Ever heard of the separation of church and state?
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti December 14, 2009 3:02 PM EST
Wacko religious freaks. Don't they know their book is only a book of myths? When most of that was written there was not even science. People were still using stone axes and grinding tools.
Reply to this comment
by sandy19731 December 14, 2009 2:56 PM EST
North Carolina should be ashamed of this.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George December 14, 2009 1:57 PM EST
by nordeck52 December 14, 2009 12:58 PM EST
Why would an Atheist use the Koran to take an oath when they don't believe in any religion?
\___________________

Right, it makes no sense......kind of like, why would a liberal take any oath to protect the Constitution, when they spit on it ? same thing
Reply to this comment
See all 134 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook