Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
December 9, 2009 7:44 AM

U.S. Expects to Lose $200B Less on TARP

By
CBSNews
(AP)  The Obama administration will lose $200 billion less than expected from the federal bailout program and is looking at using part of the savings to fund new job creation efforts.

A Treasury official said that the administration now believes the cost of the financial rescue program will be at least $200 billion below the $341 billion estimate it made in August.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the administration's new projection has not been released, said the lower estimate reflected faster repayments by big banks and less spending on some of the rescue programs as the financial sector recovered from its free fall more quickly than the administration originally expected.

The administration had made the $341 billion estimate as part of its midsession budget review released in August.

The Treasury official said Monday that the new figures were being finalized in a report being prepared by the Government Accountability Office. That report is expected to be made public on Wednesday.

The official said that the administration believes the losses incurred from the money already spent will total $42 billion. About half of those losses are expected to occur from the support provided to troubled automakers General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC; the other half will come from the rescue package put together for insurance giant American International Group.

The $42 billion in projected losses from TARP spending that occurred in the 2009 budget year, which ended on Sept. 30, is a sharp improvement from the administration's August estimate that those losses would total $110 billion. The loss figure represents the net loss to the government after subtracting earnings the government has received in interest and dividend payments.

The official said the new estimates will become part of the administration's new budget, which president Barack Obama will present to Congress in February. The reduction in projected losses from the rescue program will mean that at least some of the savings could be used to reduce the government's projected deficit, which the administration estimated in August would hit $1.5 trillion in the current budget year.

The $700 billion financial rescue program, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, was passed by Congress in October 2008 at the height of the worst financial crisis to hit the country since the 1930s.

Obama is scheduled to give a speech on the economy Tuesday and White House officials have said it is likely that the president will talk about using repaid TARP funds for a new job-creation program. Any such proposal would have to be approved by Congress, where Republican leaders have already voiced strong opposition, arguing that all the money should go to reducing the deficit.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other top Democrats have been drafting a jobs bill that would tap resources in the bailout program.

Among the proposals being considered are funding as much as $70 billion in new transportation and infrastructure projects, providing new tax credits aimed at encouraging small businesses to hire workers and providing additional aid to state governments to preserve public sector jobs.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner indicated Friday that the administration was considering supporting not only increased job creation with the TARP funds but also helping to reduce future budget deficits.

Geithner said that the administration expected to have $175 billion in repayments from the banking system by the end of next year.

Treasury has spent about $450 billion from the TARP, including around $290 billion poured into banks.

Bank of America announced last week that it would return $45 billion it had received, adding to the $71 billion already repaid by nearly 50 other financial companies. Banks have also paid the Treasury about $7 billion in dividends.

Lowering the estimated cost of TARP will also lower the administration's projections for budget deficits.

The deficit for the 2009 budget year, which ended in September, hit a record $1.42 trillion and the administration in August projected a slightly higher deficit for the current year.

AP
Add a Comment
by sjc_1 December 7, 2009 4:32 PM EST
If we do not get jobs back, the economy could go back into negative growth, then we are sunk...with a capital S.
Reply to this comment
by hull7777 December 7, 2009 4:13 PM EST
What is the Government going to do with the returned TARP money or the money that is not going to be spent? Maybe we should reduce the deficit!!! Instead of spending it on another project. However, that is not Washington's way. Its just spend, spend, spend!!!
Reply to this comment
by reveal4 December 7, 2009 2:31 PM EST
200 billion is being considered for redirection to infrastructure and small business loans. Infrastructure projects are jobs projects. Republicans have been clamoring for a 2nd stimulus aimed at job creation and small business loans. Now, the President is proposing just such a plan and the Republicans are opposed. Can anybody make sense of the Republican party?
Reply to this comment
by Oregon_State_OSU December 7, 2009 1:30 PM EST
hungry1968-17

Well Here is a comment for you hungry1968-17. You have to give the Stimulus time to work, it just does not happen over night.

Hey hungry1968-17, George W. Bush and his Administration made a lot of Promises also and even had PICTURES of WMD's that they showed to the American Public and where were the WMDs?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-17 December 7, 2009 12:04 PM EST
Obama said that if the stimulus was passed, unemployment wouldn't go above 8%, and when it did the neo cons screamed, whined, and cried.

Where are they now? Why no comments on THIS story?

Hypocrites......
Reply to this comment
by patocc123 December 7, 2009 1:38 PM EST
What retractions are you refering too? This article is good news in regards that we are not going to lose as much money as initially thought. TARP was both Republican and Democrat.

If anything can be taken from this story that may be uneasing is that since the money that we are not going to lose on tarp is wanting to be used elsewhere. Its like getting an estimate to repair your car for $1000 dollars and then the true cost was $600 dollars. Well guess what that doesn't mean you have $400 dollars to waste or spend especially if rent is due or you already have credit card bills overdue.

So not sure the legist of your comments here on good news. I guess when you continually play the blame game.
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook