December 1, 2009 10:00 AM

Africa Fights AIDS With Male Circumcision

By
CBSNews
(GlobalPost)  Editor's Note: Africa has the world's largest number of HIV infections and AIDS cases. Across the continent the disease is being battled with public education and antiretroviral drugs. A new additional strategy is male circumcision. Several tests show that circumcised men have substantially reduced risks of contracting HIV. In response, several campaigns have been launched to circumcise men.


By Greg Warner of GlobalPost

Mfangano Island on Lake Victoria, two hours by motorboat from mainland Kenya, is a popular destination spot for honeymooners on safari: a verdant fishing outpost without electricity or running water.

But this remote locale is the epicenter of Kenya's AIDS crisis. And so, besides the honeymooners, this island also attracts NGO-workers armed with pamphlets and condoms and behavior-change slogans. The residents are used to the visitors. Samuel Gabari, a 23-year-old fisherman, answers my questions about his sexual habits as if reciting from a script.

"I only have one sexual partner," he says. "And I always use condoms."

The truth is more complicated. Sex here, like anywhere else, is often a mixture of business and pleasure. Gabari says fishermen can make $7-$25 a day, a kingly salary in this region. He's constantly traveling from beach to beach, following the fish, sailing far from his girlfriend. At each beach there are temptations. "You have money, the women don't have money, so they fall for you!" says Gabari. "That is part of the game!"

Even though everyone on this island seems to have memorized the catchphrases of AIDS prevention - "Abstinence, Be faithful, use Condoms" - those messages haven't had much impact. About 21 percent of people on this island are infected with HIV, three times the national rate of 7 percent.

Now NGO-workers are offering fishermen like Gabari a new prevention tool: circumcision. The link between circumcision and reduced HIV susceptibility has been suspected since the mid-1980s, when AIDS researchers observed that circumcised Kenyan men who engaged with prostitutes were less likely to get infected. By 2007, three random clinical trials [GW1] in sub-Saharan Africa showed that circumcision reduced the risk of female-to-male HIV transmission by 50 to 60 percent.

The reason for the lower HIV infection rates for circumcised men is not fully understood. Some scientists say that the skin around the head of an uncircumcised penis is more porous. Others say that the moist environment under the foreskin invites bacterial infection, which, combined with poor hygiene, can induce lesions through which the virus can pass. Other researchers cite the large number of HIV-susceptible immune cells on the foreskin.

In 2007 the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized circumcision as a new AIDS prevention measure, opening the floodgates to American funding. That year, $16 million from the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) went to circumcision programs in Africa, with $26 million in 2008. Higher numbers are likely on the way. Kenya's campaign is the most ambitious at an estimated cost of $85 million over the next five years. Already, 50,000 Kenyans have been voluntarily circumcised, most of them fishermen. Researchers estimate that if circumcision campaigns were launched across the continent 2.7 million lives could be saved over the next 20 years, or roughly the number of Africans who lose their lives to AIDS every 15 months.

Of course, long before male circumcision became the hot new weapon in the war on AIDS, it was an ancient rite of manhood practiced by many African tribes. Well over half of African men are circumcised in traditional ways. Generally performed on boys when they reach puberty, circumcision marks their readiness to take up the duties of men: to defend the village, find a wife and begin sexual activity.

In Kenya, in particular, circumcision is deeply tied up with male identity. The Luo tribe are the third largest ethnic group in Kenya, estimated to make up 13 percent of the country's 39 million people. The Luos do not traditionally circumcise.

In Kenya's 2007 presidential election a Luo candidate began gaining strength in the polls, only to have some Kenyan newspapers mock his uncircumcised status, asking: How can a nation of men be led by a boy? These barbs go back to colonial times, when British authorities stoked cultural divisions to sow tribal enmity.

When circumcision was first introduced as a way to reduce HIV infections, the Luo Council of Elders balked. AIDS activists countered that circumcision was a medical intervention, not a cultural conversion. Luo parliamentarians joined the pro-circumcision bandwagon, testifying about their own positive experience under the knife. The tribal elders quickly bowed to political pressure from a community apparently ready to throw off tribal custom and join the modern world.

Along Lake Victoria, fishermen contemplating circumcision say that in addition to the health benefits, questions of manhood were very much on their minds. Fishermen said that circumcision had made them "perform better," feel more virile and last longer during sex.

"Some take drugs to have sex, but I just cut the foreskin," said one 30-year-old fisherman, Julius Soba. "Circumcision is my stimulant!"

Local mobilizers trying to convert as many as possible to circumcision haven't dissuaded them from this notion. More often they defer to existing cultural associations of circumcision with male potency and prowess. Women also got the message. A study in 2000 showed that 62 percent of Luo women said they preferred sex with a circumcised man. This was years before the pro-circumcision message was officially sanctioned. And since the Luo are uncircumcised, their preference was probably not based on direct experience.

"The truth is that sex is in the mind," said Dishon Gogi, with the Nyanza Reproductive Health Society. Gogi criss-crosses Lake Victoria in a motorboat he calls the "circumcision boat," ferrying trained surgeons and supplies to the fishing communities. "If a man feels that he is stronger, he is stronger! If he feels he is a lion, he's a lion! I only ask that they do it safely."

Gogi's boss, Dr. Kawango Agot, sounded a note of caution. If circumcision encourages people to have sex with more partners, or riskier sex, she noted, it will negate the benefits of circumcision and speed up the spread of AIDS. "That would be a disaster," she said.

The genie is already out of the bottle. "It is demand driven!" says Dishon Gogi. He shows me the packed schedule of upcoming site visits for his circumcision boat. "Wherever we're called we'll answer. Like the Bible says, 'wherever we're called we'll go.'"


GlobalPost Video: Africa Cuts AIDS



More GlobalPost Dispatches About Male Circumcision in Africa:
Day in the Life of a Kenyan Circumcision Doctor
Medical Evidence Shows Circumcision Effective in Battling HIV
Opinion: Male Circumcision Alone Won't Solve Africa's HIV Problem


For more info:
World AIDS Campaign
World AIDS Day 2009 Events Calendar
unaids.org
Interactive Map: Adults & Children Living with HIV
AIDS.gov (U.S. Site)
By Greg Warner of GlobalPost

GlobalPost
Add a Comment See all 13 Comments
by James-3D December 3, 2009 1:32 PM EST
Circumcision to "prevent AIDS" is medical fraud.

Circumcision touted for any "health benefits" is part of a long history of quackery.

The crazy idea that circumcision prevents AIDS is being promoted by pro-circumcision advocates who have a 140 year history of trying to legitimize circumcision by applying it to just about every ailment. Those who promote circumcision do not make a distinction between adults weighing the benifits and risks and choosing it for themsleves, and those who force this condition on infants and children.

If circumcision were a deterent to HIV then why does the USA with its very high percentage of sexually active circumcised males also have the highest rate of HIV transmission of any developed country? If circumcision were such a deterent why do many countries with a mostly intact population have very low rates of HIV transmission?

Circumcision is the removal of healthy erogenous tissue, a highly questionable practice particularly when imposed on infants and children. It is generally carried out by adults who have had the proceedure imposed upon them. Circumcision is constantly seeing validation. Pro-circumcision advocates grasp at straws trying to legitimize a horrifc assault when done to a child.

Further research will reveal that women who are partnered with men who think they are at less risk becasue of circumcision are actually more vulnerable. Circumcision to prevent AIDS is junk science, combined with wishful thinking.
Reply to this comment
by eus109937 December 2, 2009 12:47 PM EST
Circumcision is not the answer. Education is. Circumcision is gving these people a false sense of security that they are now safe to have sex anywhere and anytime without condom protection. If anything, immediatly and within a few months after the circumcision they are just as vulnerable. The risk will decline only once the skin builds up the strength it needs now that it is constantly exposed. Circumcison should never be preformed on humans; no other part of our bodies on males or femaels is cut off so why should this part be?
Reply to this comment
by fabdenise December 2, 2009 11:42 AM EST
I don't think being circumcised is the answer. I think education is the key here.
Reply to this comment
by diamruby December 1, 2009 2:11 PM EST
They should also be sterilized while they are on the table that way they can control their starving, diseased, population.
Reply to this comment
by nubian14 December 6, 2009 3:17 PM EST
diamruby, what crazy idea you got into your brain, it is very alarming to the population at large. Surely you don't believe that the starving and diseased population is only in Africa? I hope your mother taught you better than that. Your ignorance is the ultimate poison to the world at large and I pitty you, I believe however that once you get EDUCATED about why the population in question is starving and diseased then I guess you wouldn't be making such narrow minded comments....God bless you. Tip: You should learn about where Civilization came from...
by from_the_north December 1, 2009 1:33 PM EST
When are they going to do something about stopping female genital mutilation and circumcision??? As practiced among moslim savages. Unbelievable, cruel, and invented by men with inferiority complexes.
Reply to this comment
by YoureSoWrong10 December 1, 2009 1:32 PM EST
Africa has practiced female circumcision for centuries. Of course East Africa has been used in the Arab slave trade for centuries as well.
Reply to this comment
by Uncle_Eccoli December 1, 2009 1:00 PM EST
I am immensely grateful my parents had me circumcised as an infant. Those of you blathering about "butchery" and "mutilation" need to simply mind your own business. Personally, I view circumcision as a mark of civilisation and the lack of a circumcision as an indicator of savagery, but wouldn't you rather I'd kept that to myself?
Reply to this comment
by cidaia December 5, 2009 12:14 AM EST
Chopping off other peoples' genitals for no reason whatsoever is not civilized, it's barbaric.

What's worse is they don't even use a painkiller.

This is a procedure that should require informed consent. To amputate someone elses' body parts without there being a compelling medical necessity should be a crime.

If you are so into being fashionable (or conformist) that you are willing to take it to the point of body mutilation, then do it on yourself, not a baby!
by JackieNO December 1, 2009 11:10 AM EST
This is such a waste of resources and such a sham. The Africa trials were cut short so the men circumcised, that needed to heal, did not have sex as much as the natural men and the cut got condom advice and counseling. This is not science. The risk change is so small -- undert 2% risk change is alleged. A condom will loer the risk to zero risk. What abouty the FACT that the similar Afrioca studies showed circumcised men pass HIV to women at a highher rate (more risk) than natural men. Should not the women of Africa stay away from the cut men as the HIV risk is quite a bit higher.

Promoting condom use is the solution. However, a condom is much better for the makle when the male has the full sensory package with all of the nerve endings that are otherwise amputated. The foreskin is not just skin and does not just protect the glans(head). Circumcision is now known to ablate the most sensitive parts of the male genitals. This surgery takes away the main male pleasure zones with about 20000 fine touch and stretch nerve endings amputated. The foreskin has several parts including the ridged band that is great for ones pleasure (that is why nutters like Kellogg wanted to chop em off, to curtail masturbation), Masturbation is important for a mans physical and mental health. The ridged band directly contacts the vagina for very great pleasure all around. The dynamics of sex and the actual mechanism of the ***** are drastically changed by circumcision. The foreskin can normally be slipped all the way, or almost all the way, back to the base of the *****, and also slipped forward beyond the glans. This wide range of motion is the mechanism by which the ***** and the orgasmic triggers in the foreskin, frenulum, and glans are stimulated. The only touch organ possessing as rich erogenous innervation as the foreskin is the ********. Circumcision deprives man of 2/3ds of the main erogenous zone constituted of the foreskin and the glans.

Stop this madness. Stop funding this with my tax dollars. Cutting off erogenous tissue is not the answer.
Reply to this comment
by JackieNO December 1, 2009 11:10 AM EST
This is such a waste of resources and such a sham. The Africa trials were cut short so the men circumcised, that needed to heal, did not have sex as much as the natural men and the cut got condom advice and counseling. This is not science. The risk change is so small -- undert 2% risk change is alleged. A condom will loer the risk to zero risk. What abouty the FACT that the similar Afrioca studies showed circumcised men pass HIV to women at a highher rate (more risk) than natural men. Should not the women of Africa stay away from the cut men as the HIV risk is quite a bit higher.

Promoting condom use is the solution. However, a condom is much better for the makle when the male has the full sensory package with all of the nerve endings that are otherwise amputated. The foreskin is not just skin and does not just protect the glans(head). Circumcision is now known to ablate the most sensitive parts of the male genitals. This surgery takes away the main male pleasure zones with about 20000 fine touch and stretch nerve endings amputated. The foreskin has several parts including the ridged band that is great for ones pleasure (that is why nutters like Kellogg wanted to chop em off, to curtail masturbation), Masturbation is important for a mans physical and mental health. The ridged band directly contacts the vagina for very great pleasure all around. The dynamics of sex and the actual mechanism of the ***** are drastically changed by circumcision. The foreskin can normally be slipped all the way, or almost all the way, back to the base of the *****, and also slipped forward beyond the glans. This wide range of motion is the mechanism by which the ***** and the orgasmic triggers in the foreskin, frenulum, and glans are stimulated. The only touch organ possessing as rich erogenous innervation as the foreskin is the ********. Circumcision deprives man of 2/3ds of the main erogenous zone constituted of the foreskin and the glans.

Stop this madness. Stop funding this with my tax dollars. Cutting off erogenous tissue is not the answer.
Reply to this comment
by sonofsummarex December 1, 2009 10:55 AM EST
This is a thoroughly unnecessary act of butchery. The people doing it should have their hands cut off.
Reply to this comment
See all 13 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook