November 25, 2009 9:02 AM

Obama Expects Support for Troop Increase

By
CBSNews
(AP)  President Barack Obama expects Americans to support sending tens of thousands more U.S. troops to Afghanistan once they understand the perils of losing, and he is preparing to make his case to the nation next week.

Eight years after the Sept. 11 attacks led the U.S. into Afghanistan, Obama said it is still in America's vital national interest to "dismantle and destroy" al Qaeda terrorists and extremist allies. "I intend to finish the job," he said.

Military officials expect an infusion of approximately 32,000 to 35,000 troops to begin in February or March, the largest expansion since the beginning of the war and one that could bring the cost above $75 billion annually.

Special Report: Afghanistan

Mr. Obama said he would announce after Thanksgiving his decision on additional troops, and military, congressional and other sources said the occasion would be a Tuesday night televised speech laying out his plans for expanding the Afghan conflict - and then ultimately ending America's military role.

Republican critics have been pressing Mr. Obama for months to decide on a next step in Afghanistan, but Mr. Obama has said repeatedly he was more concerned with making a decision that was right rather than quick.

Neither he nor his advisers has detailed an exit plan, but the strategy he is expected to describe next week would include specific dates that deployments could be slowed or stopped if necessary, a senior military official said. The official and others spoke on condition of anonymity because the decision was not final.

With U.S. combat deaths climbing on Mr. Obama's watch and more than half the American public opposed to escalation, the president seemed to acknowledge Tuesday that he has a lot to explain.

"I feel very confident that when the American people hear a clear rationale for what we're doing there and how we intend to achieve our goals, that they will be supportive," he said, speaking at a White House news conference with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

"I can tell you, as I've said before, that it is in our strategic interest, in our national security interest to make sure that al Qaeda and its extremist allies cannot operate effectively" in the area, he said. "We are going to dismantle and degrade their capabilities and ultimately dismantle and destroy their networks. And Afghanistan's stability is important to that process."

Returning to a campaign theme, Mr. Obama said the Afghan effort had been starved for resources and attention during the Bush administration and he intended to finish the war.

To that end, much of the White House discussion during months of deliberations has centered on how the U.S. would end its military role.

Mr. Obama held his 10th war council meeting Monday evening, and officials said it was his last. Military officials have said Mr. Obama is choosing one of the least risky options he was presented, but one still expected to lead to increased U.S. casualties without guarantee of success.

War commander Gen. Stanley McChrystal has warned that the war risks failure without a large troop infusion. Although he preferred a higher figure - about 40,000 - McChrystal is expected to tell Congress next week that this lesser addition still gives him the tools to better combat insurgents in the south and east of Afghanistan.

The expected increase would include at least three Army brigades and a single, larger Marine Corps contingent, officials said.

Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress has been miffed that the administration blocked McChrystal from testifying during what many Republicans considered an inordinately long decision-making period. His testimony has not been scheduled, but would probably come late next week or early in the week after.

Among others likely to take part in congressional hearings are Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen and U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry. All were among about 20 officials and advisers participating in the president's final deliberations Monday night - one of the biggest groups gathered for these sessions.

The administration figures will have a tough sell among some congressional Democrats, including Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., who has questioned the value of adding forces and pointed to the war's rising cost.

The Afghan war bill hit $43 billion annually this summer, with the addition of 21,000 forces Mr. Obama has already added to the fight this year.

AP
Add a Comment See all 103 Comments
by revlin1 November 25, 2009 1:00 PM EST
Never ceases to amaze us that the MSM is always BEHIND in reporting the same news that has NEVER changed across America in support of our troops and a military buildup in Afghanistan. IN FACT; the deals were already CUT in Washington, D.C. over one month ago and contracts were out there last week. OF COURSE AMERICA; supports this....they were never NOT SUPPORTING. The loud mouthed left wing nutjobs are the only ones who got coverage, cameras and articles from liberal rags / news media outlets...so they were heard...same small percentage. The rest of us; we ALWAYS HAVE BEEN FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE AND OFFENSE IN MIDDLE EAST...DUH?
Reply to this comment
by griz326 November 25, 2009 11:27 AM EST
Now I can pick up my dime.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 November 25, 2009 10:53 AM EST
hungry1968-17 November 25, 2009 10:36 AM EST
The surge failed.

The violence finally subsided in August 2007 - 7 months after the surge - when Bush started PAYING the insurgents and their leaders CASH MONEY to stop killing our troops.



Well than that meens you do not give the surge credit for the subsidence of violence when every expert on the planet credited the surge.
Reply to this comment
by PaGuy1960 November 25, 2009 10:30 AM EST
I'm behind Obama on this one thing. However, I seem to remember how anti surge he was when Bush wanted troops in Iraq.. Works a little different when you're in charge and you have all the facts ...
Reply to this comment
by PaGuy1960 November 25, 2009 10:23 AM EST
Ok let's see how many protesters are outside the White House today . Or was that just the liberals doing their typical grand standing.
Reply to this comment
by charlieisrael November 25, 2009 10:13 AM EST
Looks like people dont agreee with Obama on this one at all. Time for a speech...
Reply to this comment
by endurorob_5 November 25, 2009 10:21 AM EST
Oddly enough the majority of those who will disagree with him on this are those that voted for him and those that will agree are largley those that voted against him. By the way, during his campaign he did say that the war in Afghanistan was a just war.
by charlieisrael November 25, 2009 10:09 AM EST
What would one expect if he surrounds himself w/ army personal , generals etc? to come of consultations with a view different than those who surrounded him? We the people do not want war because of its terrible toll on life,the scars are deep and last too long. Whatever happened to democracy The politicians should have to send THEIR sons and daughters first into harms way if they believe in it so much.
If we really have no alterior motives and are willing to get along with people/nations of a different stripe, Than much more could be done by being nice and talking. Its just like family, and it works the same way.
Reply to this comment
by U_S_Drug_Addict November 25, 2009 10:02 AM EST
So if we are to put our swords down and leave the killing to a God,
who loves you by the way, but wont hesitate to throw down the ribs
for the last Barbeque if you reject his chosen one.
why not breing the troops home and do the Christian thing.
and let God do the killing for us?
Reply to this comment
by U_S_Drug_Addict November 25, 2009 10:07 AM EST
(chrickets...) chirp, chirp.....
by 50BMS13 November 25, 2009 10:07 AM EST
USDA
You have a great point. I'll explain that next time we chat. I have been on for hours,...so when you see me next, let us continue! The answers are there, just lengthy, and I do have to go.
See all 4 Replies
by Lawyers-Guns-n-Money-01 November 25, 2009 9:50 AM EST
by 50BMS13 November 25, 2009 9:23 AM EST

I am wary of what they (muslims) stand for. That is the destruction of all Christians and Jews. I don't support that. We christians tolerate other faiths....we don't condemn other faiths.
==================================================================

Maybe YOU don't condemn other faiths but just as Islamic leaders decry us as infidels, there are Christians that are just as guilty concerning the hatred they spew.

Check out the abhorrent things Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and John Hagee have said about Islam.
-----------------------------------


"That is the destruction of all Christians and Jews."
Maybe YOU don't condemn other faiths...on second thought...
Reply to this comment
by newerdeal November 25, 2009 9:47 AM EST
It's our over worked under funded troops that will have to finish the job.

And the doctor that was to help the over worked, stressed out troops ?

Well, he cracked too.

Obama can't do it by himself.

If he can give a speech that will get our country to keep fighting a useless war then he will really be like that fellow on the sign that people hold up at the protests.
Reply to this comment
See all 103 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook