November 24, 2009 7:08 PM

Sanford Impeachment Hearings Begin

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  South Carolina legislators upset with Gov. Mark Sanford's summer disappearance to see his lover in Argentina began a monthslong process on Tuesday that could ultimately remove the two-term Republican from office.

The panel of the House Judiciary Committee that's debating impeachment discussed his five-day absence in June and problems related to it, including the failure to put someone in charge of the state while he was gone.

At an hourlong meeting, the panel's seven members also talked about how they would proceed with at least three more hearings in early December. The next one is scheduled for next Tuesday, and a vote by the panel is expected by the second week of December.

"All he had to do was tell the lieutenant governor that he was going away," said Rep. Greg Delleney, R-Chester, one of the sponsors of the impeachment resolution. "He didn't even have to tell him where he was going. He just had to tell him that he was going away."

Sanford's lawyer, Ross Garber, said in a statement that Sanford's five-day absence does not meet the high standard for impeachment. He noted that Sanford's power would have automatically transferred to the lieutenant governor if there had been an emergency. Impeachments are extremely rare, Garber noted; only eight governors in the nation's history have been removed from office. Garber said the only two removed in the last 80 years had also been indicted on felony charges.

Nevertheless, the four Republicans and one Democrat who co-sponsored the impeachment measure say Sanford was derelict in his duty and wrong to mislead staffers into thinking he was hiking the Appalachian Trail. The measure says in part that Sanford's "conduct under these circumstances has brought extreme dishonor and shame to the Office of the Governor of South Carolina and to the reputation of the State of South Carolina."

Sentiment among the panel members ranged from disgust at Sanford's actions to uncertainty that his behavior amounts to an impeachable offense.

"It may constitute something, but it doesn't constitute dereliction of duty, because those are military terms," said Rep. Walt McLeod, D-Prosperity. "There is no established chain of command or protocol."

Sanford has been under scrutiny and pressure to step down since admitting to an extramarital affair with the woman he has called his "soul mate." He has never revealed the identity of a so-called "back channel" senior administration official the governor contends could have reached him in an emergency. Sanford's state e-mail and phone records show he was not in touch with his office while abroad.

On Tuesday, committee counsel Patrick Dennis also read from affidavits by several officials, including Sanford's chief of staff, Scott English. In the sworn statement, English said he did not speak to Sanford from June 18 to June 23, the day the governor returned to South Carolina.

"I tried to reach Gov. Sanford by phone on multiple occasions but was unable to speak with him," Dennis quoted English as saying in the statement.

Lawyers representing Sanford said in a legal briefing delivered Monday that the governor hasn't done anything that rises to the standard of impeachment. They did not address Tuesday's hearing.

If the impeachment measure passes the panel, it would head to the full Judiciary Committee. From there it would need a majority vote of the 25 members to get it to the House floor in January for debate. A two-thirds vote in favor would result in Sanford's suspension.

The Senate, acting as jury, then would decide whether Sanford would be removed from office, which would also require a two-thirds vote. His second and final term ends in January 2011.

During its upcoming meetings, the panel will also discuss the 37 civil charges Sanford is facing following a three-month State Ethics Commission probe. Among other violations detailed Monday, Sanford is accused of using taxpayer money for high-priced airplane tickets that took him around the world and to Argentina.

The ethics probe came after a series of Associated Press investigations showed the governor had for years used state airplanes for political and personal trips, flown in pricey commercial airline seats despite a low-cost travel requirement and failed to disclose trips on planes owned by friends and donors. The State newspaper in Columbia also questioned whether Sanford properly reimbursed himself from his campaign cash.

CBS/ AP
Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by TheEnergyDoctor November 25, 2009 8:41 AM EST
It's amazing how seemingly intelligent pundits
can seperate themselves from the eventualities
of life.

This man's escapades is only important for one reason
it's called "The Vote". The Cause & remedy is in the
hand of the Voter.

"Bad politicians are elected when Good people dont Vote"
Reply to this comment
by lloydbest1 November 24, 2009 10:28 PM EST
Impeachment doesn't necessarily mean expulsion from office. This is merely a trial. There is enough evidence to convene one and if he is found guilty after all is said and done, then he is subject to dismissal.
Reply to this comment
by wdh3007 November 24, 2009 10:22 PM EST
He should resign be with the mistress and move on with life
Reply to this comment
by liza1X November 24, 2009 11:06 PM EST
Resign yes. Be with the mistress no. Sanford is experiencing an Midlife crisis, I work in the healthcare field and also deal with families in crisis -midlife crisis can be mild to servere. We all at some point stop to examine our lives. Some people attempt sucide, other's enter into affairs seeking happiness.The one thing one does not want to do is start an affair.

In Sanford case for example Maria finally got around to admitting to him that she was seeing someone else-but that she did not love him(Sanford is American therefore Maria would say to him what she think he want's here)Clearly Sanford is not her Soulmate. The majority of these relationship does not last long-let's face their orgin is built on dishonesty, one of them will end up bedding someone else or one of them will decide the relationship is not what they want. You know the saying that lust is stronger when forbidden, but once you have the person on a full bases the full picture start to resolve.

Beside per Argentina Maria is said to have a long history with bedding politicians on their way up.
by cbsblogger November 24, 2009 10:04 PM EST
Sanford needs to pay the impeachment price for irresponsibility and indiscretion to the voters.....not to mention his wife.
Reply to this comment
by tafhdyd November 24, 2009 9:30 PM EST
He would make a good candidate for the Green party. He is a real hybrid. He goes after sex like a democrat and has no ethics like a republican.
Reply to this comment
by lmartink November 24, 2009 9:06 PM EST
Not too late to call your mistress in Argentina, and pack your bags. It was very apparent that you loved her more than your wife.
Reply to this comment
by bankersvox November 24, 2009 8:28 PM EST
This is an incredibly romantic story, or love, passion and a willingness to risk all for the one you truly miss.

What was it that drove him to do this ?

What was missing at home ? Could she have saved his marriage with more love ?


Although I do not want anyone to suffer, I truly believe that understanding is far better than punishment. What a movie this could make. A man has his needs, and when they are not met, what should he do ? Does he owe more to others than he was promised ?

I would like to see all of this put to rest, so we can move on.
Reply to this comment
by pjk12354 November 24, 2009 8:13 PM EST
A question they should be asking Mark Sanford is "What is your role in 'The Family'?"
Reply to this comment
by dwilson59 November 24, 2009 8:36 PM EST
That depends on what your definition of ?is? is.

Was she wearing a blue dress?
by pjk12354 November 24, 2009 9:21 PM EST
Check out "The Family" on Wikipedia.
See all 11 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook