June 27, 2010 9:53 PM

Jim Cameron: "Avatar" A Dream Come True

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  3D or not 3D, that is the question. Hollywood has been making false starts and false promises about 3D since the 1950s. Now comes director Jim Cameron, who is unveiling a movie in mid-December that could settle the argument about the staying power of 3D once and for all.

Cameron, of course, directed "Titanic," the most profitable movie ever made. And he famously declared himself "King of the World" when Titanic won 11 Oscars in 1998. Since then he has been immersed in a wildly ambitious and very expensive 3D science fiction fantasy that mixes real actors with computer generated creatures, the sum of which he believes will change the movie business forever.

The movie is "Avatar," and 70 years after Judy Garland left Kansas for Oz, Cameron plans to take audiences down the Yellow Brick Road of the 21st century, pushing the limits of modern technology with some filmmaking magic he has helped invent.

Photos: James Cameron
Web Extra: His High-Tech Cave
Web Extra: Target Audience?
Web Extra: A Defining Moment?

"I've been working up to this for a long time. This is the film I always thought I wanted to make when I set down the path of being a filmmaker," Cameron told 60 Minutes correspondent Morley Safer.

Avatar is set on the moon Pandora, a fantasy Eden, which earthlings want to exploit. It's a Shangri-la created entirely by computers.

"You're creating a world, every creature in it, every blade of grass, every tree, every cloud in the sky, every little reflection in the eyes of the characters," Cameron explained.

It's part cross-cultural love story, part high adventure. About the only thing that's done the old-fashioned way is the music.

On the set, there are far more computer jockeys than stage hands. Avatar is made up of some 3,000 separate shots, each one containing layer upon layer upon layer of special effects.

"What's interesting to me is that, with all the technical changes it always comes down to the story, no?" Safer asked.

"It all boils down to the story and to this, right there, you know, right in the eyes," Cameron replied.

Cameron's stars are Sigourney Weaver, Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldana. But in a sense, the real stars are the inhabitants of Pandora: ten foot tall blue people with tails.

Asked why he gave them long tails, Cameron told Safer, "Well, tails are cool. Tails are very expressive. I mean, anybody that owns a dog or a cat knows that you can tell the cat's emotional state by what its tail's doing."

And this very tall tale is very expensive: roughly $400 million-plus for production and promotion. At a hi-tech complex on the 20th Century Fox lot, on the very spot where Marilyn Monroe proclaimed that gentlemen prefer blondes, Cameron works down to the wire, supervising the final tweaks to Avatar.

His fantasy creatures are based on performances by the real actors. Cameras record dots on their faces. Computers then analyze their expressions and bring the blue people to life, characters both otherworldly yet strangely like ourselves.

On a satellite link are experts at a special effects studio a world away in New Zealand. It's there the final images are processed.

"We're going through and we're analyzing every last detail within the shot to make sure that it's up to snuff. We can make the grass greener or yellower, we can make the sky bluer, all those things," Cameron explained.

"And you can now just do what you want to do electronically?" Safer asked.

"Sure," Cameron said. "Even when we were doing Titanic twelve years ago, you know, the shot at the bow where they kiss, we waited two weeks for the right sunset to get that shot. Now we'd just shoot it in front of a green screen and choose the right sunset later, you know, digitally."

Shooting actors against a green screen and filling in the background by computer is a brutally time consuming process.



Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 13 Comments
by milo55 November 24, 2009 12:20 PM EST
James Cameron is pushing his movies toward the video game arcade.. and that's not good.. unless you think movie video games are must see entertainment.. the movie industry keeps shooting itself in the foot relying on high tech graphics instead of story and real acting.. and has turned off millions of former movies goers including myself.. these high tech graphics and 3D may well spell the end of movies.. who wants to pay to watch a video game.. except 13 year olds?
Reply to this comment
by bankersvox November 24, 2009 2:07 AM EST
thanks CBS for a great interview and a preview of what will be on my calendar to watch ! When does the line start forming ?
Reply to this comment
by velma179 November 23, 2009 4:39 PM EST
It does look good....

(I sat in on a panel with Cameron at Comic-Con)
Reply to this comment
by Wookiee-1138 November 23, 2009 12:24 PM EST
No one cares what Cameron thinks any more. His security guys beat up Keith Apicary and broke his glasses! All he wanted was a drink of water!
Reply to this comment
by Bobrien48 November 23, 2009 11:13 AM EST
Saw the long trailer on TV the other night and immediately thought of a movie my kids used to watch several years ago. Plot is way too similar to be a coincidence. I'm guessing James Cameron saw "Ferngully" right before he "wrote" this script.
Reply to this comment
by Bobrien48 November 23, 2009 11:13 AM EST
Saw the long trailer on TV the other night and immediately thought of a movie my kids used to watch several years ago. Plot is way too similar to be a coincidence. I'm guessing James Cameron saw "Ferngully" right before he "wrote" this script.
Reply to this comment
by Jack Meyer--2008 November 22, 2009 10:50 PM EST
Am I the only one? I don't like 3D. It is a distraction from story.
Reply to this comment
by Jack Meyer--2008 November 22, 2009 10:50 PM EST
Am I the only one? I don't like 3D. It is a distraction from story.
Reply to this comment
by summergirl54 November 22, 2009 10:03 PM EST
I really think I will have to stop watching 60 Minutes. It amazes and disgusts me the way, from time to time, you sneak in these pot shots agains O.J. Simpson. It has been what? over 15 years since the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, over 14 years since the trial, but you people refuse to let it go. No, I'm not saying I think O.J. Simpson is completely innocent. I'm not saying I think he's a nice guy. I guess no one will ever know what really happened that night. But I would appreciate it if your journalists and the guests they interview would keep in mind that O.J. was found NOT GUILTY by a jury of his peers.
Reply to this comment
by jimbryho November 20, 2009 6:48 PM EST
get off the dope , dude. star wars was good but cameron is 10 times the story teller lucas could ever be.
Reply to this comment
See all 13 Comments
.
The Best of Andy Rooney on DVD. Order now! Order Now »
60 Minutes on Facebook