December 8, 2009 3:41 AM

Obama, Lee Seek Nuke Bargain with N. Korea

By
CBSNews
(AP)  South Korea's president said he and President Barack Obama have agreed to offer North Korea a "grand bargain" aimed at ending the North's nuclear program.

Speaking at a joint news conference with Mr. Obama, President Lee Myung-bak said the deal would be similar to his proposal for a package of political and economic incentives in exchange for the one-step, irreversible dismantling of North Korea's nuclear program.

Lee's grand bargain proposal stems from concerns that North Korea would continue to backtrack on promises after winning concessions in negotiations.

The Lee and Obama meeting comes as Washington prepares to send an envoy for the first U.S.-North Korea bilateral talks since Mr. Obama took office.

The stop in South Korea was the last round of Mr. Obama's diplomacy tour in Asia on Thursday, a visit in South Korea.

Obama joined Lee at the Blue House, South Korea's version of the White House, where the U.S. leader took in spectacular views of the hills of Seoul on a chilly, gray morning. Obama stood on red-carpeted steps and looked out on military regiments in colorful garb and flag-waving children.

The leaders walked down to the sprawling manicured lawn, taking in the pageantry as Mr. Obama shook hands. It was symbolic of America's ever-improving relations with South Korea, a crucial Asian ally.

"This was the most spectacular ceremony for a state visit we have been involved with," Obama gushed as the two leaders began their meetings. Said Lee of Obama's Asia trip: "You saved the best for last."

The two men were meeting privately before they were scheduled to make formal statements. In brief comments before reporters, Mr. Obama praised the success of the South Korean economy, saying it was one reason why the nation has become an important player on the world stage.

A stalled trade agreement, though, still looms as a concern for the economic powerhouses.

Mr. Obama was embarking on perhaps the easiest leg of his whirlwind four-country Asian trip that has taken him away from Washington for the longest stretch of his presidency.

He made brief stops in Tokyo and Singapore before a longer, ceremony-filled visit to China.

Strongly pro-U.S., Lee took office in South Korea in early 2008, a year before Obama, and relations between the two countries have been improving. The tenure of President George W. Bush had seen anti-American sentiments become more common here.

Not so much now. The South Korean president, for instance, was the first foreign leader in Obama's presidency to get the honor of a joint appearance in the Rose Garden, in June.

"I hope to look at it as growing pains of a relationship maturing," said Lee Jung-hoon, an international relations expert and dean of Yonsei University in Seoul. "Certainly under Lee Myung-bak and Obama we are returning to normalcy."

A remaining sticking point has been trade. To South Korea's dismay, a free trade agreement that was signed in 2007 by the two governments under previous leaders has been stalled ever since in Congress.

The pact was already going nowhere on Democratic-run Capitol Hill during the Bush administration, which struck the deal after painstaking negotiations. Obama's election, with his concerns about U.S. access to the South Korean market for U.S. auto exports, put the deal in further doubt.

After his talks, Mr. Obama then has a brief rally at Osan Air Base outside Seoul with some of the 28,500 U.S. troops who are stationed in South Korea. It will be the third time Obama has addressed U.S. troops with his decision still pending on how many more Americans to send into the Afghanistan war.

With that decision deferred until after the trip - "certainly before year's end," was the elastic timeframe Mr. Obama offered in an NBC News interview - the South Korean visit is an opportunity to highlight international cooperation. Lee's government recently announced plans to expand a reconstruction team now helping to rebuild Afghanistan and to dispatch police and troops to protect them, two years after withdrawing all forces following a fatal hostage crisis.

Dozens of anti-war protesters rallied outside the U.S. Embassy on Wednesday chanting "no more South Korea troops to Afghanistan." Later, though, more than 100 people waved U.S. and South Korean flags and yelled, "Welcome, Obama, U.S.A."

North Korea is an area where little daylight separates the leaders, unlike before. They are united in their impatience with North Korea's habit of making overtures, getting rewards and then backtracking to raise tensions again, and Obama and Lee were expected to discuss next steps in detail.

Seoul, fearing a military strike over its border or a rush of refugees from the North, has historically resisted a sterner approach toward ending the impasse over nuclear weapons - with it and China generally less interested than the U.S. and Japan in pursuing more sanctions. Those nations, as well as Russia, are in the six-party talks with North Korea over the active weapons program it has in defiance of U.N. Security Council resolutions.

Lee, though, has changed tack, talking of a "grand bargain" in which Pyongyang would get a one-time offer of concessions to replace the step-by-step process that has yielded little so far.

Mr. Obama, too, has made much of his desire to take a different approach. North Korean leader Kim Jong Il said the country will return to the six-party process it abandoned earlier this year only if Washington engages separately in one-on-one talks with the North. Days before Mr. Obama's arrival in the region, administration officials said Stephen Bosworth, the U.S. special envoy for North Korea, would visit Pyongyang on an unspecified date, probably this year.

Trade, though, is trickier territory for the allies.

Despite positive talk about wanting to move the trade deal, the South Korean government has received no official proposal from the Obama administration on how to do so, said a senior South Korean government official, speaking on the customary condition of anonymity.

Mr. Obama reinforced the sense that the issue isn't on a fast track in a round of TV interviews hours before his South Korean arrival.

"The question is whether we can get it done in the beginning of 2010, whether we can get it done at the end of 2010," he told Fox News. "There's still some details that need to be worked out."

The accord would be the largest for the U.S. since the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s and the biggest ever for South Korea. Lee likes to talk of it as offering a $10 billion boon to the U.S. economy. The South Koreans have balked at any suggestion of reopening the agreement.

Read about President Obama's Visit to Asia:

Photo Essay: Obama at the Great Wall of China
Photo Essay: Obama in China
Obama Calls Great Wall "Magical"
Obama Reunites with Half-Brother in China
Obama Stresses Cooperation With Hu, China
Obama Takes in the Sights of Beijing
President Obama, Can We Twitter?
Access to Obama's Remarks Blocked in China
U.S., China Fuel Each Other's Bad Habits

AP
Add a Comment See all 31 Comments
by JackpotKorea November 19, 2009 10:19 PM EST
Dear;

South and North were divided by Soviet and USA after Japan?s collapse in WWII.
Two Koreas came to war and class conflict bwtween landlord and tenant, between pro-Japnese, the previliged and revolutionists?. and the result is permanant division and no N Korea?s book, culture permited in SOuth.
Censorship? Not only N Kora but also S Kora blocks N Korean sites.

The tragedy is millions seperated families could not even know the life and death of their mother, father, brother seperated during Korean war until now and many of them already died for aging. Only hundred meet 1- 2 day as political show.
The poor puppets of South and North have competed since birth by foreign powers but if conquer is difficult, their realistic goal is to survive under division and division is possible only under ideology war and censorship with no culture exchange.
Nuke is actually for N Korea?s survival, who suffered for long by USA?s economic blocking.
China helps North for the same reason with USA helping SOuth.
However War with USA worked as good base for dictatorship and limited human rights .

Sadly, Many shouting N Korea?s human rigjts, sepecially in South now, is actually those who have suppressed dialogue between Koreas and its own peopel or those who sufered most by Korean war and cold war namely such as formal soldiers, those who lost land and job detained at colonial times and fled to South before Korean war, who lost families during the war.
.
Foreingers must know the history and background of division and coloney.
N Koreans believe they have justice in eliminating landlord suppress and pro-Japnese coloneist and insist to liberate South from US imperalism.
SOuth Korea, the freind of democracy? The SOuth killed about 200,000 real persons, at once, those they listed as leftist(as ?Bodo Yeon-maeng?) , just after break of KOrean war. And the revenge, revenge.. Also in Jeju 4. 3 inicident, more than 50000 civilians were killed by South army, only for opposed for the election of divided giovernment in the SOuth in 1948.

Those killed are their own people,
Bear in mind that killers have suppressed their people in the South. SInce they are dying safe for aging, it came to possible to talk about the reality. Thats S Korea. visit 4.3 Jeju massacre investigation report by Korean government itself.

Best way to improve N Koreas human right is to end Korean war now and establish peacy system in the penunsula.

USA have blocked North Korea since war and this help N. Korea?s present political and economical and human rights difficulties.
Obama?s goal must be to eliminate nuke? then what was the goal of USA in 1960? and 70?s?
Recent Naval clash is just for showing to Obama.

If Obama should deserve Novel peace medal, he should end Korean war now and reunite seperated families, establishing new order without war.
SOuth have no choice but to follow the big brohter. Two Korea?s effort for unification is based on too much blood and misunderstanding and it must be started from the basic and concrete exchange with compelled order.

President Lee?s policy? What its his condition for help to N Korea? abadoning Neke to what extent? and GDP 2000 USD is the condition of what?
HIs policy will surely increase tension for the good 5 year his term and the division will continue. Ask to Lee if he real want co-existence and reunite of families. He may think differently. Or wait long for N Korea?s collapse or still division?
Reply to this comment
by RedWings_ninety_one November 19, 2009 1:38 PM EST
Check out: http://brillig.com/debt_clock/ for the current national debt counter.
Reply to this comment
by RedWings_ninety_one November 19, 2009 1:36 PM EST
Bargain? That's a laugh, confrontation is what works. Compromise is how the Nazi's began to take territory in the 1930's. One town at a time, then people basically said you can have these towns if you promise not to take anymore. Until WWII, which belive it or not, solved the problem.
Reply to this comment
by JackpotKorea November 19, 2009 11:12 PM EST
Confrontation's history is more than 60 after 1948 in Korean peninsula.
South and North is one people annexated by Japan in 1910 until Nuke ended war in Aug 1945. Korea was rice field with war factories in North for Japan's war, with 90 % poor farmers. US and Soviet army governed South and North and two Korean government established in 1948. Americans must know the history and have repect to it. The Korean police employed by US military was colonial tool of Japan to crack down independent movement. Lee Seungman and the police was compeld by S Korean people's uprising in 4 19, 1960. Americans is not the owner of peninsula and must hear the Korean people's voice suppressed long, not of its foreign invented interests and previliged divided system. What is coloney? If USA decide Korean's destiny, then Korea is what? War for elimination of Nuke? Killing Korean people again.... Like Vietnam. "N Korea trade Nuke to terrorist?" It would be good excuse for war, only if N Korea have oil...^^ World is not so simple like Hillary think. Its the thought of teenager without knowing ABC of Koreans' suppressed history.
VIst this site. S Korean police and army killed innocent civilians who opposed divided election establishing S Korea government first, with US navy patrolling Jeju island. read the Newsweek article of "Ghost of Jeju"
http://www.jeju43.go.kr/
by stn_sage November 19, 2009 1:32 PM EST
IF they agree to give them some part of America, give them Connecticut and Joe Lieberman, we can afford to give that up.
Reply to this comment
by vietnamwar November 19, 2009 12:44 PM EST
he accord would be the largest for the U.S. since the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s...

Thank you Bill Clinton...for the biggest debt.
Reply to this comment
by RedWings_ninety_one November 19, 2009 1:33 PM EST
Wrong, Bill Clinton gave us a surplus, where as George W. Bush gave us 2 wars, the biggest recession since the great depression, and the 11+ trillion dollar debt that we now have.
by vietnamwar November 19, 2009 4:52 PM EST
Project surplus....
by vietnamwar November 19, 2009 12:39 PM EST
Offer Aid ? are we in DEBT.....2 TRILLIONS AND COUNTING...
Reply to this comment
by RedWings_ninety_one November 19, 2009 1:33 PM EST
No, more like 11+ trillion.
by Brokennews November 19, 2009 10:03 AM EST
North Korea will never give up it's nuke program. It's their cash cow. It's how they get free stuff from nations stupid enough to keep giving it to them. They have little else that adds to their GDP. It really is extortion. No different than what the Mob does. "Give us a cut of what you got or we will impose violence upon you."
If we're stupid enough to cave in & pay this round of extortion money, they will be back with more demands before you can blink.
Reply to this comment
by ianlou November 19, 2009 9:23 AM EST
Kimberly Dong Illness is not building nukes for his national security.
He is building them as a barganing chip to gain economic support for his failed communist economy.

Give this half pint a$$-wipe nothing but a promise to wipe his capital from the face of the map if he threatens anyone with a nuke.
Reply to this comment
by eiddam November 19, 2009 8:12 AM EST
For 8 years the Bush/Israeli regimes threatened Iran, then N. Korea. Iran, nor Korea buckled under the commands, but instead decided to arm themseves against the threats, , now sanctions are placed upon them. Obama, like Bush is running around to get backing to attack just like Bush did to invade Iraq. Israel deliberatly went into the Palestianians homeland to conquer and we deliberatly wish to conquer for oil. The US seems to bring alot of the problems on by playing the Bully. You can't bash Obama without bashing Bush they are playing the same game, while our country suffers, and crime running rampant. Send out troops home, and send in the tough guys like Beck, O'Rielly, Rush, Leiberman, to name a few.
Reply to this comment
by Brokennews November 19, 2009 10:09 AM EST
"For 8 years the Bush/Israeli regimes threatened Iran, then N. Korea. Iran, nor Korea buckled under the commands, but instead decided to arm themseves against the threats"



I know you may not have much communication with the media in the last 20 years, reception inside caves can be difficult, but North Korea has "armed themselves" since well before Clinton. Remember Albright & Lil' Kim toasting with champagne over their supposed "Nuke disarmament deal?? You need to get out more!
by countrycuz1 November 19, 2009 8:09 AM EST
Didn't we try this before?
Reply to this comment
See all 31 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook