November 16, 2009 12:03 AM

U.S. Army: Morale Down in Afghanistan

(AP)  Morale has fallen among soldiers in Afghanistan, where U.S. troops are seeing record violence in the 8-year-old war, while those in Iraq show much improved mental health amid much lower violence, the Army said Friday.

Soldier suicides in Iraq did not increase for the first time since 2004, according to a new study.

Though findings of two new battlefield surveys are similar in several ways to the last ones taken in 2007, they come at a time of intense scrutiny on Afghanistan as President Barack Obama struggles to come up with a new war strategy and planned troop buildup.

There is also perhaps equal new attention focused on the mental health of the force since a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, last week in which an Army psychiatrist is charged.

Both surveys showed that soldiers on their third or fourth tours of duty had lower morale and more mental health problems than those with fewer deployments and an ever-increasing number of troops who are having problems with their marriages.

The new survey on Afghanistan found instances of depression, anxiety and other psychological problems are about the same as they were in 2007. But it also said there is a shortage of mental health workers to help soldiers who need it, partly because of the buildup Mr. Obama already started this year with the dispatch of more than 20,000 extra troops.

Efforts already under way to get more health workers to the Afghan war could be hampered somewhat by last week's shooting. The psychiatrist charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder was slated to go to Afghanistan. Some of the dead and wounded also were to deploy there to bolster psychological services for soldiers.

The new Afghanistan survey found that individual soldier morale was about the same as previous studies, but that "unit morale rates ... were significantly lower than in 2005 or 2007," said an executive summary of the report that was to be explained in a news conference Friday. The units referred to were mostly platoons of roughly a couple dozen people each.

In Iraq, some 2,400 soldiers in randomly selected platoons filled out surveys from December 2008 through March 2009 and a mental health assessment team went to the warfront for a month starting in late February to analyze the results and hold interviews and focus groups.

In Afghanistan, more than 1,500 troops in more than 50 platoons filled out the surveys from April to June, and the assessment team when through the same process from May through June.

Mental health providers also were interviewed in each country.

It is the sixth such survey, a program that was groundbreaking when started in 2003 in that it was the biggest effort ever made to measure the health of troops - and the services they receive - right at the warfront.
By Associated Press Writer Pauline Jelinek

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 14 Comments
by underdogus2009 November 14, 2009 8:51 AM EST
AFGHANISTAN WHERE EMPIRES GO TO DIE........
Genghis Khan could not hold onto Afghanistan. Neither will the United States...*sniff*
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 November 14, 2009 12:23 PM EST
underdogus2009
The US could if they should and wanted to. Wholeheartedly the US can do anything. Half-heartedly it will fail. You have to be willing to die for the cause. The other side is. Why put America down?
by YourVeryWrong November 14, 2009 5:20 PM EST
The Mongols ruled Afghanistan for almost 300 years. So it appears that CBS News board agit-prop is where logic goes to die.
by 50BMS13 November 14, 2009 2:09 AM EST
I guess morale is down! The troops know their Commander in Chief doesn't know what to do or if they should or shouldn't be there. He apologizes for America everyday. How can they have pride when they are being apologized for? They are pawns at the expense of "politically correct".
Reply to this comment
by seaniekaye November 13, 2009 8:57 PM EST
too bad about low morale. they should have theme days. i know it sound sstupid but, like 'pirate tuesday' and 'backwards wednesday' etc. people grumble about those kinds of theme days but they all end up having a good time with it in the end
Reply to this comment
by lmartink November 13, 2009 11:09 PM EST
Are you insane, seaniekaye?
by babooph November 13, 2009 7:50 PM EST
A military designed to fight a high tech war against a major power ,sent to chase a bunch of goatherders around some useless dry mountains for 8 years.. why would that lower moral?
Reply to this comment
by lakota2012 November 13, 2009 4:42 PM EST
What a mess, with casualties up, moral down, and President Obama handed an unwinable WAR by the bushies and their poor strategy over the past 8 years. Seems as if our Afghani Ambassador, a general with over 2 years experience on the ground in Afghanistan, knows what is best over the knee-jerk GOP chickenhawks calling for tens of thousands more troops and tens of thousands more "private contractors."

What did hundreds of thousands of troops give us in Vietnam, but just another unwinable WAR for the military/industrial complex of WAR profiteer multi-millionaires?

With multiple extended tours, low moral and huge mental problems causing suicides and marriage problems among soldiers, why does America want to throw more gasoline on the fire called Afghanistan, by sending even more troops to an unwinable WAR?
Reply to this comment
by YourVeryWrong November 14, 2009 6:51 PM EST
Oh, those supernaturally crafty Jews. Or is it that they're of average intelligence, but their enemies are morons...?
by bubbadubba November 13, 2009 3:54 PM EST
Our troops are not stupid, they know we are not wanted in Afghanistan and their mission is a lost cause.
Afghanistan-Nam.
Bring our troops home.
Reply to this comment
by lmartink November 13, 2009 3:19 PM EST
Of course morale is low. Our troops aren't stupid. I think they are weary, do not see any progress happening, and they recognize a losing cause.

In the face of enemy fire, their officers have them stand up and move around a lot. Something we did not do in Vietnam.

When taking fire, enemy positions do not disappear with the intense blaze of napalm, or the smoke and dust of an artillery barrage. Things we did do in Nam, and WW II.

Instead they are trying to win over the hearts and minds of the people, and taking excessive casualties. They are soldiers and Marines, not missionaries.

They move through poppy fields that raise money for the Taliban.

They're not stupid. It is time to bring them home.
Reply to this comment
by sh81842 November 13, 2009 1:18 PM EST
So, the morale problem in Afghanistan is the result of not having enough mental health professionals? Why didn't I think of that? It's not about the multiple tours, the separation from family, the constant threat of attack, the frustration of not being able to identify good guys from bad guys, or the lack of support we are getting from the very people we are there to help. It's about not having enough shrinks to explain to our troops why it might be necessary for them to die in an ill-conceived, ill-executed, and unnecessary war with no end in sight?
All we need is a bunch of Dr. Phil's and our troubles are over.
Reply to this comment
by BeckieBest November 13, 2009 12:05 PM EST
After 8 years of not committing enough troops and resources in Afghanistan, the country is totally FUBAR.

I'm glad that Obama is taking the time to determine whether this is worth the sacrifice of more troops. I'm glad that he's not blindly backing the incredibly corrupt and weak Afghan government. I'm glad that he's not bowing to the pressure of the right wing nuts who are responsible for creating this mess in the first place.
Reply to this comment
by YourVeryWrong November 14, 2009 5:22 PM EST
Baby talk? That's so cute.
See all 14 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook