A group of doctors overseeing Nidal Malik Hasan's medical training discussed concerns about his overly zealous religious views and strange behavior months before the Army major was accused of a shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, that left 13 dead and 29 wounded.
Doctors and staff overseeing Hasan's training viewed him at times as belligerent, defensive and argumentative in his frequent discussions of his Muslim faith, a military official familiar with several group discussions about Hasan said. The official was not authorized to speak publicly about the meetings and spoke on condition of anonymity.
Hasan was characterized in meetings as a mediocre student and lazy worker, a matter of concern among the doctors and staff at Walter Reed Army the Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, a military medical school in Bethesda, Maryland, the official said.
The concerns about Hasan's performance and religious views were shared with other military officials considering his assignment after he finished his medical training, and the consensus was to send the 39-year-old psychiatrist to Fort Hood, the official said.
If this report is true, this is not just an ethical violation, it's a legal one, officials tell
CBS News correspondent Kimberly Dozier.
More Coverage of the Tragedy at Fort Hood:Exclusive: Inside Hasan's ApartmentNo Fort Hood Executions since 1961Fort Hood Hero Recalls "Chaotic" SceneThe Government Blame GameFBI Searches for Missed CluesFt. Hood Shooting: Composure Under FireRadical Imam's Web Site Praises HasanFort Hood Reflects, but Work Carries On Hasan Computer Shows No Terror Ties List of Fort Hood Dead, WoundedFort Hood, one of the country's largest military installations, was considered the best assignment for Hasan because other doctors could handle the workload if he continued to perform poorly and his superiors could document any continued behavior problems, the official said.
The group saw no evidence that Hasan was violent or a threat. It was more that he repeatedly referred to his strong religious views in discussions with classmates, his superiors and even in his research work, the official said. His behavior, while at times perceived as intense and combative, was not unlike the zeal of others with strong religious views. But some doctors and staff were concerned that their unfamiliarity with the Muslim faith would lead them to unfairly single out Hasan's behavior, the official said.
Some in the group questioned Hasan's sympathies as an Army psychiatrist, whether he would be more aligned with Muslims fighting U.S. troops. And there was some concern about whether he should continue to serve in the military, the official said.
Sharon Willis, a spokeswoman for the Uniformed Services University, referred questions Wednesday about Hasan to his lawyer. The attorney, John Galligan of Belton, Texas, did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment.
The revelations about the concerns that Hasan's superiors had before sending him to Fort Hood come amid a growing debate over what warning signs the military and law enforcement officials
might have missed before last week's massacre.
A joint terrorism task force overseen by the FBI learned late last year of Hasan's repeated contact with a radical Muslim cleric who encouraged Muslims to kill U.S. troops in Iraq. The FBI said in a statement late Wednesday that the task force did not refer early information about Hasan to superiors because it concluded he wasn't linked to terrorism.
The doctors and staff who discussed concerns about Hasan had several group conversations about him that started in early 2008 during regular monthly meetings and ended as he was finishing a fellowship in disaster and preventive psychology this summer, the official familiar with the discussions said.
They saw no signs of mental problems, no risk factors that would predict violent behavior. And the group discussed other factors that suggested Hasan would continue to thrive in the military, factors that mitigated their concerns, the official said.
(However, a person familiar with the discussions who spoke to NPR said there had been some talk of whether Hasan suffered from mental problems: "Put it this way, everybody felt that if you were deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, you would not want Nidal Hasan
in your foxhole," the person said.)
According to the official, records reviewed by Hasan's superiors described nearly 20 years of military service, including nearly eight years as an enlisted soldier; completion of three rigorous medical school programs, albeit as a student the group characterized in their discussions as mediocre; his resilience after the deaths of his parents early in his medical education, and an otherwise polite and gentle nature when not discussing religion.
The Army has said it has no record of enlisted service for Hasan, instead noting that his military service began when he started the medical school program in 1997.
The official said the group became increasingly concerned about Hasan's religious views after he completed two research projects that took a decidedly religious tone - one at the end of his residency at Walter Reed that advocated allowing Muslim soldiers to be released as conscientious objectors instead of fighting in wars against other Muslims, and the other as he pursued his master's degree in public health that discussed religious conflicts for Muslim U.S. soldiers.
Some in the group shared their experiences with Hasan, all telling similar stories about repeated instances when he made religion an issue.
Officials involved at various times in the meetings about Hasan included John Bradley, Walter Reed's chief of psychiatry; Scott Moran, Walter Reed's psychiatric residency program director; Robert Ursano, chairman of the Uniformed Services University's psychiatry department; Charles Engel, the university's assistant chair of psychiatry, and David Benedek, an associate professor of psychiatry at the university.
Those officials either declined to comment or did not return telephone calls and emails seeking comment Wednesday.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon has found no evidence that Hasan formally sought release from the Army as a conscientious objector or for any other reason, two senior military officials told The Associated Press. Family members have said he wanted to get out of the Army and had sought legal advice, suggesting that Hasan's anxiety as a Muslim over his pending deployment overseas might have been a factor in the deadly rampage.
Hasan had complained privately to colleagues that he was harassed for his religion and that he wanted to get out of the Army. But there is no record of Hasan filing a complaint with his chain of command regarding any harassment he may have suffered for being Muslim or any record of him formally seeking release from the military, the officials told the AP.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the case is under investigation.
Another Army official, Lt. Col. George Wright, said Wednesday that Hasan likely would have had to commit to another year in the military when he was transferred to Fort Hood earlier this summer. It is common for an officer to incur a one-year service extension when they receive a transfer to another post.
I say this, because I work in a state university that has had some rather unstable people working there, but there isn't anything you can do, except wait and watch. If they are fired, they can sue the pants off of everybody concerned. They can claim discrimination at the drop of a hat.
Pretty much the only thing that will make termination possible is a physical assault or a death threat (and you have to be able to prove those things).
Timothy McVeigh
Son of Sam
Hillside Strangler
Charles Manson
IRA
Columbine High
No wait, they weren't Muslims, never mind.
Er, you don't know what you are talking about.
But let's assume you are right. What about Jews who believe in an eye for eye and tooth for a tooth and believe it is alright for them to take land they claim has been promised to them?
That Bible is also 1/2 of the Christian Bible.
Well?
Besides I was talking about Jordan and you totally changed the subject because you could not dispute the facts in my post.
You are free to say Muslims are violent and evil but you are wrong.
Sorry.
Of course if you are an Iraqi Muslim and have seen 200,000 Iraqis killed and 300,000 wounded by the phoney US invasion I guess you would be inclined to say Christians are violent and evil.
My neighbor is a Muslim and he and his family are wonderful people and I hope they stay my neighbors for a long time.
Pretext, excuse, or ruse. Lame anyway you look at it.
Who signed off on this critical gaff?
Any bona fide national security investigative effort requires face to face interviews by trained investigators who can pose fact finding hard questions to people who interact with any person of interest and extract any nuances to hunt out any shrouded threat indicators.
Obviously reliance on a rubber stamped records review threat assessment from a detached cozy office does not cut it. All the clues were not linked to build a lucid hunch.
I bet those concerned fellow students and coworkers who raised loyalty or other uneasiness factors before this tragedy but were censured by systematic political correctness would have added valuable perspectives of warning to any creditable security investigation.
Inexcusably reminiscent of certain past diligent field agent investigative work which detected flying lessons by certain persons of national interest yet implication was not grasped by or perhaps even jeered by HQ.
A US Secret clearance is a condition of initial appointment as and required for commissioned officers in our military.
Exceptions for certain commissioned officers are another accident waiting to happen.
Strict requirements for entrance security investigations are rigidly adhered to except for health professionals, chaplains, and attorneys who may be commissioned prior to completion of a security investigation.
This weak policy loophole in background security process is a potential slip under the RADAR vulnerability risk that needs to be fixed. Prevention better than cure.
With hindsight could robust adherence to current personnel security procedures for protection of sensitive national information focused in on this escalating, one person rebellion?
Did Commander, US Army Central Personnel Security Clearance Facility (CCF), as sole authority for granting, denying and revoking security clearances of military employees of the Department of the Army become aware of any derogatory information on this officer?
CCF notified of ongoing FBI or Defense Criminal Investigative Service investigations?
CCF notified of any concerns of fellow students or colleagues?
Were any proactive steps taken by CCF to suspend, deny, or revoke this officers security clearance eligibility until active investigations were complete?
Could commanders, supervisors, or security managers at all levels following established protocols help identify or focus scrutiny on low level threats or hazards in this case before concerns reached dynamic meltdown?
Thankfully Senators Joe Lieberman, a Connecticut independent and Susan Collins, Republican from Maine are willing to ask the tough and valid questions.
An in depth investigation to refine all risk factor reviews is urgently required. Why?
If our national security agencies cannot coordinate, detect, and prevent this type of developing radical threat from within our military with all control measures and criteria in place to become or remain a serving officer just how can we expect to preempt threats from less scrutinized sectors or individuals in society?
He is responsible for the deaths of 13 and injury to 30 US soldiers.
Not necessarily a terrorist either. He may performed a hate crime or Hasan may have just been a wacko that his peers should have diagnosed and moved to have him removed from the military and hospitalized.
Brant
His parents are Jordanian.
Jordan is anti terrorist and very anti Islamic terrorist and is an ally against terrorists and works closely with the US and Europe.
Jordan's official position is that terrorists cannot be true Muslims since that defies the teachings of Islam.
We cannot blame his heritage for his actions as Jordan is not an enemy of the US or world.
He is also not anti-Christian since there are many Christians in Jordan.
Jordan is a good and peaceful country.
I want this guy executed but I wanted to point out that we should not blame his family or Arabs for his actions, he is a self made nut case, a terrorist, and a coward.