WASHINGTON, Nov. 10, 2009

FBI Searches for Missed Clues on Hasan

Man Accused in Fort Hood Rampage was "Assessed" by Terrorism Investigators

    • Maj. Nidal M. Hasan, the Army psychiatrist believed to have killed 13 people at Fort Hood, was supposed to discuss a medical topic during a presentation to senior Army doctors in June 2007. Instead, he lectured on Islam, suicide bombers and threats the military could encounter from Muslims conflicted about fighting wars in Muslim countries.

      Maj. Nidal M. Hasan, the Army psychiatrist believed to have killed 13 people at Fort Hood, was supposed to discuss a medical topic during a presentation to senior Army doctors in June 2007. Instead, he lectured on Islam, suicide bombers and threats the military could encounter from Muslims conflicted about fighting wars in Muslim countries.  (The Washington Post)

    • Maj. Nidal M. Hasan, the Army psychiatrist believed to have killed 13 people at Fort Hood, was supposed to discuss a medical topic during a presentation to senior Army doctors in June 2007. Instead, he lectured on Islam, suicide bombers and threats the military could encounter from Muslims conflicted about fighting wars in Muslim countries.

      Maj. Nidal M. Hasan, the Army psychiatrist believed to have killed 13 people at Fort Hood, was supposed to discuss a medical topic during a presentation to senior Army doctors in June 2007. Instead, he lectured on Islam, suicide bombers and threats the military could encounter from Muslims conflicted about fighting wars in Muslim countries.  (The Washington Post)

    • Maj. Nidal M. Hasan

      Maj. Nidal M. Hasan  (AP)

    Previous slide Next slide
(AP)  A Defense Department investigator on a terrorism task force looked into Fort Hood shooting suspect Nidal Hasan's background months ago, officials said Tuesday - providing fresh evidence the military knew worrisome details about the Army psychiatrist before last week's deadly rampage.

Two officials speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case on the record said the Washington-based joint terrorism task force overseen by the FBI was notified of communications between Hasan and a radical imam overseas, and the information was turned over to a Defense Criminal Investigative Service employee assigned to the task force.

That worker wrote up an assessment of Hasan after reviewing the Army major's personnel file and the communications. The assessment concluded Hasan did not merit further investigation, in large part because his communications with the imam were centered on a research paper he was writing at the time, and the investigator had concluded Hasan was in fact working on such a paper, the officials said.

In hindsight, critics question whether the government too quickly dismissed Hasan as a threat, reports CBS News correspondent Bob Orr.

"Did they reach a conclusion, you know, based on just an overview and a cursory view of the evidence and said, 'we don't have to worry about this guy?'" asked Rep. Peter Hoekstra, R-Mich.

Washington Unplugged: Hoekstra's Fort Hood Frustrations

The disclosure came as questions swirled about whether opportunities were missed to head off the massacre - 13 dead and 29 wounded - and the FBI launched its own internal review of how it handled the early information about Hasan. Military, law enforcement and intelligence agencies are all defending themselves against tough questions about what each of them knew about Hasan before he allegedly opened fire in a crowded room at the huge military base in Texas.

Within hours after the role of the defense investigator on the task force was disclosed, a senior defense official said "based on what we know now, neither the U.S. Army nor any other organization within the Department of Defense knew of Maj. Hasan's contacts with any Muslim extremists."

CBSNews.com Special Report: Tragedy at Fort Hood

This defense official was not authorized to discuss the case on the record and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Hasan, awake and talking to doctors, met his lawyer Monday in the San Antonio hospital where he is recovering, under guard, from gunshot wounds in the assault. He has not been formally charged but officials plan to charge him in military court, not a civilian one, a choice that suggests his alleged actions are not thought to have emanated from a terrorist organization.

Investigators still believe Hasan acted alone, despite his communications with Anwar al-Awlaki, an imam released from a Yemeni jail last year who has used his personal Web site to encourage Muslims across the world to kill U.S. troops in Iraq. But, officials deemed the communications "benign" and the FBI concluded Hasan presented no imminent threat, reports Orr.

Investigative officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case on the record. Republican Rep. Pete Hoekstra of Michigan, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said it was his understanding Hasan and the imam exchanged e-mails that counterterrorism officials picked up.

Meanwhile, The Washington Post reported Tuesday that Hasan warned his medical colleagues a year and a half ago that to "decrease adverse events" the U.S. military should allow Muslim soldiers to be released as conscientious objectors instead of fighting in wars against other Muslims. Hasan made the recommendation in a culminating presentation to senior Army doctors at Walter Reed Medical Center, where he spent six years as an intern, resident and fellow before being transferred to Fort Hood.

Washington Post Slideshow: Hasan's Presentation on Islam

(The Washington Post)
"It's getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims," Hasan said in the presentation, a copy of which was obtained by the Post (left).

FBI Director Robert Mueller ordered the inquiry into the bureau's handling of the case, including its response to potentially worrisome information gathered about Hasan beginning in December 2008 and continuing into early this year.

Authorities revealed the major had once been under scrutiny from a joint terrorism task force because of the series of communications going back months. Al-Awlaki is a former imam at a Falls Church, Va., mosque where Hasan and his family occasionally worshipped.

In 2001, al-Awlaki, a native-born U.S. citizen, had contact with two of the Sept. 11 hijackers, and on Monday his Web site praised Hasan as a hero.

Military officials were made aware of communications between Hasan and al-Awlaki, but because the messages did not advocate or threaten violence, civilian law enforcement authorities could not take the matter further, the officials said. The terrorism task force concluded Hasan was not involved in terrorist planning.

Officials said the content of those messages was "consistent with the subject matter of his research," part of which involved post-traumatic stress disorder stemming from U.S. combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A law enforcement official said the communications consisted primarily of Hasan posing questions to the imam as a spiritual leader or adviser, and the imam did respond to at least some of those messages.

No formal investigation was ever opened based on the contacts, the officials said.

The most serious charge in military court is premeditated murder, which carries the death penalty.

More Coverage of the Tragedy at Fort Hood:
Counseling for Trauma, Grief at Ft. Hood
Ft. Hood Shooting: Composure Under Fire
Report: U.S. Knew Hasan Sought al Qaeda
Radical Imam's Web Site Praises Hasan
Fort Hood Reflects, but Work Carries On
Hasan Computer Shows No Terror Ties
List of Fort Hood Dead, Wounded



© MMIX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by wheatfield2 November 11, 2009 7:47 AM EST
Hasan was a recent and frequent visitor at the local strip joint, enjoying lap dances and being known as a "good tipper". One dancer recounted that Hasan bought lap dances from her in a private room on Oct. 29 and Oct. 30 (...)This is from a Euro article.( ) Did U.S. media hide this fact?( ) If you google ""911 hijacker strip joint"", you wil see that is EXACTLY the behavior the 911 attackers exhibited in the recent months before the terrorist attack on our country.
Reply to this comment
by wheatfield2 November 11, 2009 7:45 AM EST
""Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the gunman who killed 13 at America's Fort Hood military base, once gave a lecture to other doctors in which he said non-believers should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their throats. He also told colleagues at America's top military hospital that non-Muslims were infidels condemned to hell who should be set on fire.

The outburst came during an hour-long talk Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, gave on the Koran in front of dozens of other doctors at Walter Reed Army Medical Centre in Washington DC, where he worked for six years before arriving at Fort Hood in July.

Colleagues had expected a discussion on a medical issue but were instead given an extremist interpretation of the Koran, which Hasan appeared to believe.

Fellow doctors have recounted how they were repeatedly harangued by Hasan about religion and that he openly claimed to be a "Muslim first and American second." One Army doctor who knew him said a fear of appearing discriminatory against a Muslim soldier had stopped fellow officers from filing formal complaints. ""

This is from the Telegraph.co.uk, United Kingdom. American media is now stifling the news. I hear on the news that he will be tried in military court, which means that his crime is not considered terrorist act. They will go to great lengths to coddle this man, elicit sympathy and avoid calling it like it is.
Reply to this comment
by cattail101 November 11, 2009 7:26 AM EST
I don?t understand!!!! Why is anyone with a family member or friend in the military surprised with the actions of this man? My son, who is in a high position with advising the government and military personnel of what is going on there, and the best way to attack the situation, ask for help with his condition after returning from his 3rd deployment. (No soldier wants to look weak, so most don?t report problems when they first return.) After being home for a few months, his wife told him to get help for his anger issue or get out. He lowered himself to ask for help and was told by the MILITARY DOCTOR to avoid stress. LOL Are you ?? kidding me? He is an officer who sets and looks at these reports and data all day long, and they tell him to go home and avoid stress. I?m only a high school graduate and I think sometimes I have more brains than the military and government. God be with us, because the government is going to get us all killed
Reply to this comment
by bradkt1 November 11, 2009 12:56 AM EST
"...the Washington-based joint terrorism task force overseen by the FBI was notified of communications between Hasan and a radical imam overseas, and the information was turned over to a Defense Criminal Investigative Service employee assigned to the task force. The communications were gathered by investigators beginning in December 2008 and continuing into early this year.

That defense investigator wrote up an assessment of Hasan after reviewing the communications and the Army major's personnel file, according to these officials. The assessment concluded Hasan did not merit further investigation ? in large part because his communications with the imam were centered on a research paper about the effects of combat in Iraq and Afghanistan and the investigator determined that Hasan was in fact working on such a paper, the officials said."

###############################################################

I know that this won't be a popular opinion, but I don't think that this had anything to do with political correctness at all. The key fact here is that he was an army phychiatrist who was working with soldiers returning from combat in the Middle East. Hindsight is 20-20, but who can honestly say that they expected an army psychiiatrist to go off like this? Whoever was involved with this investigationc concluded...wrongly...that this man was working within the scope of his professional responsibilities.

One of the questions that I have is if there were concerns by fellow officers about this man, why wasn't anything included in his official personnel file? Had this been the case, the investigator could have had access to this and maybe he would have had a chance to put 2 and 2 together.

I think that people are looking for a convenient scapegoat right now. From what I can see right now, a tragic mistake was made. Think about it...first, army officials were totally shocked that a officer was behind this...who turned out to be an army psychiatrist?
Reply to this comment
by dscott2009 November 10, 2009 9:58 PM EST
I hope the Director Mueller is not trying to use that old tired line he was under investigation, but there were no specifics. He never said that he planed to kill 13 of his fellow soldiers during our investigation. Nobody could have possibly foreseen that a man this unstable would be capable of such an act.

The FBI is only capable of stopping such acts only if the perpetrators of such acts provide them with the specific date and time they plan to Carrie out such acts. Otherwise, they don't know what to do...
Reply to this comment
by wdh3007 November 10, 2009 9:48 PM EST
Everyone failed to see this coming the FBI failed the CIA failed the Army failed the media failed but my guess is the Democrats will lose the millitary vote forever because of this one.
Reply to this comment
by ConstantineXIII November 10, 2009 9:45 PM EST
Obama bears some responsibility for this attack because he has fostered and encouraged the atmosphere of political correctness that led Army personnel, the FBI, and the CIA to ignore or fail to act upon numerous warning signs and evidence of jihad allegiance and activity on the part of Major Hassan. It was Obama who insisted upon not even using the word "jihad". It was Obama who threatened to prosecute CIA officers. It was Obama who appointed a Homeland Security Director who calls terrorist acts "man caused disasters" and who thinks "right wing extremists" are a greater danger to the country than Islamic jihadists. It was Obama who basically did everything in terms of praising Islam in his Cairo speech but prostrate himself toward Mecca. Folks, poltical correctness doesn't work one iota with people who have Hassan's mindset. And pretending certain people like Hassan and some other Muslims don't believe Islam justifies terrorist acts is simply living in denial.
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 November 10, 2009 9:47 PM EST
ConstantineXIII....darn rights!
by wheatfield2 November 10, 2009 9:23 PM EST
If a man stood up on a desk, shot 100 rounds of ammo into a crowd of unarmed people and hollered "TAKE THAT, YOU GAY HOMOSEXUALS", would you say the motive was NOT a crime against gay people? That he was just a mass murderer? The motive had NOTHING to do with gay people? He just snapped?

The government is excusing Hasan's crime the same way.
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 November 10, 2009 9:37 PM EST
wheatfield2....good post. You are correct. I've said it before, but the reason the Gov't is doing this is because Obama chose to define his presidency on muslim issues. The very first thing he did was go overseas and make grandiose speeches apologizing to all muslims for America. He also said we are a muslim nation just as much a christian one. He praises muslims for their peace and ways. He BET THE WHOLE DARNED PRESIDENCY of his and his administration on this right off the bat. He rolled snake eyes! He has chosen his path and now his hands are tied. This is ugly and a mess and there is no way to save face out of it asides having a new Commander in Chief. Till then, he will have to borrow more cause the farm was lost on the bet and there is no more money for the next roll.
by djaymick November 10, 2009 9:17 PM EST
The media, Democrats and this Administration will never label this a terroristic act because it gives credibility to "George Bush's War".
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 November 10, 2009 9:24 PM EST
djaymick...You are correct. But how long can muslim loving politically correct Obama keep this up? There are going to be many more deaths because of radical muslims...it has to be termed "terrorism" eventually you would think? He threw the dice and rolled snake eyes by praising the hell out of muslims and apologizing to the internationally for the USA. Now that their true colors are showing up on our soil he has egg on his face. His whole presidency will be defined on muslim issues because he rolled the dice and bet the farm and rolled snake eyes.
by bruce789 November 10, 2009 9:15 PM EST
They didn't do anything because someone would charge them with racism and they would be fired or disgraced, goes beyond common sense it is peer-group like thinking without reasoning. Example too is the bogus mortgage phenomenon, everyone knew the loans were bad, managers reasoned bad investment should taint good when the short term benefit was profitable, yet was bogus.
Reply to this comment
by brian1920 November 10, 2009 8:38 PM EST
CBS News is a participant in this utter nonsense that this guy was a victim. He is a terrorist and a muslim just like all the rest of the lunatics. Obama gave a speech today and failed to call this a terrorist act, and urged caution. This is utter crap and more BS from Obama.
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 November 10, 2009 8:46 PM EST
brian1920 My name is Brian too! You are absolutely correct. This political correctness stuff and muslim loving stuff from our CIC is doing untold damage. Good post.
by djaymick November 10, 2009 9:13 PM EST
You are absolutely correct. In a piece by CBS on June 2, CBS had no qualms reporting a piece called, "Tiller Murder is Terrorism, And All Pro-Lifers Are To Blame." I guess a late-term abortionist is more important than the men and women in our armed forces. Glad to see CBS showing its true colors. Absolutely disgraceful.
by maxcoffee-2009 November 11, 2009 1:49 AM EST
What about people that kill abortion doctors? wouldn?t that also be considered a terrorist act? Or really for that matter would what The D.C. Sniper did be considered a terrorist act? Or any school shooting, church shooting, etc? What about what happened to Matthew Sheaperd? Wouldn?t that also be considered a terrorist act?
What happened is terrible but it seems that because this guy is Muslim? that makes what he did an act of terrorism. Wouldn?t any act of violence on the population be considered terrorism then?
Just asking.
by 50BMS13 November 10, 2009 7:48 PM EST
The first clue? Anyone wearing traditional muslim garb on NorthAmerican soil! Anyone that wears clothes like that in America and goes to mosques 7 days a week to pray is a HUGE red flag. People....open yours eyes please and report this stuff. They only look peaceful to keep us sleeping and docile so that we let them be. But peace is really the last thing on their mind.
Reply to this comment
by maxcoffee-2009 November 11, 2009 1:51 AM EST
I think that you might have a problem... Christians have caused horrible crimes as well... If people going to a mosques is a red flag... then wouldn't people going to church be a red flag too?
by 50BMS13 November 11, 2009 3:25 AM EST
maxcoffee-2009 Yes in the annals of history christians are just as bloodguilty. I'm talking about 7 day a week muslim garb in North America....seems a little extreme. In this day and age, christians don't kill like in the crusades. If a Catholic was playing with her beads or rosary on a plane no one would give it a second thought. But if a muslim dressed in garb put down a rug in the middle of the aisle and started praying you would be covered in FBI agents. Perception is reality these days unfortunately cause of what muslims are doing these days.
by fleabag75 November 10, 2009 4:24 PM EST
It is really irrelevant what was said or not said with this guy in earlier times. It's done. Over. Nothing will come of it. Now they should be focusing on the next one. And surely there will a next one. Look for signs now, not after it's all over. We're great at hind sight,, not to good at looking forward.
Reply to this comment
by bubbadubba November 10, 2009 2:38 PM EST
Can I play the right wing Obama hater crazy comment game.
OK, let me give it a go.
THIS IS PALIN'S FAULT!
How did I do?
Or maybe " When Bush was President, Muslims loved us and there never any incidents of violence until Obama was elected".
Yea, that sounds more like the Limbetts and Hannitones.
Reply to this comment
by pcevet4 November 10, 2009 2:09 PM EST
This is the FBI, as in "Hey boss, they're takin' flight lessons in Minnesota and they don't wanna know how to land de plane. Hello... Hello ...."

You can bet an enlisted soldier would have received a higher level of scrutiny. Part of the problem is that the Army couldn't believe an officer would be capable of something like this. The FBI couldn't believe a fellow agent would sell out state secrets. Homeland Security went off on three buckwheat characters talkin sh.. a few years ago (Ax us if we's evil) and ignored this fanatic in touch with other fanatics. Meanwhile we have nuns and peace demonstrators on no-fly lists.
Reply to this comment
by newerdeal November 10, 2009 1:43 PM EST
Thank you cbsnews.com for staying on top of this story.

You are #1 ! ! !
Reply to this comment
by revlin1 November 10, 2009 1:07 PM EST
Here's a clue: http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2009/11/06/mass-murdering-muslim-major-worked-to-assist-obamas-transition-team-through-university-project/

Did anyone think to look at him while he was "assist" to help some guy get into WH who had "questionable" background? I wonder if this is tied in anyway? Maybe those "right wingers" out there and "birthers" aren't crazy after all...hmmm? Wonder if lamestream media better take a second look (as well as the FBI)...
Reply to this comment
by actornaught November 10, 2009 12:47 PM EST
You know it's phony outrage when the obvious is ignored, like Hasan was born in Virginia.

Anti-Immigration Yappers, get this:

1. Stop blaming the victims (after all, mexico, etc. sucks)

2. Put in place a system that's enforceable, walls, checkpoints, whatever legally suits your ugly little fancy is okay with me.

Nevermind that it's unamerican, I'm tired of the yapping, so GET ON WITH IT...
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George November 10, 2009 12:41 PM EST
by hungry1968-17 November 10, 2009 10:51 AM EST
So you're comparing the 10+ warnings that the Bush administration received regarding the pending 9/11 terrorist attack
____________________

Do you read at a pre-k level ? oh, hooked on cronic instead.

Where in my comment do I....."Compare the 10 warnings, blah, blah blah" ?? where do I compare anything ?? only foolish libs such as yourself only see life in a constant Bush vs. Obama way.
Reply to this comment
by Empire-George November 10, 2009 12:37 PM EST
by hungry1968-17 November 10, 2009 10:51 AM EST

Four words.....ON HIS WATCH

Period.....obviously the Army/Obama CinC, missed more than 10 warnings
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (327 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: