Obama's Afghan Plan: About 40K More Troops
Editor's note, 9:57 p.m. EDT: The White House has issued the following response to this story, attributed to White House National Security Advisor James Jones:
"Reports that President Obama has made a decision about Afghanistan are absolutely false. He has not received final options for his consideration, he has not reviewed those options with his national security team, and he has not made any decisions about resources. Any reports to the contrary are completely untrue and come from uninformed sources."
Tonight, after months of conferences with top advisors, President Obama has settled on a new strategy for Afghanistan. CBS News correspondent David Martin reports that the president will send a lot more troops and plans to keep a large force there, long term.
The president still has more meetings scheduled on Afghanistan, but informed sources tell CBS News he intends to give Gen. Stanley McChrystal most, if not all, the additional troops he is asking for.
Special Report: Afghanistan
McChrystal wanted 40,000 and the president has tentatively decided to send four combat brigades plus thousands more support troops. A senior officer says "that's close to what [McChrystal] asked for." All the president's military advisers have recommended sending more troops.
But they also have warned that troops alone will not win the war unless Afghan President Hamid Karzai cleans up his government.
"He's got to take concrete steps to eliminate corruption," Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said last week. "That means you have to rid yourself of those who are corrupt. You have to actually arrest and prosecute them."
The first combat troops would not arrive until early next year and it would be the end of 2010 before they were all there. That makes this Afghanistan surge very different from the Iraq surge, in which 30,000 troops descended on Baghdad and the surrounding area in just five months.
Related stories:
Karzai Vows to Tackle Corruption, Cronyism
Opinion: Afghanistan: Obama's First Domino
U.S. Troops to Afghanistan: A Waiting Game
Obama Eyes Smaller Afghan Troop Option
On Afghanistan, a Decision Comes Slowly
Obama Nears Decision on Afghanistan Troops
Obama: I Won't Rush Afghanistan Decision
Fred Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute says a slow motion surge will produce slow motion results.
"If they're going to be sort of trickled in very slowly over the course of a year than it's unlikely to have a very decisive impact in the course of 2010," he said.
The buildup would be expected to last about four years, until McChrystal completes his plan for doubling the size of the Afghan army and police force.
With 68,000 Americans already there, the Afghan surge would mean there would be 100,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan by the end of the president's first term.
The president is not expected to announce his decision until after he returns from China the week before Thanksgiving.
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved. "Reports that President Obama has made a decision about Afghanistan are absolutely false. He has not received final options for his consideration, he has not reviewed those options with his national security team, and he has not made any decisions about resources. Any reports to the contrary are completely untrue and come from uninformed sources."
Tonight, after months of conferences with top advisors, President Obama has settled on a new strategy for Afghanistan. CBS News correspondent David Martin reports that the president will send a lot more troops and plans to keep a large force there, long term.
The president still has more meetings scheduled on Afghanistan, but informed sources tell CBS News he intends to give Gen. Stanley McChrystal most, if not all, the additional troops he is asking for.
Special Report: Afghanistan
McChrystal wanted 40,000 and the president has tentatively decided to send four combat brigades plus thousands more support troops. A senior officer says "that's close to what [McChrystal] asked for." All the president's military advisers have recommended sending more troops.
But they also have warned that troops alone will not win the war unless Afghan President Hamid Karzai cleans up his government.
"He's got to take concrete steps to eliminate corruption," Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said last week. "That means you have to rid yourself of those who are corrupt. You have to actually arrest and prosecute them."
The first combat troops would not arrive until early next year and it would be the end of 2010 before they were all there. That makes this Afghanistan surge very different from the Iraq surge, in which 30,000 troops descended on Baghdad and the surrounding area in just five months.
Related stories:
Karzai Vows to Tackle Corruption, Cronyism
Opinion: Afghanistan: Obama's First Domino
U.S. Troops to Afghanistan: A Waiting Game
Obama Eyes Smaller Afghan Troop Option
On Afghanistan, a Decision Comes Slowly
Obama Nears Decision on Afghanistan Troops
Obama: I Won't Rush Afghanistan Decision
Fred Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute says a slow motion surge will produce slow motion results.
"If they're going to be sort of trickled in very slowly over the course of a year than it's unlikely to have a very decisive impact in the course of 2010," he said.
The buildup would be expected to last about four years, until McChrystal completes his plan for doubling the size of the Afghan army and police force.
With 68,000 Americans already there, the Afghan surge would mean there would be 100,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan by the end of the president's first term.
The president is not expected to announce his decision until after he returns from China the week before Thanksgiving.
Popular on CBSNews.com
- Mexico's drug war 20 Photos
- Graphic video: Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack Play Video
- Muslim hard-liners ID suspect in London attack
- U.K. official: London attack suspects probed before
- Tokyo's rockabilly scene 16 Photos
- Former sex slaves: Osaka mayor should quit
- Man dead in "truly shocking" London attack
- People cling to car in "sidewalk skiing" stunt Play Video
<a href=" http://ketiva.com/Politics_and_Government/obama_isnt_eight_years_in_afghanistan_enough1.html">http://ketiva.com/Politics_and_Government/obama_isnt_eight_years_in_afghanistan_enough1.html</a>
That is why the puppeteers had their puppets, the Bush Crime Family, instigate the fraudulent War on Terror. What a bunch of ignorant, sorry, sad suckers we are.
AND THE MOON IS MADE OF CHEESE!
And global climate change is a hoax
And 911 was done by Afghani terrorists
And Fox News is news channel
Of particular significance was the donation of US-made FIM-92 Stinger anti-aircraft missile systems, which caused a small increase in aircraft losses of the Soviet Air Force.
Courtesy of Wikipedia.com. And thanks to the good folks who work there round the clock, the information is true and not edited.
ANT THE MOON IS MADE OF CHEESE
I think we are actually chasing criminals and that requires a police action not a war.
Sending our troops overseas and then having them return fire with anyone who engages them is really a poor way to engage in warfare.