November 10, 2009 10:00 AM

A Battle for Senate - And the GOP's Soul

By
Brian Montopoli
Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio (marcorubio.com)

(CBS)  This story was filed by CBSNews.com political reporter Brian Montopoli.
Florida Senate hopeful Marco Rubio is sitting in a hotel lobby in midtown Manhattan, arguing that his Republican Party has a decision to make.

"It's what the party's going to be about," says Rubio, the 38-year-old former speaker of the Florida House of Representatives. "It's not a choice between two evil paths. It's a choice between one I believe is right and one I believe is wrong."

A choice, in other words, between Marco Rubio and Charlie Crist.

Rubio and Crist are competing against each other in a Republican primary to fill the seat previously held by Republican Mel Martinez, who resigned in August. (The current senator, George LeMieux - who was appointed by Crist - has said he's not going to run.)

When he announced in May that he was running for the seat, Crist was expected to have a relatively easy time winning the primary, and then the general election: A popular Republican governor with the backing of the GOP establishment, he'd staked out moderate positions on climate change and government spending that made him palatable to Florida's independents and Democrats.

Six months on, however, Crist looks vulnerable. His poll numbers are down, though he still has a sizable, if shrinking, lead over Rubio. What he does not have is the enthusiasm of the state's Republican activists, who have repeatedly indicated their preference for Rubio in straw polls.

Only registered Republicans can vote in Florida's GOP primary, which will take place in August. That's a problem for Crist, who has long been viewed with suspicion by the more conservative elements of the party - the folks who tend to show up in low-turnout, non-presidential year elections.

If Rubio can convince enough of those voters that he deserves their vote - and raise enough money to put a dent in Crist's six-to-one fundraising advantage - Rubio could effectively steal the nomination out from under Crist, and in the process help put the GOP on a path that some fear will lead to its marginalization.

The clean-cut and charismatic Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants, is in many ways the perfect candidate for the fiscal conservatives who have taken over the Republican spotlight - and who seem intent on taking over the Republican Party. President Obama's spending policies, he argues, "will rob my children and their generation of their prosperity, and some of their freedoms."

Rubio sees America as a nation of people who "want government to get out of the way" - and casts himself as an uncompromising advocate for those who believe prosperity results not from government largess but rather free enterprise. He's not the only one: Anti-taxation heavyweight Grover Norquist called Rubio "the most pro-taxpayer legislative leader in the country," and he has the backing of the powerful limited-government group The Club For Growth.

(AP Photo/Phil Coale)
Rubio has aggressively hammered Crist (left) for supporting the president's $787 billion stimulus package, offering up a photo on his Web site of the two at a February rally in support of the bill. (The two literally hugged at the event.) In an interview Monday, Rubio said he was "disturbed" by Crist's recent claim that he didn't actually endorse the legislation.

"I think it's part of a broader problem in American politics, and that is people who will say or do anything in order to win an election…including lie about their record," Rubio said.

Rubio says he largely supports the tea party protesters, many of whom have cast health care reform as a socialist takeover. (The feeling is mutual: FreedomWorks, the conservative lobbying group that has helped organize the protests, is planning to mobilize thousands of volunteers on Rubio's behalf.) Asked if he would welcome the support of former GOP vice presidential candidate and Alaska governor Sarah Palin, Rubio offers an unqualified yes, adding that "I can't think of anything her and I disagree with off the top of my head."

Palin hasn't offered an endorsement in the Florida Senate race, but she did weigh in on another race with some striking similarities - last week's House contest in upstate New York. In that race, a moderate Republican was forced out of the contest amid a challenge from conservative party candidate Doug Hoffman; Hoffman went on to lose the election to Democrat Bill Owens, even though the rural district had been reliably Republican for years.

Shortly before the vote, Rubio wrote this in a blog post: "For conservatives who still don't believe we can be true to our principles and win elections, I hope NY-23 serves as a wake-up call." Wouldn't Hoffman's loss, then, be a wake-up call of a different kind - evidence of the potential fallout when conservative Republicans like Rubio take on moderates from their own party?

Not at all, Rubio said. He pinned the loss on the local Republican Party, which he said shouldn't have selected moderate Republican Dede Scozzafava in the first place.

"The blame lays on those who decided to anoint someone who was so outside the mainstream of Republican thought," he argued.

Some prominent Republicans, including former House speaker Newt Gingrich, saw the upstate House New York race as a cautionary tale about what happens when Republicans become too dogmatic, rejecting candidates who don't conform to a relatively narrow set of beliefs. Gingrich suggested that conservatives like Rubio and Palin are engaged in a "purge" of moderates that could ultimately result in Democrat Nancy Pelosi being "speaker-for-life."

Rubio rejects the notion that there is a purge going on of moderate Republicans, arguing that Gingrich has it exactly backward, at least when it comes to his campaign.

"People always couch it as 'is there a purge of moderates,'" he said. "I think the real question is, 'is there room for the conservatives in the party?' Let's not forget that the establishment has endorsed the moderate in this race, Charlie Crist. So if anything, the people fighting to be a part of the Republican Party are the conservatives in this race, not the moderates."

Crist's campaign, for its part, is trying to change the narrative by going after Rubio's self-image as a "true conservative." That mantle, suggests Crist communications director Andrea Saul, actually belongs to the governor.

Saul pointed to Rubio's "excessive spending following his election as speaker, support for tax increases, limitations on the 2nd amendment, lack of leadership on immigration reform, [and] political favors for key supporters" as evidence of his liberalism.

"On the contrary, Governor Crist has demonstrated a solid commitment to social and fiscal conservatism and is strongly pro-life and pro-family," she said. Saul went on to note that Crist was named Gun Rights Defender of the month in July by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

But while Crist's camp may be stressing his conservative bona fides to fend off Rubio's challenge from the right, one of the governor's strongest arguments (and one he can't explicitly make) may be that he is better positioned to defeat likely Democratic nominee Kendrick Meek in a general election. Meek, a Democratic congressman from the Miami area, has been moving toward the center in advance of the general election - where he would be well-positioned to make a play for independents and moderate Republicans who could be turned off by Rubio if he is the Republican nominee.

The race, then, could hinge on whether GOP primary voters opt for Crist, the potentially safer if perhaps less emotionally-satisfying option, or the seemingly more dogmatic Rubio. Republicans have already begun taking sides: Crist has the backing of Sens. John McCain and Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, while Rubio has been endorsed by conservative Sens. Jim DeMint and James Inhofe, as well as former GOP presidential candidate Mike Huckabee.

The outcome of the race could demonstrate what the GOP will become as it tries to find its footing following two years in the political wilderness.

"I believe that I represent those who believe the Republican Party should be an alternative to the Democratic Party," Rubio said. "I believe that I give voice to those that believe that limited government is the source of our great prosperity as a people. And that's why I believe I'm going to win."
By Brian Montopoli
By Brian Montopoli

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
  • Brian Montopoli

    Brian Montopoli is the senior political reporter at CBSNews.com.

Add a Comment See all 149 Comments
by AK-47_Justice November 11, 2009 10:58 AM EST
by us_1776:
The mindless arguments made by the Limbaugh/Beck/Hannity parrots is incredible. Nothing more than lies, scares, and gross distortions of fact. With as many of these irresponsible lies that have been debunked by credible news organizations around the country I cannot imagine why the FCC has not pulled the license from these propagandists and incitists.
***************************************






Actually ever since reagan's FCC repealed the Fairness Doctrine and reagan vetoed legislation to re-instate it, we've seen the advent of one-sided propaganda sources for GOP talk radio and cable nonsense, preaching to the choir with all their hatred and attacks against any Dem president and loving admiration for the bushies numerous mistakes.

Seems as if America is incapable of having an honest debate about anything today, and is something we truly need for such a divided country which is only getting worse fueled by propaganda outlets.
Reply to this comment
by proudmilvet November 11, 2009 3:25 AM EST
What makes me laugh are the Neocon Politicians who Rant & Rave against the same Federal Govt. they wish to be a Representative of, using the same tired neocon catch phrases such as "The American people want the Govt. to get out of the way!" Once they win, they Lap up the Federal Gravy! Still preaching the Ronald Reagan B.S. but doing otherwise themselves. Hypocrits!!
Reply to this comment
by AK-47_Justice November 11, 2009 11:08 AM EST
Yes, the neocons are truly hypocrites, spewing the same attacks against our government as reagan did 30 years ago, and I challenge any of these GOP supporters to show us exactly which one shrunk government and curtailed spending besides Bill Clinton, the most the conservative president since Eisenhower.

It was reagan that tripled our national debt while presiding over a 10.8% unemployment rate and the bushies that doubled our national debt while presiding over 2 recessions -- the current one being the worst economic times since the Great Depression of hoover's making. Seems as if GOP supply-side economics of tax cuts for the wealthiest has been proven an absolute failure more than once, yet they keep pushing the same failed policies and ideology, but can never deliver!
by themooniac November 11, 2009 1:44 AM EST
geez these guys must be WAY stupid! Lindasy Graham is the one running for President, DUH.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 November 10, 2009 7:03 PM EST
A Battle for Senate - And the GOP's Soul
*************************************

Should be a short battle. The GOP has no soul.
Reply to this comment
by briannorwood November 10, 2009 4:55 PM EST
On Sarah Palin, Rubio says "I can't think of anything her and I disagree with off the top of my head."

----

Apparently, this includes butchery of the English language! LOL!
Reply to this comment
by us_1776 November 10, 2009 6:03 PM EST
Rubio is going to win this primary. But then Meeks will have a good shot.
by pjk12354 November 10, 2009 10:58 PM EST
Pretty Boy & Barbie Doll.............except the dolls have more brains.
by Empire-George November 10, 2009 1:57 PM EST
by abbarick November 10, 2009 1:00 PM EST
Who allowed Ford to fail? And under whose watch is it posting the huge profit? And how many jobs has Ford created as a result?
_________________

Under the watch of the "Free-Market Capitalism" that's who.....certainly NOT due to a takeover by Obama, but due to their own re-structuring.

Why are you looking for Ford to "create" jobs, when they are downsizing due to the recession ? Restructuring and Reducing workload to stay in business is their current priority, not "creating" jobs so Obama can throw around numbers for his own benefit.
Reply to this comment
by briannorwood November 10, 2009 4:59 PM EST
Do any of you people understand that Ford was the one American automaker that DID NOT receive federal bailout money?
by Empire-George November 10, 2009 1:53 PM EST
by us_1776 November 10, 2009 1:11 PM EST
No mortarman-29, the Democrats try to help their fellow man.
________________________

"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them". - Thomas Jefferson

?I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.? - James Madison

That's the problem, Democrats think they need to "take care of everyone" while taking care of emptying THE PEOPLE's wallets for that purpose
Reply to this comment
by BigJim716 November 10, 2009 2:03 PM EST
That argument the Democrats help their fellow man is bogus. I have no doubt that most Democrats have great intentions of doing this. The problem is they believe it is best done through Government. The reality of it is that all government does is get in the way of prosperity and opportunities for all. If the Democrats put as much focus on charities as they did no seeing their politicians elected the truly deserving people would be better off.
by tiktin November 10, 2009 11:24 PM EST
Thank you for this comment and these quotes. It is quite remarkable that everything that is happening was foreseen by the founding fathers. It is founded in human nature after all, and they understood human nature. Let me add a few more quotes: "The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes" (I think that was Thomas Paine, but no doubt some reader can correct me) "They gave up their liberty in hopes of gaining safety and wound up with neither" (Thucydides). "Eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty" (Andrew Jackson).
by AK-47_Justice November 10, 2009 1:34 PM EST
by Mortarman-29:
Let's imagine. Ford was allowed to fail, and they just posted a hug profit. Hmmmmmmmm.
**************************





Hmmmmmmmmmmm... is right, since it was "restructuring" by Ford -- closing factories and laying-off employees -- that lead to their latest "profit." Isn't that just peachy?? Get a clue!

I'm still waiting to hear what these "true" conservatives will cut out of the budget to balance it, since they can't seem to cut the bloated "defense" budget which is out of control, they like pork projects too much to cut spending, and when in power the GOP has only grown government ever-larger. The bush tax cuts luckily sunset next year, so that part of the reduced federal revenue will not affect America much longer hopefully, so if the economy continues to improve, we'll see an increase in federal revenue.
Reply to this comment
by BigJim716 November 10, 2009 1:46 PM EST
First and foremost they will need to cut welfare as Clinton did. Then they will need to cut Pork projects as Obama promised to do. The Federal Education department would be another good place as Reagan tried to do. Also..the Army Corps of Engineers is pretty much a useless entity...actually they do more harm than good. Whether it happens or not remains to be seen but adding entitlement program after entitlement program is certainly not the answer as Obama believes it is.
by AK-47_Justice November 11, 2009 10:26 AM EST
by BigJim716:
First and foremost they will need to cut welfare as Clinton did.
********************************************




Welfare reform was indeed passed in the 90's, and remains on the books, so please tell us all how any of that has changed recently.

Seems as if the GOPer's are just fine with corporate welfare subsidies, but have a problem with helping out their fellow Americans when they need a hand. Shoveling billions of dollars to the "defense" budget black hole is also just fine, as waste, fraud and abuse is rampant -- especially during the bushie years of no-bid contracts.

With our educational system falling apart like our infrastructure, with such a high-rate of dropouts and testing showing that American students are far behind many other countries, you deliriously propose to cut federal funding of education. Of course reagan "tried" to do it, since he knew that an uneducated and illiterate population would be easier to sway, and by getting rid of the Fairness Doctrine, we just saw the rise of one-sided propaganda outlets like the murdoch empire to preach to the choir of non-thinking Americans.

Please explain your "entitlement program" belief, since the last one passed by Congress was back in 2003, by the GOP and the bushies, which has cost us hundreds of billions of dollars in BIG PHARMA subsidies in Medicare Part D, with no funding proposed -- just entitlement to a certain segment of Americans.
by AK-47_Justice November 10, 2009 1:25 PM EST
"Some prominent Republicans, including former House speaker Newt Gingrich, saw the upstate House New York race as a cautionary tale about what happens when Republicans become too dogmatic, rejecting candidates who don't conform to a relatively narrow set of beliefs. Gingrich suggested that conservatives like Rubio and Palin are engaged in a "purge" of moderates that could ultimately result in Democrat Nancy Pelosi being "speaker-for-life."
*********************************************





Purging the GOP of all moderates will only make the OLD big tent much smaller and never win another election!
Reply to this comment
by BigJim716 November 10, 2009 1:38 PM EST
Gosh...didn't they win solidly liberal New Jersey by 5 percentage point and purple Virginia by 19 points. HMMM

And Crist and Scozzafava are big spenders with Scozzafava endorsing a Democrat.

I agree Republicans need to be open to differing views such as gay marriage, abortion and gun laws. But when it comes to out of control spending like Bush and Obama let them go with the Democrats.

Fiscal Responsibility is a winning argument.
by louiville35 November 10, 2009 1:50 PM EST
Isn't that what you want? So why the post or are you a closet Republican?
See all 4 Replies
by Empire-George November 10, 2009 1:24 PM EST
Mortarman-29

Welcome back Mortarman.....your wisdom has been lacking on these boards.

may I ask you a question, last friday, loven and myself were discussing taxation, education....when I stated that the constitution "limited government" and they screamed that nothing in the document limited taxes or limited government....of course, I disagreed....my question is..what clause or amendment would you confirm or support the notion of limited government powers ? would that be the Preamble ? thanks for your comment.
Reply to this comment
See all 149 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook