Africans End U.N. Climate Meetings Boycott

Wealthy Countries Set Carbon-cutting Targets Too Low, African Countries Say

(AP)  African countries ended a boycott of meetings at U.N. climate negotiations on Tuesday, after winning promises for more in-depth talks on how much rich nations need to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Due to the Africans' demands, most of the rest of this week's talks in Barcelona will be devoted to discussing carbon-cutting pledges rather than other issues including carbon offsets and action by developing countries, said John Ash, chairman of the negotiations on emissions.

The Africans, supported by about 70 other developing countries, said industrial nations were making weak commitments to stave off dramatic temperature rises while Africa was being devastated by droughts and floods blamed on global warming.

Scientists say industrial countries should reduce emissions by 25 to 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2020, but targets announced so far amount to far less.

The walkout by some 50 African countries from committee work at the U.N. talks in Barcelona forced only some technical meetings to be canceled, but sent a clear signal that the developing countries would be tough negotiators at next month's final U.N. climate conference in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Negotiators hope to adopt a treaty in Copenhagen on regulating carbon emissions.

"It's really good that the Africans have finally been able to stand up together," said Fiona Musana of Johannesburg-based Greenpeace Africa. "That sends a strong signal."

German Chancellor Angela Merkel was in Washington on Tuesday, urging both chambers of a skeptical Congress to "overcome the walls of the 21st Century" and emphasizing the need for a global agreement on climate change.

"We have no time to lose," she said. She said that while she recognized no deal could be successful without support from China and India, those fast-growing economies could be persuaded to sign on to a deal once it is struck.

[vuenbelvue]

India and China and the continent of Africa with over 3 billion people (close to 50%), aka, developing countries, will not face any cost impacts but the USA with 4.5% of the world's population is expected to be blackmailed, again, in to paying a Lion's Share. "Tree hugger wet dreams have gone to far" What are you talking about? In Africa did the air smell like carbon dixode from 2 cycle engines, bad exhauses, wood and charcoal burning stoves? In Africa is their population also out of control? The US has been spending trillions since 1950 to clean the air and have done a fantastic job.

[lightningF]

The Africans want redistribution,by the global agreement on climate change that would set up a panel to take funds from the wealthier nations and give to the poorer nations,to further their development while maintaining the global warming agreement.In other words we would be taxed more and the funds given to the African countries,that is why they want stronger carbon controls. It is not as if they produce ant carbon foot prints.

[Stevenapoli7]

I have to agree with the Africans. The tree hugger wet dreams have gone too far. I've been to Africa and no way these guys will be driving 2010 hybrids.