Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
November 11, 2009 7:08 AM

GAO: Taxpayers Won't Recoup $80B Car Loans

By
CBSNews
(AP)  Taxpayers are unlikely to recover their full investment in General Motors or Chrysler, government investigators said Monday in the latest review to cast doubts that the government will recoup the $80 billion it poured into the two automakers.

The Government Accountability Office concluded that General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC likely won't be valuable enough for the Treasury Department to break even on its investment in the two auto companies that went though bankruptcy earlier this year.

The GAO also revealed that the Obama administration is closely scrutinizing the finances of GM and Chrysler and has set some requirements on production even though it has said it will maintain a hands-off approach on the automakers' daily operations.

To recover the loans Treasury gave Chrysler and GM to keep them afloat, the automakers would have to reach valuations they didn't approach even when they were healthier.

Treasury officials said they were considering a series of initial public offerings to dispose of the government's 61 percent stake in GM. For Chrysler, a private sale of the government's nearly 10 percent stake is more likely because of the government's minority ownership.

GM would need a market capitalization, or the market value of the company's outstanding shares, of $66.9 billion for Treasury to make its money back, according to GAO. GM's peak market value was $57 billion in 2000. Chrysler, which was last publicly valued at $37 billion in 1998 when it merged with Daimler AG, would need a market value of $54.8 billion.

Treasury officials told GAO that the companies' previous equity values were not comparable because GM and Chrysler have undergone substantial reorganizations through bankruptcies. The Obama administration has said it is confident it can recover the bulk of its investment in the GM and Chrysler restructurings.

GM spokesman Greg Martin said "if we get our job done, the government has an excellent chance of getting a return on its investment." Chrysler declined to comment.

In September, the Congressional Oversight Panel reviewing the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program said most of the $23 billion initially provided to General Motors and Chrysler late last year was unlikely to be repaid. GAO did not provide an estimate of how much might be returned to taxpayers.

Treasury officials reiterated that they don't plan to be involved in the companies' day-to-day management. But as a major creditor and equity holder, Treasury is closely scrutinizing the financial well-being of Chrysler and GM.

In GM's case, it must supply 13-week forecasts every two weeks, monthly reports on its liquidity and monthly budgets covering a five-year period. All financial statements, budgets and other material must be turned over to Treasury as long as it owns 10 percent of GM. The automaker must provide its consolidated balance sheet until it repays its loans. Chrysler is required to make similar disclosures.

Both automakers must keep much of their manufacturing in the United States. Chrysler must produce either 40 percent of its U.S. sales volume domestically or come near its 2008 U.S. production volume. GM agreed to give its "best efforts" to keep its U.S. manufacturing within 90 percent of its business plan.

The companies are also subject to limits on executive pay and corporate expenses. Italy's Fiat Group SpA can increase its stake in Chrysler if it produces a new engine in the United States or a car that gets 40 miles per gallon.

Treasury officials told the GAO that the measures were meant to protect the government's financial interest, but acknowledged that they "reflect the administration's views on responsibly utilizing taxpayer resources for these companies," the GAO report said.

GAO also questioned staffing levels for the administration's auto task force. Treasury officials told GAO that they plan to disband the team over time as other Treasury aides monitor the companies' financial conditions. Once made up of 16 staffers, the task force now has just four professional staff members. Former task force head Steve Rattner has left, while Ron Bloom, a key member, is now also advising the administration on manufacturing policy.

GAO said it was concerned Treasury "may not have sufficient expertise to actively oversee and protect the government's ownership interests, including determining when and how to divest these interests."


AP
Add a Comment See all 24 Comments
by reality42 November 3, 2009 8:00 PM EST
America makes over priced junk and the goverment suckers us people into giving them more money for free--- Were American suckers
Reply to this comment
by hull7777 November 3, 2009 2:34 PM EST
All of our tax money gets flushed down the toilet whenever the Government gets involved in anything. I would think they could figure that out except then they would not have jobs and take the millions of $ on the side in the name of reelection.

If anyone thinks the bailout was a good decision and the taxpayers would get a return on their investment must be smokin something. The only time a bailout was effective was the first time with Chryler. But that was in the day when the CEO cared and there was still some ethics in business and maybe Washington (but I doubt that).

The US auto industry has been not competitive for years mainly because of the unions. However, when life seems good and you can't see the trees for the forest, management went along.

Now, the taxpayers again pick-up the pieces. Sooner or later everyone else runs out of money.
Reply to this comment
by Constitionalist November 3, 2009 9:01 AM EST
Imagine that, the bailout program is really a welfare for the rich program. Never saw that coming.
Reply to this comment
by s0055d-2009 November 3, 2009 8:47 AM EST
You are going to end up with a lot of angry, un-bailed out people in America. They have to shift for themselves, while certain groups of people get helped with the tax money from those not getting anything. Another factor is the Federal Reserve scheme
to devalue the money in order to save the real estate thieves. Once the public wakes up and realizes what is going on, there will be problems.
Reply to this comment
by nowhiningallowed November 3, 2009 8:02 AM EST
Another well thought out plan by the Obama Administration. Can't blame this one on Bush at all.
Reply to this comment
by Stop_the_crying November 3, 2009 6:39 PM EST
Your correct, It's the first time. W was the villian. You must be one of those self employed individuals that file a schedule c and are responsible for the 68 billion under reporting of your taxes.
by wyodutch November 3, 2009 7:18 AM EST
Incredibly... Americans continue to believe that there actually is a difference between the two liars clubs... the Republican Party and the Democratic Party.
.
White the thugs continue to beat you over the head... You argue about which thief is doing a better job.
.
Reply to this comment
by bubbadubba November 3, 2009 7:01 AM EST
Well I guess if you ignore the jobs, taxes paid, local money made, companies who supply parts and employ people, dealership employees, possible US depression, panic in the US, and everything else that would have been destroyed if those companies went under you could say we will never get the 80 billion (nothing compared to the 800 billion we gave Wall Street Tycoons for their pockets) this story might make some sense.
Another stupid story from brainless people.
Reply to this comment
by Marc_1986 November 3, 2009 9:00 AM EST
@bubbadubba

Complete poppycock. Ford took no bailout money and look at them! You can claim that GM and Chrysler were in much worse shape, but why not let them fail... Odds are Ford would have increased its market share, and would have picked up some of the laid off workers lessening the impact. The Gov't is clearly the problem here in the auto industry: they twisted the arm of the UAW to make them give Chrysler and GM better deals, but when Ford comes asking for the same deal the UAW says no...

You're completely missing the point here. Bar a (some might say 'miracle') complete change in US car production and US/Asian relations, GM is going to have to cut jobs anyway, they simply cannot compete. So why are we throwing $80 billion at a problem just to 'kick the can down the road' 10 or 15 years? It was and is continuing to be a complete waste of taxpayer money.
by sl3_007 November 3, 2009 12:41 AM EST
Should have let both go through bankrupcy. Ford obviously was better run and survived. We have way too much auto production and we didn't need to spend taxpayer money on this. I am sorry that the workers would have been hurt, but being self employed I received no bailout on my IRA which lost half its value. You Obama people need to get a grip on the magnitude of our current gov't spending. Bush did us no favors, but the Dems controlled the congress the last 2 years and just love to come up with a gov't spending solutions to everything. Gov't is out of control right now. It is scary with 3 of the most incompetent politicians, Obama, Pelosi and Reid, leading this country to financial ruin.
Reply to this comment
by spaceatoms November 3, 2009 12:27 AM EST
Maybe we should just get rid of cars altogether, then we wouldn't have pollution and wouldn't have to bailout the compensation packages.
Reply to this comment
by John_272 November 2, 2009 11:08 PM EST
When will government ever get better? Source: http://www.hudincomeexclusions.wordpress.com.
Reply to this comment
See all 24 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook