October 30, 2009 8:25 PM

White House Unveils Stimulus Jobs Report

(CBS/AP)  Updated at 7:03 p.m. EDT

The White House put out a report card Friday claiming that stimulus spending has directly created or saved about 650,000 jobs.

Critics question how can anybody can claim success when unemployment is almost 10 percent, reports CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid. But Vice President Biden said Friday that without the stimulus funds, unemployment would be even higher.

The Obama administration also said Friday it is on track to reach the president's goal of 3.5 million jobs by the end of next year.

"This is helping put us back on track," Biden said, though he acknowledged "we've still got a long way to go."

"We know more jobs are on the way … we're only about a third of the way through this marathon."

New job numbers from businesses, contractors, state and local governments, nonprofit groups and universities were released publicly Friday afternoon on Recovery.gov, the Web site of the independent panel overseeing stimulus spending. It showed 640,329 jobs created or saved directly through federal contracts.

When adding in jobs linked to $288 billion in tax cuts, Biden said, the stimulus plan has created or saved more than 1 million jobs.

Government recovery plans - everything from the $787 billion stimulus to tax credits for buying new homes to government deals on new cars - are credited with helping the economy grow again after a record four straight losing quarters.

But the job market has yet to show signs of recovery, putting pressure on the White House to show that the stimulus was worth its hefty price tag. The economy has shed millions of jobs since Obama signed the stimulus in February, giving Republicans ammunition to say the government is spending too much for too little effect.

The White House says the report bolsters its case that the economy would have been far worse without the stimulus - a package of government spending, tax cuts, state aide and social programs.

Friday's data will have its limitations, since calculating "jobs saved" will always produce an inexact estimate and collecting data from so many sources is certain to produce errors. But the number released Friday represents the most accurate head count of stimulus jobs to date, one that is more precise than previous estimates based on White House economic formulas.

And it represents the most extensive effort ever by any administration to calculate the effect of a spending program in real time.

"It's a great example of the unprecedented transparency, where the American taxpayer can point and click and see their taxes creating jobs," White House economic adviser Jared Bernstein said.

The claims of job creation were quickly criticized in Republican circles. Tony Fratto, a former Bush administration spokesman, called the reports a "useless exercise that completely misses the aims of an expensive stimulus bill," reports CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller.

Fratto's response, published on The Roosevelt Room, criticized the Obama administration as having "no clue" on the impact of stimulus spending on "net employment."

The White House promised the data would be far more reliable than the first batch of numbers, on federal contracts, which the administration initially embraced, then branded a "test run" after .

Teachers are expected to represent the largest number of jobs in the report. With state budgets in crisis, federal aid helped governors avoid major cuts in education, which officials said spared hundreds of thousands of teachers from the unemployment line.

In Indiana, where officials reported saving 13,000 teaching jobs, Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels warned against putting too much stock in the job numbers.

"I personally wouldn't try to tell a taxpayer that this had any effect that I can see on the economy or let alone that there is some specific number of jobs attached to it," Daniels said earlier this month.

Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle, a Democrat, said Friday "there's just no doubt" that the federal aide spared 6,100 government jobs, including teachers, police officers and firefighters, in his state.

"There would have been dramatic layoffs," he said.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 286 Comments
by dan1967win November 2, 2009 6:42 PM EST
When Bush was our President 3.6 million manufacturing jobs were lost. How can the people in Virginia or New Jersey vote for another Republican? Here is a Link that gives details about the failed economic policies of Bush and the Republicans: http://budget.house.gov/doc-library/fy2009/7.31.08_Bush%20economic_%20and%20fiscal_%20record.pdf
Reply to this comment
by u74s88 November 2, 2009 6:52 AM EST
Am I the only one who can't stand to see that arrogant Robert Gibbs vomit up treasonous lies day in and day out??? This administration has to go...and no republicans either....we need a legitimate 3rd party. Throw all these Benedict Arnolds out.
Reply to this comment
by natdef_1 November 1, 2009 11:03 PM EST
SAM's been to the Barry Kool-Ade jug one too many times.

I would just like to know...when a guy lies to you so often, how do you decide what to believe??? Do you just pick the things you would LIKE to be true???

All Hail, Mr. Present
Reply to this comment
by SAMTORRES66 November 1, 2009 1:38 PM EST
It will take 4 years of OBAMA to Fix 8 Years of BUSH CARTEL....Patience is a virtue, lets time-out for a few month and watch where OBAMA plan's will take us, Implemeting new & modifing existing systems is no easy task, it will take TIME to see the long term effects and benefits....
Reply to this comment
by natdef_1 November 1, 2009 10:36 AM EST
by midlclass October 31, 2009 10:19 AM EDT
also notice that nothing intellegent has been saidon this page that relates to the issue typical republican't attitude. some good jokes though,
-------------------------------

Actually, there were some very good points made when the story first came out, with the consensus forming that these numbers are BOGUS, and that the Obama people will do or say ANYTHING to self-aggrandize and promote their power.

Then, BambieBest got frustrated by the fact that her tired and redundant anti-Bush rants did nothing to refute the truth, so she decided to start dominating the board with (not very funny) anti-Bush jokes. That's when the comedy really started. Then, some pretty funny Obama cracks got deployed. At this point, Barbie started to cry and shut down her computer...
Reply to this comment
by bcpats October 31, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
3 seconds and the dems would be out of details or explanation for their infatuation and gullability to believe that 'democracy' is a system controlled by the government.



midlclass :in your response "or a three second talk with a repub"

to natdef_1 comment"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average Obama voter."
Reply to this comment
by natdef_1 November 1, 2009 10:27 AM EST
You're right -- the majority of Obama voters interviewed at exit polls last November could not properly identify Obama's platform positions...even ubiquitous news stories like "who told Joe the Plumber that government should redistribute wealth" were not attributed to Obama by his own constituency.

Pretty pathetic, and certainly removes credibility from any "mandate for change" that the Obama crowd likes to claim.
by BeckieBest October 31, 2009 9:29 AM EDT
Ever notice how good news upsets the right wing nuts and bad news makes them happy?

Why do they want the country to fail?

Wasn't 8 years of Bush enough?

Maybe they're still upset that he wasn't able to run for a third term?
Reply to this comment
by midlclass October 31, 2009 10:19 AM EDT
also notice that nothing intellegent has been saidon this page that relates to the issue typical republican't attitude. some good jokes though,
by bcpats October 31, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
beckiebeast- - your repeated notes (from yesterday) still holds no merit - - do you still believe the reported job increase numbers?? Read today's article on CBS "Stimulus Jobs Check: Are They for Real?"
by BeckieBest October 31, 2009 9:26 AM EDT
Ever notice that when how good news upsets right wing nuts and bad news makes them happy?

Why do they want the country to fail so badly?

Wasn't 8 years of Bush enough?
Reply to this comment
by djpompea October 31, 2009 1:50 AM EDT
640,329 jobs created or saved? Well, duh. All the government had to do is write checks for $1 million each, and it would have created 787,000 millionaires!!! Given the choice, I'd rather have a million dollars than have a "job".
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-17 October 31, 2009 9:41 AM EDT
Exactly how many bridges and roads would have been built?

How many teachers and police would have been kept on the payroll?

No critical thinking skills at all, huh?
by natdef_1 November 1, 2009 10:39 AM EST
NO ONE KNOWS, HUNGRY, THAT'S THE POINT!!! AT LEAST IF WE JUST PAID PEOPLE, WE WOULD KNOW WHO BENEFITED!
by sliwas1 October 31, 2009 12:52 AM EDT
hey, I see this Becky person hangs out on these comments pages, and repeats the same sound bytes. She never once cross examines, or has a cosmic moment where she can see with clarity that Obama's policies never could, and have proven that they don't yield the desired affect -and most critics with financial backgrounds concur.

She decrie, Bush as be the out of control freak growing the deficit. However, she must admit that this statement loses out to the fact that Obama, at a time when the deficit control became a central alert-went ahead and quadrupled it. He another words gambled with all we have at the slot machine.

Let's all do our best to really ignore Becky, because she is not qualified to debate. She could be a drone.
Reply to this comment
by jsd330 October 31, 2009 9:04 AM EDT
As much time as Beckie spends on these boards, I doubt Beckie even has a job. Unless she is a paid blogger.
See all 286 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook