U.N. Vote Condemns U.S. Embargo on Cuba

19th Year in a Row that General Assembly has Condemned U.S. Cuba Policy

(AP)  The U.N. General Assembly on Wednesday overwhelmingly condemned the 47-year U.S. trade embargo on Cuba, an annual ritual that serves to highlight near unanimous global opposition to America's hard-line policy toward the communist island, but which has done little to change Washington's stance, even with a new administration.

This year's vote was 187-3 in opposition to the embargo, with only Israel and the tiny Pacific island nation of Palau supporting the United States — just as they did last year. It was the 19th year in a row that the General Assembly has taken up the symbolic measure, with Washington steadily losing what little support it once had.

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez ticked off a long list of grievances in his speech before the world body, saying the embargo, which the Cubans refer to as a blockade — had cost the island's fragile economy tens of billions of dollars over the years and prevented Cuban children from getting needed medical care.

"The blockade is an uncultured act of arrogance," Rodriguez said. He likened the policy to "an act of genocide" that is "ethically unacceptable."

It was the first time the world body has taken the vote since U.S. President Barack Obama took office in January, promising to extend a hand of friendship to Washington's traditional enemies.

The administration has loosened financial and travel restrictions on Americans with relatives in Cuba, and started talks aimed at restoring direct mail links. It sent a senior diplomat to Havana in September for unannounced meetings with Cuban officials that were believed to be the highest-level talks between the two countries in decades.

Still, Washington has made clear it is not prepared to lift the embargo until Cuba accepts some political, economic and financial changes.

Rodriguez said the question of the embargo represented a "test of character" for the U.S. and its new president.

"President Obama has a historical opportunity to lead a change of policy toward Cuba and the lifting of the blockade," he said, but lamented that "since the election" of the new U.S. leader "there has not been any change in the implementation of the economic, commercial and financial blockade against Cuba."

U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice reacted strongly, calling Rodriguez' statements "hostile" and "straight out of the Cold War era."

Still, she said the Obama administration was committed to writing "a new chapter to this old story" by engaging with the Cuban government. Rice used her speech to highlight the steps the Obama administration had taken to improve ties.

"We hope they can be the starting point for further changes in the relationship," she said. "The United States has demonstrated that we are prepared to engage the government of Cuba on issues that effect the security and well being of both our peoples."

One after another, global representatives stood to speak in opposition to the embargo, calling it a cruel anachronism that ran counter to international law and which had only succeeded in hurting ordinary Cubans, particularly women and children.

[worldcitizen1]

To Tom; So the Cuban gov. must live to the rules of the US? Will we live by others rules? US policy is counter productive to the interests of both countries. Vietnam, then the domino to prevent from falling, now a source of trade and non enemy.

[OregonJames]

We should end the embargo completely TODAY. We should immediately reverse our hostile stance and end the foolishness that has gone on for decades too long. Friendship and trade will do more to end communism in a short time than an embargo ever will, and it will help both nations in many ways.

Hostility and paranoia suck. Peace and good will doesn't.

[missme4]

Maybe if the rest of the world thinks you're wrong, you are wrong. End this bs with Cuba.

[zoopster1]

It doesn't matter whether the embargo is still justified or not. As long as there is a large Cuban-American community in south Florida that can swing elections, the policy will remain in force.

[SHEETPAN]

Screw the U. N. Communist thugs take over a nation. Steal all privatly held property. Remove individual rights. Restrict travel among all of it's citizen's. Take over industry. Put people in jail for political purposes. And the United States is suppose to make nice with them. The hell with that!

[missme4]

"thugs take over a nation. Steal all privatly held property. Remove individual rights. Restrict travel among all of it's citizen's. Take over industry. Put people in jail for political purposes."


It's funny. You just described america. Well done!

[tom_gwynn]

missme4, if that were true it would be Americans lining up to pay thousands of dollars to risk a 90 mile crossing in treacherous seas in rickety boats, all for the hope of landing in the "workers paradise" of Cuba. But that's not what's happening, is it? Oh my gosh, you really don't know what you're talking about, do you?

The Cuban communist government can end this embargo any time they want to, and they know it. All they have to do is open up their government so that the people they rule actually have a say in who rules them. That's not a lot to ask, but it appears it's easier to cry a river in the UN than it is to take a few simple actions to actually improve the lives of their people. That's their choice, but in the meantime we have no obligation to trade with a regime hostile to us and our way of life.

[worldcitizen1]

Cuba is not a true communist country, but a socialist country. The US, with it's record of slavery, lack of women's rights, segregation, legalized bigotry, use of nuclear weapons on a civilian targets, unnecessary wars of aggression, has little right to preach morality to the rest of the world. If this such a "free" country, why dose the US gov. limit access to a neighboring country.