October 27, 2009 8:29 AM

Obama: Health Care Reform Closer than Ever

(AP)  President Barack Obama said an overhaul of the U.S. health care system is closer than ever, but he warned of tough battles ahead as major industries such as insurance companies fight hard to preserve their profits.

Mr. Obama made his remarks Monday night at a pair of Democratic Party fundraisers in Miami.

He spoke a few hours after Senate leaders endorsed legislation that would add a government-run health insurance plan for Americans, with states having the right to opt out. Mr. Obama did not mention the Senate action, but he predicted success in realizing his top domestic policy priority.

Mr. Obama said that America has no choice but to overhaul the health care system to make insurance cheaper for families, businesses and the government.

"It's going to get harder," the president told about 200 people who paid $500 each to greet him at a reception. "Now's the time when all the special interests are saying, 'Oh, this is really going to happen, we might lose some of our profits.' And they start paying big lobbyists, and they start twisting arms."

CBSNews.com Special Report: Health Care Reform

The focus of the health overhaul debate now shifts to whether Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid can persuade a handful of moderate senators to get behind his new proposal for a government-sponsored insurance plan.

That's no sure bet. Even Reid didn't claim to have the 60 votes needed to pass his proposal when he ended weeks of speculation by announcing that the Senate version of sweeping health care legislation would include a provision for the government to sell health insurance in competition with private insurers.

The issue has been the biggest flash point in the health care debate and government-sponsored insurance had been seen as unlikely to be included in Senate legislation because of opposition from moderates. The House's health care bill, expected to be released as early as this week, is certain to contain a strong provision for a so-called public insurance option, though details aren't final.

"While the public option is not a silver bullet, I believe it's an important way to ensure competition and to level the playing field for patients with the insurance industry," Reid told reporters Monday.

Individual states would have the choice of opting out of the government plan under Reid's proposal. It still amounted to a victory for liberal lawmakers who have pushed for a public insurance option they contend would create needed competition for private insurers and provide affordable choices to consumers. Republicans have denounced the public option as a "government takeover" of health care.

The reaction from moderate Democrats - they fear a public plan could drive insurers out of business and take over the marketplace - ranged from muted to skeptical. The one Republican who has so far lent her support to Democratic health overhaul proposals, Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine, said she was "deeply disappointed" by Reid's decision.

Snowe had supported allowing government insurance in individual states only if the private market wasn't providing sufficient choice and competition. But Reid said he wasn't sending that "trigger" option to the Congressional Budget Office for evaluation, as he did Monday with the opt-out proposal.

"We hope that Olympia will come back. She's worked hard. She's a very good legislator. I'm disappointed that the one issue, the public option, has been something that's frightened her," Reid said.

If Snowe doesn't come back, the fate of Reid's public option could rest in the hands of a few key moderate Democrats including Sens. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana.

Landrieu said in a statement that she's still "very skeptical" about a government plan run from Washington but would keep working with Reid to find a "principled compromise."

The White House released a statement saying Mr. Obama was "pleased that the Senate has decided to include a public option for health coverage, in this case with an allowance for states to opt out."

Mr. Obama has long voiced support for such a plan but has also signaled it was not a requirement for a health care bill he would sign. He has also said he would like bipartisan support for the legislation - and Snowe appeared to be his best hope for that.

Changes on the public option - and numerous other provisions in the measure - are possible during a debate expected to last for weeks. If Reid's public option proposal is knocked out during the amendment process, liberals will at least have had their shot, possibly answering pressure from Democratic base voters.

The insurance industry was sharply critical of Reid's announcement.

"A new government-run plan would underpay doctors and hospitals rather than driving real reforms that bring down costs and improve quality," said Karen Ignagni, head of America's Health Insurance Plans.

Both the House and Senate are struggling to complete work by year's end on legislation extending coverage to millions who lack it, banning insurance industry practices such as denying coverage because of pre-existing medical conditions, and slowing the rise in medical costs nationally.

Senate Democratic officials say the bill Reid envisions would require most individuals to purchase insurance, with exemptions for those unable to find affordable coverage. Large businesses would not be required to provide insurance to their workers, but would face penalties of as much as $750 per employee if any qualified for federal subsidies to afford coverage on their own.

The bill will also include a tax on high-cost insurance policies, despite opposition from organized labor, officials said. In a gesture to critics of the plan, Reid decided to apply the new tax to family plans with total premiums of at least $23,000 a year. The Senate Finance Committee approved a tax beginning at $21,000 in total premiums.

Officials said Reid had prepared several variations of key provisions so he could make adjustments in his bill at the last minute and still make sure he was within Mr. Obama's target of a $900 billion price tag over a decade.

Differences in bills passed by the House and Senate would have to be reconciled before any legislation reaches Mr. Obama's desk.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 89 Comments
by suespring October 27, 2009 6:30 PM EDT
Why do you not even discuss the option of buying insurance across state lines as a solution to the problem of competition? You act as if the public option is the ONLY solution to having more competition.
Reply to this comment
by pflack October 27, 2009 4:26 PM EDT
It's time to elevate National Health Care to the same status as Fire and Police Protection, Education and the Military. Our fore fathers had the insight to see the value of a collective effort to handle some things in the most enconomical way. If they would have spouted the "Personal Responsibility" nonsense, we would all have to figure out how to employ our own cop, fireman, teacher, not to mention how many persoal armies would be here. (Sounds like the potential for War Lords)The world continues to evolve, and The United States has to meet the challange. The truth is, there are many who would like to keep the status quo. Some has to do with greed, i.e., the medical industy, but from reading posts, talking with people, I honestly think most who oppose getting serious about reform are reacting to fear mongering from special interest groups. The saddest of all, is the politician who is not being honest in any why, shape or form. He is worried about re-election and has completely failed his consitituency by not being forth right. The time has come for Washington to get on their knees and ask for guidence from a Higher Power outside of themseleves, and for once do what is right.
Reply to this comment
by mcapek October 27, 2009 6:39 PM EDT
Report for a boot camp immediately, lard boy. We will get you down to the permissible weight range in 15 weeks of intense training, so you too can enroll and participate in the new HealthCorps.gov healthcare. That will keep the costs down.
by mcapek October 27, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
Great! The incompetents in government that want to you immediately get vaccinated, but are unable to provide vaccines, will be running our healthcare now. Welcome to VA Healthcare Horror 2.
Reply to this comment
by lovenpeace1 October 27, 2009 12:10 PM EDT
by mcapek October 27, 2009 12:05 PM EDT
Great! The incompetents in government that want to you immediately get vaccinated, but are unable to provide vaccines, will be running our healthcare now. Welcome to VA Healthcare Horror 2.

********************

Hey mcapek,

None of the Seasonal Vaccines and included this H1N1 Vaccine are made by the U.S. Government. They are all contracted to Private Pharmaceutical companies.

Why are the Private Pharmaceutical companies so slow?
by roach9703 October 27, 2009 12:59 PM EDT
...And don't forget cash for clunkers!
See all 5 Replies
by lovenpeace1 October 27, 2009 12:04 PM EDT
hey Mortarman_29,

No problem if they pass a Health Care Reform without the Public Option. No problem if they Do Not Pass a Health Care Reform at all. Why?

As long as the Costs of Private Health Care Insurance increases at the Average 11% of the last 35 years, a Universal Health Care system will eventually pass to firmly control the cost.

According to all Liberal and Conservative experts, Health Care spending consumes 17% of our GDP today. It is expected to jump to 33% of GDP by 2022. Anything over 31% will suffocate the U.S. Economy. In other words, the 4th Great Depression.

In summary, if we wish to survive as an Empire, we must control the cost of Health Care somehow sooner or later. The Public Option is the best guarantee of that firm control.

So, to my amigo Mortarman_29, shall we have a strong Rebust Public Option now or a Universal Single-Payer system later? I suggest you pick the best of the 2 evils for you. :-)
Reply to this comment
by lovenpeace1 October 27, 2009 12:02 PM EDT
Folks,

This is what American's get for $3.6 Trillions a year from our current Private Health Care system:

America ranks #42 worst in Infant Mortality Rate in the modern world:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2091rank.html

America ranks #47 in Life Expectancy Rate in the modern world:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2102rank.html

America got the #1 Highest Healthcare Cost (over twice (2X) 2nd place Sweden) in the modern world:
http://dll.umaine.ed/ble/U.S.%20HCweb.pdf

When you are ill or injured and especially in an emergency, nobody shops around for the clinic or hospital with the best value care. Hence, there cannot be Competition in Health Care.

62% of all personal bankruptcies filed in the U.S. every day are due to medical cost issues.

All Foreign Capitalists (companies) have a Huge Competition Advantage against all American's Capitalists because they never pay Private Health Insurance for their employees.

All Seniors are very happy with their Socialized HealthCare (Medicare). Sooner or later you will be a Senior. All low-income Children are happy with their Socialized HealthCare (CHIP). All Military Veterans are very happy with their Socialized Health Care. All Federal workers are very happy with their Socialized Health Care. All congressmen and congresswomen are very happy with their Socialized Health Care. Republicans say they want the same deal that our congressmen/women have!

Americans are paying $6,000.00 more per year (2x) per person with worst ranking results than the next most costly nation Sweden. Sweden is a very Socialistic nation.

What good is it to have the most Advanced/High-Tech Innovated Health Care in the world if nobody can afford and access it?
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday-05 October 27, 2009 11:50 AM EDT
"by Mortarman_29
Fact No. 4: Americans have better access to preventive cancer screening than Canadians. "


Mortimer - we all know you're a paid hack for the health-insurance industry. We all know you have a business you run with your wife which is paid basically to lie about the level of care.

In short, you have no credibility.

And these "facts" you post HAVE NO RELEVANCE. We are not adopting the Canadian system.

We are simply talking about health-insurance reform. Try to stay on topic.



.
Reply to this comment
by slownewsday-05 October 27, 2009 11:52 AM EDT
Correction: "We all know you have a business you run with your wife which is paid basically to lie about the level of care in VA hospitals."
by nevermime October 27, 2009 11:48 AM EDT
If they want the GOP to support health care reform just call it a war funding bill.
Reply to this comment
by sassafrass019 October 27, 2009 11:44 AM EDT
by Mortarman_29 October 27, 2009 11:07 AM EDT

There is NO proposal on the table to recreate the Canadian system in the US. Why do you continue to post these meaningless references to the Canadian System? Just to create fear of something you apparently know little about?
Reply to this comment
by steveinohio1 October 27, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
I have read all the above posts. But what is not clear to me is why it is going to be my responsibility to make sure that everyone has health care? I am going to pay a tax for my health care insurance. I am no more for Big Government getting into the insurance business, than I was to see it get involved with the Auto industry, Wall Street, or the Bank bailouts. Look, I know there will be 90 posts telling me that I am wrong and for what reasons. But look at what everyone one of these Government bailouts has done for the economy at this point... Nothing. My bank is paying nothing for my savings account interest. Loans are harder to get today. Cars are still not selling. The stock market is still circling the drain. And there is still no end in sight to all the borrowing by the Government. How much money does the government think they can squeeze out of the working person. I know that the Insurance industry is the driving force in the health care problems in the country. Go after the root of the problem. The Government needs to stick to what is does best. I will get back to you when I figure that one out.
Reply to this comment
by teejcee44 October 27, 2009 11:28 AM EDT
Spread the wealth. Lets go socialist Mmmmm. Mmmmm. Mmmmm! Barak Hussein Obama Mmmmm! Mmmmm! Mmmmm! Lets be socialist!
Reply to this comment
See all 89 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook