October 22, 2009 6:35 PM

Gays Will Get Hate Crimes Protections

(CBS/AP)  Physical attacks on people based on their sexual orientation will join the list of federal hate crimes in a major expansion of the civil rights-era law Congress approved Thursday and sent to President Barack Obama.

A priority of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., that had been on the congressional agenda for a decade, the measure expands current law to include crimes based on gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability. The measure is named for Matthew Shepard, the gay Wyoming college student murdered 11 years ago.

President Obama had previously urged Congress to pass the bill and has promised to sign it.

To assure its passage after years of frustrated efforts, Democratic supporters attached the measure to a must-pass $680 billion defense policy bill the Senate approved 68-29. The House passed the defense bill earlier this month.

Many Republicans, normally staunch supporters of defense bills, voted against the bill because of the hate crimes provision.

"The inclusion of the controversial language of the hate crimes legislation, which is unrelated to our national defense, is deeply troubling," said Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala.

Hate crimes law enacted after the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., in 1968 centered on crimes based on race, color, religion or national origin.

The expansion has long been sought by civil rights and gay rights groups. Conservatives have opposed it, arguing that it creates a special class of victims. They also have been concerned that it could silence clergymen or others opposed to homosexuality on religious or philosophical grounds.

House Republican Leader John Boehner's office suggested earlier this month that Boehner opposed expanding the law to protect gays and lesbians because sexual orientation is not an "immutable" characteristic.

More: Why GOP Leader Opposes Hate Crimes Protections for Gays

Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay rights group, hailed the bill as "our nation's first major piece of civil rights legislation for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Too many in our community have been devastated by hate violence."

Some 45 states have hate crimes statutes, and the bill would not change current practices where hate crimes are generally investigated and prosecuted by state and local officials.

But it does broaden the narrow range of actions - such as attending school or voting - that can trigger federal involvement and allows the federal government to step in if the Justice Department certifies that a state is unwilling or unable to follow through on an alleged hate crime.

"The action by Congress today to pass this vital legislation is a milestone in helping protect Americans from the most heinous bias-motivated violence," said Attorney General Eric Holder. "Hate crimes victimize not just individuals, but entire communities. Perpetrators of hate crimes seek to deny the humanity that we all share, regardless of the color of our skin, the God to whom we pray, or whom we love."

The measure also provides federal grants to help state and local governments prosecute hate crimes and funds programs to combat hate crimes committed by juveniles.

"As we learned in the civil rights era, sometimes communities need assistance and resources from the federal government when they have to confront the most emotional and dangerous kinds of crimes," said Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo.

The bill also creates a federal crime to penalize attacks against U.S. service members on account of their service.

At the urging of Republicans the bill was changed to strengthen free speech protections to assure that a religious leader or any other person cannot be prosecuted on the basis of his or her speech, beliefs or association.

"Nothing in this legislation diminishes an American's freedom of religion, freedom of speech or press or the freedom to assemble," said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. "Let me be clear. The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act targets acts, not speech."

That didn't convince Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., who said the bill was a "dangerous step" toward thought crimes. He asked whether the bill would "serve as a warning to people not to speak out too loudly about their religious views."

Holder said there have been nearly 80,000 hate crime incidents reported to the FBI since he first testified before Congress in support of a hate crimes bill eleven years ago.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 72 Comments
by tennessee77 November 13, 2009 6:38 PM EST
So, I guess we need to express to everyone who we are sleeping with to have justice served in this America Obama is recreating! Justice is now peeking and No Longer Blind! OUTRAGEOUS!!! STAY OUT OF MY BEDROOM!
Reply to this comment
by Aldymac October 23, 2009 9:48 AM EDT
The majority of 'hate' crimes against homosexuals are perpitrated by homosexuals themselves, I have lived by them and have never seen more violence of a group of people that is vented toward each other than the gays. Jelousy and hatred flourishes in that crowd more than any other that I have seen, so there is more to the hate crimes act than is being told. I think the government will use it to force people to submit to government entities, espiecialy federal entities.
Reply to this comment
by RandomUser1886 October 23, 2009 11:38 AM EDT
Careful with those comments there, you'll get banned for speaking against The Left.
by hakori October 24, 2009 9:38 AM EDT
Aldymac, gays are a violent group? Are you serious? I'll agree that some gays do commit violence against other gays, but it's those gays who are afraid or ashamed of who they are because they're taught from the earliest time of their lives that who they are is bad. Now whose fault is that, Aldymac? Get a frickin clue!
by nokia3210c October 23, 2009 9:04 AM EDT
now i see where the so called civilised people are going! i hav 1 question:- what is the %ge of gays in american society? is it 1:1; 1:2 or 2:1; 2:3 or 3:2?
THAT IS THE SO CALLED FREE-WORLD.
no wonder, the whole society is!
Reply to this comment
by wizcat123 October 23, 2009 8:58 AM EDT
Exactly what is a hate crime? A crime where hate is the motive. And what is an assault weapon? A weapon with which an assault is commited. So then it is possible to commit a hate crime with an assault weapon on a gay homosexual.
Reply to this comment
by djseavy October 23, 2009 8:49 AM EDT
Why can't our law enforcement just enforce the laws we already have? I agree that it's illegal to single out anybody to murder because of their sexual orientation, but simply adding more distinctions to the existing laws just takes up more court time and jury time. Murder is murder - so try it as such, and forget all the time wasted proving that it was because someone was white, black, gay, straight, etc.
Reply to this comment
by Hosheen October 23, 2009 7:00 AM EDT
Hmm, I thought there were already laws against assault and murder. As far as I know, none of those laws make exceptions for race, creed, religion, or sexual preference. Why do we need more laws for prosecutors to trump up charges to enhance their careers?

So, if I call someone an SOB, and it turns out their mother was a "less than ideal" person, is that a hate crime against someone who is "parenting disadvantaged"?

Whenever we think the government goons have reached the limit of stupidity, they always manage to show us, "No we haven't. We can be far more stupid!"
Reply to this comment
by warsux October 23, 2009 8:44 AM EDT
hey hosheen, since there are no laws stating that idiots are protected under hate crime laws, I can tell you that you are a moron.
by j_mcdonald-2009 October 28, 2009 2:40 AM EDT
Because hate crimes are two crimes at once: the first, against an individual, is (as you note) already covered by existing laws.

But hate crimes are also designed to strike fear into an entire population. They amount to an additional crime of coercion designed to inhibit people beyond the individuals assaulted, and to strike at the fabric of legal protections that provide the groundwork for civilized society. And current law doesn't address that additional crime very well.

Maybe a better name would be to call them terrorism crimes. You get one sentence for shooting someone, and another for letting their friends know they are next.
by michaelm07 October 23, 2009 4:44 AM EDT
I don't get it, a crime, is a crime. You're either pregnant or you are not, you can't be more or less pregnant.

Why is a supposed hate crime, defined as different than any other crime? It is PC crap, and if you think about it, it makes no sense unless the goal is to make people 'feel' like, by defining something as a hate crime they are singling out people who are worse than say, a mugger who beats up and robs and elderly person, or rapes and abuses a child. Those can be called hate crimes also. How do you separate a hate crime, is it a crime, or it isn't? That is the problem with applying 'feelings' to legislation of criminal laws and punishment. It seems hate crimes legislation is the ONLY category in which victim's rights is considered so important. If you applied the same logic to all crimes committed against all people, instead of just selected demographics we'd all be better off. But that would be true equality, wouldn't it? That is logical but our country no longer applies logic as it once did or as the Constitution demands. You know, the Constitution, that old rag liberals think is out of date. A criminal is a criminal, period. Punishment should be applied equally regardless of who or what group the perpetrator or the victim is.
Reply to this comment
by michaelm07 October 23, 2009 4:28 AM EDT
What a joke. Granted, gays shouldn't be picked on nor should anyone else who is a minority but there are those in the majority who are targetted by a minority, but these laws are never used to defend those victims. You can too easily mold and shape what defines a "hate crime" all day long and apply it to almost any group all too selectively. I white kid getting beaten up (and video taped) on a bus by a number of black punks (who do NOT represent most law abiding blacks) can be defined as a hate crime, but wasn't. Black assaults on Hispanics in L.A. - and vice versa, can be called hate crimes but usually aren't. I've seen reports of gays beating up heteros. Why is it that hate crime laws are primarily applied to white on black or, straight on gay crimes and NEVER the other way around? Sure there are likely more of them percentage-wise but you mean to tell me there are NEVER black on white or, gay on straight crimes committed, never? Hmmm, something is amiss. Well, I "hate" political correctness and whiny people who promote PC, so charge me.
Reply to this comment
by nextgenman09 October 23, 2009 4:05 AM EDT
"Insecurity is defined by those who pretend to have the quotable elegance of the truly intellectual."
TheActualTruth

The Fantasies of the Mediocre
Reply to this comment
by searingtruth October 23, 2009 2:30 AM EDT
"Truth is defined by the weakest of us who must suffer through it."
SearingTruth

A Future of the Brave
Reply to this comment
See all 72 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook