October 22, 2009 4:43 PM

Treasury Orders Bailout Firms to Slash Pay

(CBS/AP)  Updated at 4:00 p.m. EDT

The Treasury Department on Thursday ordered seven companies that received billions of dollars in government bailouts to halve total compensation for their top executives. But the big reductions will not apply to pay earned before November.

Kenneth Feinberg, the Treasury official leading the pay review, told reporters that average salaries for the top 25 executives are being cut 90 percent starting next month.

The action will apply to the top executives at Bank of America Corp., American International Group Inc., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve unveiled a proposal Thursday that for the first time would police banks' pay policies to ensure they don't encourage employees to take reckless gambles like those that contributed to the financial crisis.

Fed Proposal Would Watch Banks' Pay

Unlike the Treasury plan, the Fed proposal would cover thousands of banks, including many that never received a bailout. But the central bank would not actually set compensation. Instead, the Fed would review - and could veto - pay policies that could cause too much risk-taking by executives, traders or loan officers.

The government did not want to make executives return compensation already received this year, but the reduced pay levels will be the base for making decisions on salary in 2010, Feinberg said.

The executives will still be subject to compensation limits as long as their companies are receiving support from the government's $700 billion bailout fund. Their total compensation was being cut in half, on average.

Feinberg got the job as pay czar earlier this year when Congress, responding to outrage about huge bonuses being paid to AIG, amended the bailout law to require that executive compensation at companies getting exceptional assistance be curbed.

He has been reviewing compensation packages since August and called many of the negotiations "intense."

Speaking earlier at the White House, President Barack Obama welcomed Treasury's decision and said Americans' values are offended by excessive paychecks for executives whose companies were bailed out by taxpayers. He urged Congress to pass legislation to give shareholders a voice in executive pay packages.

Obama: Excessive Pay Offends our Values

"It does offend our values when executives of big financial firms that are struggling pay themselves huge bonuses even as they rely on extraordinary assistance to stay afloat," Obama said.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner also praised the outcome of Feinberg's deliberations.

"We gave him the difficult task of cutting excessive pay, striking a balance between compensation and risk taking and keeping strong management teams in place to help the economies recover - all in the public interest," Geithner said in a statement.

Smaller companies and those that have repaid the bailout money, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co., are not affected by the plan.

Under the Fed proposal, the 28 biggest banks would develop their own plans to make sure compensation doesn't spur undue risk taking. If the Fed approves, the plan would be adopted and bank supervisors would monitor compliance.

At smaller banks - where compensation is typically less - Fed supervisors will conduct reviews. Those banks don't have to submit plans.

The Fed refused to identify the 28 banks that will have to submit plans. But Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo & Co. are usually included on such lists. Nearly 6,000 banks regulated by the Fed would be covered.

"The Federal Reserve is working to ensure that compensation packages appropriately tie rewards to longer-term performance and do no create undue risk for the firm or the financial system," said Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.

Elizabeth Warren, who heads the Troubled Asset Relief Program's oversight committee, said Thursday on CBS' "The Early Show" addressed the pending slashes in executive salaries.

Warren said executive compensation has become a "problem in American industry" and reflects corporations' misguided priorities.

In the AIG trading division, the arm of the company whose risky trades caused its downfall, no top executive will receive more than $200,000 in total compensation for 2009. However, the issue of $198 million in bonuses that are to be paid to employees of the trading unit in 2010 still must be determined. The government has said it will push to see those bonuses reduced.

The giant insurance company has received taxpayer assistance valued at more than $180 billion.

The pay restrictions for all seven companies will require any executive seeking more than $25,000 in special benefits - things such as country club memberships, private planes and company cars - to get permission for those perks from the government.

Feinberg's decisions come days after administration officials voiced sharp criticism of plans by some firms, particularly those on Wall Street, to pay huge bonuses even as the country continues to struggle with rising unemployment and the effects of the recession.

Goldman Sachs, which has paid back its bailout money, has said it earmarked $16.7 billion for compensation so far this year, more than $500,000 per employee. Citigroup is paying $5.3 billion in bonuses to its employees and Bank of America $3.3 billion.

Elsewhere, Freddie Mac is giving its chief financial officer compensation worth as much as $5.5 million, including a $2 million signing bonus. The government-controlled mortgage finance company doesn't have to follow the executive compensation rules because it is being paid outside the TARP.

Congress passed legislation in February requiring Treasury to oversee pay at companies that took bailout money. Treasury created the pay czar's office in June as one means of implementing that law.

Treasury's rules require the special master to review pay for the 25 top earners at companies that received "exceptional assistance," examining overall pay structures and recapturing payouts that go against taxpayers' interests.


© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 38 Comments
by weewillywonka October 23, 2009 9:20 AM EDT
"Goldman Sachs, ..., has said it earmarked $16.7 billion for compensation so far this year, more than $500,000 per employee."

What a stupid statistic - how many secretaries, clerks, and rank and file do you think are going to get their $500,000 piece of the pie? Nada! Zip! Zero!
Reply to this comment
by midlclass October 23, 2009 9:54 AM EDT
thats the point the sec. clerks and rank and file won't get this its what the average would be if they did. thats whats so foolish on the corperations part is that a few of the top exec. will get all this money and for what. this is what the boards need to ask and this is what the average share holder needs to ask of there board members.
by weewillywonka October 23, 2009 9:15 AM EDT
They're worried about a Brain drain if these overcompensated executives have to take a cut in their obscene compensation? They are the same guys who's short-sighted policies have helped destroy the middle-class. Good riddance.
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 October 22, 2009 10:13 PM EDT
I knew all along and have been outspoken on the subject here online eversince the question of bailouts first was demanded by those business giants of bad standing...under a different login...I was banned but have returned to enlighten your day.
Reply to this comment
by Treadlightly2 October 22, 2009 9:30 PM EDT
I keep jumping back and forth between business and politics to read the comments.

I don't see any difference.

That feels very wrong. Separation of church and state was a good idea.
Separation of business and politics sounds even better.
How do we accomplish that?
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 October 22, 2009 10:17 PM EDT
well there it is...how indeed....I say that with pessimism. This government is based on the people, but business has taken it away with money and corruption.
by lami987 October 22, 2009 8:45 PM EDT
Bravo Obama and democrats. Now its time to allow share holders to decide executive pay, not company boards. Those company board members and executives work together to profit only themselves.
Reply to this comment
by Overruled1 October 22, 2009 10:20 PM EDT
It's a start...
by Marsuzie October 22, 2009 8:24 PM EDT
I meant to say "story" - not a very good typist.
Reply to this comment
by Marsuzie October 22, 2009 8:21 PM EDT
The much bigger sotry here: I really want to say how proud I am of CBS and the other 3 "major" network" for finally saying NO to the White House when they said Fox News would not be a part of the WH pool interview with the Feinberg today. I had given up on a free press until this happened. My faith is now renewed somewhat. It must be that even YOU are starting to wonder about what is going on in our "free" country.
Reply to this comment
by stn_sage October 22, 2009 7:01 PM EDT
Great! The "Fed" has had decades to come up with pay policies and regulate the banking system (but FAILED to do it)...and now that Treasury is capping pay...the Fed hopes to STEAL any other regulatory actions away from Treasury by 'volunteering' to regulate the banking system!?

What a colossal, SICK joke! Yes, by all means...let's put the foxes in charge of the hen house! I mean...just possibly...there's SOME damage left that the FED hasn't completed in setting up the economy for collapse!

Just like all these guys who have been caught spying on the USA, the guys at the Fed banks ought to be brought out of their offices and put up against a wall...and given one chance to tell the truth.
Reply to this comment
by Peoplewatcher October 22, 2009 6:59 PM EDT
I keep hearing about those employees that work for the companies that got the bailout money. The CEO say their employees will quit and go work somewhere else if they don?t get paid those lavish salaries and gigantic bonuses. The real truth is that they?re not getting paid for their smarts or talents. The success of a business is based on its products and services, no one or a few people can do anything to make a company tons of money unless it?s a corrupt system. They?re getting paid hush money for their dirty deeds.
Reply to this comment
by Peoplewatcher October 22, 2009 6:58 PM EDT
I keep hearing about those employees that work for the companies that got the bailout money. The CEO say their employees will quit and go work somewhere else if they don?t get paid those lavish salaries and gigantic bonuses. The real truth is that they?re not getting paid for their smarts or talents. The success of a business is based on its products and services, no one or a few people can do anything to make a company tons of money unless it?s a corrupt system. They?re getting paid hush money for their dirty deeds.
Reply to this comment
See all 38 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook