Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
October 21, 2009 3:02 PM

Task Force Was "Shocked" By GM, Chrysler

By
CBSNews
(AP)  Shockingly poor financial management at General Motors and Chrysler weakened their case for a federal bailout, but officials feared letting them collapse, the former head of a government auto task force said Wednesday.

In a first-person account posted on Fortune magazine's Web site and in a Brookings Institution speech, Steven Rattner said he was alarmed by the "stunningly poor management" at the Detroit companies and said GM had "perhaps the weakest finance operation any of us had ever seen in a major company."

GM's board of directors was "utterly docile in the face of mounting evidence of a looming disaster" and former GM chairman and chief executive Rick Wagoner set a tone of "friendly arrogance" that permeated the company, Rattner wrote.

"Certainly Rick and his team seemed to believe that virtually all of their problems could be laid at the feet of some combination of the financial crisis, oil prices, the yen-dollar exchange rate and the UAW," Rattner wrote.

Rattner described his six-month stint leading the Obama administration's auto task force, which pushed GM and Chrysler into quick bankruptcies last summer with the help of billions of dollars in federal aid. The task force won concessions from the union, suppliers, bondholders and dealers, and the U.S. government now owns nearly 61 percent of GM and 8 percent of Chrysler.

Rattner said at the National Press Club that he, along with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and White House economic adviser Larry Summers, "hated the idea of the U.S. government owning equity in these companies" but they concluded the government needed to protect taxpayers.

"It was frustrating that many commentators were suggesting that the government stay on the sidelines and let the companies fend for themselves," Rattner said. "With financial markets still frozen, both would have unquestionably run out of cash quickly, slid into bankruptcy, closed their doors and liquidated."

Rattner said the loss of the companies could have severely harmed the economy, costing "more than a million jobs in the short run." He said their failure also would have dramatically deepened and prolonged the recession and would have pushed unemployment rates in several states "above 20 percent."

GM said in a statement that it was "a new company with a strong balance sheet, less debt and a fresh product lineup that is making consumers take notice. ... Looking back doesn't help us with the important work we have in front of us. We are grateful for the second chance our nation's support has given us, and we are confident we will succeed."

Rattner said the task force was divided on whether to save Chrysler. The automaker was poorly run during its alignment with Daimler AG, and "larded up with debt, hollowed out by years of mismanagement, Chrysler under (private equity firm) Cerberus never had a chance," he added.

The task force determined that Chrysler could not survive without a corporate partner and turned to Italy's Fiat Group SpA. Fiat took control of Chrysler after it emerged from bankruptcy protection in June and received a 20 percent stake in the company, with the opportunity to take on 35 percent.

As for GM, Rattner said Wagoner told him in mid-March that he wanted to remain at the company but was willing to step down to help GM. Rattner said that Fritz Henderson, who succeeded Wagoner as chief executive, "conveyed more energy and openness to change."

Rattner asked Wagoner to step aside on March 27 and Wagoner agreed, supporting their plan to make Henderson the new CEO. In an "awkward conversation," Rattner said that Wagoner had asked whether the administration planned to fire UAW President Ron Gettelfinger.

"I'm not in charge of firing Ron Gettelfinger," Rattner replied.

Rattner has faced his own scrutiny. His former investment firm, Quadrangle Group, paid more than $1 million to a New York political consultant indicted in a public corruption probe in New York.

Rattner wrote that he grappled with "the New York attorney general's investigation of my former firm, Quadrangle Group, and me about our actions in connection with an investment from the state pension fund." He did not elaborate.

AP
Add a Comment
by sjc_1 October 21, 2009 1:29 PM EDT
Corporations are mismanaged and the worker takes the punishment. The management screws up, they fire a bunch of people and then management gets a bonus. There are few incentives for management to run the company well nor any disincentives for them when they run the company poorly. It is all upside for the management and downside for the workers. This is the same old stuff that should have been changed LONG ago.
Reply to this comment
by dprice123-2009 October 21, 2009 11:16 AM EDT
We bailed out the banks because of bad management. Many American companies are badly managed.Most companies will just sock it to the consumer.No mere bail-outs...Please
Reply to this comment
by cbs4111 October 21, 2009 11:04 AM EDT
The pot calling the kettle black. Rattner is under investigation by the FBI for a "pay-for-play" scheme involving the New York State Pension fund. That's why Rattner had to resign.

Obama's task force is a real group of losers. Two of them, Stephen "paint your roof white" Chu, the wacko Secretary of Energy and Carol "CO2 is poison" Browner, DON'T EVEN OWN A CAR.
Reply to this comment
by mitdgreenb October 21, 2009 9:40 AM EDT
Mrs Nuetron

This is the fault of all of them, management and unions. Wagoner (and his two immediate predecessors, at least) ran the company on momentum... on a "not on my watch" basis. Wagoner was unlucky enough to be the last in the line of bad managers.

At the same time, the union failed repeatedly to acknowledge reality over the last three decades. Japanese and German automakers have plants in California, South Carolina, and Ohio that produce cars much more efficiently and competitively. It took this crisis for the unions to compromise on healthcare and pensions. And it's only through the grace of populist leadership that the UAW is not suffering the fate of the Steelworkers in the 1980's... another union that failed to acknowledge reality for far too long.

There's lots of blame to go around. The Left will blame management; the Right will blame the unions. As a Moderate, I blame all of them and then ask if I will get a return on my taxpayer's investment in saving them from themselves.
Reply to this comment
by mrs_nuetron October 21, 2009 9:22 AM EDT
This is all the fault of the unions, I heard this on FOXNews and since I am conservative I believe that and anything else must be a lie.
Reply to this comment
by Marc_1986 October 21, 2009 9:39 AM EDT
Troll.
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook