U.K. Urges Progress on Global Climate Pact

If Nations Fail to Agree on Reductions of Greenhouse Gases, Brown Says Result Would Be Catastrophic

(AP)  Failure to strike a new global deal on reducing greenhouse emissions would be catastrophic, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Monday, urging other national leaders to attend this year's climate summit in Denmark.

Brown told delegates to the Major Economies Forum talks in London that failure countries need to compromise with one another to reach a deal at December's summit to avoid "the catastrophe of unchecked climate change."

He said nations must make substantial new cuts in gas emissions by 2020 to meet targets proposed in The Stern Report, which predicted economic breakdown if climate change is not controlled.

The Copenhagen summit caps two years of negotiations on a global climate change treaty to replace the U.N.'s 1997 Kyoto Protocol on carbon dioxide emissions.

Brown, who plans to attend the summit personally, called on fellow leaders to join him.

"There are now fewer than 50 days to set the course of the next few decades," Brown said. "We cannot afford to fail. If we fail now, we will pay a heavy price ... If we falter, the Earth will itself be at risk."

Text of Prime Minister Brown's Speech

Few other world leaders have said they would go to the summit, though Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen and U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will likely attend.

Wealthy nations are seeking broad emissions cuts from all countries in the new pact.

Developing countries say industrialized nations should carry most of the burden, saying tough limits on their emissions would likely hamper their economic growth.

The British leader appealed to both the industrialized and developing world, saying they each could take advantage of business opportunities in creating new energy sources and improving energy efficiency.

The two-day talks in London, ending Monday, were attended by representatives from Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, the EU, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, Sweden, Britain and the United States.

Pressure has been mounting for the U.S. to finalize its position before the December summit. The Obama administration says it is tied to action by Congress, where climate bills are slowing moving forward.

Other nations including India, China, Brazil and Mexico have agreed to draw up national programs to slow the growth of greenhouse gas emissions, but have resisted making those limits binding and subject to international monitoring in a treaty.

Worries over the U.S. and China have led to mounting pessimism that a deal can be struck in Copenhagen without major policy changes.

"The prospects that states will actually agree to anything in Copenhagen are starting to look worse and worse," Rajendra Pachauri, head of the U.N. scientific panel studying climate change, wrote in a Friday post on the Newsweek Web site.

However, Sweden's environment minister, Andreas Carlgren - who represented the EU at the talks in London - told The Associated Press he has become more optimistic about the chances for an agreement in Copenhagen. He said progress had been made in talks over how to manage a system for funding climate measures.

"We are more in agreement about how the financial system should be managed, and there is also shared support for the idea that developing countries should be included and have their say in the management of the system," he said.

Most estimate that hundreds of billions of dollars would be needed every year.

The London meeting - the second meeting of the Major Economies Forum - was seeking agreement on funding from the developed world for poorer countries, to help them adapt to changes in the earth's climate that threaten to flood coastal regions, make farming unpredictable and spread diseases.

President Barack Obama launched the informal forum this year to privately discuss key international problems.


For more info:
Major Economies Forum on Climate Change
United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP15) - Copenhagen, Dec. 7-18, 2009
Report: The Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change (hm-treasury.gov.uk)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
"Cutting the Cost: The Economic Benefits of Collaborative Climate Action" (The Climate Group)
Summary of American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009

[sjc_1]

It is about the world using fossil fuels more wisely. A transition must occur and the resistance to change is keeping that from happening. We will either wait until it is very difficult, or we will start now and make it relatively painless, it is our choice.

[SHEETPAN]

There has been 10 straight years of climate change from 1999 to now. The irony is that it's gotten progressivly colder. Thats why they don't call it global warming anymore. How convenient to change the name to climate change. It works both ways. What a joke. The arrogant, self-righteous glory seeking world leaders that promote this nonsense are so caught up in thier own sense of importance that they would never consider the possibility that they might just be wrong.

[Questionews]

I'm totally covered on this issue.
I ordered my first 10 pack of carbon credits from the Al Gore Carbon Credit Company. The ad was on the back of Mad magazine right next to the ad for the X-ray glasses. I am saving the world dudes!!!